Home Blog Page 7135

Take That: February 11, 2011

0


The Most Poignant Readers Comments of the Week

In Response to: “An Open Letter to the Water and Sewer Utility Board Members from a Fellow Board Member”

“While residing within the City, I must concede to the undeniable truth of Mr Hatfield’s contentions. What’s right is right. Equalize the rates. …” Bubbageek

“Damn straight! The city needs $500 million for combo sewer improvements over 20 years and the country residents are expected to pay a 38% premium?” Mole 411

“Bottom line is neither the water & sewer utility nor the city council can mathematically justify the rate differential. They’ve been asked to, and have failed to provide actual justification.” Soon2B

In Response to “LA Abolishes Practice of Elected Officials Getting Free Tickets to Events”

“Geez, taking away all the freebies from politicians is really harsh:-) Poor babies might have to take on a second job, like many of their constituents, or even, gasp, sit in bleacher seats! That is ‘scrimination! How will you ever get anyone to spend a million bucks to get elected to a 4 year office that pays $125,000 @ year if you exclude them from all the graft?” Magic Man

In Response to: “Dan Effinger asks Mayor to Define Atrocious Maintenance”

“Is a drug needle in a public sand box, atrocious?” Eville Taxpayer

“as a longtime Vectren employee, I can promise you that the bathrooms don’t always work and we don’t dare drink the water, tests have turned up ecoli lately” vvc1

“It’s hard to find a clean park that is well-kept. The best one around is at the 4-H Center and I think it is maintained by 4-H. We definitely need to upgrade and maintain our parks for the families of this community. Overall, they are a disaster. “ Helen Perkins

Tornatta, Davis, and Winnecke: Who Has the Cash

6

The City County Observer has obtained all three of the campaign disclosure statements that were filed by the Committee to elect Troy Tornatta, a political committee that was formed to raise campaign contributions for Mr. Tornatta’s effort to retain his seat on the Vanderburgh County Commissioners. All of the files exceed the file size limitation of WordPress so we will not be able to post them as a part of this article.

The contents of the documents that dealt with different periods of 2010 essentially show that this committee raised a total of $119,653.44 and ended the year with a cash balance of $38,706 that we assume will start the warchest for Troy’s run for the Democratic nomination for Mayor of Evansville.

Contrasting that with his Democratic opponent for the party nomination Rick Davis’s much smaller pile of cash of $582 and County Commissioner Lloyd Winnecke’s stash of $9,495 and it becomes apparent that Tornatta has a head start when it comes to an army of Benjamins.

We must acknowledge that the documents all seem to be in order and that the disclosure is complete as were the disclosures of Mr. Davis and Mr. Winnecke.

If anyone would like to request copies of these documents we would be pleased to email them to you.

Federal Rules on Gifts from Outside Sources

0

The basic rule

Donna works at the Environmental Protection Agency assembling data on the incidence of pesticide poisoning nationwide. In the course of her work she has occasionally spoken to Paul, a representative of a particular pesticide manufacturer. They’ve discovered that they were both raised on farms in Kansas. One day Paul stops by Donna’s office and proudly presents her with an expensive signed and framed print depicting a typical Kansas farm scene.

May Donna accept the print? No.

A Federal employee may not accept gifts from any person or organization that

Seeks official action by the employee’s agency;*
Does business or seeks to do business with the employee’s agency;*
Conducts activities regulated by the employee’s agency;*
Has interests that may be substantially affected by performance or nonperformance of the employee’s official duties;
Is an organization a majority of whose members are described above; or
Gives the gift because of the employee’s official position.
* Most Justice Department employees need only be concerned with persons having business with their components.

What is a gift?

Jake, an employee at the Fish and Wildlife Service, attends a 2:30 p.m. meeting with officials of a local environmental organization that is concerned about a proposed FWS regulation. The meeting is held at the offices of the environmental organization, which sends out for coffee and donuts. Jake would like to help himself to the refreshments but wonders whether they might be considered a prohibited “gift.”

May Jake accept the snacks? Yes.

The term “gift” includes almost anything of monetary value. But there are some items that won’t be considered gifts. Among these are soft drinks, coffee, donuts, and other modest refreshments offered other than as part of a meal.

Other items that won’t be considered gifts include–

Items of little intrinsic value which are intended solely for presentation, such as greeting cards, plaques, certificates, and trophies;

Anything paid for by the Government or secured by the Government in accordance with a statute;

Anything for which the employee pays market value;
Most rewards and prizes in contests open to the public;
Commercial discounts available to the general public or to all Government or military personnel;
Loans from banks and other financial institutions on terms generally available to the public; and
Payments under pension and similar employee benefit plans.
Exceptions to the gift rule

Nick’s job at the Federal Trade Commission is to provide economic input on issues involving consumer protection. He is given a ballpoint pen worth about $18 from a member of a consulting firm that frequently makes presentations before the FTC on behalf of affected clients.

May Nick accept the pen? Yes.

There are a number of exceptions to the rules against acceptance of gifts and one of these permits employees to accept unsolicited gifts with a market value of $20 or less per occasion.

This “$20 rule” does not apply to gifts of cash or investment interests. Also, under the rule, gifts received from any one source may not, in the aggregate, exceed $50 in a calendar year.

Jenny is employed as a researcher by the Veteran’s Administration. Her cousin and close friend, Zach, works for a pharmaceutical company that does business with the VA. Jenny’s 40th birthday is approaching and Zach and his wife have invited Jenny and her husband out to dinner to celebrate the occasion.

May Jenny accept? Yes.

Gifts are permitted where the circumstances make it clear that the gift is motivated by a family relationship or personal friendship rather than the position of the employee. It would be improper, however, for Jenny to accept the dinner if Zach charged the meal to his employer because then it would no longer be a gift from Zach.

Exceptions to the rule against acceptance of gifts allow employees to accept–

Unsolicited gifts with a value of $20 or less;
Gifts clearly given because of a family relationship or personal friendship;
Free attendance at an event on the day an employee is speaking or presenting information on behalf of the agency;
Free attendance at certain widely-attended gatherings;
Certain discounts and similar opportunities and benefits;
Certain awards and honorary degrees; and
Certain gifts based on outside business or employment relationships.
You should be aware that there are limitations on the applicability of some of these exceptions. For example, use of the widely-attended gathering exception would require an advance determination by your agency that your attendance is in the interest of the agency. Also, there are more exceptions than those listed above. When you are faced with a gift issue, it’s a good idea either to get advice from your agency ethics official or to look up the relevant provisions in the regulations.

Limits on use of the exceptions

Once you’ve determined that a gift falls within one of the exceptions to the gift rules, are you free to accept it? Not necessarily. None of the exceptions may be used to–

Accept a gift in return for being influenced in the performance of an official act;
Solicit or coerce the offering of a gift;
Accept gifts so frequently as to create an appearance that you are using public office for private gain;
Accept a gift in violation of any statute.
Among the statutes you should know about are those prohibiting–

Solicitation or receipt of bribes (18 U.S.C. § 201(b)); and
Receipt of salary or any contribution to or supplementation of salary as compensation for Government service from a source other than the United States (18 U.S.C. § 209).
Remember also that just because you may accept a gift under one of the exceptions to the gift rule doesn’t mean that you must accept the gift. It is never wrong, and is often wise, to decline a gift offered by a person or organization whose interests could be affected by actions of the agency where you work, or a gift offered because of your official position. Exercising your discretion to decline a gift may be particularly smart when a gift is offered by a person or organization whose interests could be affected by your official actions.

Fourteen Principles of Ethical Conduct for Federal Employees

0

What the United States Department of Justice Says About Gifts

(1) Public service is a public trust, requiring employees to place loyalty to the Constitution, the laws and ethical principles above private gain.

(2) Employees shall not hold financial interests that conflict with the conscientious performance of duty.

(3) Employees shall not engage in financial transactions using nonpublic Government information or allow the improper use of such information to further any private interest.

(4) An employee shall not, except as permitted by the Standards of Ethical Conduct, solicit or accept any gift or other item of monetary value from any person or entity seeking official action from, doing business with, or conducting activities regulated by the employee’s agency, or whose interests may be substantially affected by the performance or nonperformance of the employee’s duties.

(5) Employees shall put forth honest effort in the performance of their duties.

(6) Employees shall not knowingly make unauthorized commitments or promises of any kind purporting to bind the Government.

(7) Employees shall not use public office for private gain.

(8) Employees shall act impartially and not give preferential treatment to any private organization or individual.

(9) Employees shall protect and conserve Federal property and shall not use it for other than authorized activities.

(10) Employees shall not engage in outside employment or activities, including seeking or negotiating for employment, that conflict with official Government duties and responsibilities.

(11) Employees shall disclose waste, fraud, abuse, and corruption to appropriate authorities.

(12) Employees shall satisfy in good faith their obligations as citizens, including all financial obligations, especially those — such as Federal, State, or local taxes — that are imposed by law.

(13) Employees shall adhere to all laws and regulations that provide equal opportunity for all Americans regardless of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or handicap.

(14) Employees shall endeavor to avoid any actions creating the appearance that they are violating the law or the ethical standards set forth in the Standards of Ethical Conduct. Whether particular circumstances create an appearance that the law or these standards have been violated shall be determined from the perspective of a reasonable person with knowledge of the relevant facts.

LA Abolishes Practice of Elected Officials Getting Free Tickets to Events

5

Should Elected Officials be Treated?

Mayor of LA had received over $100,000 worth of tickets

The Los Angeles City Ethics Commission has voted to ban the city’s elected officials from accepting tickets to events in exchange for performing a ceremonial function, if the host of the event has business before the city.

The common practice of comping elected officials with tickets to events as is practiced in many cities was struck down by the LA Ethics Commission because the value of the “gifts” was getting out of hand.

The acceptance of high value gifts by all citizens including elected officials is supposed to be recorded as income according to the IRS. In a recent controversy the Green Bay Packers came under fire for selling Super Bowl tickets to elected officials at face values of about $1,000 when similar tickets were selling online for as much as $8,500. Such practices have been abolished as unethical in cities all across the country. If practices like this were conducted inside a public corporation and these tickets were shares of stock, they would not only trigger a taxable event but could be characterized as insider trading.

The cities that have taken definitive action to abolish this form of making something available to elected officials that are not available to the general public have done the right thing. It is a good time for Evansville to put this situation to rest and follow these other cities examples by abolished this alleged practice.

Here is a link to the LA article.

http://blogs.laweekly.com/informer/2010/09/villaraigosa_ethics_tickets_1.php

IS IT TRUE February 10, 2011 Part 2: Roberts Stadium Maintenance Email Exchanges

0
The Mole #??

IS IT TRUE that Dave Rector made two site inspections at facilities managed by VenuWorks for the purpose of assessing the state of the maintenance being done there?…that VenuWorks manages 30 venues according to their website 10 of which are classified as arenas?…that we are curious to learn about who chose what facilities to visit?…we are curious about just who paid for the trips?…that we are curious about whether or not SMG or the 3rd candidate were also visited in other cities to put their best feet forward with hand picked facilities?…that judging the maintenance at Roberts Stadium that has a maintenance budget controlled by the City of Evansville and has been slated for the wrecking ball by senior elected officials is not a fair comparison up against new or currently valued facilities?…that we surely hope that the comparison of the maintenance performance of the three firms that responded to the RFP were done on a fair and equitable basis?

IS IT TRUE that the following is an email exchange of a water fountain problem at Roberts Stadium?…that Todd Denk of SMG responded to a complaint from a member of the Roberts Stadium Foundation about the non working water fountain by making Dave Rector, the man that Mayor Weinzapfel put in charge of the stadium maintenance aware of the situation by email?…that after a series of emails and a quote for $2,500 from Industrial Contractors that a decision was made by Mr. Rector to “ignore it for now unless someone feels strongly about it”?…that a member of the Roberts Stadium Foundation who complained must not matter much?…that Mr. Rector made a decision to IGNORE THE BROKEN WATER FOUNTAIN? ….that the email exchange is published below?

First Email
From: tdenk@smgevansville.com
To: drector@evcba.org
Subject: Maintenance Items – Roberts Stadium Foundation 12/6/10
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 08:53:57 -0600

At last night’s Roberts Stadium Foundation Meeting, they brought up a couple of items they would like to have taken care of. I said I would pass them along.

1. Water Fountain at Gate 1 has no pressure during games.

2. Lighting in VIP cases is not working. Said last year they had maintenance look at it and it got fixed. Not sure if it was a breaker issue or what.

Thanks.

Todd Denk, SMG Evansville

2nd Email
From: Dave Rector [mailto:drector@evcba.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 11:53 AM
To: Luigs, Steve
Cc: Wzinn10@aol.com
Subject:

Please have a plumber check out the drinking fountains on the concourse at Roberts Stadium and give me an idea on cost of repair

3rd Email

From: Luigs, Steve
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 8:50 AM
To: Dave Rector
Subject: RE:

Good morning Dave, an approximate cost to repair (4) drinking fountains $2500.00. The cost includes (1) bad compressor the condition of the other compressors is unknown.

Thank you,

Steve Luigs, Industrial Contractors

4th Email

From: drector@evcba.org
To: jcollins@evansvillegov.org
CC: tdenk@smgevansville.com
Subject: FW:
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:38:51 -0600

Todd had received a complaint about the water fountains at Roberts from a Foundation member. Below is the cost to repair. We were able to get some pressure in them and they are better, but not much. Unless someone feels strongly about this I plan to ignore for now.

IS IT TRUE? February 10, 2011

9

The Mole #??

IS IT TRUE? February 10, 2011

IS IT TRUE that one ranking source tells us that IDEM, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management has imposed a condition on the Highway 41 & Lloyd interchange?… that this condition requires that if any additional impervious surface area were to be added to the interchange, then the design would have to incorporate separating the storm drainage from the combined sewer it flows to now?…that the closest discharge point is somewhere on Pigeon Creek?… that this is a lot of storm sewer to build for one extra square foot of concrete?…that this alleged requirement may just be the tipping point that will keep the intersection from ever becoming a FULL CLOVERLEAF, as it needs to be?…that the mirror image half-a-job proposal made by INDOT basically does nothing but move two stoplights?…that a FULL CLOVERLEAF could be and should be installed by using everything that already is in place and by adding the two new circular ramps on the INDOT drawing?…that doing this job right would require some sewer separation work?…that this work has to be done anyway due to the EPA summary judgment against the City of Evansville?…that it may just be time for INDOT to choose to go for the FULL CLOVERLEAF with the City of Evansville participating in part of the funding for separating the sewers?…that makes much more sense than doing road work that adds no value that will eventually be ripped out to comply with the EPA ruling?

IS IT TRUE that the Vanderburgh County Republican party is talking with the following individuals to carry their political banner in the upcoming City of Evansville elections? ….that Shaun Short is running for the 6th Ward City Council seat?…..that nobody is being interviewed to run against extremely popular City Councilwoman, Connie Robinson of the 4th Ward?….that Herb Hatt and Greg Stilwell are looking at the 3rd Ward City Council race?…..that Bill Kramer, Lon Walters and Jim Braker are looking at running for City Council in the 2nd Ward?…. Dr. Neil Troost and Paul Abramson are looking at running in the AT Large race?….that Dan McGinn the 1st Ward City Councilmen shall run un-opposed?….that Brent Grafton shall take on present City Councilman John Friend in the General election for the 5th Ward seat if and only if Councilman Friend can survive a rumored primary challenge? ….that one should not discount the political genius of the Vanderburgh County Republican party Chairman Wayne Parke because he shall insure that the Demo’s will have to fight hard if they wish to keep control of city hall?

IS IT TRUE that the ruckus over SMG being shut out by the Advisory Committee in favor of VenuWorks has taken a turn in another direction?…that there is still not agreement among legal minds on whether or not the open door laws apply to the Advisory Committee’s recommendation?…that John Kish says it is legal but that other legal professionals say it is not?…that the key to the real answer lies in how the committee was formed and in who appointed the members?…that the question to the State of Indiana can be posed a couple of ways and that the answer to the question depends very much on how the questions are posed?…that there is some private investigation going on with respect to any influential political contributions or favors that have been made on either side to City of Evansville elected officials?…that this plot will get thicker before it is completely resolved?…that City Councilman Curt John has now taken up the mantle for SMG?…that more members of the City Council support SMG too?…that if elected officials were making this decision instead of appointed ones that we may just have a veto-proof majority of the City Council overruling Mayor Weinzapfel this time around?…that all good things must come to an end and that popularity is a fleeting and sinking commodity?

IS IT TRUE that officials of VenuWorks are meeting with our local elected City and County officials during the next 3 days?….that the reason for this move should be considered a public relations move on their behalf? ….it looks like they need to have double scheduled meetings with the Dean of the Evansville City Council, Curt John?….we are pleased that Councilman Curt John has publically declared that he has never received any free tickets to Stadium events and hasn’t accepted any political campaign money from SMG and or its executives?….we are hoping that Mayor Weinzapfel will come forward and follow Curt John’s example and announce that he hasn’t received any free tickets, Comp Sky Boxes for select events held at Stadium, expense paid trips covered by SMG, or received any political campaign money from SMG, VenuWorks, or either of their executives?

An Open Letter to the Water and Sewer Utility Board Members from a Fellow Board Member

4

Date: February 8, 2011

To: Water and Sewer Utility Board Members

Re: Equalization of Water and Sewer Rates

I would like to propose to my fellow board members that we begin the discussion of rate equalization for water and sewer ratepayers countywide.

Currently, as you are aware, we charge as much as 30 -38% more for our service to those customers who live outside the city limits of Evansville. This practice has been policy long before the current administration and this current board came into office.

Recently, the City of Evansville/Vanderburgh County Plan of Reorganization dated 1/11/2011 proposed equalization of rates in the event of a government merger. Also, officeholders Joe Keifer – County Council (R) and Bill Jeffers – County Surveyor (D) have recommended equalization as well.

Arguments in past years to affirm current policy have stated that service to outlying areas of the county cost the utility more, although I am not aware of any existing proof or study to prove this position.

In reality, the water and sewer lines outside the city limits are (A) much newer and cost less money to maintain, and (B) the majority of this infrastructure was paid for by private developers and homeowners.

Another argument used to support our current rate structure has been that city residents, through their property taxes, pay for both county government and city government; and that taxpayers outside the city only pay for county government yet benefit from the amenities of the city without contributing to its welfare. There have been plenty of examples in the last twenty years where all county taxpayers have contributed tax monies for the benefit of both city residents and those outside the city limits. Also, residents outside the city, as well as city residents, currently pay for the reconstruction of our infrastructure in the oldest areas of the city, which is a substantial expense to all ratepayers. Property taxes have nothing to do with the rates our customers pay. Our utility is rarely supported by anything other than the rates we charge our customers.

Why bring this issue forth now? Through the leadership of Mayor Weinzapfel and this board, we have taken over management again of this utility and are setting the stage for a much more financially healthy utility. We have already noticed a vast improvement in our cash reserves brought about by self-management.

I would like to encourage this board to commission a study by our current accounting service to review optional rate structures that would be equal, fair, phased-in and revenue neutral. We do not need to wait for a possible merger to do what is right and fair.

Respectfully submitted,

Jeff Hatfield

Board Member

IS IT TRUE? February 9, 2011

19

The Mole #??

IS IT TRUE? February 9, 2011

IS IT TRUE that just as anticipated that the Vanderburgh County Commissioners passed the first reading of the comprehensive smokefree workplace ordinance last night?…that the vote like last time was 2 – 1 along party lines?…that the lone dissenting vote came from Commissioner Stephen Melcher who made an informative speech explaining his no vote as based on his historical position more than on opposing the facts that support such ordinances?…a parade of speakers went to the lectern to plea with the commissioners to adopt the resolution?…that the reasons cited were scientific evidence of the damage that second hand smoke causes, lifestyle, and economic competitiveness?…that not a single speaker stood up to oppose the ordinance?

IS IT TRUE that earlier in the County Commissioners meeting that Russ Fowler from INDOT testified about the proposed changes to the FULL CLOVERLEAF that had been on the drawing board for years for the intersection of Highway 41 and the Lloyd Expressway?…that the mirror image design of what is already there will basically only result in the two stoplights on the Lloyd being moved to 41?…that Highway 41 is the reason that Evansville is known by some professional drivers as “stoplight city”?…that if one drives from Princeton to Miami by the shortest route that more stoplights will be encountered on 41 going through Evansville that will be encountered on the entire rest of the trip?…that INDOT stands to save $13 Million by doing a mirror image design instead of a full cloverleaf?

IS IT TRUE that $10 Million of those savings will come from avoiding the need to make some needed and positive changes to the sewers?…that if a full cloverleaf is put in that one of the requirements is to convert a short segment of the existing COMBINED SEWER into a modern sewer for drainage purposes?…that the City of Evansville is under court order to make these changes to the sewer in the next 20 years anyway?…that if INDOT goes ahead with its money saving half job that the $10 Million sewer cost to the City of Evansville will most likely increase because now our city will not only have to fix the sewer it will have to tear out and replace part of the half job intersection to do so?…that if there ever was a time to look a gift horse in the mouth that it may just be this project?…that this intersection may just be the gift that keeps on taking?

IS IT TRUE that we have a need for improvements on the west side that would not require tearing them out later?…that Mr. Fowler advised the Commissioners that if the money is not spent where INDOT decided that it will not necessarily be redirected to another project in Vanderburgh County?…as pleasing as Mr. Fowler’s demeanor seemed to be, that was a veiled threat?…that the City County Observer is very proud of the letter sent and efforts expended by Mayor Jonathan Weinzapfel, City Council President B. J. Watts, County Council President Joe Kiefer, and County Commissioners President Lloyd Winnecke to convince INDOT to go forward with this project as it has been planned for years?…that the FULL CLOVERLEAF solution is the right solution?…that all of our elected officials agree and have let that be known?…that INDOT saving $13 Million now and causing Evansville to spend more than that later to tear it out and rebuild it to satisfy the EPA lawsuit is just not good business?

IS IT TRUE that the UE Purple Aces are now sitting alone in 4th place in the Missouri Valley Conference after last night’s victory over defending champion Northern Iowa?…that the USI basketball team is having a good year and just got a favorable ruling from the NCAA regarding post season play?…that some people can’t take a joke?…that we were just kidding about the Bruce Pearl visit to Team Troy’s announcement?…that we knew that Coach Pearl had a job to do in Lexington last night in his return to the bench after his 8 game suspension?…that we were just kidding about Troy being named the head of public relations for the Tennessee basketball team too?…that we really do not believe that the abominable snow man rules downtown Evansville when it snows?…that sometimes we use humor mixed into our column.

IS IT TRUE that we are curious about what Troy will call his team?…that Team Troy, Team Tormatta, or even a band of Trojans will get the point across?

IS IT TRUE that Mole #3 is not known for joking and never uses humor?

Madison, Indiana Announces Million Dollar Incentives for Businesses that Create JOBS

0

City will Pay up to $10k per job, Jobs must pay at least $33,280

February 8, 2011

News Release

Madison, Ind., February 8, 2011 – The city of Madison is serious about attracting more jobs to the thriving community nestled on the banks of the Ohio River in Southeast Indiana. Today, Economic Development Partners in Madison announced a Million Dollar incentive program, offering businesses expanding or moving to the area up to $1 million in financial incentives from the city’s Tax Increment Financing (TIF) board.

Effective immediately, Economic Development Partners will offer up to $10,000 per job for any company creating at least 100 permanent full-time jobs paying an average wage of $16 per hour. To encourage continued job growth in the county, the jobs must be created within three years of the start of the project and the incentive money may be used for investments related to constructing or expanding a building and/or needed equipment.

“This is a very important financial incentive that will help boost our economy and attract new, good paying jobs for the people of Madison,” said Mayor Tim Armstrong, City of Madison, Indiana.

The Tax Increment Finance district for this $1 million incentive includes the city owned Madison- Jefferson County Industrial Park and other buildings and parcels in the area. The Park is state certified as “Shovel Ready,” reducing potential costs of site development and moving permitting processes quickly through the system. In addition, lots in the park are “Pad Ready” ensuring employers all utilities are in place and drainage and retention work is completed.

“Madison is open for business. We are excited to offer this financial incentive as a compliment to Indiana’s already attractive tax climate,” said Corey Murphy, executive director of Economic Development Partners in Madison.

Besides accounting for 10 percent of the nation’s private sector job growth in the past year, Indiana’s tax climate gives the Madison area an advantage over other states nearby. In the last two years alone, Indiana has earned “Best in Midwest for Business” by Forbes Best States for Business Index and “Best in Midwest for Low Taxes” (ranked 10th Nationally) by the Tax Foundation’s 2011 Business Tax Climate Index, just to name a few.

“The State of Indiana offers a favorable tax climate for businesses. We want to offer even more of a reason to do business in Madison and Jefferson County,” added Murphy. “Being able to add $1 million to the state benefits puts us in prime position for companies looking to expand or locate operations.”

Indiana’s competitive business tax structure includes an 8.5 percent corporate income tax on adjusted gross income in addition to no gross receipts tax or inventory tax. In addition, worker’s compensation rates are very competitive.

To compliment the million dollar incentive, the Economic Development Partners will offer other business tools to employers accepting the offer including job training assistance, tax abatements, and other eligible incentives offered by the city and state.

“We created this million dollar bounty to attract companies that create diversified, well-paying employment opportunities for our citizens. The added benefit to the incentive is businesses can now
take advantage of the affordable and available land as well as take advantage of our low cost of living and doing business in Madison,” said Armstrong.

Madison is located on the banks of the Ohio River with easy access to metropolitan areas like Louisville, Cincinnati and Indianapolis.

For more information about the Million Dollar incentive, call Corey Murphy at 812-265-4769 or email at cmurphy@locateinmadison.com .