
IS IT TRUE that Michael Isikoff of NBC News, revealed yesterday that the Obama administration believes that high-level administration officials — not just the president — may order the killing of “senior operational leaders†of al-Qaida or an associated force even without evidence they are actively plotting against the U.S?…“A lawful killing in self-defense is not an assassination,†states the Justice Department white paper quoted by Isikoff?…the 16-page memo, given to Congress in June, is not the final Office of Legal Counsel memo that news organizations have sued to obtain but it offers plenty of insight into the government’s justification for killing AMERICAN CITIZENS in overseas drone strikes?…the paper states that the Obama Administration would be able to kill a U.S. citizen overseas when “an informed, high-level official of the U.S. government” determines the target is an imminent threat?…the white paper suggests that such decisions would not be subject to judicial review and outlines a broad definition of what constitutes “imminent†threat?…we are distressed to point out that this document that outlines a process to preemptively murder an American Citizen who is deemed to be a threat by a government official with no consequences for doing so is ONE WORD FROM ALLOWING DRONE STRIKES ON AMERICAN SOIL ON AMERICAN CITIZENS?…it is no wonder that gun stores all over the country are selling out of every gun or box of ammo on the shelf?…the true beliefs of this administration are finally coming out in the mainstream media?…this was available in June but somehow stayed hidden?…with this kind of governance and the “free when they want to be†and “lapdog when they need to be†mainstream media it is time for FREEDOM OF INFORMATION TO BE BROADLY DEMANDED? …this starts at home?
IS IT TRUE that the At-Large City Councilman, Dr. Dan Adams attended the Historic Preservation Commission meeting last night?…that Dr. Adams seemly lectured members of the Commission on how politically damaging it could be if the Historical District is allowed to go forward with this a lighting project without all people living in this area being notified about this proposed project?…that it seems like Dr. Adams may be getting less then accurate information concerning this project from a small group of disgruntled people living in this area?…Dr. Adams needs to be reminded that at this time this project has no specific answers because there aren’t any concrete answers to this proposed project?…if Dr. Adams would like to receive information on what the other side of thinks about this issue he needs to contact members of the OEHA so he can get their side of the story concerning this issue?…we are surprised that Councilman Adams once again allowed himself to be put into a political position such as he experienced with “Earthcare” project?…residents of the Historic District have been trying to get the go ahead for this project and have even pledges some personal money to pay toward it for over 5 years now yet the city bureaucracy is still in their way?
IS IT TRUE Rockport city officials have decided to file a petition to express grievances against the Vectren Corporation?…Rockport’s leaders during a city council meeting voted to appear before the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC) to question why Vectren has the highest rates in Indiana and its coal purchasing practices?…Officials say the Vectren’s rates and its opposition to the proposed coal-to-gasification plant is hindering Rockport’s economic growth?…Rockport officials are inviting other local municipalities in the petition against Vectren?…the Mole Nation tells the CCO that Evansville officials are not taking this bait and will not be joining Rockport?…if the bosses of Rockport want to lay blame for their economic dilemma they would be well served to blame the price of natural gas which is what really made the value of the proposed coal gasification plant drop while the cost to construct it did not?…in this particular case that which is good for Rockport is not good for the rest of the country and particularly Indiana?









