SPONSORED BY DEFENSE ATTORNEY IVAN ARNAEZ.
DON’T GO TO COURT ALONE. CALL IVAN ARNAEZ @ 812-424-6671.
http://www.vanderburghsheriff.com/recent-booking-records.aspx
SPONSORED BY DEFENSE ATTORNEY IVAN ARNAEZ.
DON’T GO TO COURT ALONE. CALL IVAN ARNAEZ @ 812-424-6671.
http://www.vanderburghsheriff.com/recent-booking-records.aspx
Gavel Gamut
By Jim Redwine
GRAND JURIES
We have used our one day to give thanks and now begin the Advent Season during which some anticipate celebrating what they believe to have been a heavenly miracle. Others just hope for earthly miracles, such as the continuation of plunging gas prices and peace on earth to those of good will.
As for me, I began glancing wistfully toward the east when I spoke to a friend who had actually read last week’s column about Ferguson, Missouri. Even though my friend criticized the column claiming he could not tell where I came down on the issues, I was thrilled anyone cared where I came down.
Since last week we have added the New York City case of Eric Garner to that of Ferguson’s Michael Brown. Mr. Garner was a large African American man as was eighteen-year old Michael Brown. Several New York City police officers confronted Mr. Garner for allegedly selling unpackaged cigarettes on the street. Who knew this was such a harmful activity?
Mr. Garner took umbrage at the police action and was subdued with a chokehold from which he died.
A New York City grand jury did not indict Officer Daniel Pantelo who applied the chokehold. As with the Michael Brown grand jury, everyone who claimed to know anything about the Garner case, including Pantelo, testified.
The District Attorney, Dan Donovan, is asking the court to release the grand jury transcript as was done at the request of the Ferguson, Missouri prosecuting attorney, Robert McCulloch.
Both grand juries spent several months investigating the cases of the actions of white police officers confronting African American men.
My friend who quizzed me on my take of the Ferguson case concentrated on the motives and actions of Mr. McCulloch. He quoted the ‘oft repeated maxim that any prosecutor who wanted to do so could indict a ham sandwich. I heard CNN news anchor Chris Cuomo make the same statement on December 04, 2014 concerning Mr. Garner.
Such cynicism towards the legal system is of more concern to me than the results of and reactions to the Missouri and New York grand juries.
As a prosecuting attorney in Vanderburgh and Posey Counties and as Judge I have been involved in grand jury proceedings.
When I as prosecutor served as the legal advisor of a grand jury my charge to the jury was to do their best to charge those who committed crimes as long as the panelists were convinced beyond a reasonable doubt a particular crime had been committed by a particular person.
The standard for grand juries is probable cause. But if after a thorough review of the evidence, without the balance of a defense attorney and a neutral judge, six lay people are not firmly convinced of guilt, it is not only a waste of valuable and limited taxpayer resources, but also, unjust to indict.
Another legitimate function of a grand jury is to temper overzealousness by prosecuting attorneys. Sometimes as an individual a prosecutor may lose perspective and feel an urge to act precipitously to charge, or not charge. Six lay people, if fully informed, can help bring reason and focus to a matter charged with emotion.
Further, many times a case looks clear to a prosecutor based on a preliminary investigation but changes greatly when subjected to more extensive scrutiny.
This tempering of state power as exercised by a prosecuting attorney under political pressure was the original theory behind grand juries. That is, their job was not to be the puppet of an over-zealous individual but the handmaiden of justice.
See there, my friend, I do take positions.
By Hannah Troyer
TheStatehouseFile.com
COLUMBIA CITY, Ind. – Amanda Banks is not your typical stay-at-home mother.
Before Amanda and her husband, Sen. Jim Banks, R-Columbia City, had children, she loved working on public policy for various organizations. But, since her first daughter’s birth in 2009, her days have been less political.
Until now.
With her husband serving in Afghanistan until May 2015, Amanda Banks will be the interim senator for the district until his return – a first in Indiana history.
Jim Banks – who serves as a supply corpsman in his Navy Reserves unit – deployed to Afghanistan in September. The eight-month assignment is the senator’s first. He was commissioned as an officer in the Navy Reserves in 2012.
He was reelected unopposed on Nov. 4. Two weeks later, Banks took the oath via Skype from Afghanistan. But after the swearing-in ceremony, Banks submitted a leave of absence – triggering the Republican Party to convene a caucus of precinct committee officials to appoint an interim senator until his return in May.
On Thursday night, that group chose Amanda Banks – with her husband’s blessing.
“I am biased but I can’t think of anyone who could represent the district better.
Amanda is imminently qualified,†Banks said. “She has been around the legislative process and the district since I was elected in 2010. She knows the issues and she knows the leaders around District 17. More than anything else she is thoughtful about the issues and will work hard at serving the district well over the next six months.â€
Politics brought the Banks together 14 years ago. And so the idea that Amanda Banks would take her husband’s seat is no surprise to those who know their history.
The couple first met during a congressional campaign in 2000. Both had an interest in politics and were volunteering to aid the effort.
Jim Banks was the president of College Republicans at Indiana University – a national organization on college campuses looking to support and aid in the election process of Republican candidates. He encouraged his now-wife to get involved.
“Jim was the president and I became the vice president. We started spending a lot of time together,†Amanda Banks said. “We were working on political issues we were interested in. Our relationship went from friendship to finally dating after college.â€
Amanda Banks majored in public policy at IU where she graduated with honors with a bachelor’s of science in public affairs and a business certificate from the Kelley School of Business.
After graduation, she landed her “dream job.†She ventured off to Colorado Springs to work as a federal policy analyst for Focus on the Family – a Christian ministry centered on biblical marriages and child rearing.
Banks was the organization’s chief liaison to the U.S. Congress – advocating for traditional family values in the formation and adoption of federal policy. She analyzed, wrote and spoke about federal legislation for the organization’s print publications and news broadcasts and acted as its spokesperson.
“I really enjoyed the job. I used my degree to help advance pro-family legislation in congress, and I did that for four years,†Banks said.
During that time, the couple continued to date. But, after a year apart, Jim Banks made the move to Colorado to be closer to his future wife.
They married in 2005.
Eager to have children, the Banks returned to Indiana to be closer to family – ultimately settling in Columbia City in 2007. A few years later, Jim Banks decided to run for state Senate and was elected in 2010.
While Jim Banks has stayed involved with politics over the years, having kids changed Amanda Banks’ career.
Now, Amanda Banks’ days consist of dropping off and picking her kids up from preschool, making lunches, and interacting with her children. It’s the everyday life of most stay-at-home moms.
She said leaving her career in public policy was the right decision and one she was willing to make.
“I just want knew it was right for me,†Banks said. “It’s by far the hardest job I have ever had. To care for, nurture and raise three little girls is very challenging. I do have days were I think working outside the home would be wonderful. But, it is a privilege to stay home with them and be a primary influence.â€
So just as he did at IU, Jim Banks had to convince his wife to get involved in politics. Shortly after he got his deployment orders, the senator told her he did not want to leave the district without representation.
Sen. Banks told her he would submit a leave of absence upon reelection – with someone filling his place. He asked his wife to consider applying for the position.
Though Amanda Banks loved politics and did miss working outside the home, the initial discussion did not go as Jim Banks planned.
“I didn’t know what to think,†she said. “At first, I thought, ‘How could I?’ It would just be too hard. I just dismissed it. I was so consumed by emotions, I wasn’t ready to think about it.â€
In the coming months, Jim Banks continued to talk about the idea. And the more the couple talked, the more Amanda Banks began to see it as a great opportunity.
“What I came up with were potential benefits for me and the girls – for all of us while he’s away,†Amanda Banks said. “I have the opportunity to make a meaningful difference while he’s away. What better way to spend my time while he’s gone? It’s a unique opportunity. I have an interest in public policy and this is a chance for me to get back into my career and do something I care about.â€
Close friends and coworkers have no doubt Amanda Banks is the person for the job.
Cathie Humbarger, executive director of Allen County Right to Life met Amanda Banks 10 years ago during her Focus on the Family days. Humbarger interviewed her for a radio show. Since returning to Indiana, Amanda Banks helps Humbarger with the radio show and is now a co-host.
“It is hard to find anyone with more of a passion for the life issue than Amanda,†Humbarger said.
Amanda Banks has also been involved with various public policy, including serving as the vice president of Allen County Right to Life. She is co-host of “I Choose Life News and Views,†a weekly, pro-life radio program broadcasted on nine stations across Indiana.
In addition to her continued involvement with public policy, she believes she has a deep knowledge of the district because of her role as a senator’s wife.
“I have traveled the district with Jim and I know the issues and concerns of those who live there,†Amanda Banks said. “My stay-at-home wife, mom and military wife perspectives are unique and can be very good for the state. I think I have every reason to believe that I will enjoy working in the Senate and the opportunity to represent our community is an honor.â€
Andy Zay, the Huntington County Republican Party secretary, came to know the couple through political networking and events. He said the transition from husband to wife in the Senate seat will be smooth because of the couple’s similar political views.
“To know the Banks family and how they operate, they work as a team,†Zay said. “As for her values and serving in the Senate, I think you’re going to have very similar moral, political and value-based decision-making. Amanda may even be more conservative than Jim.â€
Amanda Banks already has an agenda along with a desire to have her voice heard. She would like to advance pro-life policy and hopes to replace her husband on the Senate Education Committee, an issue important to her because of her small children.
She would also replace her husband on the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee. She believes her role as a military wife would be a welcomed perspective and she hopes to help and support Hoosier military members and their families any way she can.
Amanda Banks plans to consult both her husband and other senators for advice and council, but Jim Banks said his wife wouldn’t need his help much.
“Amanda is smart and she is an independent thinker. She doesn’t need me to guide her necessarily,†Banks said. “As there are issues where we disagree at home, I’m sure there will be issues where we will disagree in the legislature. It will be fun for me to watch. “
The Banks’ “team†philosophy to conquer the everyday tasks of childrearing and work has shifted a bit since Jim Banks left in September.
Like anyone adjusting to life while a member is deployed, Amanda Banks admitted the first three weeks of her husband’s deployment felt like three months. “Adventure†is the word she hopes her family will come to use in the coming months to describe this chapter of life.
And she said her husband’s absence reminds her of his importance and contribution to the family.
“I miss him terribly. Caring for the girls is difficult without my teammate there,†Amanda Banks said. “This serves as a reminder that we weren’t meant to do parenting things alone, and I have great respect for those who do. It reminds me how God created males and females differently and how they bring different things to families. We miss Daddy, miss my husband, and we miss the man in our lives.â€
Amanda Banks said that while the experience is a challenge for her, she knows other military families are going through the same thing. She said the experience has given her a new perspective.
“I have gained such an appreciation for military families who do this all time. I feel lonely, but I know they are too,†Amanda Banks said. “Prior to Jim’s service, I had an appreciation for the military – a great respect. I just had no idea the sacrifice that they and their families make.â€
Banks knows her young daughters feel their dad’s absence as well. Her two oldest daughters, Lillian, 5, and Elizabeth, 3, both started preschool the same week their father left, which helped the family establish a weekly routine.
Her youngest daughter, Joann, 1, goes to the local YMCA two mornings a week so Banks has some time to herself to run errands, do chores or just take a few moments to breathe.
One of the most challenging things for Amanda Banks isn’t necessarily balancing a new schedule – it’s been explaining her husband’s deployment to her young daughters.
“Lillian understands that Daddy is gone for a long time and is appropriately emotional and expresses it,†Amanda Banks said. “Elizabeth doesn’t understand it. She asks frequently if Daddy is coming home today which is quite hard.â€
The family is able to see each other face-to-face sometimes. With about an eight hour time difference, this means Amanda Banks and the girls use Skype to call Jim Banks during their lunch time while he is getting ready for bed.
The family’s daily schedule will change when Amanda Banks comes to the Statehouse. The girls will be spending a lot more time with her mother during the day while she works.
Amanda Banks said balancing being both a mother and a senator will be a challenge, but said it is a challenge all women with children who decide to join the work force face.
Jim Banks agrees and said his wife can handle the day-to-day schedule of being a mother and senator. In fact, he said that may help her when it comes to relating to Hoosiers.
“The challenge for Amanda to balance life during the session is not unlike the challenge that any other legislator faces in striking the best balance with work, home, family, etc.,†her husband said. “We are fortunate to have a strong cast of family around us during this experience to help in many ways. I also believe that balance will make Amanda a better legislator in understanding the complicated and challenging lives that some Hoosiers face.â€
And she said taking her husband’s seat creates a “silver lining†in his deployment.
“This is an opportunity for me to do something meaningful and do something for my own community and represent the people†while her husband is away, Banks said. “To take on a leadership role is a wonderful opportunity.
“The best advice I have for significant others going through a deployment is to look for something meaningful to put yourself into. For me, it’s pursing the Senate seat.â€
Hannah Troyer is a reporter for TheStatehouseFile.com, a news website powered by Franklin College journalism students.
The Indiana Supreme Court noted Thursday that the parties and both of the previous courts involved in an adoption matter were partly correct in their analyses as to where the petitions needed to be filed. But the Lake Superior Court, Civil Division should have transferred the petitions from its court to the juvenile division, where a local rule requires adoption petitions to be filed.
N.E. sought to adopt her cousins, J.T.D. and J.S. She filed her petitions in 2013 in Lake Superior Court 2, part of the court’s civil division. Statute divides Lake Superior Court into four divisions and says that the civil division includes probate. But Lake County’s Caseload Allocation Plan indicates that the adoption of minors should be exclusively filed in the juvenile division.
The Department of Child Services moved to intervene and asked that the adoptions be transferred to the juvenile division. Lake Superior Judge Calvin D. Hawkins denied the motion, saying local rules do not trump statute. The judge believed the case could be filed in his court. He then certified the order for interlocutory appeal.
The Court of Appeals affirmed, but in In the Matter of the Adoption of Minor Children: J.T.D. and J.S.: Ind. Dept. of Child Services v. N.E., 45S03-1406-AD-387, the justices pointed out that the local rule doesn’t impermissibly expand jurisdiction beyond statutory bounds, it simply prescribes venue. Like all local rules, it is binding on the courts and litigants, Chief Justice Loretta Rush wrote.
“The parties and both of the previous courts were all partly correct in their analyses. The trial court was correct that it did have subject matter jurisdiction over adoptions and that the Caseload Allocation Plan was a matter of venue and not jurisdiction. Yet DCS was correct that the trial court was bound by the Caseload Allocation Plan and therefore obligated to transfer the adoption to the Juvenile Division,†Rush wrote. “Because nothing in Indiana Code chapter 33-33-45 restricts the probate jurisdiction of any of the Lake Superior Court’s divisions, each division — including the Juvenile Division — is imbued with the same jurisdiction as the court at-large. Therefore, even though the Caseload Allocation Plan’s provisions establish only venue and not jurisdiction, they are binding on the court and litigants. Lake County was free to adopt a Caseload Allocation Plan establishing exclusive venue for adoptions in the Juvenile Division as a matter of administrative convenience and efficiency, and that Rule is binding on the court and litigants.â€
STATEHOUSE – House Speaker Brian C. Bosma (R-Indianapolis) announced standing committee assignments for the 119th General Assembly. Standing committee assignments are made biennially after each election.
State Representative Holli Sullivan (R-Evansville) has been appointed to the Ways and Means and Roads and Transportation Committees.
“The most important job of the Ways and Means committee is to craft the state’s biennial budget,†said Rep. Sullivan. “Having the opportunity to help craft this essential piece of legislation and provide a perspective from southwest Indiana is an honor.â€
Standing committees are an integral part of the legislative process. Committees with specific expertise receive public testimony and work out the details of proposed legislation before it is heard on the House floor.
“I am confident in the abilities of each of these leaders, and I know they are all eager to begin their work,†said Speaker Bosma.
To view the committee assignments please visit: http://www.in.gov/legislative/house_republicans/newsroom/2015/2015committeeassignments.pdf
-30-
Democrats cheered when Senator Barack Obama promised them that if he were elected President, no lobbyists would “work on regulations or contracts directly and substantially related to their prior employer for two years.â€
On his first day in office, President Obama propagandized this campaign deceit with a press conference broadcasting him signing an executive order to that effect.
Back in the Oval Office, President Obama’s team devised a scheme to circumvent this “promise.†That scheme became “The Waiver.â€
Americans were promised that presumably unscrupulous, untrustworthy and despicable lobbyists would be banned from influencing policy under Obama.
What most Americans don’t know is that Obama shrewdly broke his promise to them on just his third day in office by appointing William Lynn, a former lobbyist for Defense contractor Raytheon, to Deputy Secretary of Defense.
This is not just some little government job. This is a major position.
Obama justified this with a “waiver†that says, well, this guy is an exception. He’s really smart, so just this once, okay?
Within one year in office, he appointed not only three Cabinet Secretaries and the Director of Intelligence who were all lobbyists, but over 30 lobbyists as political appointees.
By the end of 2013, over 50 Obama appointees were former lobbyists.
That’s quite a few waivers. Some didn’t even have waivers to get the job. Being a Democrat seems to help quite a bit.
Have you noticed the silence from liberals on this extraordinary violation of trust they extended him?
His reported preference for John Ashton as Secretary of Defense should be no surprise, as his employment record fits Obama’s mold for appointing high-dollar lobbyists to important cabinet positions.
Remember, the disgraced Eric Holder was a lobbyist at Covington and Burling, whose client list includes legal, defense and civil servant organizations.
Mr. Ashton has an impressive resume: bachelor’s degrees in physics from Yale, where he graduated Summa Cum Laude and Phi Beta Kappa, a Rhodes Scholar doctorate in theoretical physics at Oxford where he also taught physics. He’s worked on defense matters with Democrats and Republicans from Clinton to Bush.
Mr. Ashton is certainly a qualified and bipartisan choice for Secretary of Defense, but his selection is another blatant Obama corruption of his promise to voters.
If a Republican who made the same promise as Obama were in the White House, every mainstream news program, online news site and Sunday news show would be splattered with partisan outrage that this President just cannot keep such an important promise as keeping lobbyists out of the administration.
Why?
The Washington Times writes:
“Mr. Carter received almost as much money from defense consulting work as he did from Harvard University before he joined the Obama Administration in 2009…â€
According to the waiver, he ‘provided specific business advice’ on a weapons system called the Sensor Fused Weapon. The last year of Defense funding for the weapon system was in fiscal 2007.
In 2011, a White House spokeswoman said Mr. Carter would be recused from two years from participating in matters involving Harvard because he resigned his tenured position there in 2011.â€
There is a photo from 2008 in which Barack Obama, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi promised “the most ethical†administration and Congress in history while standing at a podium in front of a gigantic poster that reads, “Honest Leadership. Open Government†that is now priceless as a laugh-out-loud, self-mocking satirical commentary on what has become one of the most corrupt and unethical presidencies in history.
This Ashton incident is really just a small example of President Obama’s audacity of smoke and insincerity.
——-
© Copyright 2014 Rick Jensen, distributed exclusively by Cagle Cartoons newspaper syndicate.
SPONSORED BY DEFENSE ATTORNEY IVAN ARNAEZ.
DON’T GO TO COURT ALONE. CALL IVAN ARNAEZ @ 812-424-6671.
http://www.vanderburghsheriff.com/recent-booking-records.aspx
SPONSORED BY DEFENSE ATTORNEY IVAN ARNAEZ.
DON’T GO TO COURT ALONE. CALL IVAN ARNAEZ @ 812-424-6671.
SPONSORED BY DEFENSE ATTORNEY IVAN ARNAEZ.
DON’T GO TO COURT ALONE. CALL IVAN ARNAEZ @ 812-424-6671.
Below is a list of felony cases that were filed by the Vanderburgh County Prosecutor’s Office on Wednesday, December 03, 2014
Aaron Carnahan             Operating a Vehicle as an Habitual Traffic Violator-Level 6 Felony
Quentin Carter               Operating a Motor Vehicle after Forfeiture of License for Life-Level 5 Felon
Resisting Law Enforcement-Class A Misdemeanor
Terry Johnson              Battery Against a Public Safety Official-Level 5 Felony
Intimidation-Level 6 Felony
Resisting Law Enforcement-Class A Misdemeanor
Disorderly Conduct-Class B Misdemeanor
Lsheila Lewis               Battery Against a Public Safety Official-Level 5 Felony
Resisting Law Enforcement-Class A Misdemeanor
Daniel Rodriguez       Battery Against a Public Safety Official-Level 5 Felony
Resisting Law Enforcement-Class A Misdemeanor
Katrina Sartore             Domestic Battery-Level 6 Felony
Lindsay Cargill             Possession of Methamphetamine-Level 6 Felony
Possession of Paraphernalia-Class A Misdemeanor
Possession of a Synthetic Drug or Synthetic Drug Lookalike Substance-Class A
Misdemeanor
Kent Dougan                Possession of Methamphetamine-Level 6 Felony
Possession of Paraphernalia-Class A Misdemeanor
Operating a Vehicle While Intoxicated Endangering a Person-Class A
Misdemeanor
Operating a Vehicle While Intoxicated-Class C Misdemeanor
Walter Ellis                 Domestic Battery-Level 6 Felony
Shannon Fisher         Intimidation-Level 6 Felony
Intimidation-Class A Misdemeanor
Domestic Battery-Class A Misdemeanor
William Gonzalez        Operating a Vehicle as an Habitual Traffic Violator-Level 6 Felony
Chevette Hilliard          Operating a Vehicle as an Habitual Traffic Violator-Level 6 Felony
False Informing-Class B Misdemeanor
Mark Long                     Operating a Vehicle with an ACE of .15 or More-Level 6 Felony
Jose Lopez                   Criminal Recklessness-Level 6 Felony
Criminal Mischief-Class B Misdemeanors (Four Counts)
Kevin Marshall           Attempted Burglary-Level 5 Felony
Donald Sallee            Possession of Methamphetamine-Level 6 Felony
Possession of Paraphernalia-Class A Misdemeanor
Possession of Marijuana-Class A Misdemeanor
Eric Schnautz             Battery Against a Public Safety Official-Level 5 Felony
Attempted Battery by Bodily Waste-Class B Misdemeanor
Roger Taylor                 Possession of Methamphetamine-Level 6 Felony
Possession of Paraphernalia-Class A Misdemeanor
Possession of a Synthetic Drug or Synthetic Drug Lookalike Substance-Class A
Misdemeanor
Blanche Welman    Prostitution-Level 6 Felony
For further information on the cases listed above, or any pending case, please contact Kyle Phernetton at 812.435.5688 or via e-mail at kphernetton@vanderburghgov.org
Under Indiana law, all criminal defendants are presumed to be innocent until proven guilty by a court of law.
By Lesley Weidenbener
TheStatehouseFile.com
INDIANAPOLIS – Indiana will join 16 states in a lawsuit challenging President Barack Obama’s new immigration policies.
The suit – spearheaded by Texas – asks a judge to declare the president’s executive order unconstitutional because it’s a policy change that did not receive congressional approval.
Pence will use outside attorneys to handle the lawsuit and any legal costs will be covered by the governor’s office, not the attorney general.
“While reasonable people can differ on ways to improve our nation’s broken immigration system, the president’s unilateral action was an unacceptable end run around the democratic process and joining other states in pursuing legal recourse to challenge this action is the right thing to do,†Pence said in a statement.
He said the suit is “not about immigration.â€
“It is about denying states such as ours the opportunity to be represented in policy-making through our elected members of Congress,†he said.
Pence had been informally discussing a possible suit with Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller since the president last month issued his executive order, which provides deportation relief to about 5 million immigrants in the country illegally.
On Wednesday, Pence sent Zoeller a letter “formally directing you to use any and all legal means necessary to represent the state of Indiana as a plaintiff in the suit being filed by the state of Texas today.â€
“I firmly believe that the president, by his own previous admissions, has overstepped his executive authority by circumventing Congress, thereby preventing Indiana’s elected representatives from participating in the debate on this important issue and eliminating the state of Indiana’s voice in the matter,†Pence wrote.
But instead, the attorney general authorized the governor to hire attorneys Peter Rusthoven and Joe Chapelle from the Indianapolis-based firm Barnes and Thornburg to represent the state. Kara Brooks, a spokeswoman for Pence, said there’s “no way to estimate the cost of any litigation at the outset.â€
Zoeller was not available for comment about the lawsuit and earlier declined a request for an interview about immigration. But the Republican said in a memo to the governor that he shares concerns about Obama’s actions and will continue to work with a bipartisan group of attorneys general to urge Congress to step into the debate.
Obama has repeatedly defended his actions, saying in an editorial piece on Tuesday that he still believes “the best way to solve this problem is by working together with both parties to pass that kind of bipartisan law.â€
“But until that happens, there are actions I have the legal authority to take as president – the same kinds of actions taken by Democratic and Republican presidents before me – that will help make our immigration system more fair and more just,†he wrote.
And he told disgruntled federal lawmakers to pass a bill.
“The day I sign an immigration reform bill into law, the actions I’ve taken to help solve this problem will no longer be necessary,†Obama said.
Indiana joins a number of southern and Midwestern states in the lawsuit, which Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott filed Wednesday in federal court. Abbott said in a statement that Obama’s executive action “tramples†on federal law and the U.S. Constitution’s Take Care Clause, which limits the president’s power and to executing laws passed by Congress.
Abbott also said the federal Department of Homeland Security issued the new immigration policies without following federal rulemaking guidelines.
The case was filed in the Southern District of Texas. The multistate coalition includes Alabama, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, North Carolina, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia and Wisconsin.
Lesley Weidenbener is executive editor of TheStatehouseFile.com, a news website powered by Franklin College journalism students.