Home Blog Page 7126

ANNOUNCEMENT Website Down Time Expected Tonight (2/2/2011)

0

**Announcement**

city-countyobserver.com and community-observer.com will be migrating to a new dedicated server based in Chicago.

This new server is not only geographically closer, but has more processing power and bandwidth. The entire machine is dedicated only to city-countyobserver.com and community-observer.com. Expect to load the website at lightning speed after the update is complete.

The server is also capable of running a new “Daily Local News Email” service which we will be releasing more information on in the coming weeks.

Down time is expected to begin around 9pm CST
The site may remain down for 12-24 hours

A Statement from City of Evansville Mayoral Candidate Rick Davis regarding the City of Evansville’s Proposal to Hire a new company to manage the Downtown Arena.

6

Rick Davis

Published without bias or editing

By: Rick Davis

Once again, a proposed recommendation directly affecting Evansville taxpayers — in addition to the future of Downtown Evansville — is being decided by a relatively unknown board consisting of appointed members, including one who does not even live in the Evansville area, and includes only one elected official. In the latest example, the Evansville Arena Management Committee — which has no direct accountability to the public and meets hidden from the public and without public input — has recommended that the City of Evansville hire a new, unheard of company to manage operations of the new Downtown Arena. This unheard of firm would also manage The Victory Theatre and will be in direct competition with SMG’s management of The Centre for already stretched downtown parking facilities and entertainment opportunities. The new Downtown Arena is a facility that has received an investment of $127.5 million in taxpayer dollars to be paid for by Downtown TIF money, food & beverage taxes and casino revenues. The Downtown Arena is a facility that is the centerpiece in the latest revitalization effort for Downtown Evansville. But only one of the members of the Evansville Arena Management Committee is an elected official, meaning a decision on the future of Downtown is being made behind closed doors by a body that has little or no accountability to the public. On Tuesday, after spirited hearings in an amazing expression of self restraint, the Evansville Redevelopment Commission voted to table a decision to hire the new firm so that elected officials from both the City and County can publicly discuss this important situation. It’s time we put more elected officials on all of these hidden boards, including the Evansville Redevelopment Commission, so that taxpayers can hold them openly accountable for the decisions that are supposedly being made on behalf of the public.

Worse yet, City leaders have largely declined input from the full membership of the County Council and County Commissioners in an open forum for an expression of ideas, while secretly attempting to hire a second management firm to handle the operations of the new arena for its entertainment facilities owned by taxpayers. In short, if this faulty decision stands, the City and County will now have two competing management companies working against each other for the downtown entertainment dollar at The Victory Theater, The Centre, and The Downtown Arena. It simply does not make good business sense to have City and County venues competing for an already challenged entertainment dollar in a market the size of Evansville. Coordination of booking all three sites is essential. I would ask that City administration sit down openly with all of the County representatives and come to an agreement to have one company handle all of the downtown entertainment venues in the City and County so that every taxpayer who has a stake in Downtown will benefit. With our investment of the Downtown Arena, Evansville and Vanderburgh County residents have too much at stake, particularly with declining tax revenues due to a troubled economy. We have to stretch every dollar to ensure the public is getting the best, coordinated entertainment value possible. Hiring two firms to do the job of one is simply a waste of taxpayer dollars and sets up an unnecessary competitive formula that works against good common sense. It should not be allowed or tolerated.

City County Observer Traffic Crashes Servers Again!

2

Adding Capacity to Serve More Readers within 48 Hours

For the second time in 2011, the City County Observer and the Community Observer have generated sufficient internet traffic to crash our servers. At two separate times yesterday the internet server that hosts our sites was overloaded to the point that it shut down. Despite losing 2 hours of traffic over these technical problems both publications still set records for pageviews and for time on site.

These incidents and the one earlier in the year have made it necessary to migrate our sites to a dedicated server. We would like to acknowledge and thank our media partners at Townsquare Media for the part they have played in our recent expansion.

We would like to thank our readers for their continued interest in our content and for the encouraging comments that are posted. We even appreciate the criticism. As any person competent in control systems knows, it is only the constructive negative feedback that enables one to improve.

IS IT TRUE? February 2, 2011

2

The Mole #??

IS IT TRUE? February 2, 2011

IS IT TRUE that Evansville Mayor Jonathan Weinzapfel made it clear yesterday that the City of Evansville gets to make the decision on what company gets to manage the new Evansville Arena?…that he is technically correct in his assertion?…that the Arena and the Centre to avoid competing for limited parking places and yes for the same audience need to coordinate efforts to optimize the use of the Downtown Evansville entertainment complex?…that as much as it is the City of Evansville’s decision to make, there are open door laws that apply in the State of Indiana and that trained legal minds submitted the following opinion to the City County Observer on the legality of the closed door manner in which this was done?

IS IT TRUE that the Evansville Redevelopment Commission is responsible for selecting a management firm for the new Downtown Arena pursuant to REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (“RFQ”) sent out by the City of Evansville to eight (8) potential companies?…that SMG, Central Illinois Arena Management and VenuWorks responded to the Downtown Arena RFQ?…that the Evansville Redevelopment Commission did the right thing by not voting today on the selection of a management firm for the new Downtown Arena.

IS IT TRUE that Sara Miller, a member of the Evansville Redevelopment Commission, was also a member of the six (6) member Interview Team (“Interview Committee”) who interviewed the three (3) Downtown Arena applicants on January 6, 2011 at some unknown Evansville location?…that the Interview Committee unanimously recommended that the Evansville Redevelopment Commission award the Downtown Arena Management contract to VenuWorks.

IS IT TRUE that the Interview Committee did not comply with the requirements of the Indiana Open Door Law (Indiana Code 5-14-1.5) in connection with its interview and decision making process concerning its recommendation that the Evansville Redevelopment Commission choose VenuWorks to manage the new Downtown Arena.

IS IT TRUE that Sara Miller, as a member of the Interview Committee and a member of the Evansville Redevelopment Commission, should recuse herself from voting on the selection of the firm to manage and operate the new Downtown Arena.

IS IT TRUE that the entire Procurement Process, utilized by the City of Evansville, including the actions taken by the Interview Committee, could be subject to legal action should someone feel that the City of Evansville/Evansville Redevelopment Commission violated the Indiana Open Door Law?

End of Legal Contribution

IS IT TRUE that Mayor Weinzapfel and Mr. Kish’s assertion that VenuWorks missing some entertainment convention in California will put the performance of the new Evansville Arena at risk is what psychologist often refer to as a bit of “control drama”?…that if the Arena is everything it has been advertised to be that the first several months will draw big name acts and crowds no matter which firm eventually wins the business?…that if this whole process would have been conducted openly that none of the mudslinging of the last couple of days would have happened?

IS IT TRUE that Mayor Weinzapfel has accused the group that stood up before the Evansville Redevelopment Commission to oppose the secretive manner that the choice of VenuWorks was made of “politicizing” the decision?…that the process was indeed “politicized” by continuing the practice of secret meetings to conduct important public business?…that it was the Mayor himself who “politicized” this decision?…that the hit dog always howls?

IS IT TRUE that an arrangement may just be under consideration that will keep the park at 4th and Main a park?…that the City County Observer truly hopes this materializes and encourages all involved to endeavor to preserve this slice of urban green space for generations to come?

Physician Father Crusades for Sanitation and Safety in Evansville City Parks: Today is his Day before the Parks Board

2

Is This How Evansville's Parks Should Look?

Physician Father Crusades for Sanitation and Safety in Evansville City Parks

The Evansville Parks and Recreation Department will have a regular scheduled meeting on Wednesday February 2nd at noon in Room 301 of the Civic Center. The agenda of the meeting is included at the end of this article.

In early November Dr. Neil Troost who lives across the park from Sunset Park stood before the Evansville City Council to describe an incident in which his 6 year old daughter was stuck by a hypodermic needle while playing in the sandbox at Sunset Park. Dr. Troost took it upon himself to bring this unfortunate event forward in an attempt to get the Evansville Parks and Recreation Department to do something about assuring that the City of Evansville parks were managed in a way that they are both safe and sanity. Much to his chagrin, there has allegedly been no official response from the Parks Department. When asked about his experience Dr. Troost said that “I engaged the parks department and got no reaction…no engagement, no park staff to my park, nothing.”

Evansville City Councilman Dr. H. Dan Adams personally went to Sunset Park to examine the situation and according to Dr. Troost, Dr. Adams found another hypodermic needle. Dr. Troost has engaged other members of the community as well and what he has found is an attitude toward Evansville’s parks that there is a long history of major dissatisfaction with the parks. Crime, drugs, prostitution, graffiti, poor sanitation, poor maintenance, broken equipment, and poor grounds care are considered typical by the citizens and officials that Dr. Troost engaged.

Photographed on the Ground

Depressed neighborhoods with horrible conditions that lack the advocacy for improvement are what Dr. Troost says he has learned in his investigation. He also found other stories of citizens going to the city for improvements, and feeling their complaints fall upon deaf ears. “The problem was just simmering” and looking for an event to rally around” said Troost when asked about the attention that has come to his daughter’s misfortune.

Dr. Troost believes that the Evansville City Parks are a sign of neglect of our civic environment, and will be a barometer for progress. He would like to see the people of Evansville come out and support this movement to voice their opinion that “Sanitation and Safety” in Evansville’s parks should be a priority for the City Administration

Neighborhood leaders with particular problems are encouraged to come out and make it known. The agenda for the meeting follows:

BOARD OF PARK COMMISSIONERS
REGULAR MEETING
KEVIN WINTERNHEIMER CHAMBERS
ROOM 301, CIVIC CENTER COMPLEX
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 2011
12:00 NOON

AGENDA
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. MINUTES January 19, 2011
3. ELECTION OF OFFICERS
4. CONSENT AGENDA
a. Request Re: Execute Contract with United Consulting for Construction Engineering for the Pigeon Creek Greenway Passage. – Phase 3. – Boberg
b. Request Re: Approve and Execute Agreement Addendum for Transcription Services to Include Port Authority Minutes. – Hayes
5. OLD BUSINESS
a. Request Re: Open Quotes for HVAC Maintenance on System #2 at Swonder Ice Arena. – Nadeau
b. Request Re: Award Quote for Glass Work at the C.K. Newsome Community Center. – Schall
c. Request Re: Award Quote for Plumbing Improvements at Lorraine Pool. – Schall
d. Request Re: Approve and Execute Programming Agreement with Carver Community Organization for the C.K. Newsome Community Center. – Schall
e. Request Re: Authorization to Sign Uniform Property or Easement Acquisition Offer on Behalf of the Department to Acquire Property for the Pigeon Creek Greenway Passage. – Phase 3C-4. – Boberg
6. NEW BUSINESS
a. Request Re: Any Other Business the Board Wishes to Consider and Public Comments.
7. REPORTS
a. Dr. John Foster, WWNP, Howell Wetlands, Canoe Evansville
b. Dan Schall, Executive Director
8. ACCEPTANCE OF PAYROLL AND VENDOR CLAIMS
9. ADJOURN

IS IT TRUE? February 1, 2011 PART 3

11

Justice is Done

IS IT TRUE? February 1, 2011 PART 3

IS IT TRUE that the Evansville Redevelopment Commission has postponed the vote on what firm will manage the new Evansville Arena for a period of two weeks?…that the deliberations and discussions that lead up to this vote should include elected officials from the Vanderburgh County Commissioners, the Vanderburgh County Council, and the Evansville City Council?…that these discussions should be announced, open, and treated as though they are subject to Indiana code 5-14-1.5-2?

IS IT TRUE that the City County Observer is shocked and amazed but profoundly encouraged by the elected officials who stood up for good public policy today at the meeting of the Evansville Redevelopment Commission?…that we are proud of Vanderburgh County Commissioner Marsha Abell for being a strong and solid watchdog of the Centre?…that we are also proud of the stand taken in favor of deferring the vote to allow public discussions taken by Evansville City Council members Curt John, Missy Mosby, Dan McGinn, and Councilman and Advisory Committee member John Friend?…that Mr. Friend is to be especially commended for recognizing the error of his ways, admitting it, and coming out in favor of public deliberations and good public policy?

IS IT TRUE that Vanderburgh County Council president Joe Kiefer met privately with Mayor Weinzapfel to request that this vote be delayed?…that his request was dismissively denied?…that Mr. Kiefer wrote a letter to the ERC asking that the vote be deferred?…that Mr. Kiefer is due commendation first for trying to broker the right solution privately but mostly for putting the courage of his convictions on paper for all the world to see?

IS IT TRUE that Arena project manager John Kish quoted Republican candidate for Mayor of Evansville and the president of the County Commissioners Lloyd Winnecke as saying “he is okay with what the Mayor wants to do”?…that no one other than Mr. Kish has attributed any statement to Commissioner Winnecke and that he has not made a public statement on this issue himself?…that the City County Observer would welcome and publish an unbiased position paper from Commissioner Winnecke on this issue and will not offer any editorial comment or bias on his position?

IS IT TRUE that today’s deferral was a giant positive step for the City of Evansville and for Vanderburgh County?…that being seen as a place that conducts business in an honest and open manner, that conducts deliberations in cognitive and respectful manner, and reaches informed decisions that garner public support will go a long way toward Evansville being seen as an attractive place to do business?…that this place is a little bit better today than it was yesterday?….that it feels good to write that last sentence?

IS IT TRUE? February 1, 2011 PART 2 (Timing is Critical)

5


IS IT TRUE? February 1, 2011 PART 2

IS IT TRUE that the unedited six page memo published yesterday by the City County Observer that Mayor Weinzapfel sent to the entire Evansville City Council was dated January 31, 2011 and was distributed via email to the entire Council?…that this document contained 698kBytes of data?

IS IT TRUE that a six page memo of the same title was sent by Mayor Weinzapfel to only five members of the Evansville Council on Friday January 28, 2011?…that the members of Council who were sent this official memorandum by Mayor Weinzapfel three days before the other 4 members of Council were Curt John, B. J. Watts, Missy Mosby, Connie Robinson, and John Friend?…that John Friend actually served as the Mayor’s appointment on the Advisory Committee that was tasked to make the recommendation on who should manage the new Evansville Arena?

IS IT TRUE that all nine members of the Evansville City Council are elected by their respective constituents?…that each member of the City Council has one vote to cast in the best interest of their constituents?…that it is right and fair that all official memorandums sent by the Office of the Mayor of Evansville should be sent to ALL COUNCIL MEMBERS at the same time?…that we are puzzled at the purpose behind the Mayor’s decision to dole the information out to certain members of the Evansville City Council four days before a critical vote of the Redevelopment Commission?…that the other four members of the City Council had less than 24 hours to formulate an opinion about this critical decision?

IS IT TRUE that five votes can carry the vote on the Evansville City Council?…that the five members of the City Council who got the official memorandum on Friday are the block that seldom departs from Mayor Weinzapfel’s wishes?…that the four members of the Evansville City Council who were surprised by such a memo on Monday are the four who are more inclined to ask the tough questions instead of capitulating to the Mayor’s demands?…that we would really appreciate an explanation for this “divide and conquer” manipulation of the timing of the release of critical information by the Mayor?

IS IT TRUE that this tactic is both condescending and insulting to both groups of the Evansville City Council?…that it is insulting to be considered to be in someone else’s pocket?…that it is equally insulting to withhold information from elected officials hired by the people of Evansville to watch after their interests?…that the OFFICE OF THE MAYOR OF EVANSVILLE STILL BELONGS TO THE PEOPLE OF EVANSVILLE?…that it is about time that the current occupant of that office starts to treat both the Office of Mayor that he is privileged to be an elected steward over and the members of the Evansville City Council with the respect that they deserve?

Indiana Chamber Squares Off with Unions over Right to Work

1

Dueling Press Releases Issued by Chamber and AFL-CIO

The City County Observer would like to make both press releases available to our readers in full so that each reader can develop their own opinion about Right to Work laws. We encourage all of our readers to elevate their awareness and think this through. This is a big decision for our state and should be deliberated to completion before taking action.

From the AFL-CIO

January 31, 2011
News Release

INDIANAPOLIS – Today Indiana State AFL-CIO President Nancy Guyott issued the following statement responding the to the Indiana Chamber of Commerce’s “study” on the so-called right to work law.

“It is disappointing that at a time when we should be having an open and honest debate about building an economy that works for all Hoosiers, the Chamber would publish such misleading and distorted documents.

Despite the leading questions, the deceptively appealing slogans and the overinflated promises of jobs, the simple fact remains that this legislation will devastate Indiana’s working families. Based on experiences of other states we know that wages will be driven down, benefits will be cut, workplace safety will suffer and the overall quality of life will decline.

Given all the facts, this is something no Hoosier could ever support.

The Chamber clearly has its own agenda and will do and say whatever it takes to implement it. However, if Indiana is to achieve true economic sustainability we cannot always put profits before people and ideology before facts.

We must restore balance so that our businesses, communities and workers can all have access to economic opportunity and that’s why defeating the so-called right to work law is so important.”
The Indiana State AFL-CIO (American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations) is a federation of 800 local unions across the state belonging to 50 International Unions. In total, the Indiana State AFL-CIO represents more than 300,000 working Hoosiers.

For more information on please visit www.in.aflcio.org or call 1-800-638-1217.
Source: AFL-CIO

From the State Chamber of Commerce

January 31, 2011
News Release
January 31, 2011 (INDIANAPOLIS)
— Improving the per-capita income of Indiana workers and creating more job opportunities for Hoosiers would be among the major benefits of Indiana becoming the 23rd state to pass a right-to-work (RTW) law, according to research released today. In addition, statewide voter polling results show Hoosiers favoring adoption of RTW by a 3-to-1 margin.
Dr. Richard Vedder, an Ohio University economist, and his colleagues report in the study (Right-to-Work and Indiana’s Economic Future) that if Indiana had adopted RTW in 1977, per-capita income would have been $2,925 higher – or $11,700 higher for a family of four – by 2008. Looking forward (projecting the same growth rate in the next 10 years after adjusting for inflation), passage of a RTW law in 2011 would raise per capita income by $968 – or $3,872 for a family of four – by 2021.

Site selection experts and economic development consultants around the country contend that at least one-third to as many as one-half of companies looking to grow businesses and add jobs will not even consider a non-RTW state. Also, the new study finds that nearly five million Americans left non-RTW states since 2000 to move to RTW states with increased job opportunities and higher economic growth rates.

“This is the single most important step Indiana lawmakers could take in putting more Hoosiers back to work,” states Mike Blakley, chairman and CEO of Indianapolis-based Blakley Corporation and 2011 chair of the Indiana Chamber of Commerce board of directors. “The Indiana Economic Development Corporation has done an outstanding job in its business attraction and expansion efforts, but a right-to-work law would open the door to hundreds of new deals and thousands of new jobs.”

The researchers note Indiana’s lagging economic numbers during the 31-year period (1977-2008):

Per-capita income growth:
RTW states, 62.3%;
United States average, 54.7%;
non-RTW states, 52.8%;
Indiana, 37.2%
Employment growth:
RTW states, 100%;
U.S. average, 71%;
non-RTW states, 56.5%;
Indiana, 42.8%
Growth in real personal income:
RTW states, 164.4%;
U.S. average, 114.2%;
non-RTW states, 92.8%;
Indiana, 62%

In the study, Vedder writes, “Our results suggest that the impact of a RTW law is to increase economic growth rates by 11.5%. The work (also) suggests that over two-thirds of the difference between Indiana and the national rates of economic growth in modern times is explainable by Indiana’s lack of a RTW law.”

He describes Indiana not adopting a RTW law, concluding, “Indiana has failed to avail itself of that opportunity and has paid a high economic price for not doing so as RTW laws attract productive resources (both capital and labor) to a state, while the absence of such laws repels them.”
The presence of a RTW law over that timeframe would have allowed Hoosier workers to earn $19 billion more in 2010. The additional state income and sales tax generated would have eliminated the state’s projected $1 billion deficit heading into the next two-year budget cycle.

A separate, scientific public opinion poll of 800 registered voters (conducted between December 14-21, 2010), found that by a 3-to-1 margin Indiana voters support passage of a RTW law. Respondents were asked: “Do you favor or oppose a right-to-work law for Indiana?” The results: 69% support; 23% oppose; 8% uncertain. Of the 69% in favor, 41% indicated their strong support.
Significant majorities of support exist across all demographics – including age, income, gender, occupation – and political identification. The support/oppose totals by political party: Republicans, 80%-13%; Independents, 74%-13%; and Democrats, 53%-37%. Even among union members, 44% were in support of a RTW law, with 48% opposed and 8% uncertain.

Asked to identify the single major problem facing Indiana now, 53% answered lack of jobs or low wages. Related responses such as “poor economy” and “loss of tax base” raise the level of the economy as the leading concern to 60%.

Indiana Chamber President Kevin Brinegar contends, “The impact numbers are clear in the analysis and Hoosiers are in strong support. This is the opportunity to further separate Indiana from its Midwest neighbors, make our state a prime contender for the economic projects we miss out on due to the lack of a right-to-work law and, most importantly, provide more jobs for Hoosier workers.”
Dr. Verne Kennedy, senior analyst for Market Research Insight, served as project director for the poll. Kennedy has conducted more than 100 public opinion surveys in Indiana over the past two decades.
The study was commissioned by the Indiana Chamber of Commerce Foundation; it is available online at www.indianachamber.com/studies-reports.

Source: Indiana Chamber of Commerce

City County Observer Traffic Grows 57% in January

0


The City County Observer is pleased to announce another month of record growth in readership and extends our thanks and gratitude to our readers both new and old. January marked a month that saw our readership jump to a new level, our servers crash, and our ranking rise to 8th among all websites for traffic in the Evansville area. Eleven of January’s 31 days resulted in traffic volumes that exceeded our highest previous day ever.

Accompanying the growth in traffic was a 33% increase in the time on site per visit another key metric that indicates satisfaction of our readers. Google Analytics reports the City County Observer performs at 303% of our peer website average in visits, 80% higher in average time on site, and 17% better on bounce rate. Bounce rate is the rate at which a reader exits a website after only viewing a single page and is considered to be the most important indicator of reader loyalty.

January also saw the launch of our “good news” publication called the Community Observer and the release of mobile versions of both publications. You may read the Community Observer with its new column that counters our flagship “IS IT TRUE” called “AIN’T IT GREAT”, that profiles the great things that happen each day in Greater Evansville at www.community-observer.com.

Finally January launched the City County Observer and the Community Observer into the airwaves with our exclusive agreement with Townsquare Media. Please tune in to AM 1280 and FM 105.3 to hear snippets of our feature columns.

Thank you all again for a great month to start 2011 and keep those comments coming as we all work together to promote GOOD PUBLIC POLICY in Greater Evansville.

IS IT TRUE? February 1, 2011

2

The Mole #??

IS IT TRUE? February 1, 2011

IS IT TRUE that candidate for Vanderburgh County Auditor, Maura Robinson has corrected her campaign finance disclosure statement to reflect that she indeed received a $250 contribution from the Weinzapfel for Mayor Committee?…that now all of the discrepancies have been corrected and all of the checks and balances for local 2010 campaigns are in order?

IS IT TRUE that the Evansville Convention and Visitors Bureau is in the news again and that a new board of directors has been seated…that Steve Schaefer of the Chamber of Commerce was elected to be the president of the new board?…that Mr. Schaefer is known to be an honest and high energy man who works tirelessly for every mission he is given?…that he was welcomed to his first day on this volunteer job with yet another scandal involving the giving of gift cards to board members and employees during the Christmas season?…that this alleged practice has been going on for several years?…that both Mike Roeder and Kristin Tucker have returned the gift cards that they were given?

IS IT TRUE that there are also allegations that Christmas dinners are not the only extravagant spending soirees that the previous board of directors indulged themselves in?…that it is alleged that on several occasions bar bills al local establishments where the “beautiful people” gather have been the sites of some gatherings where the bar tab was nearly $800?…that Mr. Schaefer and the new board of directors needs to do their investigation, make full public disclosure, and put this entire chapter of excessive behavior behind this much needed entity?

IS IT TRUE that in today’s world that “you are what you Google”?…that right now when a candidate for the position of Executive Director of the ECVB that this job does not look like an attractive place to be?…that the country’s perception of Evansville based on the past year’s antics at the CVB do not make us look very good?…that Mr. Schaefer, his board, his acting Executive Director have a big job ahead of them to sanitize this perception?…that the City County Observer is supportive of the efforts of this agency and has confidence that given time, Mr. Schaefer will find a way to accomplish this task?

IS IT TRUE that the 5th Ward race for the Democratic nomination for Evansville City Council may just be having another hat thrown into the ring?…that a somewhat well known is considering making a run for this nomination and will let their intentions be known next week?…that this person is in favor of a comprehensive smokefree workplace ordinance?…that a door-to-door survey in the 5th Ward showed that 80% of the people who were surveyed support a comprehensive smokefree workplace ordinance for the City of Evansville?…that if the 5th Ward member of the Evansville City Council would have voted as his constituents wanted him to last March that Evansville would have a smokefree workplace ordinance now?…that the only discussion would be making it comprehensive?…that the 5th Ward is not the only Ward where the people of Evansville favor a comprehensive smokefree workplace ordinance?…that every vote against constituent wishes on this issue will have to be addressed over and over again by any incumbent that hopes to retain a seat on Council?

IS IT TRUE that Mayor Weinzapfel or some very skilled writer working on his behalf burned some serious midnight oil last weekend crafting a six page explanation about how VenueWorks came to be recommended to run the new Evansville Arena?…that this six page manifesto was quite critical of the performance of SMG?…that it even went so far as to disapprove of whomever SMG (a private entity) wanted to place in Evansville to do the general management?…that the Centre is owned and managed by the Vanderburgh County Commissioners?…that the Centre is still a state of the art venue and needs excellent management?…that in the event that SMG decides that the opportunities to manage non Arena venues is not large enough to meddle with, that once again the Centre and Vanderburgh County will suffer as a result of decisions coming from the City of Evansville?…that there was not one elected official representing the County Commissioners or the County Council appointed to the Advisory Committee by Mayor Weinzapfel?…that as the elected body responsible for the Centre that the County Commissioners should have been represented on this Advisory Committee?…that this sort of behavior on the part of the City of Evansville toward Vanderburgh County does not bode well for any unified government effort?

IS IT TRUE that it has now been 1,362 days since the announcement was made on May 14, 2007 that the McCurdy Hotel was to be refurbished into luxury apartments?…that it has now been 1,216 days since the Evansville Redevelopment Commission at the request of Mayor Weinzapfel approved the spending of $603,000 to purchase the parking lot?…that City Centre Properties and Scott Kosene the developers of the McCurdy project are both listed as contributors to the Weinzapfel for Mayor committee for 2010?

IS IT TRUE that there are now 648 days remaining in the two years that the EPA had given the City of Evansville to present an acceptable solution to the Combined Sewer Overflow problem?…..that this plan is an expensive and complex endeavor that needs immediate attention to avoid the embarrassment and expense of another round of fines?