Home Blog Page 6860

Rocketjet Incorporated of Orlando, FL (a SCAM or not a SCAM, that is the question)

2

WATER ATOMIC ENGINE TO START FREE ENERGY ERA

Newly acknowledged ultra-powerful water atomic energy without radioactivity is heat-released from water hydrogen with Rocketjet Corporation’s Water Atomic Engine, US Patent No. 7,685,973. It will END GLOBAL WARMING and start a FREE ENERGY ERA with: Free electricity from freshwater or seawater for fuel; Cars and trucks getting 1,000 mpg of water only that is condensed after use and recycled; Planes flying supersonically in space and subsonically in the atmosphere with only water for fuel; Ships and boats having unlimited range on flotation water for fuel; and much more. The Water Atomic Engine is small and round with a turbocam engine system.

Drive your car for a year on a tank of freshwater or seawater. Get free-energy heating, air conditioning, electricity and unlimited utilities for your home or business. Drive your motor home energy-free anywhere. In a boat, yacht or ship, go global with flotation water for fuel. Fly fast and energy-free anywhere in the atmosphere subsonically or high supersonically in space.

These advantages and high-return investment in the patented Water Atomic Engine that gives the world free energy can be made available soon, although having been prevented previously by super obstruction by the Energy Industry and its supportive capital sources.

This energy advancement enables the most significant improvement of national and global economic conditions in the history of civilization.

Water being a fuel was assumed to be ridiculously impossible by Scientist/Patent Lawyer/Inventor/Economist, Dr. Daniel Nelson, as well as by other members of the scientific community. That was before he observed much more pressure from steam than from combustion per heat in a steam-injection engine that Dr. Daniel Nelson and his partner CO-inventor wife, Anju Nelson, (the Nelsons) of Orlando, Florida were developing.

Scientific research and analysis of the obviously greater pressure energy produced than heat energy added led to thorough analysis of increasingly exponential pressure per heat level that is recorded in the standard steam table and its higher-heat extensions. This increasingly greater pressure per heat level has been found to be nonradioactive heat-activation release of stored water-hydrogen atomic energy. Otherwise, the greater energy produced than energy added to a heat reaction would be impossible creation of energy in violation of the First Law of Thermodynamics.

Increasingly ultrahigh pressure in proportion to relatively minute incremental increase of heat level has been shown and precisely recorded in technical references to be nonradioactive atomic energy, but it has not been acknowledged as such. It has been printed in such readily accessible technical references as Mechanical Engineering Handbooks and in most Physics Handbooks for more than 100 years and, more recently in data related to stored-steam-powered US Navy torpedo engines.

Although well-known, the increasingly ultrahigh pressure per heat has not been useable for steam-engine power previously. Instead of being used, the ultrahigh pressure has been avoided as detrimental because it blew up or distorted prior steam engines that transferred heat to bulk water through boiler walls that were weakened by the heat transfer. Standard steam tables of pressure per heat level of steam were generated under laboratory conditions by the US Bureau Of Standards. The pressures per heat level were printed in engineering and science references as guides for avoiding the ultrahigh pressure of what is now known to be hydrogen-electron-activation heat release of stored atomic energy of proton-nuclear water hydrogen without atom-splitting radioactivity.

The laboratory conditions under which steam pressures per heat level were generated apparently did not reveal the exponentially greater pressure energy per heat energy in a manner that was recognized by Steam Engineers as being heat-activative release of stored atomic energy.

With the revolutionary Water Atomic Engine, use of the ultrahigh pressure is enabled by controllably high internal heating of controllable injections of spray-atomized water electrically inside of insulated thick metal walls of atomic-energy generators without external heat transfer that heat-weakens boiler walls. This overcomes the prior obstacle to utilization of inherently ultrahigh atomic-energy pressure by the Water Atomic Engine’s proprietary turbocam engine system that enables utilization of pressures up to 75,000 psi in comparison to approximately 2,000 psi of useable pressure for conventional steam-engine systems and for combustion pressure of internal combustion engines.

Pressure of newly acknowledged water-hydrogen atomic energy increases 47.88 times from only 2.35 times the increase of heat between 300 degrees F with 67 psi and 705 degrees F with 3,208 psi at the top of the steam table. Above the steam table at 1,600 degrees F with approximately 60,000 psi, exponentially explosive pressure increases 895.53 times the 67 psi at 300 degrees F. This is an increase of 168 times in proportion to only 5.35 times the incremental-unit increase of heat above a start of effective water-hydrogen atomic energy at 300 degrees F.

Simply stated, what is now acknowledged as water-hydrogen atomic energy occurs from heat activation of the singular electrons of negligible-attraction proton-nuclear hydrogen of water. The negligible attraction of electrons by proton nuclei of hydrogen is relatively like total absence of nuclear attraction of electrons that allows relatively far greater electron activation of nuclear energy by total destruction of nuclear electron attraction from radioactive atom splitting with far greater heat.

The Energy Industry and major supportive capital sources are obstructing capitalization for the Water Atomic Engine because the FREE ENERGY ERA it can so obviously cause will end their inherently detrimental energy business opportunities for making more than 30 trillion dollars annually from: (a) prolonging the economic life of forms of fossil fuels; from (b) nuclear energy that is dangerous, expensive and nuclear-weapons supportive; from (c) now needless “green tech,” such as far more expensive wind, solar and bio-fuel energy systems; from (d) all energy-support industries; and from (e) whatever other needless fuel systems can be promoted fallaciously.

Utilization of newly acknowledged and therefore newly discovered non-radioactive water-hydrogen atomic energy is described and has been acknowledged by the US Patent Office in US Patent Number 7,685,973 for a Water Engine. The Engine is known preferably also as a Water Atomic Engine. It is being further developed for international patenting continuously.

The Water Atomic Engine is revolutionary advancement of all forms and uses of engines. It will greatly change all global economics and conditions of civilization.

With a Company proprietary-secret Invention Computer System (ICS) that has enabled invention and development of the Water Atomic Engine, Rocketjet Corporation will lead the world in innovative advancement of previously impossible benefits of the FREE ENERGY ERA.

IF YOU WISH TO READ THE ENTIRE PROSPECTUS GO TO WWW.WATERATOMICENGINE.COM

City Controller’s Office Refuses CCO FOIA Request Based on Technicality

2

CITY OF EVANSVILLE
Office of the City Controller
CIVIC CENTER COMPLEX, ROOM 300
ONE NW MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. BOULEVARD
EVANSVILLE, INDIANA 47708
(812) 436-4919 FAX (812) 436-4926
Lloyd Winnecke, Mayor

April 18, 2012

Mr. Tim Eckels
City County Observer
Evansville, IN 47714

Re: Public Records Request

Dear Mr. Eckels:

The Finance Department received your written request on April 17, 2012 for the following: credit checks, background checks, contracts, studies, technical performance reports, purchase orders, terms of payment, power purchase agreements (PPA’s), and other pertinent documentation associated with the recently announced agreement between the City of Evansville and/or its surrogates and Earthcare Energy and its associated subcontractors and/or surrogates. To be more specific the project that I refer to is the recently announced loan and incentive package worth approximately $5 million that was approved by the Evansville City Council on March 26th, 2012. I would also like any agreements pertaining to the use of Park 41, formally known as the Whirlpool building, by Earthcare Energy LLC.

Your request contains “catch-all” language at the end of the list of specific documents or types of documents – “any other pertinent information regarding” the [Ford Center or the Earthcare agreement.] This is a problem because we do not know what you mean by “pertinent,” but assuming everything “regarding” those topics is “pertinent,” the request would encompass massive amounts of materials, including items that are or may be subject to non-disclosure under the following exceptions:

1. Records that cannot be disclosed, pursuant to IC 5-14-3-4(a), including the following subparagraphs:

(1) Those declared confidential by state statute.

(2) Those declared confidential by rule adopted by a public agency under specific authority to classify public records as confidential granted to the public agency by statute.

(3) Those required to be kept confidential by federal law.

(4) Records containing trade secrets.

(5) Confidential financial information obtained, upon request, from a person, other than information that is filed with or received by a public agency pursuant to state statute.

(6) Information concerning research, including actual research documents, conducted under the auspices of a state educational institution, including information:
(A) concerning any negotiations made with respect to the research; and
(B) received from another party involved in the research.

(8) Those declared confidential by or under rules adopted by the supreme court of Indiana.

(10) Application information declared confidential by the board of the Indiana economic development corporation under IC 5-28-16.

(12) A Social Security number contained in the records of a public agency.

(13) The following information that is part of a foreclosure action subject to IC 32-30-10.5:
(A) Contact information for a debtor, as described in IC 32-30-10.5-8(d)(2)(B).
(B) Any document submitted to the court as part of the debtor’s loss mitigation package under IC 32-30-10.5-10(a)(3).

2. Records that can be withheld and not disclosed at the discretion of the public agency pursuant to IC 5-14-3-4(b), including the following subparagraphs:

(1) Investigatory records of law enforcement agencies, other than those that must be made available for inspection and copying as provided in IC 5-14-3-5.

(5) Records relating to negotiations between the Indiana economic development corporation, the ports of Indiana, the Indiana state department of agriculture, the Indiana finance authority, an economic development commission, a local economic development organization (as defined in IC 5-28-11-2(3)), or a governing body of a political subdivision with industrial, research, or commercial prospects, if the records are created while negotiations are in progress (except for certified terms of the final offer of public financial resources communicated by the Indiana economic
development corporation, the ports of Indiana, the Indiana finance authority, an economic development commission, or a governing body of a political subdivision to an industrial, a research, or a commercial prospect, which terms shall be available for inspection and copying after negotiations with that prospect have terminated.)

(6) Records that are intra-agency or interagency advisory or deliberative material, including material developed by a private contractor under a contract with a public agency, that are expressions of opinion or are of a speculative nature, and that are communicated for the purpose of decision making.

(7) Diaries, journals, or other personal notes serving as the functional equivalent of a diary or journal.

(10) Administrative or technical information that would jeopardize a record keeping or security system.

(11) Computer programs, computer codes, computer filing systems, and other software that are owned by the public agency or entrusted to it and portions of electronic maps entrusted to a public agency by a utility.

(12) Records specifically prepared for discussion or developed during discussion in an executive session under IC 5-14-1.5-6.1.

(13) The work product of the legislative services agency under personnel rules approved by the legislative council.

(14) The work product of individual members and the partisan staffs of the general assembly.

(15) The identity of a donor of a gift made to a public agency if:
(A) the donor requires nondisclosure of the donor’s identity as a condition of making the gift; or
(B) after the gift is made, the donor or a member of the donor’s family requests nondisclosure.

(19) A record or a part of a record, the public disclosure of which would have a reasonable likelihood of threatening public safety by exposing a vulnerability to terrorist attack.

You may wish to narrow your request or restate it in a way that allows us to more specifically address the scope and nature of the documents that will be produced or withheld. Otherwise, our response is that we possess documents responsive to your requests but that some of them may be withheld for the foregoing reasons.

Finally, because your request is so broad, and may amount to far more than 1,000 pages, your statement that you are only willing to spend $100.00 in copy charges presents a problem. Per your request, we will not compile records that exceed 1,000 pages, and are not required to categorize or prioritize in any particular way which 1,000 pages of records we compile and copy for you. Therefore, once we resolve the issue of the scope of your request, you may wish to change your request to provide for inspection rather than copying, and then identify and request the specific documents you wish to have copied.

Please contact us for clarification of your request and to discuss these issues

Sincerely,

Jean Carlson
Office Manager

IS IT TRUE April 27, 2012

11

Snegal: Sneaky but Legal

IS IT TRUE April 27, 2012

IS IT TRUE that a number that has reached at least 5 and maybe as high as 7 members of the Roberts Stadium Task Force have now come out and stated that the conclusions on Page 13 do not reflect the conclusions of the group but only the conclusions of the writer of Page 13 who was the leader of the group of 15 Larry Steenberg?…that only one person has come forward to back Steenberg’s assertion that Page 13 was always part of the study and that it was not added late?…that the one person who is backing Steenberg’s assertion is local banker Luke Yeager?…that careful examination of the statements will lead to the conclusion that all can be telling the truth?…that it is reasonable to expect that all 15 members of the task force would be on board in expecting that there would be a conclusion at the end of the report?…that having a conclusion is not at issue here, but what is at issue is whether the conclusion reflects the beliefs of the group?…that it clearly does not with as many dissenters as there are?…that Steenberg did indeed meet the deadline to accommodate Mayor Winnecke’s request?…that shoving the page in after the 14 other members were finished and emailing it to them before the Mayor’s deadline would technically meet those requirements?…that we are certain at this point that the task force members do not substantially agree with the “conclusion” and that the “conclusion” really was written and inserted without the sanction of the task force?

IS IT TRUE that even though everyone is most likely telling the truth including Ella Johnson Watson, Mayor Winnecke’s Director of Communication who posted a paragraph that supports the assertion that Page 13 was put into the study after the task force was thanked and before the study was released to Mayor Winnecke?…that most people when faced with reading a 13 page document go right to the conclusion before deciding whether or not to read the whole document?…that this conclusion does not necessarily support the words on the other 12 pages?…that a conclusion reader would come away with the wrong impression of what “the 15 person task force” thought?…that for this misleading nature of the conclusion this report gets the first SNEGAL award of 2012?

IS IT TRUE that one thing is for sure and that is the implied conclusion that an Events Center like Roberts Stadium could be built new for less than the $6.5 Million that the study said it would cost to refurbish Roberts into?…that any fool knows that you cannot recreate Roberts Stadium for $6.5 Million?…that it is even unlikely that a 6,000 seat outdoor rodeo rink could be built for $6.5 Million?…that if one would scale the $600,000 that the Evansville Redevelopment Commission spent on a small parking lot at the McCurdy Hotel that the Roberts Stadium parking lot would fetch $60 Million if the ERC was buying?…that in all reality the parking lot at Roberts could be build new for $10 Million to $12 Million from scratch?…that the parking lot alone negates the central assertion of the SNEGAL CONCLUSION of the Roberts Stadium Task Force?

IS IT TRUE that we have been curious about the McCurdy Convalescent home for bats and pigeons?…that we are hoping to see some work going on down there as we always encourage private business projects that do not rely on public assistance to move forward?…that we still think that turning the McCurdy back into a grand hotel is the best use of the building but prefer apartments to a pile of rubble?

Four student athletes recognized at USI All-Sports Banquet

0

In an evening that celebrates the accomplishments of the University of Southern Indiana student athletes, senior Dustin Emerick (men’s cross country/track & field), senior Danielle LaGrange (volleyball), senior Brendan Devine (men’s cross country/track & field), and junior Susan Ellsperman (women’s soccer) were recognized as the top student athletes at the 10th annual USI All-Sports Banquet sponsored by Old National Bank on April 25.

The ONB/USI Male Student Athlete of the Year, Emerick is a three-time All-American earning his first title in track last spring. The history major earned All-Great Lakes Valley Conference honors for the fourth-straight year this past fall in cross country and was All-Region for the third time. He was named the Midwest Region Athlete of the Year in outdoor track last spring and captured two GLVC championships during the indoor season this past February.

The ONB/USI Female Student Athlete of the Year for the second-straight year, LaGrange earned second-team All-America honors, first-team All-Region honors, and was the GLVC Player of the Year in 2011. She led her team to the NCAA Division II Tournament for the second straight year and was the AVCA National Player of the Week during the regular season.

Devine and Ellsperman were named the male and female recipients of the ONB/USI Screaming Eagles Pride Award. The award winners are selected in a vote by the Athletic Department staff.

Devine won the GLVC individual championship in helping lead USI to the conference championship on the USI cross country course last fall. The senior history major also helped the Eagles to a seventh-place finish at the NCAA II Cross Country Championships in November. Overall, Devine finishes his cross country career with two All-America and four All-GLVC honors.

The student representative to the USI Board of Trustees, Ellsperman is pursuing a degree in biology/pre-medical program. On the field, Ellsperman was named second-team All-Midwest Region and second-team All-GLVC after leading USI in scoring with 14 points on five goals and four assists. She also earned first-team Capital One/CoSIDA Academic All-America and Academic All-District IV honors.

Dr. Laci Rogers, instructor in the College of Business, was presented the Dr. Jane Davis Brezette Award. The award is presented to a USI faculty member who has contributed to the success of USI Athletics by mentoring student athletes and helping them to achieve their goals in the classroom and beyond. Previous winners of award were Dr. Jane Davis-Brezette, the former chair of Kinesiology and Sport Department; Tim Mahoney, an instructor in economics and Patti Marcum, instructor in physical education.

The USI Student Athlete Advisory Committee (SAAC) recognized softball with the Team GPA Award (3.511) and men’s and women’s soccer as co-winners of the Team Spirit Award.

Source: USI.edu

City Announces SculptEVV Art and Music Festival

0

A nationally advertised, juried outdoor sculpture exhibition and art and music festival
is coming to the Haynie’s Corner Arts District on June 8 and 9. The SculptEVV Art and Music Festival
is a partnership between the City of Evansville, the University of Southern Indiana, the Evansville
Bicentennial Committee and the Arts Council of Southwestern Indiana.

The SculptEVV opening is free and is accompanied by the Arts Council’s juried art fair – ArtEVV – and a
series of free live music concerts. The arts fair and concerts begin Friday, June 8, at 5 p.m. and continue
Saturday, June 9, at noon. In addition, two juried exhibitions – ClayEVV and Inspired by ArchitectureEVV
– will also open in the Adams Street galleries next to the Alhambra Theater, 50 Adams Ave. Both are
organized by USI ceramic professor Alisa Holen and USI wood sculpture professor Rob Millard-Mendez.
Awards for SculptEVV, ClayEVV and Inspired by ArchitectureEVV will be announced on Saturday, June 9,
at 8 p.m.

The 12 sculptures of SculptEVV will be located in and around the Haynie’s Corner Arts District and
adjacent Sculpture Park. Marilu Knode, Executive Director of the internationally regarded Laumeier
Sculpture Park in St. Louis, Missouri, selected the works for the exhibition as well as the prize winners.
The winners will be announced on June 9. The prizes are $1,000 for 3rd place, $5,000 for 2nd place
and $10,000 for Best-of-Show. A SculptEVV committee of visual arts professionals will choose the
$20,000 purchase award winner. All visitors to the exhibit who take a guided tour may vote for the $500
People’s Choice award.

Artists from as far away as California and Texas submitted artworks to be judged. A collaborative work
by Evansville artists Joe Smith, Jenny Smith and Alisa Holden entitled Becoming Evansville has been
accepted. Additionally, the following artists have sculptures selected for the exhibition: Amelia Toelke
(Wisconsin), Derek Chalfant (New York), John Utgaard (Kentucky), William Kolok (Kentucky); Samantha

Pasapane (New Jersey), Sue Berkey (Iowa), Tom Scicluna (Florida), Wade Kramm (Pennsylvania), Scott P
Ross (Illinois), Saul Melman (New York), Jonathan Hils (Oklahoma).

Artists will install their works starting Saturday, May 12, and continuing on Saturdays through June 2.
USI students will document the installations and post video and photo updates. To preview the works
accepted into the show visit www.SculptEVV.org.

Guided tours, led by USI Students, will start at 10:30 a.m. on June 9 and leave from the intersection of
Washington Ave. and Parrett St. near the Bokeh Lounge, 1007 Parrett Street. The first 200 middle school
and high school students who complete a tour will receive a free SculptEVV T-shirt, and the first 200
kindergarten and grade school children who complete a tour each receive colored chalks, water colors,
and modeling clay.

River City Food Coop, the River City Roller food truck and other vendors will be selling concessions at
the event. The downtown trolley will shuttle visitors between the Shriners’ Fest, SculptEVV, and other
downtown locations.

A schedule of SculptEVV and ArtEVV events is posted on the SculptEVV Facebook page and on
SculptEVV.org.

Friday, June 8, 2012

5 p.m. – Live music and ArtEVV juried arts fair begins

5:00 p.m. – The Funk

6:45 p.m. – Flawless Wells

8:00 p.m. Art EVV winners announced

8:00 p.m. – 11:00 p.m. – Boat Monkeys

Saturday, June 9, 2012

10:30 a.m. – 2:30 p.m. Guided Tours

12:00 p.m. – Kennedy Rose

1:30 p.m. – Blind Dog Gatewood

3:00 p.m. – Zion

5:30 p.m. – Boscoe Friends

8:00 p.m. – SculptEVV, ClayEVV, ArchitechEVV winners Announced

8:30 p.m. – Fire Family

10:00 p.m. – Smoke Rings

2012 PRIMARY ELECTION VOTE CENTERS

0

Early voting (for voters who choose to vote early at the Election Office, Libraries or the designated Saturday Vote Centers)

Early voting ends May 7th at noon.

Location, Days, Times, Dates

ELECTION OFFICE, Monday thru Friday, 8 am to 4 pm, April 9th to May 7th at noon
ELECTION OFFICE, Saturday, 8 am to 4 pm, April 28th & May 5th
CENTRAL LIBRARY, Monday thru Thursday, noon to 6 pm, April 30th to May 3rd
MCCULLOUGH LIBRARY, Monday thru Thursday, noon to 6 pm, April 30th to May 3rd
OAKLYN LIBRARY, Monday thru Thursday, noon to 6 pm, April 30th to May 3rd
NORTH PARK LIBRARY, Monday thru Thursday, noon to 6 pm, April 30th to May 3rd
RED BANK LIBRARY, Monday thru Thursday, Noon to 6 pm, April 30th to May 3rd
SALVATION ARMY, Saturday, 8 am to 3 pm, April 28th & May 5th
NORTHEAST PARK BAPTIST CHURCH, Saturday, 8 am to 3 pm, April 28th & May 5th

The libraries will be open from noon to 5 pm on Friday May 4th

“Page 13 was added to the Roberts Stadium Report”: Ella Johnson Watson, Mayor Winnecke’s Director of Communications

21

The following quote is from a comment post that was made by Ella Johnson Watson, the Director of Communications for the Office of Mayor Winnecke. We call upon our readers to make their own conclusions with respect to whether or not the report was corrupted and upon the 15 members of the Roberts Stadium Task Force to offer their own opinions on the contents of the report and the way it was made public.

“The page was drafted as a summary by Task Force Chairman Larry Steinberg. It was added to the report and presented to Task Force sub-committee coordinators. Larry sent an email to all Task Force members on April 19 thanking them for their work. “I sent an electronic copy of the report to each sub-committee coordinator and to Steve Schaefer. If you wish to review the report, you can do so by contacting one of them and arranging time. It is my plan to submit the report to the Mayor on Friday afternoon to make his deadline.” Larry did not receive any comments from Task Force members about the “General Conclusions” page before the report was submitted to Mayor Lloyd Winnecke.”

The City County Obserever would like to thank and congratulate Jordan Baer and City Councilwoman Stephanie Riley for having the courage to come forward and challenge page 13 as it should have been challenged. We also thank the other three members of the task force who confidentially have communicated the same message. These task force members are a great example for pointing out flaws in communications where public dollars are at stake.

Perhaps the four members of the Evansville City Council who opposed the Earthcare Energy deal will follow this lead and make the information they now have that was either ignored or oppressed prior to the vote to make a $4.8 Million loan was shoved through under threat of withdrawal.

Link to Task Force Report

Roberts_Stadium Task Force Report

IS IT TRUE April 26, 2012

22

The Mole #??

IS IT TRUE April 26, 2012

IS IT TRUE that some of the members of the Roberts Stadium Task Force are taking issue with the report that was released to the media yesterday on their behalf?…that the most visible of those is Jordan Baer who has kept a blog of ideas for consideration for Roberts Stadium for at least 3 years now?…that Mr. Baer who is a strong supporter of doing something productive with Roberts Stadium alleges that “page 13” or the page with the questionable statement that says any refurbishment project involving Roberts Stadium will cost more than building new will?…that it is not just Jordan Baer who has stated that the committee never gave its blessing to such a statement?…that three other members of the Roberts Stadium Task Force have in other ways without attaching their names to their statements all backed up Mr. Baer’s assertion?…that we encourage these people and any others on the task force to make it known if someone from the Winnecke Administration or the Task Force has dealt a card from the bottom of the deck and inserted a blatantly false statement into the study?..that at this time no member of the Task Force has come forward to state that “page 13” was indeed the consensus of the group?…that right now the votes of the Roberts Stadium Task Force are 4 – 0 that someone tampered with the report to give a worse than real impression?…that we call on the other 11 to state their case on the “official” reports credibility?

IS IT TRUE that Roberts Stadium has been suffering from willful neglect and intentional misrepresentation for at least 3 years now?…that every time that Dave Rector has given a tour of Roberts Stadium to the media that the same busted toilet, non-working water fountain, and leak in the roof are the highlights of the tour?…that the closet where chemicals are kept is also one of the main stops on the guided tour?…that pointing out the 4 or 5 worst things in any building or place is not a way to provide a picture of reality?…that if Dave Rector were a real tour guide on a cross country tour of America the narrated stops would be exclusively as follows?

Day One: New York City, stops in the South Bronx, the Bowery, and Hell’s Kitchen

Day Two: Michigan, stops in Detroit and a drive by of 8 Mile Road

Day Three: Chicago, only stop for a Southside walkabout

Day Four: Evansville, picnic lunch on Bee Slough and an evening stroll down Fares Avenue

Day Five: Cincinnati, a tour of “Over the Rhine”

Day Six: Los Angeles, forget Disneyland, you are going for a jog through Compton

Day Seven: San Diego, a blindfolded trip to Tijuana where you will be told you are in San Diego

IS IT TRUE that such a tour of the United States would not only give you a wrong impression but it would make you think that there is not one decent place in this country?…that by exclusively showing the absolute worst parts of anything always distorts the conclusions?…that Roberts Stadium has been the victim of neglect, abuse, and a negative campaign of propaganda for 3 years now?…that the latest allegations of releasing a false report are just the attempted last nail in the coffin for Roberts Stadium and show the depths to which some will go for a chance to tear it down?…that what is really disturbing is that not one person has come forward to refute what Jordan Baer has boldly stated?…that what is even more disturbing is that no one has expressed surprise that a false report may have been issued?…that the CCO really wishes that the people of Evansville could look at “official” press releases without the jaded view that manipulation and falsehood masked in SNEGALNESS are the law of the City?

IS IT TRUE that perhaps a Freedom of Information Act request will get to the real study?…that perhaps that will only produce doctored reports or refusals as well?…that we should be able to report the results of the FOIA’s served on the Office of the City Controller and the Office of the Mayor this week with respect to the Earthcare Energy VETTING?…that those two places cannot assert that they are not subject to FOIA laws as GAGE did?…that those offices are clearly subject to open door laws and that they will either have to give up the goods or come up with some nonsensical reason to delay?