Home Blog Page 7134

IS IT TRUE: Part 2 February 11, 2011: The cost of bad public policy

3
The Mole #??

IS IT TRUE that the Evansville Convention and Visitors Bureau settled the lawsuit filed by former Executive Director Marilee Fowler for a sum that is just over $43,000?…that the executive search fees already expended to replace her have already exceeded $30,000?…that the legal fees incurred by the ECVB in the past 10 months to defend Ms. Fowler’s lawsuit are just over $20,000?…that the total of these cost is nearly $100,000 and we have absolutely nothing to show for it and we still need to spend more good money in a search for an executive director?…that this should serve as a $100,000 lesson to those who wish to perpetuate poor public policy upon the taxpayers of Evansville that it is time for this nonsense to end?

IS IT TRUE that the City County Observer absolutely supports and is proud that the newly appointed board of directors is doing what it takes to start with a clean slate and to concentrate on making Evansville a visible location for visitors, conventions, and tourists?

Will this be deja vu all over again at the Evansville Housing Authority?

IS IT TRUE that the Evansville Housing Authority has hired the Ralph Anderson & Associates of Rocklin, Calif. to locate and interview candidates to be considered to become the next Executive Director of the Evansville Housing Authority? …..that it is refreshing to see that this City of Evansville sponsored board of directors at least didn’t hire a firm from Indianapolis to conduct this search?

Letter from Law Firm to the Commissioners of the CVB

2

Here is a letter that is not edited or changed in any way from the firm of Kahn, Dees, Donovan, and Kahn to the Evansville Convention and Visitors Commissioners regarding a review of past Evansville Convention and Visitors Bureau Holiday Dinners and Gifts.

[Untitled] (2)

CVB to Settle Lawsuit With Former Executive Director

1


Marilee Fowler to be paid $43,383

In a move that the City County Observer predicted and approves of the new board of directors of the Evansville Convention and Visitors Bureau has decided to settle the lawsuit filed by Marilee Fowler for a sum of $43,383.

Half of the proceeds will be paid by the insurer of the CVB and the other half will be coming from CVB funds.

This decision will remove one of the objections that would surely have a negative affect on the ability of the CVB to attract a replacement for Ms. Fowler. We applaud this decision by the new board of directors as an act of good public policy and encourage them to continue making good decisions that will enable Evansville to move forward with all of its goals to become a desirable tourist destination.

Will the Midwest Become the Next Silicon Valley

0

By the Venture Capital Barometer Ohio is Doing Well: Local Venture Funds Still at ZERO

Phil Brennan is a renaissance man. An Irishman who now calls Akron, Ohio home, he’s been an actor, a brand manager and a Fortune 50 business leader, having launched more than 200 new products into the marketplace over the course of his career.

Since 2006, he has added “cleantech entrepreneur” to his resume. As the CEO of Echogen Power Systems, Phil is leading a 20-person team in the final stages of commercializing a thermal heat engine. When placed into a factory smokestack, the engine harvests the heat escaping out of the smokestack, converting it into electricity used to power the factory and, depending on the size of the heat engine, homes in the neighboring area.

Stories like this are common in entrepreneurial hotbeds like Silicon Valley, Boston, San Diego and Seattle. But in Akron, Ohio?

You bet. Surprising as it might be, Ohio is one of several states in the Midwest where successful entrepreneurial companies are charting the way for a new economy and demonstrating that high-growth entrepreneurship can happen anywhere when a region plays on its existing strengths.

Venture capital investment activity is a good proxy for high-growth entrepreneurship because venture capitalists invest in companies bringing transformative ideas to market. Consider the facts about venture capital investing: See the following link:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ray-leach/is-midwest-us-the-next-si_b_820032.html?ref=tw

IS IT TRUE? February 11, 2011

5
The Mole #??

IS IT TRUE? February 11, 2011

IS IT TRUE that the census data for the State of Indiana regarding population was released yesterday?…that Evansville retained its position as the 3rd largest city in Indiana despite losing 3.4% of its population settling in at 117,429 in a geographic area that includes 10 years of annexations…that if not for the annexations that Evansville would have dropped about another 2,000 to 115,429?…that there are those who may ask “where did the people go”?…that one would have to look no further than the unincorporated areas of Vanderburgh County that grew 22% during the first decade of the new millennium to house 62,274 people of the 179,703 that make up the entire county that grew by 4.5% despite the losses in the City of Evansville?…that Warrick County also experienced double digit growth?…that at the current growth rates the unincorporated parts of Vanderburgh County will have more people than the City of Evansville in about 2035 when Evansville will slip below the 100,000 level?…that consolidation should be looking at how Vanderburgh County can take over the City of Evansville in an outside in annexation instead of the other way around?…that Vanderburgh County seems to attract people while the City of Evansville continues with its now 50 years of population losses per the United States Census?

IS IT TRUE that the Evansville Convention and Visitors Bureau is back in the news today?…that the new board of directors is meeting to discuss the lawsuit filed against them by former Executive Director Marilee Fowler and to consider what policy would be reasonable with respect to meals and entertainment?…that Ms. Fowler’s lawsuit is one big axe hanging over the recruitment effort to replace her?…that when that Mr. or Mrs. Right is found for the job that there will always be that question aimed at the recruitment committee of what the heck happened to the last person in this job?…that lawsuits like this are expensive and tend to drag on for a long time?…that the new board is made up of practical, learned people of mostly local origin?…that maybe it is time to do what is best for moving this much needed agency forward without the legacy issues that will continue to raise questions?…that we expect the best decisions for the ECVB’s success to come from today’s meeting?

IS IT TRUE that after publishing the financial disclosure document of the Committee to elect Troy Tornatta that as of January 31, 2010 showed him to have a 6550% fundraising lead over his opponent in the democratic campaign to become candidate for Mayor of Evansville Rick Davis, that two unsolicited pieces of information were sent to us stating the same thing?…that that information is that substantially all of the $38,706 is owed to another campaign and that we essentially have a situation where both candidates started 2011 in hand to mouth mode?…that this will come down to issues, accomplishments, and hard work?

IS IT TRUE that now that the primary campaign has begun that it is time for our sister publication The Community Observer to hold another eDebate?…that we have had several requests for eDebates the biggest of course having to do with the democratic nomination for Mayor of Evansville?…that there have been multiple requests for an eDebate between 2nd Ward opponents Patrick McBride and incumbent Missy Mosby?…that the invitations went out this week and that Mr. McBride has already accepted?…that we truly hope that Miss Mosby accepts and mixes it up with Mr. McBride on some important questions about where they each stand on the issues facing the City of Evansville?…that no one should win or lose by default in an eDebate?…that there were more readers of our last eDebate that there were primary voters in the 2nd Ward in the 2007 democratic primary?…that our eDebates are free exposure for candidates for office?

HOT TRUE NEWS: Incumbent City Councilwoman Missy Mosby has just notified the Community Observer that she ACCEPTS the invitation to participate in the eDebate. The date of publication will be forthcoming at www.community-observer.com

IS IT TRUE that in yesterdays www.trafficestimator.com numbers that the City County Observer is ranked third in the Evansville media market with monthly traffic of 95,500 visits?…that translates into a readership rate of over 1 Million views per year?…that only the Courier Press at 567,200 per month and WFIE at 223,200 per month exceed the City County Observer for internet traffic?…that most of the content at those sites is directed at things other than our narrow focus of good public policy?…that we expect that from a local public policy perspective that the City County Observer has the highest internet traffic in the Evansville media market?…when the Community Observer is added to the CCO that lead is overwhelming?

IS IT TRUE that City Councilman Curt John is taking no prisoners in advocating for SMG to be awarded the management contract for the new Evansville Arena?…that Councilman John’s public stance of opposition to the recommendation of the appointed Advisory Committee for the appointed Evansville Redevelopment Commission which is of course validating the desired outcome of Mayor Weinzapfel is somewhat unprecedented in modern day Evansville?…that if his opposition leads to openness and fairness, compliance with the spirit of the open door laws, and better contracts between local government and their suppliers then Councilman John will be remembered for firing the first shot?…that the first trip to see the maintenance conditions of a VenuWorks facility was taken after the recommendation to hire them had already been made?…that it this was a car the Advisory Committee seems to have bought it based on the brochures and no test drive?

Take That: February 11, 2011

0


The Most Poignant Readers Comments of the Week

In Response to: “An Open Letter to the Water and Sewer Utility Board Members from a Fellow Board Member”

“While residing within the City, I must concede to the undeniable truth of Mr Hatfield’s contentions. What’s right is right. Equalize the rates. …” Bubbageek

“Damn straight! The city needs $500 million for combo sewer improvements over 20 years and the country residents are expected to pay a 38% premium?” Mole 411

“Bottom line is neither the water & sewer utility nor the city council can mathematically justify the rate differential. They’ve been asked to, and have failed to provide actual justification.” Soon2B

In Response to “LA Abolishes Practice of Elected Officials Getting Free Tickets to Events”

“Geez, taking away all the freebies from politicians is really harsh:-) Poor babies might have to take on a second job, like many of their constituents, or even, gasp, sit in bleacher seats! That is ‘scrimination! How will you ever get anyone to spend a million bucks to get elected to a 4 year office that pays $125,000 @ year if you exclude them from all the graft?” Magic Man

In Response to: “Dan Effinger asks Mayor to Define Atrocious Maintenance”

“Is a drug needle in a public sand box, atrocious?” Eville Taxpayer

“as a longtime Vectren employee, I can promise you that the bathrooms don’t always work and we don’t dare drink the water, tests have turned up ecoli lately” vvc1

“It’s hard to find a clean park that is well-kept. The best one around is at the 4-H Center and I think it is maintained by 4-H. We definitely need to upgrade and maintain our parks for the families of this community. Overall, they are a disaster. “ Helen Perkins

Tornatta, Davis, and Winnecke: Who Has the Cash

6

The City County Observer has obtained all three of the campaign disclosure statements that were filed by the Committee to elect Troy Tornatta, a political committee that was formed to raise campaign contributions for Mr. Tornatta’s effort to retain his seat on the Vanderburgh County Commissioners. All of the files exceed the file size limitation of WordPress so we will not be able to post them as a part of this article.

The contents of the documents that dealt with different periods of 2010 essentially show that this committee raised a total of $119,653.44 and ended the year with a cash balance of $38,706 that we assume will start the warchest for Troy’s run for the Democratic nomination for Mayor of Evansville.

Contrasting that with his Democratic opponent for the party nomination Rick Davis’s much smaller pile of cash of $582 and County Commissioner Lloyd Winnecke’s stash of $9,495 and it becomes apparent that Tornatta has a head start when it comes to an army of Benjamins.

We must acknowledge that the documents all seem to be in order and that the disclosure is complete as were the disclosures of Mr. Davis and Mr. Winnecke.

If anyone would like to request copies of these documents we would be pleased to email them to you.

Federal Rules on Gifts from Outside Sources

0

The basic rule

Donna works at the Environmental Protection Agency assembling data on the incidence of pesticide poisoning nationwide. In the course of her work she has occasionally spoken to Paul, a representative of a particular pesticide manufacturer. They’ve discovered that they were both raised on farms in Kansas. One day Paul stops by Donna’s office and proudly presents her with an expensive signed and framed print depicting a typical Kansas farm scene.

May Donna accept the print? No.

A Federal employee may not accept gifts from any person or organization that

Seeks official action by the employee’s agency;*
Does business or seeks to do business with the employee’s agency;*
Conducts activities regulated by the employee’s agency;*
Has interests that may be substantially affected by performance or nonperformance of the employee’s official duties;
Is an organization a majority of whose members are described above; or
Gives the gift because of the employee’s official position.
* Most Justice Department employees need only be concerned with persons having business with their components.

What is a gift?

Jake, an employee at the Fish and Wildlife Service, attends a 2:30 p.m. meeting with officials of a local environmental organization that is concerned about a proposed FWS regulation. The meeting is held at the offices of the environmental organization, which sends out for coffee and donuts. Jake would like to help himself to the refreshments but wonders whether they might be considered a prohibited “gift.”

May Jake accept the snacks? Yes.

The term “gift” includes almost anything of monetary value. But there are some items that won’t be considered gifts. Among these are soft drinks, coffee, donuts, and other modest refreshments offered other than as part of a meal.

Other items that won’t be considered gifts include–

Items of little intrinsic value which are intended solely for presentation, such as greeting cards, plaques, certificates, and trophies;

Anything paid for by the Government or secured by the Government in accordance with a statute;

Anything for which the employee pays market value;
Most rewards and prizes in contests open to the public;
Commercial discounts available to the general public or to all Government or military personnel;
Loans from banks and other financial institutions on terms generally available to the public; and
Payments under pension and similar employee benefit plans.
Exceptions to the gift rule

Nick’s job at the Federal Trade Commission is to provide economic input on issues involving consumer protection. He is given a ballpoint pen worth about $18 from a member of a consulting firm that frequently makes presentations before the FTC on behalf of affected clients.

May Nick accept the pen? Yes.

There are a number of exceptions to the rules against acceptance of gifts and one of these permits employees to accept unsolicited gifts with a market value of $20 or less per occasion.

This “$20 rule” does not apply to gifts of cash or investment interests. Also, under the rule, gifts received from any one source may not, in the aggregate, exceed $50 in a calendar year.

Jenny is employed as a researcher by the Veteran’s Administration. Her cousin and close friend, Zach, works for a pharmaceutical company that does business with the VA. Jenny’s 40th birthday is approaching and Zach and his wife have invited Jenny and her husband out to dinner to celebrate the occasion.

May Jenny accept? Yes.

Gifts are permitted where the circumstances make it clear that the gift is motivated by a family relationship or personal friendship rather than the position of the employee. It would be improper, however, for Jenny to accept the dinner if Zach charged the meal to his employer because then it would no longer be a gift from Zach.

Exceptions to the rule against acceptance of gifts allow employees to accept–

Unsolicited gifts with a value of $20 or less;
Gifts clearly given because of a family relationship or personal friendship;
Free attendance at an event on the day an employee is speaking or presenting information on behalf of the agency;
Free attendance at certain widely-attended gatherings;
Certain discounts and similar opportunities and benefits;
Certain awards and honorary degrees; and
Certain gifts based on outside business or employment relationships.
You should be aware that there are limitations on the applicability of some of these exceptions. For example, use of the widely-attended gathering exception would require an advance determination by your agency that your attendance is in the interest of the agency. Also, there are more exceptions than those listed above. When you are faced with a gift issue, it’s a good idea either to get advice from your agency ethics official or to look up the relevant provisions in the regulations.

Limits on use of the exceptions

Once you’ve determined that a gift falls within one of the exceptions to the gift rules, are you free to accept it? Not necessarily. None of the exceptions may be used to–

Accept a gift in return for being influenced in the performance of an official act;
Solicit or coerce the offering of a gift;
Accept gifts so frequently as to create an appearance that you are using public office for private gain;
Accept a gift in violation of any statute.
Among the statutes you should know about are those prohibiting–

Solicitation or receipt of bribes (18 U.S.C. § 201(b)); and
Receipt of salary or any contribution to or supplementation of salary as compensation for Government service from a source other than the United States (18 U.S.C. § 209).
Remember also that just because you may accept a gift under one of the exceptions to the gift rule doesn’t mean that you must accept the gift. It is never wrong, and is often wise, to decline a gift offered by a person or organization whose interests could be affected by actions of the agency where you work, or a gift offered because of your official position. Exercising your discretion to decline a gift may be particularly smart when a gift is offered by a person or organization whose interests could be affected by your official actions.

Fourteen Principles of Ethical Conduct for Federal Employees

0

What the United States Department of Justice Says About Gifts

(1) Public service is a public trust, requiring employees to place loyalty to the Constitution, the laws and ethical principles above private gain.

(2) Employees shall not hold financial interests that conflict with the conscientious performance of duty.

(3) Employees shall not engage in financial transactions using nonpublic Government information or allow the improper use of such information to further any private interest.

(4) An employee shall not, except as permitted by the Standards of Ethical Conduct, solicit or accept any gift or other item of monetary value from any person or entity seeking official action from, doing business with, or conducting activities regulated by the employee’s agency, or whose interests may be substantially affected by the performance or nonperformance of the employee’s duties.

(5) Employees shall put forth honest effort in the performance of their duties.

(6) Employees shall not knowingly make unauthorized commitments or promises of any kind purporting to bind the Government.

(7) Employees shall not use public office for private gain.

(8) Employees shall act impartially and not give preferential treatment to any private organization or individual.

(9) Employees shall protect and conserve Federal property and shall not use it for other than authorized activities.

(10) Employees shall not engage in outside employment or activities, including seeking or negotiating for employment, that conflict with official Government duties and responsibilities.

(11) Employees shall disclose waste, fraud, abuse, and corruption to appropriate authorities.

(12) Employees shall satisfy in good faith their obligations as citizens, including all financial obligations, especially those — such as Federal, State, or local taxes — that are imposed by law.

(13) Employees shall adhere to all laws and regulations that provide equal opportunity for all Americans regardless of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or handicap.

(14) Employees shall endeavor to avoid any actions creating the appearance that they are violating the law or the ethical standards set forth in the Standards of Ethical Conduct. Whether particular circumstances create an appearance that the law or these standards have been violated shall be determined from the perspective of a reasonable person with knowledge of the relevant facts.

LA Abolishes Practice of Elected Officials Getting Free Tickets to Events

5

Should Elected Officials be Treated?

Mayor of LA had received over $100,000 worth of tickets

The Los Angeles City Ethics Commission has voted to ban the city’s elected officials from accepting tickets to events in exchange for performing a ceremonial function, if the host of the event has business before the city.

The common practice of comping elected officials with tickets to events as is practiced in many cities was struck down by the LA Ethics Commission because the value of the “gifts” was getting out of hand.

The acceptance of high value gifts by all citizens including elected officials is supposed to be recorded as income according to the IRS. In a recent controversy the Green Bay Packers came under fire for selling Super Bowl tickets to elected officials at face values of about $1,000 when similar tickets were selling online for as much as $8,500. Such practices have been abolished as unethical in cities all across the country. If practices like this were conducted inside a public corporation and these tickets were shares of stock, they would not only trigger a taxable event but could be characterized as insider trading.

The cities that have taken definitive action to abolish this form of making something available to elected officials that are not available to the general public have done the right thing. It is a good time for Evansville to put this situation to rest and follow these other cities examples by abolished this alleged practice.

Here is a link to the LA article.

http://blogs.laweekly.com/informer/2010/09/villaraigosa_ethics_tickets_1.php