IS IT TRUE the Evansville City Attorney has stated that the bonds will be sold to fund the $4.8 Million loan to Earthcare Energy by the middle of next week?…that just as the situation at the Riverhouse has run into some real problems due to having undisclosed material information come to the table after the initial loan approval, the Earthcare Energy deal has had new material information discovered or disclosed after the 5 – 4 vote to approve the $4.8 Million loan was approved?…that when material information changes occur, the lending institution whether it is a bank or the Evansville City Council needs to take a step back and digest that information?…that one member of the Evansville City Council whose name is Councilman Jonathan Weaver is on record as saying that “We had to take the best information we were provided at that time, and we now have new (other) issues to tackle.”?…that this is one of the most misinformed and ignorant statements possible?…that when material information is made available after the fact that was either withheld or undiscovered that any prudent person or lending institution would reconsider a decision based on the new information?
IS IT TRUE that the normally rational and intelligent voice of the Evansville City Council, Dr. H. Dan Adams is quoted as saying that “with my limited resources of vetting, I have found no smoking gun.”?…that one must ask, are arrests a smoking gun, are bankruptcies a smoking gun, are untested products a smoking gun, are tax liens smoking guns, and are patents claimed that do not exist smoking guns?…that if those five things are not “smoking guns†then there must be a blind spot when it comes to smoking guns?…that the real problem lies with the “limited resources of vettingâ€?…that this deal has been turned down by 6 or 7 banks according to GAGE president Debbie Dewey, has attracted exactly ZERO private investors, and has not sold a single unit in spite of the fact that there are multiple distributors authorized to make sell these products?
IS IT TRUE that it is time for the other two members of the Evansville City Council namely Dan McGinn and John Friend to come forward and let us all know why they were not in favor of this deal?…that both of these gentlemen Councilmen have been candid in private about what they think about this deal but that it is now their duty to make that known before a check is issued?…that there was a rush to vote and now there is a rush to fund prior to the City Council meeting of May 14, 2012?…that no patent exists, no contracts have been shown, no test results have been published, and no track records of the principals have been verified?…that the people of Evansville who are disgusted with this foolishnes sneed to pick up the phone and call their City Council members and let them know that this is not good public policy and that it is not acceptable?
IS IT TRUE that if the people of Evansville fail themselves on this deal that they deserve what they get today, tomorrow, and into the future?…that finally there is no Power Purchase Agreement in place with Vectren at the present time and that Earthcare does not even have the ability today to try to capture the energy that they claim makes the Langson device valuable?…that Vectren has nothing to lose by signing this agreement that will allow them to triple their money on power if and we do mean if it works except their self respect if this turns out like the other dozen businesses that this management team has presided over?…that Vectren which is usually a prudent business will suffer much embarrassment along with their shareholders if this deal does not deliver as advertised?