IS IT TRUE? May 9, 2011
IS IT TRUE that the City County Observer had enough ABSOLUTE UNIQUE VISITORS last week to win any seat on the Evansville City Council?…that at our present growth rate we will have enough ABSOLUTE UNIQUE VISITORS in any given week to put a candidate in the Office of the Mayor of Evansville by mid-summer?…that for the Ward based City Council seats that the CCO has enough ABSOLUTE UNIQUE VISITORS in a single day to win the election?
IS IT TRUE that tonight’s meeting of the Evansville City Council is shaping up to be one tent revival type “Coming to Jesus†event for Mr. John Kish?…that two single BIG TICKET discrepancies are coming before the FRIEND-QUISITION of at least two astutely aware members of the Evansville City Council?…that these two BIG TICKET discrepancies are with respect to the previously published deals with the Hunt Construction Group and Populous?…that the total of just these two discrepancies are at $3.68 Million and counting?…that we wonder just how many other discrepancies that are lurking in the trivial contracts of lesser amounts?…that every discrepancy should be accounted for and reconciled and that those that are not formally approved by either the Evansville Redevelopment Commission or the Evansville City Council should not be paid?
IS IT TRUE that this meeting of the Evansville City Council will forever be known as the beginning of the “FRIEND-QUISITION” in the evolving tale of the Evansville Arena and its associated costly activities?
IS IT TRUE that the City County Observer has gotten our hands on a letter that was sent by City Councilman John Friend to Mr. Kish that was dated May 5th, 2011 that asks questions about 8 specific topics that are worthy of scrutiny?…that the topics of Councilman Friend’s letter are Parking, Executive Inn Costs, Professional Fees (legal), Professional Fees (other), Insurance, Populous, Hunt Construction, and the Hotel Incentive package?…that this letter is available online at the following link:
Councilman Friend’s Letter to John Kish
IS IT TRUE that it has been 96 hours this morning since the City County Observer offered a $500 bounty on anyone that Jonathan Weaver would come forward to back up his on camera assertions of being ELECTION SIGN THIEVES?…that Mr. Weaver has not yet accepted our challenge nor has he come forward to claim the bounty?…that he has exactly 72 hours to accept our challenge or it will no longer be available?…that we do not understand why Mr. Weaver has not come forward?…that a candidate for office is expected to be both honest and charitable?…that IF Mr. Weaver was honest in his allegations of theft that the City County Observer has given him the perfect opportunity to be charitable as a result of his honesty?…that we are STILL waiting?
And so begins the unraveling of the legacy of King John Weinzapel. It’s a good thing that some members of the council are beginning to act like leaders instead of sheep. Does this mean that Mark Owen will stop talking to them? And BTW, I’m still waiting for my invitation to the Lifetime Achievement dinner.
Hopefully Weaver’s team of 1 will be voted out in November. The 8700 reassessments themselves shoud be enough to get him beat. Voters do your homework look at the total work of the candidates, not the new look that they are trying to give themselves. The majority of the present council have followed the pied piper of Evansville (Weinzapfel)since he has been in and don’t deserve another term.
Vote anyone and everyone one out of office who favors a consolidation vote without Rejection Threshold. Get rid of ’em. They are thieves that cannot be trusted to do the right thing, only what the Chamber of Commerce tells them to do.
The public is well served by Mr. Friend’s very astute financial questions to Mr. Kish. Keep up the good work Mr. Friend!
Comments are closed.