Home Blog Page 7013

IS IT TRUE? September 22, 2011

13

The Mole #??

IS IT TRUE? September 22, 2011

IS IT TRUE that the City County Observer will be checking everyday from now until Halloween to see if the real estate taxes have been paid on the McCurdy Hotel? …that on the morning of September 22, parcel #82-06-30-020-005.002-029 also known as the McCurdy Hotel and located at 100 SE Riverside in Evansville, IN indicates that there is still a delinquent tax amount of $12,274.76?…that if we can report that the taxes are paid on this property that the CCO will become more enthused about the proposition of this project moving forward?…that it has now been 2 full days since Mr. Steve Scott was advised that the taxes on the McCurdy Hotel have not been paid?

IS IT TRUE that we were all treated to the announcement yesterday that the City of Evansville will be installing a charging station for electric cars in the downtown parking garages?…that to the joy and benefit of a very few people the City will be absorbing the cost of the electricity that the lucky people who are first in line use to charge their batteries?…that this is the same thing as buying someone a tank of gas per day?…that depending on the speed of the charging station then maybe the City of Evansville will be filling a couple of tanks per day?…that as progressive and green as this may sound it is really nothing more than one more redistribution of wealth from the slow to the fast?…that we support placing the charging stations in the parking garages but that we think it is much preferred if the patrons of the parking garage pay for using the charging station?…that the City of Evansville could actually create a revenue stream by installing multiple charging stations in the city parking garages?…that we wonder just why government entities continue to think the best way to do business is to give things to people at the expense of other people?

IS IT TRUE that the question of whether or not the Evansville Redevelopment Commission has learned any lessons about VETTING from the downtown Convention Hotel experience?…that one would think that City Centre Properties LLC that got a round of applause for saying he had financing in place to proceed with construction would be VETTED just like the hotel proposals are being VETTED?…that it really seems like that lesson was not learned?…that not being able or willing to pay $12,274 in real estate taxes does not seem to be a good indicator that this business is even a player in a $12 Million project?…that this financing package is straight out of the playbook of the mortgage meltdown that caused the banks to stop lending in the first place?…that one would think that the Browning/Woodruff experience would have reinforced the lesson that VETTING is necessary in public projects?…that this will be quite embarrassing to the City of Evansville and the ERC if this deal has any hitch at all?…that the ERC should be on the safe side and check these guys out now that we are four years down the NO MONEY DOWN highway?

IS IT TRUE that Mr. John Kish stood before the Evansville City Council and said that Klenck Construction may get stiffed for the work that they did to demolish the old Executive Inn parking tower on City of Evansville property because public property is not subject to mechanics liens?…that Indiana Law I.C. 5-16-5-1 et seq. does not necessarily support Mr. Kish’s assertion?…that publicly owned property or buildings are lienable only to the extent of the unpaid contract price?…that is not as protective of construction companies as it is with private property but it does seem to state that a mechanics lien may be possible on local government land?

Vectren Sources Clarify Customer Bill Impacts from Dense Pack Implementation

7

Vectren Sources Clarify Customer Bill Impacts from Dense Pack Implementation

After recognizing that the Vectren fact sheet issued yesterday may have been misinterpreted, Vectren authorities have reached out to clarify the actual benefit that a residential customer is expected to realize if the new dense pack technology is approved for installation by the IURC.

Dense pack technology enhances a turbine’s efficiency whereby it can produce the same amount of energy with less fuel (coal). Vectren wants to be clear that no charge will be added to customer bills until the dense pack technology has been installed and is turned on. When that happens, Vectren would begin adding a minimal monthly charge to the residential electricity bills to, over time, recover the costs of the technology. However, when the dense pack technology is brought online, it will result in a decrease in fuel costs given Vectren will not have to burn as much coal. As such, the fuel cost savings from utilizing this technology will instantly begin reducing the bill thereby offsetting the new monthly charge mentioned above. This offset (the lower fuel costs) would then continue over the life of the dense pack units and would yield $30 to $130 in savings at the residential customer level.

Vectren reiterates that while this implementation has not yet been approved that the net result to their customer base is positive.

IS IT TRUE? September 21, 2011 Part 2

11

McCurdy
IS IT TRUE? September 21, 2011

IS IT TRUE that finally the words that the Evansville Redevelopment Commission, the City County Observer, and a host of others had been wanting to hear regarding the McCurdy Hotel were spoken yesterday by Mr. Steve Scott of City Centre Properties?…that those words in the status report were “our financing will close by October 31st and we will start the refurbishment in November”?…that this brought smiles of relief and applause all around the room?…that we had all better hold our rabbits foot and cross our fingers that this does not vaporize like many other such statements have over the last four years since the press conference announcing this project?

IS IT TRUE that when the City County Observer asked Mr. Scott after the status report if the real estate taxes on the McCurdy have been paid that he said he would have to get back to us on that?…that when he was told that the Vanderburgh County Assessors website indicates an overdue balance in the amount of $12,274.76 yesterday morning that he had little to say other than that he would have to check on that?…that this amount when compared to the total cost of this project is only 0.10% of the approximately $12 Million total?…that having an overdue tax bill of $12,274 (0.10%) is not an indicator of financial strength and makes us a bit pragmatic regarding getting enthusiastic for this project really moving ahead?…that an equivalent scaled transaction would be making a deal for a $20,000 car and not having the $20 (0.10%) to pay the recording fees?

IS IT TRUE that on the morning of September 21, parcel #82-06-30-020-005.002-029 also known as the McCurdy Hotel and located at 100 SE Riverside in Evansville, IN indicates that there is still a delinquent tax amount of $12,274.76?…that if we can report that the taxes are paid on this property that the CCO will become more enthused about the proposition of this project moving forward?…that the RFP for the downtown Convention Hotel required developer equity to be invested?…that whichever company chosen to develop that hotel will have significant skin in the game from day 1?…that the financial details as presented regarding the McCurdy project calls for absolutely ZERO DOLLARS of developer equity?…that between City of Evansville direct contributions ($1.403 Million), US Park Service Tax Credits ($1.8 Million), an FHA backed loan ($8.2 Million), and a bridge loan of $1.8 Million that this is a classic NO DOWN PAYMENT deal that is financed or guaranteed with GOVERNMENT MONEY?…that as much as the McCurdy will be a classy addition to a slowly developing downtown Evansville, it is just demoralizing to see out of town people getting a 100% financing package from the people of the United States to do this?…that we also wonder just how much of a market there is for luxury apartments?…that we shall see as this unfolds?

IS IT TRUE that we are quite pleased that the park at 4th and Main will be getting a facelift and reliable stewardship?…that this park has gone from being a nice place to sit for lunch to a gathering place for street people and drug dealers?…that it is a wonderful thing that the Kempf family is partnering with Keep Evansville Beautiful to do and we are looking forward to spring of 2012 when the work will get started?

Attorney General’s statement on ruling in Barnes case (Resisting Police Entry)

1

Zoeller: Fourth Amendment intact, misdemeanor convictions upheld

INDIANAPOLIS – Today the Indiana Supreme Court issued a new ruling in the case of Richard L. Barnes v. State. The Court today granted a rehearing of its May 12 ruling in the case and then simultaneously ruled on that rehearing — affirming the defendant’s convictions for battery on a police officer and resisting arrest. The Indiana Attorney General’s Office on June 27 filed a brief supporting a petition for rehearing, arguing the Court should rule more narrowly than it did May 12 while affirming Barnes’ convictions. Today Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller issued this statement:

“The Indiana Supreme Court’s ruling today means that individuals still have the common law right of reasonable resistance to an unlawful entry, though there is never justification for committing battery against a police officer. In volatile domestic violence situations, police have the right to enter a home to ensure safety of others, but today’s ruling also means the individual has the right to stand against his locked door to protect his home and communicate with police outside without a physical altercation. While the Legislature considers whether to revise the existing statute, we respect the Indiana Supreme Court’s ruling, which underscores that the individual’s constitutional right remains in force,” Zoeller said.

The Indiana Attorney General’s Office represents the prosecution on appeal. After the Indiana Supreme Court’s 3-2 ruling on May 12, Barnes filed a petition for rehearing and the Attorney General supported a rehearing, but for different reasons than the defense. The Supreme Court today granted a rehearing, and then ruled based upon the pleadings already filed, without additional oral argument. The 4-1 ruling today means Barnes’ misdemeanor convictions aren’t overturned.

NOTE: The Indiana Supreme Court’s ruling today in the Barnes v. State case is at this link:
http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/09201101shd.pdf

Downtown Today: 9/21/2011

0

Time 8:00 AM – 5:00 PM
Subject IBTR
Location 307
Reminder 15 minutes
TIFFANY COLLINS @ 5269
Categories ROOM 307

Time 9:00 AM – 10:00 AM
Subject GIS TECHNICAL COMMITTEE
Location 318
Recurrence Occurs the third Wednesday of every 1 month effective 9/21/2011 until 9/21/2011 from 9:00 AM to 10:00 AM
Reminder 15 minutes
Laura Howell @ 5071
Categories ROOM 318

Time 9:00 AM – 10:30 AM
Subject BLOOD PRESSURE SCREENING/FREE
Location MAIN HALL 1ST FLOOR
Recurrence Occurs the third Wednesday of every 1 month effective 9/21/2011 until 9/21/2011 from 9:00 AM to 10:30 AM
Reminder 15 minutes
435-5015 HEALTH DEPT
Categories Phone Call, EVENTS

Time 12:00 PM – 1:00 PM
Subject PARKS BOARD
Location 301
Recurrence Occurs the third Wednesday of every 1 month effective 9/21/2011 until 9/21/2011 from 12:00 PM to 1:00 PM
Reminder 15 minutes
GLENN BOBERG @ 6141
Categories ROOM 301

Time 1:00 PM – 4:00 PM
Subject DEFERRED COMP
Location 318
Recurrence Occurs the third Wednesday of every 1 month effective 9/21/2011 until 9/21/2011 from 1:00 PM to 4:00 PM
Reminder 15 minutes
DIANNA WEBB
WEBBD@NATIONWIDE.COM
Categories Must Attend, ROOM 318

Kempf family and Keep Evansville Beautiful Teaming up to Reclaim Park at 4th & Main *Pre-released Artist Rendering*

5


*updated with artist rendering graphic*

The project to revitalize the park at 4th and Main Street in downtown Evansville is finally going forward. An agreement between the Edwina Kempf Family, Keep Evansville Beautiful, Old National Bank, and the City of Evansville will allow the much needed stewardship and revitalization of the downtown park to proceed. The City County Observer has supported this effort and will continue to support it as we see urban parks as a positive contributor to quality of life.

More details may be revealed at 1:00 pm today at a press conference to be held at the park.
Artists rendering of proposed park:

IS IT TRUE? September 21, 2011

9

The Mole #??

IS IT TRUE? September 21, 2011

IS IT TRUE that the Vectren Corporation issued a statement yesterday afternoon in an effort to inform and clarify the benefits to the residential rate payers if approval is granted by the IURC for them to raise our monthly bills by $1.08 to pay for the installation of the so called “dense pack” technology upgrades that will enhance the efficiency of two steam turbines?…that Vectren’s statement made an estimate of what each residential customer may save over the 36 year life of the upgrade?…that according to Vectren that we can each look forward to banking between $30 and $130 over that 36 year period?…that this calculates out to between $0.07 to $0.30 (yes you read that right 7 cents to 30 cents per month) for our investment of $1.08 per month?…that everyone reading this needs to let that sink in for a second?…that Vectren’s spokesperson actually said that with a straight face?

IS IT TRUE that if each of us sends $1.08 to Vectren they think it is a great service for them to send us between 7 cents and 30 cents each back?…that there must be something that they are not sharing because that proposition is a guaranteed immediate loss of between 63% and 94%?…that the company that is making the people of SW Indiana this offer that we can’t refuse is petitioning the Indiana Utilities Regulatory Commission for a guaranteed 7.29% return on investment for the same “dense pack” gear that they wish to install?…that some things really are astonishing when you think them through?…that a four year old when offered the same deal with stacks of pennies has the good sense to think they are being tricked?…that the financial proposition of this request for ratepayers is so bad that this must be a trial balloon launched to be rejected as a distraction while something else is sneaked through while we are concentrating on our 7 cents for $1.08 offer?

IS IT TRUE that 7 cents per month can be easily saved or earned by picking up and recycling about 3 aluminum cans?…that the average person consumes 3 cans full of cold beverages per day?…that at that rate just saving each person’s aluminum cans for recycling saves more money each day than this Vectren deal saves in a month?…that whomever put this trial balloon out there must really think that the people of SW Indiana are a bunch of economic imbeciles?…that Chase Kelley, Vectren’s spokesperson says that we will hardly even notice the change in our bills?…that with an average electric bill of $155 per month that this is one thing that Ms. Kelley is correct about so let’s just all pony up our funds and send Vectren an additional $1.83 Million per year so they can buy a shiny new toy and we won’t notice it anyway?…that this upgrade is not even needed to meet EPA standards?…that if the standards are raised that Vectren says we will be ahead of the curve?…that one more time “does Vectren really think we are all stupid”?

IS IT TRUE that unfortunately we the people of Evansville are not the ones that get to make this decision?…that we have the IURC to do that for us and lately they have been getting the wool pulled over their eyes on a regular basis?…that between expensive lobbyists, political contributions, smiling spokespersons, and plain old back room coersion that this playing field will not be level when the decision is made?…that sometimes utility pricing is complex and really does need advanced analysis and a room full of actuaries to teach the IURC why a rate increase is needed?…that this proposition whereby over a 36 year period the ratepayers hand Vectren $466.46 each to get back between $30 and $130 (333% range) really is a deal that a four year old knows is not a good deal?…that we hope that the political appointees at the IURC will prove that they are smarter than a four year old and reject this ridiculous proposition?

IS IT TRUE that the City County Observer wishes to issue a challenge to each and every candidate for office in the City of Evansville’s 2011 election?…that we challenge every candidate first to make public disclosure of the full dollar value of the political contributions that Vectren, Vectren’s PAC, Vectren Officers, and Vectren Subsidiaries have made to your campaign?…that the second challenge is to make your position known on this proposition of Vectren’s to take a guaranteed 7.29% return in exchange for a guaranteed loss for the ratepayers of at least 63%?…that we offer to publish each and every candidates position without edit or bias?…that we extend the same offer to Vectren Corporation?

Jeff Dunham Coming to Ford Center

0

Jeff Dunham is coming back to Evansville with his interesting and entertaining puppet show. Dunham, Ahmed, and company last appeared in Evansville at the Centre in the mid 2000’s

Link to Press Release

Ford_Center_-_Jeff_Dunham