Crash With Injury At Hwy 41 North And Mt Pleasant Rd
Deputies were dispatched to US Hwy 41 North and Mount Pleasant Road regarding a crash. When deputies arrived, they observed a blue Jeep Cherokee and a red Toyota Corolla crashed in the roadway. The Jeep Cherokee was laying on it side in the southbound lane facing north. The red Corolla was facing west in the intersection. Deputies closed the southbound lane of US Hwy 41 North for approximately 45 minutes to complete the investigation and the cleanup.
The driver of the blue Cherokee, Patricia Southerland, and a juvenile occupant were unable to exit the vehicle due to the position of the vehicle. Deputy Bryan Bishop was able to crawl through the back window, release their seatbelts, and pull them from the vehicle.
Sutherland told deputies she was turning west onto Mount Pleasant from US Hwy 41 North. Sutherland stated she was not paying attention to the traffic signal and went through the red light crashing into the red Corolla which was traveling south.
All parties involved were transported to Deaconess Hospital for non-life threatening injuries. The investigation is ongoing, but neither drugs nor alcohol appear to be a factor.
DRIVER #1
Patricia Sutherland
W/F, 64 YOA
Evansville, Indiana
DRIVER #2:
Patsy J. Phillips
W/F, 61 YOA
Evansville, Indiana
Battery By Strangulation Arrest
On Thursday, June 13, 2013, at approximately 5:40 AM, the Vanderburgh County Sheriff’s Office was dispatched to 4600 Rolling Ridge Court regarding a domestic violence in progress. Deputies were advised that a white female and white male were arguing in front of the apartment.
Upon their arrival, deputies found the victim, Donna Kay Boyer, standing by the office. Boyer appeared to be distraught and had visible marks on her neck and arm from a struggle. Boyer stated that she and her boyfriend, Bradley Ray Barney, had returned from the hospital and had been arguing over his cell phone. Boyer stated she went into the bedroom to start packing her clothes because she was leaving.
Boyer stated when she attempted to walk out of the bedroom; Barney blocked the doorway and refused to let her leave. As Boyer was trying to get out of the room, Barney spat in her face. He then grabbed Boyer around the neck and started squeezing to where she could not breathe and started to lose consciousness.
Boyer stated Barney then threw her down to the ground and started twisting her arm behind her back causing extreme discomfort. Finally, Boyer was able to distract Barney by telling him his phone was outside. Once Barney left to look for it, Boyer was able to escape the apartment.
When deputies went to Barney’s apartment, they were unable to get Barney to answer the door. Approximately an hour, Barney exited the apartment thinking deputies had left. Barney was then taken into custody without further incident.
As the deputies were speaking with Barney, they observed blood coming from several small cuts on his forehead with blood over his face, hands, arms, and the front of his shirt. Barney also had bruising over one eye. Barney stated to deputies that Boyer had cut him with a knife.
Based on evidence at the scene and witness statements, deputies believe the cuts were self-inflicted by Barney. The witness stated Barney was wearing a red t-shirt and had no blood on him when he chased Boyer out of the apartment. Additionally, a small knife was located in the sink with blood on it.
Barney was transported to Deaconess Hospital for treatment of the minor injuries and then to the Vanderburgh Sheriff’s Confinement Center where he was booked on several charges.
OFFENDER
Bradley Ray Barney
50 YOA, W/M
Evansville, Indiana
CHARGES
Battery by Strangulation – D felony
Criminal Confinement – C felony
Battery by Bodily Waste – A misdemeanor
Battery by Hand, Fist, Feet Causing Injury – A misdemeanor
VICTIM
Donna Kay Boyer
51 YOA, W/F
Newburgh, Indiana
VANDERBURGH COUNTY FELONY CHARGES
Below is a list of felony cases that were filed by the Vanderburgh County Prosecutor’s Office on Wednesday, June 12, 2013.
Terrence Gibson Operating a Vehicle as an Habitual Traffic Violator-Class D Felony
Kenaz Jones Operating a Motor Vehicle after Forfeiture of License for Life-
Class C Felony
False Informing-Class B Misdemeanor
Operating a Vehicle with an ACE of .08 or More-Class C Misdemeanor
Adam Pfau Operating a Motor Vehicle While Intoxicated-Class C Misdemeanor
(Enhanced to D Felony Due to Prior Convictions)
Brandi Phillips Robbery Resulting in Serious Bodily Injury-Class A Felony
Armed Robbery-Class B Felony
Conspiracy to Commit Robbery-Class C Felony
Wendy Stone Possession of Methamphetamine-Class D Felony
Possession of Marijuana-Class A Misdemeanor
Possession of Paraphernalia-Class A Misdemeanor
Cole Tennyson Domestic Battery-Class D Felony
Resisting Law Enforcement-Class D Felonies (Four Counts)
Battery Resulting in Bodily Injury-Class D Felonies (Two Counts)
Criminal Recklessness-A Misdemeanor
Criminal Mischief-Class A Misdemeanor
Stacy True Possession of Methamphetamine-Class D Felony
Unlawful Possession or Use of a Legend Drug-Class D Felony
Possession of Marijuana-Class A Misdemeanor
(Enhanced to D Felony Due to Prior Convictions)
Possession of Paraphernalia-Class A Misdemeanor
(Enhanced to D Felony Due to Prior Convictions)
(Habitual Substance Offender Enhancement)
Cory Tyus Dealing in Marijuana-Class D Felony
Possession of Marijuana-Class D Felony
Zackary Wall Burglary-Class B Felony
Attempted Theft-Class D Felony
Edward Wells Battery Resulting in Bodily Injury-Class D Felony
Resisting Law Enforcement-Class D Felony
Possession of Marijuana-Class A Misdemeanor
(Enhanced to D Felony Due to Prior Convictions)
False Informing-Class B Misdemeanor
Operating a Motor Vehicle While Intoxicated-Class C Misdemeanor
Taylor Cox Theft-Class D Felony
Blake Fisher Robbery Resulting in Serious Bodily Injury-Class A Felony
Armed Robbery-Class B Felony
Conspiracy to Commit Robbery-Class C Felony
Heather Hoffman Domestic Battery-Class D Felony
Robin Marshall Operating a Vehicle as an Habitual Traffic Violator-Class D Felony
Buck Pace Operating a Vehicle as an Habitual Traffic Violator-Class D Felony
Ryan Schmitt Pointing a Firearm-Class D Felony
Criminal Recklessness-Class D Felony
Stanley Snyder Resisting Law Enforcement-Class D Felony
Battery Resulting in Bodily Injury-Class D Felony
Intimidation-Class D Felony
Disorderly Conduct-Class B Misdemeanor
For further information on the cases listed above, or any pending case, please contact Kyle Phernetton at 812.435.5688 or via e-mail at KPhernetton@vanderburghgov.org
Under Indiana law, all criminal defendants are considered to be innocent until proven guilty by a court of law.
Crash With Injury On SR 65
The Vanderburgh County Sheriff’s Office was dispatched to a crash with injury at 5919 State Road 65. When deputies arrived, they found three vehicles, a 1995 White Toyota Avalon; a 2009 Tan Toyota Camry; and a White 2003 Honda Civic, in the middle of the roadway. The investigation and cleanup caused deputies closed the roadway for approximately one hour.
Upon investigation of the crash, the driver of the Toyota Avalon, Megan Marie Blankenberger, stated she was driving southbound on State Road 65 behind the Tan Toyota Camry. Blankenberger stated she had looked down to read a text message on her cell phone. Blankenberger stated when she looked up, the driver of the Camry had stopped to turn into the driveway of 5919 State Road 65. Blankenberger stated she was unable to stop in time and crashed into the back of the Camry. The Camry then went across the center of the roadway and side-swiped a White 2003 Honda Civic which was traveling northbound on State Road 65.
There were four occupants in the Toyota Camry, 2 adults and 2 juveniles, who were transported to Deaconess Hospital for complaint of pain. Blankenberger was written a citation for a traffic infraction, using a telecommunication device while driving.
DRIVER #1:
Megan Marie Blankenberger
W/F, 22 YOA
Evansville, Indiana
DRIVER #2:
Lisa Ann Mayhugh
W/F,48 YOA
Evansville, Indiana
DRIVER #3
Jenna Rose Adler
W/F, 24 YOA
Haubstadt, Indiana
Former Democrat Operative Pat Cadell “One Way or Another a Revolution is Coming”
The sordid revelations from the Obama administration are coming at a pace that can only be described as, well, fast and furious. So let’s lay down some markers here, as a sort of road map for the months and years ahead:
First, if the PRISM program and all the rest of the government’s surveillance programs were so good and necessary, then why didn’t the feds catch the Tsarnaev brothers, who earlier this year blew up the Boston Marathon? Or Major Hassan, the 2009 Fort Hood mass-murderer? Or the “underwear bomber,†also from 2009, who nearly succeeded in blowing up the passenger jet flying into Detroit?
Second, if and when everything is revealed about PRISM and all the rest, it’s likely that we will learn of important and inculpating connections between the National Security Agency (NSA), on the one hand, and many civilian agencies, on the other.
I am not just referring to Eric Holder’s Justice Department; I am also referring to the gleefully gushing leakers and win-at-any-cost politicos in the White House. And oh yes, let’s not forget the Obama administration’s partisan allies at the IRS, as well as the Obamacare overseers at the Department of Health and Human Services.
Moreover, since we know that the IRS was eagerly willing to share secret tax information with favored private groups, we shouldn’t be surprised, in the end, to learn that NSA/PRISM material ended up in the hands of Obama friends and allies outside of the government.
Third, we now know that Silicon Valley, and the telecommunications industry, are the key to the Obama strategy for total information awareness. In fact, the internet companies, and the phone companies, were the spearpoint for PRISM. No, wait, that’s not the right image. Let’s try this: These communications companies put peepholes into all of our private lives, through which Uncle Sam could sneak a peek. Every e-mail, every phone call, every text-message–the government knows about them all.
It’s now evident that all these wonderful digital services–many of them, such as Google’s Gmail, given away for free–were, in fact, a kind of Trojan Horse. That is, on the outside, it all seemed like a good deal–but then the real truth comes tumbling out, and it’s too late. Some might recall the rueful lesson of the Trojan War: “Beware of Greeks bearing gifts.†The rueful lesson of our own time: “Beware of geeks bearing gifts.â€
Yes, Big Brother walks among us now, peeking and snooping into everything. And we, innocently and unwittingly, invited Big Brother into our midst.
Fourth, it’s not an accident that these Silicon Valley companies are supporters of Barack Obama. The greatest among these Obama supporters is Eric Schmidt, executive chairman of the largest of these companies, Google. Google gained a lot of traction–the company is now worth nearly $300 billion, and Schmidt owns a good chunk of that–on the slogan, “Don’t be evil.†But now we know better. Indeed, we are reminded of another old piece of wisdom: Be extra careful around the man who protests his virtue too much. And beware the company, too.
Google and all the rest of the Silicon Valleyites say they didn’t know about what was happening, and if you don’t believe that, well, they will then tell you that they didn’t provide “direct access.†Oh, okay, not “direct access‖just full access. And what did the companies get in return for this cooperation with the government? A pat on the head? Or something more? Did any of these companies make any serious attempt to put any sort of limits on what was being snooped, and how it was being utilized?
Let’s remember: All these companies had a lot of leverage, because any one of them had the power to make the PRISM operation, at least some of it, public. But they all chose not to; they all chose to be part of the effort. How come? Patriotism? Or something else?
Fifth, Eric Schmidt, in particular, seems on his way to becoming a major Democratic powerbroker, bringing Silicon Valley smarts–and who knows what else–into the realm of partisan campaigning. Schmidt is so into this president that he snapped up the 2012 Obama campaign’s data analytics team–hired the whole Chicago group–and has now launched them in a new company. The company, Civis Analytics, will work on various for-profit and non-profit projects, including helping the Obama administration dragoon young people into Obamacare. And oh yes, Civis will also work on political campaigns–but only for Democrats.
So we might ask: Is Schmidt really doing the right thing for the employees and shareholders of Google? To say nothing of all those Google users? Is it really in keeping with Schmidt’s fiduciary duty to his company to get so extended into the policy and politics of the Obama administration? Are Schmidt’s actions truly helping the long-term growth and well-being of Google? Not only are its American customers justifiably freaked out, but how ‘bout customers worldwide? If you were a citizen of another country, would you really want to keep using Google if you know that American intelligence types–and maybe American political operatives–were perusing your private life?
Sixth, young Edward Snowden, the 29-year-old who leaked the PRISM information, is sort of a Zelig figure–if you remember your Woody Allen movies–for our own time. That is, the naive figure who ends up in the middle of great events, without fully understanding what is happening all around him. As a teenager in 2003, at the height of the patriotic feeling of the War on Terror in 2003, Snowden joined the US Army. He was discharged after breaking both of his legs in a training accident, and then, as he made his way up the ladder in the national security apparatus, he seems to have veered between sort of liking Obama and actually supporting libertarian candidates.
In other words, Snowden seems to have been pro-war when just about everyone was pro-war, and he became part of the national security sector when it was a boom industry. More recently, he believed that Obama would bring about positive hope and change, even as he himself became more and more skeptical of government. Then, of course, came his profound disillusion, and the PRISM leak.
More biographical information on Snowden will come pouring out, but it surely seems, as of now, that Snowden was riding on the same political rollercoaster as many millions of American. First, trust in George W. Bush, then trust in the system, then trust in Obama–and now, trust in nobody and nothing in Washington.
Seventh, as far as the American people are concerned, this domestic spying is a big deal. Yet revealingly, to the political class–that is, our leaders in Washington DC–it’s not such a big deal. And there we see the central cleft in our politics today: the widening gap between the government and the governed. According to pollster Scott Rasmussen, the American people oppose the US government’s secret collection of phone records by a whopping 59:26 margin.
People know, in their bones, that unaccountable government is bad government; as Patrick Henry said more than two centuries ago, “The liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them.†So when Obama said, on Friday, “I welcome this debate and I think it’s healthy for our democracy,†we might ask right back: Mr. President, if you welcome this debate so much, why didn’t you begin the debate yourself? Why did you wait until PRISM was leaked?
The reason, of course, is that Obama did not see anything objectionable about PRISM. Moreover, neither did anyone around him–in either party. On Sunday, the talkshow airwaves were thick with DC Establishment tools rallying around PRISM–that is, rallying around their own entrenched and centralized power.
Only a few outsiders, such as Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY)–who has retained his outsiderness, even inside the club of the US Senate–are reading public sentiment correctly. Paul plans a class-action suit against the communications companies, inviting all Americans to join him. That’s the sort of citizen-engagement effort that the insurgent and outsider-ish Obama campaign of 2008 would have loved, even if the arrogant and insider-ish Obama administration of 2013 hates it.
In fact, those Americans whom Rasmussen categorizes as the “political class‖that is, those connected to DC and governance–support PRISM by a 71 percent to 18 percent ratio. Meanwhile, the rest of the country opposes PRISM by a more than three-to-one ratio, 69 percent to 21 percent. Now let’s think about the enormous chasm here: The political class supports the program by a 53-point margin, while everyone else opposes it by a 48-point margin. If you add up those two margins, 53 and 48, you get 101. That’s a vivid indicator of the gap between the government and the governed.
So here we see it: The elites think one thing, and the people think another thing. Nothing new there, of course, except that rarely, if ever, has the dichotomy between overdog and underdog been this stark.
Something is going to have to give. We are on the cusp of some huge shift in power relations between the core and periphery, between the DC Beltway and flyover country. Right now, Washington has the upper hand, but an aggrieved population can always win–if it is willing to stand up and fight.
In the minds of ordinary Americans, the fuse of outrage has been lit. Now this is the question: Can honest but responsible leaders, truly reflecting populist anger, find a way to force change in DC? Moreover, can this needed reform happen without tearing apart the country? Let’s hope so.
But we must know this for sure: One way or another, a revolution is coming.
IS IT TRUE June 13, 2013

IS IT TRUE June 13, 2013
IS IT TRUE our readers interests have been high about the reconciliation of the City of Evansville’s accounts?…it will be interesting to see which assertion of reconciliation the SBOA will endorse in the upcoming audit?…David Garrett is correct that knowing about a $7 Million discrepancy and not knowing how it happened does not constitute full reconciliation?…Controller Russ Lloyd is also right that there are accepted accounting practices to “wash away†the discrepancy with a one-time correction entry to raise the white flag of surrender and hit the reset button to magically declare the books to be reconciled so we can go forward without a scar on our accounts?…assuming that there is a $7 Million discrepancy and that the books were reconciled for the year 2010 it is safe to conclude that this discrepancy has happened since January 1, 2011?…if we further assume that this $7 Million discrepancy is a legacy of poor accounting handed to the Winnecke Administration and Russ Lloyd the only place to find this discrepancy is during calendar year 2011?…one would think that 18 months is enough time to comb through every check, nook, and cranny to find this discrepancy but it seems this has not been done to the satisfaction of either David Garrett or the Evansville City Council?…there are several possibilities for this the first of which is it has not legitimately been found?…it is also possible that it has been found and the source of the discrepancy is politically unpalatable to disclose?…it would be productive and would restore some faith in the competency of local government accounting to find and disclose the source of the discrepancy and let the chips fall where they will on the past administration?…if the City has indeed been diligently trying to find this discrepancy for 18 months and can’t there should be some time declared as drop dead date and just admit we can’t find it and plug some number in so this circus of idiocy can move forward with clean books even if they were cleaned by painting over the problem?…we really hope the discrepancy is found and that Russ and David agree on the final solution?
IS IT TRUE that another long time eastside business has announced that they are running up the white flag and closing up shop?…Lorenzo’s Bakery and Restaurant that has long served the community from the outlot at the Schnuck’s at the corner of Green River Road and Washington Avenue will soon be serving its last bowl of heavenly soup, its last magnificent salad, and sending its last basket of homemade bread to the houses of its customer base?…we encourage our readers to send Lorenzo’s out with a great ending and to develop a habit of going to your favorite places more often so we don’t lose more of our little treasures that if replaced will probably be another chain store?
IS IT TRUE the sequester cuts that were touted by President Barack Obama to be so painful that the people will be in breadlines has finally come home to roost here in Evansville and the State of Indiana?…the President did sort of overplay and over hype his pair of twos in this poker hand but there may be some pain after all?…the pain in this case is amazingly small and should be easy to backfill with local heartfelt charity?…the entire State of Indiana will be getting $700,000 less than expected which works out to a bank breaking 12 cents per Hoosier?…locally the YWCA will be losing $8,500 that they were counting on which works out to less than 5 cents per Vanderburgh County resident?…a few other local humanitarian groups are about to experience similar shortfalls?…if every person in Vanderburgh County would donate $1 to a sequester relief fund that any of our big rich churches could easily promote our charities will be better off than they were before the sequester by a wide margin?…this is a great opportunity to prove that local charity beats federal largesse and it does it more efficiently?…we encourage our readers to do their part and commit $10 each to one of the humanitarian groups that lost some funding from the sequester cuts?…the CCO is still free so consider this $10 a subscription alternative?
IS IT TRUE there is a very interesting article by Brad Linzy in today’s CCO that promotes unmetered water at flat rates?…much of the western world already does this?…he also raises the question of the reliability and useful life of smart meters like the ones in the Johnson Controls contract?…the average life of the batteries and the cost to service them should raise a few eyebrows?…maybe the eyebrows of the City of Evansville engineering department and the City Council should be raised?
General Assembly Overrides Veto
STATEHOUSE — The Indiana House of Representatives voted 68 to 23 to override Gov. Pence’s veto of House Enrolled Act (HEA) 1546. Elected Representatives returned to the Statehouse on Wednesday, as provided for in House Concurrent Resolution 60, for the First Regular Technical Session to address the most cost-effective solution for Hoosier taxpayers by overriding the veto of HEA 1546. This is the first time the legislature has convened on technical corrections day since legislation was passed in 1995 allowing for the General Assembly to convene to address technical corrections and to override vetoes.
“This law fixes a mistake that was made at both the state and local level affecting local taxes in Jackson and Pulaski counties,†said State Representative Ron Bacon (R-Chandler). “If we did not override the veto, these counties would have to seek an alternative avenue to collect money in order to pay for their local jails; a solution the residents of the counties didn’t want. While the oversight was unfortunately not realized earlier, this law now provides a prudent solution for the counties, in addition to providing other needed tax reforms for spouses of deceased veterans. â€
HEA 1546 passed unanimously out of the House and with only one dissenting vote in the Senate. The bill addresses a number of tax issues, most notably the Local Option Income Tax (LOIT) for Jackson and Pulaski counties, as well as providing benefits for surviving spouses of deceased veterans and making it easier for an out-of-state business to help with disaster emergency relief here in Indiana.
Local officials from Jackson and Pulaski counties came to the Statehouse to encourage the General Assembly override the veto.
“On behalf of County Commissioners, we appreciate the urgency that the General Assembly is placing on this issue. The funding is a vital need for our communities, and it was a necessity that this matter be solved,†said Larry L. Brady, Pulaski County Commissioner.
If the General Assembly did not reconvene to address this bill, the veto would have required over 1,000 employers in the two counties to make mid-year adjustments to their payrolls, affecting over 20,000 employees. In addition, since the two counties need to pay for the ongoing costs of operating the jail, losing funding could put jail operations in jeopardy.
Do We Really Need Water Meters?
Do We Really Need Water Meters?
By: Brad Linzy
HYPOTHESIS:
Water metering is not needed in Evansville. A Flat Rate scheme might be preferable.
ARGUMENTS:
A lot has been said already about the Evansville/Johnson Controls (JCI) Smart City 2.0 deal in fiscal terms, but little has been said about the technology itself and how a smart meter that measures water actually works. Anyone who has experienced the frustration with digital device running out of battery power can attest to the fact that sometimes flashy, feature-laden devices aren’t always superior in long term reliability or build quality.
In the last 30 or 40 years everything from clocks, barometers, hygrometers, thermometers, odometers – basically anything with “meter†at the end of it – has been given an electronic makeover. While economies of scale have generally made these devices cheaper and sometimes easier to use, they also have suffered from designs that rely on batteries to operate and are considered disposable in nature.
The idea of making water meters “smart†obviously has its advantages. Some of those include remote reading, elimination of data entry, real time monitoring by consumers, remote control of valves, early leak detection, to name a few. In fact, they seem like a great idea on the face of it. But not so fast…
There are three aspects of this deal to which I object – the timing of it, the long term reliability of the technology, and finally the assumed need for meters in the first place. Enough has already been said about the timing of the JCI deal, so I will focus instead on the latter two of my three complaints.
The major downfall of smart water meters lies in the fact they need batteries to operate, and not just any batteries, they need expensive Lithium Thionyl Chloride batteries, which according to a Silicon Labortories report add $10-$15 to the cost of each meter (compare that with the average $20 cost of old mechanical meters), and they also happen to be regulated as “dangerous†for transit and require a qualified technician to change. (1)
Furthermore, according to my research and a phone conversation I had with a technician at Elster, one of the largest manufacturers of smart meters in the US, any smart water meter sold in the US will not be field serviceable due to OSHA regulations, i.e. the batteries cannot simply be changed while the meter is connected to the pipe. The meter will have to be taken out of service and a replacement meter installed. The lifespan of Lithium Thionyl Chloride batteries under optimal conditions is 20 years, but the industry standard for smart meter manufacturer warranty is 15 years of service life. (1)(2)(3)
I have not read the full contract for the JCI deal, but I do know there is a service and replacement agreement for up to…you guessed it…20 years. This raises a couple of pressing questions. What are the exact terms of the service and replacement portion of the contract? And what happens after the contract is up and the meters start dying one by one because of the inherent limitations of their power source? Are we going to be right back in a similar boat in 20 years? (4)
My guess is, yes. In 20 years’ time, the next generation of Evansville leaders will experience the wages of our ill-conceived plans. They will look back with 20/20 hindsight, analyze the long term return on investment and realize throwing away all our old, boring yet reliable mechanical meters was a mistake. But hidden away beneath the blanket of our assumptions is a larger question about water in the “River Cityâ€. Why are we metering our water at all?
Meterless water billing is quite common in most parts of the world, and even in some developed nations like the UK. Water departments in these places use different schemes, but flat rates and “assessed volume†charges, based on the size and characteristics of a property, are the most common. (5)
This might sound alien to some of us, but think about it: are there any among us whose actions change because of our water bill? Do any of us really open up our bill and think, “if only I hadn’t washed so many dishes and clothes last month, I could have cut this bill in half,†or, “man, if only I would stop showering and flushing the toilet, this bill would go down� The truth is, we use the amounts of water we use because that is the amount we need to use for whatever lifestyle we’ve carved out.
These visions of a future where residents conserve water diligently because they can view their real time usage are just utopian dreams. We all know the truth, and the truth is these meters will raise revenues for the water dept. because, at least for the service life of the meters, they will be slightly more accurate. It’s only about raising revenues. JCI’s own website uses this argument of raising revenues in their sales pitch. Even if this plan fell on its face, the water dept. is already asking state regulators for a rate hike because they have a shortfall of revenue. So the bottom line is they need X dollars to operate and they are bringing in less than X. The rates will rise whether we like it or not, so the real question is, do we need state of the art, battery-powered meters that will fail within 20 years’ time, or is there another way?
CONCLUSIONS:
The JCI deal is wasteful. It will add to the debt burden of the people of Evansville with very little perceivable reward. There are some good aspects of smart meter technology, particularly if you live in places where water conservation is paramount, but the “River City†can hardly be called such a place. Furthermore, the design limitations, namely the limitations on power supply and OSHA regulations against changing the Lithium Thionyl Chloride batteries, poses a serious future liability in 20 years’ time when the service and replacement contract runs out.
A water pricing structure based on a tiered system with flat rates and assessed volume billing would work better than the current volumetric pricing system. Such a system would save the people of Evansville a $46 million debt, would be cheaper on average for residents, and would have minimal effect on actual water usage. After the first month or so, everyone would get over what little thrill there was in leaving on a faucet or garden hose and things would be normal. The water dept. operations and billing would be streamlined, passing the savings (of both meter reading and the JCI deal) on to customers. The old residential meters could remain in place to aid in leak detection, but would not be used for billing. Our rates will rise for water no matter what path we take. The cheapest path for all is to rethink the system from the ground up, not move to “smart†meters with a limited service life.
SOURCES:
(1) Silicon Labs “How to Design Smart Gas and Water Utility Meters for the Utmost in Power Efficiencyâ€
http://www.silabs.com/Support%20Documents/TechnicalDocs/Low-Power-MCU-Metering.pdf
(2) MSDS FOR LITHIUM THIONYL CHLORIDE BATTERY
http://www.uscg.mil/hq/cg4/cg432/docs/msds/MSDS_IceBatteries.pdf
(3) Elster Metering Model SM700 Data Sheet
http://www.elstermetering.com/downloads/SM700_4pp_090311.pdf
(4) IURC Joint Petition
http://www.in.gov/iurc/files/44123order_081512.pdf
(5) Overview of Meterless Water Billing Schemes in the UK
http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/wales/consumer_w/consumer_energy_and_water_supply_e/consumer_water_supply_e/consumer_paying_your_water_bill_e/paying_for_water_without_a_meter.htm
Safety Board Agenda 6/12/13â€
AGENDA
Wednesday, June 12, 2013
Building Commission – Ron Beane Police Department – Chief Billy Bolin
Emergency Management-Sherman Greer Fire Department – Chief Mike Connelly
~ Pledge of Allegiance ~
.
Business with representatives:
1. Jason Ragle with Ragle, Inc. would like to address the board in reference to street closings related to Oak Hill Road Reconstruction project.
New Business:
1. Appoint committee to undertake review of current taxi cab ordinance and make proposals concerning enforcement issues potential amendments to said ordinance; committee to consist of David Gulledge, an individual from the Controller’s Office and Evansville Police Department, and a member of City Council, with assistance from the Secretary and Attorney for the Board of Public Safety, Tina Owen and Clay Havill, respectively.
Departmental Reports:
A. Police Department – Chief Billy Bolin
1. Request approval to surplus the following items:
a. HP Officejet 7130 All in One Serial #SG37JD1244
b. Compaq Armada 1700 laptop Serial#3J96BNJ5P27L
c. HP Compaq NX9030 laptop Wer#CNF4370YJP
d. Scanner for the fingerprint comparison
2. Would like to notify the board of Officer Christopher Ramirez resignation after serving 11 months and 1 day.
B. Fire Department ~ Chief Mike Connelly
1. Request approval May 2013 monthly report.
C. Special Events
1. The Potter’s Wheel requests approval to close Jefferson Ave between Judson and Governor on July 4, 2013 from 10:00 am until 4:00 pm for “Potter’s Wheel 4th of Julyâ€. ***Barricades requested***
2. New Hope Memorial Baptist Church requests approval to close Elliott between Mulberry and Bellemeade on June 22, 2013 from 8:00 am until 5:00 pm for “Silence Won’t Stop Violenceâ€. ***Barricades requested***
3. Raben Tire Company requests approval to close Ingle between 3rd & 4th, Market between Ingle & Court, 4th St between Court & Bond on June 22, 2013 from 3:00 pm to 10:00 pm for
“Wheel City 15th Cruise-Inâ€. ***Barricades requested***
4. Helfrich Park STEM Academy requests approval for “Helfrich Park Cross Country Invitational†September 4, 2013 from 3:30 pm until 5:00 pm. Starts at Golfmoor Park, run west to Harmony Way, turn around and return to the park.
C. Transportation and Services ~ Todd Robertson
1. Request approval to install 4, “30 MPH Speed Limit†signs on 7th Ave between Maryland St & Cody Ave due to continual speeding problems.
2. Request approval to remove city parking signs on Benninghof Ave within the section that was vacated to Memorial High School.
3. Removal of “Full Year†school signs for Lincoln Elementary School.
4. Removal of the southbound left turn signal on Vann Ave @ Lincoln Ave. Engineering study revealed the overall light operation at this intersection operates at decreased overall time delay without the left turn signal being in operation.
D. Building Commission ~ Ron Beane
1. Request approval to open and award bids for the below listed properties:
a. 500-502 Adams Ave – House/Duplex and remove fences. The wooden privacy fence on the east side of the property must be removed by hand. The abutting chain link fence on the east side belongs to the adjacent property owner and is not to be removed or damaged. All fences on the north, west, and south side of the property are to be removed by the contractor. ***This property is owned by the City of Evansville. City of Evansville reserves the right of first salvage “project bidâ€.
b. 1730 E. Division St – House and garage
c. 1611 St – House
d. 501 Jackson Ave – House
e. 713 Jackson Ave – House, shed, remove front chain link fence, a section of chain link fence on the w/s and front entry gate. Remove, section of wood fence across back of lot, back fence, the gate on the e/s of the lot and the playhouse between two trees.
f. 1300 Fountain Ave – House and remove collapsed portion of the retaining wall, leave the retaining wall that is standing intact, remove fence.
g. 1319 W. Maryland St – House and shed
h. 1013 W. Virginia St – House/duplex
Consent Section:
A. Taxi Cab Driver’s Permits
1. Request approval for the following to receive taxi cab drivers permits:
a. Nathan Ludwig
b. Sean Dennis
c. Ashley Macken
d. Angela Adams
e. John Eakins
2. Request approval to deny the following taxi cab driver based on criminal history:
a. Shannon Shepard
B. Dumpster
1. 616 N. 4th Ave – Safe Guard Properties – May 13, 2013 for 3 days
OTHER BUSINESS:
1. Approve claims.
2. Approve the minutes of Wednesday, May 22 & 29, 2013
Announcements:
Next meeting, June 24, 2013 at 1:00 pm