Last week, I had the opportunity to visit with Youth First! as they visited the Statehouse to provide an update to Indiana’s southwest delegation.
Youth First! is a 501 (c) 3 organization in Evansville which aims to strengthen youth and families and maximize student success through the prevention of substance abuse and the promotion of healthy lifestyles.
Their main areas of concern include depression, anxiety, anger, substance abuse, peer conflicts, home and family conflicts as well as divorce and/or grief adjustment. Over the last year, through their social work programs and services, Youth First! has achieved improved parent/child bonding, peer resistance, coping skills and decision making skills.
While here, they presented us with their annual impact statement for the 2012-2013 school year. While they currently serve Vanderburgh, Warrick, Gibson and Posey counties, they reported that 58 percent of schools still need service, and 54 percent of students still need access to Youth First!’s social work programs.
To illustrate just how much of an impact they are having on our communities, Youth First! reports 11 life-saving interventions each week. In one year, that equates to 572 potential lives saved!
Their primary reason for coming to the Statehouse, however, was to announce that they had received a $500,000 grant, and as a result, they would be hiring four new full-time social workers and providing services at eight schools, bringing their total to 34 master’s level social workers serving at least 47 schools in at least five counties in southwest Indiana.
They will also be providing 60 evidence-based programs at up to 20 schools. These programs focus on youth safety and measure their success based on individual student concerns, school adjustment, problem behaviors, risk and protective factors such as communication and coping skills, as well as the percentage of students who graduate and are promoted to the next level. In six months, the organization will report back to us on their progress.
If there is one thing I have learned during my time in the legislature, it is the vulnerability of our youth. I believe that protecting our youth and preserving their childhood is an important challenge that we face. Sometimes, however, there isn’t necessarily a legislative fix. The legislature alone cannot teach a strong work ethic, a positive attitude, commitment to self-improvement or the ability to overcome adversity.
That is why it is so important to have organizations like Youth First! who are committed to improving our communities and serving as champions of our youth. It was a pleasure to have them at the Statehouse last week, and I look forward to hearing their future successes.
By Abdul Hakim-Shabazz
IndyPoltics.Org
A week or so ago, Republican State Sen. Mike Delph of Carmel talked about his “tweet heard around the world.â€Â He sent out a Twitter
Abdul Hakim-Shabazz is an attorney and the editor and publisher of IndyPoltics.Org.
message that there were not enough votes in the Senate caucus to restore the second sentence banning civil unions into HJR-3, the marriage amendment. Delph had broken the cardinal rule that what is said in Senate caucus stays there. A couple hundred twitter posts and a few days later Delph found himself stripped of Senate leadership position, no press secretary and stuck on the far side of the chamber surrounded by Democrats.
More recently in the Statehouse an amendment was added to a bill that would have allowed state contractors to discriminate based on religion. No one would have noticed anything until it broke out on social media. Within 24 hours the bill was sent back to committee and the amendment was removed.
And there’s no need to go back to the 2012 U.S. Senate race and the infamous “rape†comment which spread like wildfire, mostly due to Twitter and Facebook.
So what am I getting at?
Social media aren’t just for posting pictures of your kid’s soccer or basketball game. You can do a lot more on Twitter than tell everyone you’re standing in line to see the new Lego movie. (Which I did tweet was “totally awesome†after I saw it.) Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, You Tube, blogs, you name it. What once seemed like the sole purview of teenagers and 20-somethings to waste valuable time talking about absolutely nothing has become a very valuable asset in the world of politics and if you don’t know how to use it, you lose it.
For example, during the debate over House Joint Resolution 3, there was a group called “Young Hoosiers for Marriage†who supported traditional marriage. About 100 of them held a rally at the statehouse showing their support for the amendment and wanting lawmakers to restore the second sentence. What they didn’t do was made sure they owned the internet domain name “Young Hoosiers for Marriage†because when you typed it in on the web, it took you straight to Freedom Indiana’s web page. Freedom Indiana was the group opposing HJR 3. And to add insult to injury, with 10 minutes after “Young Hoosiers for Marriage†was announced there was a Facebook all set up by opponents of HJR 3 saying what a bad idea the second sentence was.  You may not like, but you have to respect it.
As I said, social media can be a very powerful tool which can easily make or break a candidate or an issue. A political career can easily come to an end if you catch the right candidate doing the wrong thing at the right time. Smart political operations not only master the art of social media by knowing how to properly get out information, but they also know how to monitor it. And if you are smart and monitoring, or to use a technical term “following,† a reporter’s Twitter account many times you can figure out where the reporters’s going with a particular story and know how to either do damage control or enhance your own political profile.
As the old saying goes, “politics ain’t no bean bag†and social media has made it a lot more fun and a lot more complicated. By the way, you can follow me on Twitter at either AttyAbdul or IndyPoliticsOrg.  You’ll be doing yourself a big favor. Trust me on that one.
Abdul is an attorney and the editor and publisher of IndyPoltics.Org. He is also a frequent contributor to numerous Indiana media outlets. He can be reached at abdul@indypolitics.org.
By Erika Brock
TheStatehouseFile.com
INDIANAPOLIS – A bill to ban state education officials from using the controversial Common Core standards and replace them with Indiana-based curriculum rules passed the House with bipartisan support on Thursday.
But the legislation no longer appears terribly relevant. The State Board of Education is already working on new standards that are in some parts similar to the Common Core but diverging in other areas.
“It is the right thing to do for Indiana,†said the bill’s sponsor, Rep. Jeff Thompson, R-Lizton. “It sets up the guidelines needed to move forward.â€
The bill requires new “college and career readiness standards†to be ready for the 2014-2015 school year. It also defines college and career readiness as standards that provide high school graduates with the “requisite knowledge and skill to transition without remediation to postsecondary education or training and ultimately into a sustainable career.â€
However, the bill doesn’t require testing on the new standards right away. That would be implemented the following year.
Democratic Rep. Kreg Battles, a teacher in Vincennes, said the bill is “setting kids up for failure†because it doesn’t include a pilot program to try out the standards and testing program.
“If you know anything about testing you do not give a test unless it has been piloted first,†Battles said. He had offered an amendment on Wednesday that would have added a pilot program to the bill but it was shot down.
Rep. Vernon Smith, D-Gary, said that the reason for the pilot would have been to insure that the teachers will not be “teaching one thing and testing another.â€
But Thompson said, “Nothing at all in this bill I can find that does not allow a department to do pilot testing.â€
Last year, lawmakers passed legislation to pause the implementation of Common Core, which is a set of standards originally written by officials from several states but adopted by the administration of President Barack Obama. Last year’s bill also called for lawmakers and state education officials to reconsider the State Board of Education’s adoption of the standards.
Now, the board is holding public hearings on a different set of standards, which members want to implement by the next school year.
Erika Brock is a reporter for TheStatehouseFile.com, a news website powered by Franklin College journalism students.
Â
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
The owners of a southern Indiana general store accused in a federal lawsuit of selling knockoff high-end Coach-brand products may not represent pro se their incorporated general store named in the suit.
New York-based Coach Inc. sued Dyer’s General Store and Outlet in Worthington, also naming its owners, Kimberly and David Dyer. The suit, filed three months ago, claims an investigator hired by Coach purchased a counterfeit wristlet bearing a Coach trademark at the store and observed handbags and accessories that “had trademarks for high-end brands including, but not limited to, Coach.â€
The suit seeks damages and fees for alleged Lanham Act violations including trademark counterfeiting, trademark infringement and false advertising; common law trademark infringement, unfair competition, forgery, counterfeiting and unjust enrichment.
“Coach is suffering irreparable injury, has suffered substantial damages as a result of Defendants’ activities,†the suit alleges. The case in the District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Terre Haute Division, is Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc. v. Dyer’s General Store and Outlet, Kimberly Dyer, and David L. Dyer, 2:13-cv-0411.
David Dyer filed a pro se response in which he said Dyer’s doesn’t deny the allegations but believed the products it bought and sold were “designer inspired†and that the store has since removed the items and worked with Coach “with the desire to resolve all concerns with promptness and diligence.â€
But District Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on Tuesday ordered the corporate entity to appear by counsel and file an answer to Coach’s complaint by March 13.
“The Court notes that corporations cannot appear pro se, but must appear through an attorney,†she wrote, citing Nocula v. UGS Corp., 520 F.3d 719, 725 (7th Cir. 2008). The Dyers may represent themselves, but “Dyer’s General cannot represent itself and the Dyers cannot represent Dyer’s General either.â€
Dyer’s is the latest Indiana retailer sued in federal court as Coach pursues an aggressive defense of its intellectual property, asserting in the suit that its marks “are widely recognized and exclusively associated by consumers, the public and the trade as being high quality products sourced from Coach, and have acquired a strong secondary meaning.â€
Since 2009, Coach has filed at least 21 lawsuits against retailers in Indiana federal courts. Just two, including the suit against Dyer’s, remain open.
STATEHOUSE — State Representative Ron Bacon (R-Chandler) has sponsored a piece of legislation to allow psychologists to testify in criminal courts as mental health witnesses. Senate Bill (SB) 88 passed the Indiana House of Representatives on 3rd reading today unanimously.
Under current law, a psychiatrist must be used in any criminal cases involving an insanity defense. SB 88 provides that in insanity hearings not involving a homicide, the court shall appoint two or three competent and disinterested:
* Psychiatrists;
* Psychologists endorsed by the State Psychology Board; or
* Physicians who have expertise in determining insanity, at least one of whom must be a psychiatrist or psychologist.
“The court system generally prefers a psychiatrist, however availability has become an issue,†said Rep. Bacon. “By allowing psychologists to do this work, we will make the judicial process more efficient and expeditious. This will also reduce local expenditures by reducing the amount of time a defendant, who utilizes an insanity defense, spends in jail while the court looks to appoint a psychiatrist.â€
In insanity hearings that do involve a homicide the court will have the same criterion by which to appoint mental health experts, however in this case, when appointing physicians who have expertise in determining insanity, at least one of them must be a psychiatrist and at least one of them must be a psychologist.
The bill will now go back to the Senate for concurrence because it was amended in the House.
-30-
Rep. Bacon (R-Chandler) represents portions of Warrick, Pike and Spencer counties.
IS IT TRUE today is the day that the $200,000 loan that Mayor Winnecke and the Loan Administration Board sneaked to Earthcare Energy LLC is due and payable in full?…the balance is now $186,000 and will be a welcome addition to the coffers of the City of Evansville?…there are some CCO Moles that have told us that the City of Evansville may still consider Earthcare Energy as a viable option for a manufacturing attraction project?…upon hearing that resurrecting this deal was in the cards we did a little research and learned that the website for Earthcare Energy LLC is no longer functional?…we also learned that Mr. Ken Haney, Steven Geldmacher, Ervin Washington and the crew that was well VETTED by City Councilwoman Stephanie Brinkerhoff-Riley back in 2012 has renamed the enterprise as ENVIRO ENERGY LLC?…we also saw that the website is the exact same website as the Earthcare Energy LLC site and still has the same news releases about meetings with the Department of Energy and an Indonesian business?…all of the articles about Evansville including the announcement that they were ready to start hiring 120 people are missing?
IS IT TRUE even some halfway intelligent people who are irrationally exuberant may get fooled once by failing to VET, but only a complete fool falls for the same trick twice?…it is time to collect this debt and put this money to some good use like a free dental clinic to serve Evansville’s poor?…the reaction of the Mayor and the Loan Administration Board at Monday’s 3:00 meeting will be very interesting to watch?…one would think that having handled snakes once and being bitten would be a sufficient lesson for one with even a shred of wisdom?
IS IT TRUE we were surprised to learn in our recent Freedom of Information Act request that the law firm that employs former Mayor Jonathan Weinzapfel has been cashing checks of over $900,000 per year since the Winnecke Administration occupied the Civic Center?…prior to Winnecke becoming mayor this law firm was billing the City of Evansville less than half of that amount?…we wonder why the business of this firm with the City of Evansville doubled right after the former Mayor became employed there?
IS IT TRUE that the City County Observer has presented the City of Evansville with a formal request to be included in future press releases sent out by the Mayor’s Media person?… the City County Observer shall be filing a formal complaint against the Mayor and his Media person with the Indiana Public Access Counselor for not complying with Public Access laws of Indiana on Monday of next week?…posted below is our formal requests to the City of Evansville concerning future news releases sent out by the city.
“For the remainder of 2014, the City County Observer requests that the City of Evansville please send it copies of any and all City of Evansville press and news releases, all City of Evansville Board meeting notices, all City of Evansville Commission meeting notices, and all Evansville Water & Sewer Utility meeting notices and related agendas for all such bodies. Please send such documents to this email address. Thank you.â€
IS IT TRUE that the leadership of the area’s “SmokeFree” group can’t get an appointment with the Mayor of Evansville until mid March?…the reason given was the Mayors schedule is full until that time?
IS IT TRUE we are wondering what the status is concerning Comp Time Bank Buy-Out option with members of the Evansville Fire Department?…the Evansville City Council had nothing to do with the city deciding not to fund Comp Time Bank Buy-Out option of the Police Department in 2014 …that the only cuts City Council made had to do with COLA increases, Capital Improvement project and not cuts in wages, employee benefits or overtime funding issues?
IS IT TRUE we would like to thank FOP President Larry Nelson for pointing out to the difference between FOP membership and members of the Evansville Police Department?…we have agreed to sit down with Mr. Nelson and do an in-depth interview concerning the many charitable acts the FOP does on behalf of this community? …once this article is published we know that our readers will be motivated to support the worthy charitable activities sponsored by the FOP?