Home Blog Page 6221

MEMORANDUMS FROM CITY OF EVANSVILLE POLICE BRASS CONCERNING POSSIBLE FINANCIAL SHORTFALL ADJUSTMENTS

18

The following two memorandums were given to the CCO by confidential sources.  Posted below are two memorandums for you to read and draw your own conclusions if indeed the City of Evansville is experiencing current budget challenges.  Our confidential sources also tell us that the Evansville Fire Department is also facing budget issues.

MEMORANDUM NUMBER # 1

DECEMBER 5, 2014

TO: ALL SWORN PERSONNEL

SUBJECT: VEHICLE ASSESSMENT FOR PERSONALLY ASSIGNED VEHICLES

Due to the continuing high costs to provide and maintain a take home / personally assigned police vehicle fleet for EPD Officers, the fuel assessment fee will increase beginning in January of 2015.

Every officer will complete and turn in a “Vehicle Assessment Form”, either denoting the authorization to have a fee deducted from their paycheck or noting that they do not have a personally assigned vehicle. The “Vehicle Assessment Form” can be found in the EPD Documents folder.

The “Vehicle Assessment Form” must be turned in by December 17, 2014 to either Captain Chandler or Captain Cox.

Each officer choosing to receive a take-home/personally assigned vehicle will sign a payroll deduction card that allows the Controller’s Office to deduct the fee from each paycheck.

The vehicle assessment fees are as follows:

$20.00 per paycheck ($520.00/annually) for those officers living within the Evansville city limits.

$38.00 per paycheck ($988.00) for those officers living outside of the city limits of Evansville.

Officers who choose not to sign the payroll deduction card or have not completed it by the deadline will forfeit the use of their personally assigned vehicle as a take-home vehicle.

This administration feels strongly in the value of the personally assigned vehicle policy.  It is our hope that these changes will allow us to continue the personally assigned vehicle policy.

All officers are asked to implement wise fuel-saving practices, including not running vehicles when unoccupied (except K-9 vehicles) and no excessive idling of vehicles.

BY DIRECTION OF,

BILLY BOLIN,

CHIEF OF POLICE

MEMO NUMBER #2 From Capt. S Clark  Concerning Year Of the End Police Budget Issues.

Officers,

As most of you are aware we had to temporarily stop our oil changes and repairs at Muensterman’s due to end of year budget issues.   We now have money in place to begin necessary repairs on vehicles as mechanical issues occur.  We ask that you still hold off on routine oil changes until January.  If you have a mechanical issue, we definitely need to be made aware of them through work orders and we will fix as many of these issues as possible.
We fully anticipate being able to go back to normal vehicle operations and maintenance just after the first of the year.   Thanks to everyone for your patience while we get through the end of the year.

Capt. S. Cox

POSTED BY THE CITY COUNTY OBSERVER WITHOUT OPINON, BIAS OR EDITING

Copyright 2014 City County Observer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

IS IT TRUE “Weekend Hotel Blues”

53

IS IT TRUE the reality of maxing out the credit card must have reached out an smacked the Winnecke Administration right upside the head this week?…the Saturday confession that there are some serious financing issues going on in the preparation to fund the City of Evansville’s part of the downtown convention hotel and the IU Medical School?…we cannot emphasize just how much this confession to the public must have rankled the stomachs of the people who have been willing to mortgage the future for a few pieces of brick and mortar jewelry to enjoy martinis in?…even the bond council is warning the City that the revenue streams that are slated to pay for these playthings will be stretched to the limit to service the $77 Million of debt?…no prudent manager would go forward with a warning that if things do not go perfectly for the next 20 years that financial disaster is looming?…we assure our readers that things will not go perfectly for even a year, much less for the 20 years the debt will have to be serviced?

IS IT TRUE the most revealing part of the confession is that “Old National Giveth, and Old National Taketh Away”?…in an unanticipated and unplanned for punch to the revenue stream, Old National Bank has successfully challenged the assessment on their downtown headquarters and have been granted a $1 Million per year reduction in their property tax bill?…this translates into exactly $1 Million per year that will not be available to the TIF district that is being counted on to pay the notes on downtown debt?…ONB was hailed as a model corporate citizen for agreeing to pay $14 Million for the worthless naming rights for the Centre?…that is of course deductible as a marketing expense the way the naming rights deal was structured?…after taxes this $14 Million may actually cost ONB $8 Million in the event that they actually write the check?…the million dollar reduction in property taxes is essentially perpetual and at today’s interest rates is worth just over $30 Million?…that is a pretty darn good trade on the part of ONB?…we would like an offer of roughly 300% return on any cash investment out there? …every taxpayer in downtown Evansville now knows that ONB has gotten a tax reduction of over 50% and are doubtlessly considering challenging their own assessments?…a mass assessment challenge that succeeds is the death spiral for downtown public projects and if a 50% reduction is good for ONB it is good for nearly every building in Downtown Evansville?

IS IT TRUE the other confession is that in the best of circumstances the hotel will feed $600,000 per year into the fund that will be used to pay off the $20 Million in bonds that have been approved by the City Council to gift to the developer?…at the 7% interest rate that the City Council has approved the interest on the debt will be $1.4 Million per year?…even if they somehow get a deal on what will be junk municipal bonds at 5% the annual interest payments will be $1 Million?…the reality is that this deal given the whole confessions of the day has turned into a very bad deal for the people of Evansville and at least two members of the City Council (Friend and O’Daniel) have been warning the Winnecke Administration about these risks for over a year?…we are about to find out if we have a Council with a brain and a spine?…watching this deal unfold will define next years election and the next 30 years of the financial prospects for the City of Evansville?

Copyright 2014 City County Observer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Open Forum Weekend December 6-7 Concerning Revenue Bonds

3

What is your opinion concerning the reality of the Winnecke Administration is in danger of maxing out the taxpayers credit card (revenue bonds) as reported by local media this week?

EPD Activity Report December 6, 2014

0

SPONSORED BY DEFENSE ATTORNEY IVAN ARNAEZ.
DON’T GO TO COURT ALONE. CALL IVAN ARNAEZ @ 812-424-6671.

EPD Activity REPORT

Vanderburgh County Recent Booking Records

0

SPONSORED BY DEFENSE ATTORNEY IVAN ARNAEZ.
DON’T GO TO COURT ALONE. CALL IVAN ARNAEZ @ 812-424-6671.

http://www.vanderburghsheriff.com/recent-booking-records.aspx

GRAND JURIES by Jim Redwine

0

Gavel Gamut

By Jim Redwine

GRAND JURIES

We have used our one day to give thanks and now begin the Advent Season during which some anticipate celebrating what they believe to have been a heavenly miracle. Others just hope for earthly miracles, such as the continuation of plunging gas prices and peace on earth to those of good will.

As for me, I began glancing wistfully toward the east when I spoke to a friend who had actually read last week’s column about Ferguson, Missouri. Even though my friend criticized the column claiming he could not tell where I came down on the issues, I was thrilled anyone cared where I came down.

Since last week we have added the New York City case of Eric Garner to that of Ferguson’s Michael Brown. Mr. Garner was a large African American man as was eighteen-year old Michael Brown. Several New York City police officers confronted Mr. Garner for allegedly selling unpackaged cigarettes on the street. Who knew this was such a harmful activity?

Mr. Garner took umbrage at the police action and was subdued with a chokehold from which he died.

A New York City grand jury did not indict Officer Daniel Pantelo who applied the chokehold. As with the Michael Brown grand jury, everyone who claimed to know anything about the Garner case, including Pantelo, testified.

The District Attorney, Dan Donovan, is asking the court to release the grand jury transcript as was done at the request of the Ferguson, Missouri prosecuting attorney, Robert McCulloch.

Both grand juries spent several months investigating the cases of the actions of white police officers confronting African American men.

My friend who quizzed me on my take of the Ferguson case concentrated on the motives and actions of Mr. McCulloch. He quoted the ‘oft repeated maxim that any prosecutor who wanted to do so could indict a ham sandwich. I heard CNN news anchor Chris Cuomo make the same statement on December 04, 2014 concerning Mr. Garner.

Such cynicism towards the legal system is of more concern to me than the results of and reactions to the Missouri and New York grand juries.

As a prosecuting attorney in Vanderburgh and Posey Counties and as Judge I have been involved in grand jury proceedings.

When I as prosecutor served as the legal advisor of a grand jury my charge to the jury was to do their best to charge those who committed crimes as long as the panelists were convinced beyond a reasonable doubt a particular crime had been committed by a particular person.

The standard for grand juries is probable cause. But if after a thorough review of the evidence, without the balance of a defense attorney and a neutral judge, six lay people are not firmly convinced of guilt, it is not only a waste of valuable and limited taxpayer resources, but also, unjust to indict.

Another legitimate function of a grand jury is to temper overzealousness by prosecuting attorneys. Sometimes as an individual a prosecutor may lose perspective and feel an urge to act precipitously to charge, or not charge. Six lay people, if fully informed, can help bring reason and focus to a matter charged with emotion.

Further, many times a case looks clear to a prosecutor based on a preliminary investigation but changes greatly when subjected to more extensive scrutiny.

This tempering of state power as exercised by a prosecuting attorney under political pressure was the original theory behind grand juries. That is, their job was not to be the puppet of an over-zealous individual but the handmaiden of justice.

See there, my friend, I do take positions.

Amanda Banks jumps back into politics, takes her husband’s Senate seat – temporarily

1

By Hannah Troyer
TheStatehouseFile.com

COLUMBIA CITY, Ind. – Amanda Banks is not your typical stay-at-home mother.

Before Amanda and her husband, Sen. Jim Banks, R-Columbia City, had children, she loved working on public policy for various organizations. But, since her first daughter’s birth in 2009, her days have been less political.

Until now.

With her husband serving in Afghanistan until May 2015, Amanda Banks will be the interim senator for the district until his return – a first in Indiana history.

Jim Banks – who serves as a supply corpsman in his Navy Reserves unit – deployed to Afghanistan in September. The eight-month assignment is the senator’s first. He was commissioned as an officer in the Navy Reserves in 2012.

He was reelected unopposed on Nov. 4. Two weeks later, Banks took the oath via Skype from Afghanistan. But after the swearing-in ceremony, Banks submitted a leave of absence – triggering the Republican Party to convene a caucus of precinct committee officials to appoint an interim senator until his return in May.

On Thursday night, that group chose Amanda Banks – with her husband’s blessing.

“I am biased but I can’t think of anyone who could represent the district better.

Amanda is imminently qualified,” Banks said. “She has been around the legislative process and the district since I was elected in 2010. She knows the issues and she knows the leaders around District 17. More than anything else she is thoughtful about the issues and will work hard at serving the district well over the next six months.”

Politics brought the Banks together 14 years ago. And so the idea that Amanda Banks would take her husband’s seat is no surprise to those who know their history.

The couple first met during a congressional campaign in 2000. Both had an interest in politics and were volunteering to aid the effort.

Jim Banks was the president of College Republicans at Indiana University – a national organization on college campuses looking to support and aid in the election process of Republican candidates. He encouraged his now-wife to get involved.

“Jim was the president and I became the vice president. We started spending a lot of time together,” Amanda Banks said. “We were working on political issues we were interested in. Our relationship went from friendship to finally dating after college.”

Amanda Banks majored in public policy at IU where she graduated with honors with a bachelor’s of science in public affairs and a business certificate from the Kelley School of Business.

After graduation, she landed her “dream job.” She ventured off to Colorado Springs to work as a federal policy analyst for Focus on the Family – a Christian ministry centered on biblical marriages and child rearing.

Banks was the organization’s chief liaison to the U.S. Congress – advocating for traditional family values in the formation and adoption of federal policy. She analyzed, wrote and spoke about federal legislation for the organization’s print publications and news broadcasts and acted as its spokesperson.

“I really enjoyed the job. I used my degree to help advance pro-family legislation in congress, and I did that for four years,” Banks said.

During that time, the couple continued to date. But, after a year apart, Jim Banks made the move to Colorado to be closer to his future wife.

They married in 2005.

Eager to have children, the Banks returned to Indiana to be closer to family – ultimately settling in Columbia City in 2007. A few years later, Jim Banks decided to run for state Senate and was elected in 2010.

While Jim Banks has stayed involved with politics over the years, having kids changed Amanda Banks’ career.

Now, Amanda Banks’ days consist of dropping off and picking her kids up from preschool, making lunches, and interacting with her children. It’s the everyday life of most stay-at-home moms.

She said leaving her career in public policy was the right decision and one she was willing to make.

“I just want knew it was right for me,” Banks said. “It’s by far the hardest job I have ever had. To care for, nurture and raise three little girls is very challenging. I do have days were I think working outside the home would be wonderful. But, it is a privilege to stay home with them and be a primary influence.”

So just as he did at IU, Jim Banks had to convince his wife to get involved in politics. Shortly after he got his deployment orders, the senator told her he did not want to leave the district without representation.

Sen. Banks told her he would submit a leave of absence upon reelection – with someone filling his place. He asked his wife to consider applying for the position.

Though Amanda Banks loved politics and did miss working outside the home, the initial discussion did not go as Jim Banks planned.

“I didn’t know what to think,” she said. “At first, I thought, ‘How could I?’ It would just be too hard. I just dismissed it. I was so consumed by emotions, I wasn’t ready to think about it.”

In the coming months, Jim Banks continued to talk about the idea. And the more the couple talked, the more Amanda Banks began to see it as a great opportunity.

“What I came up with were potential benefits for me and the girls – for all of us while he’s away,” Amanda Banks said. “I have the opportunity to make a meaningful difference while he’s away. What better way to spend my time while he’s gone? It’s a unique opportunity. I have an interest in public policy and this is a chance for me to get back into my career and do something I care about.”

Close friends and coworkers have no doubt Amanda Banks is the person for the job.

Cathie Humbarger, executive director of Allen County Right to Life met Amanda Banks 10 years ago during her Focus on the Family days. Humbarger interviewed her for a radio show. Since returning to Indiana, Amanda Banks helps Humbarger with the radio show and is now a co-host.

“It is hard to find anyone with more of a passion for the life issue than Amanda,” Humbarger said.

Amanda Banks has also been involved with various public policy, including serving as the vice president of Allen County Right to Life. She is co-host of “I Choose Life News and Views,” a weekly, pro-life radio program broadcasted on nine stations across Indiana.

In addition to her continued involvement with public policy, she believes she has a deep knowledge of the district because of her role as a senator’s wife.

“I have traveled the district with Jim and I know the issues and concerns of those who live there,” Amanda Banks said. “My stay-at-home wife, mom and military wife perspectives are unique and can be very good for the state. I think I have every reason to believe that I will enjoy working in the Senate and the opportunity to represent our community is an honor.”

Andy Zay, the Huntington County Republican Party secretary, came to know the couple through political networking and events. He said the transition from husband to wife in the Senate seat will be smooth because of the couple’s similar political views.

“To know the Banks family and how they operate, they work as a team,” Zay said. “As for her values and serving in the Senate, I think you’re going to have very similar moral, political and value-based decision-making. Amanda may even be more conservative than Jim.”

Amanda Banks already has an agenda along with a desire to have her voice heard. She would like to advance pro-life policy and hopes to replace her husband on the Senate Education Committee, an issue important to her because of her small children.

She would also replace her husband on the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee. She believes her role as a military wife would be a welcomed perspective and she hopes to help and support Hoosier military members and their families any way she can.

Amanda Banks plans to consult both her husband and other senators for advice and council, but Jim Banks said his wife wouldn’t need his help much.

“Amanda is smart and she is an independent thinker. She doesn’t need me to guide her necessarily,” Banks said. “As there are issues where we disagree at home, I’m sure there will be issues where we will disagree in the legislature. It will be fun for me to watch. “

The Banks’ “team” philosophy to conquer the everyday tasks of childrearing and work has shifted a bit since Jim Banks left in September.

Like anyone adjusting to life while a member is deployed, Amanda Banks admitted the first three weeks of her husband’s deployment felt like three months. “Adventure” is the word she hopes her family will come to use in the coming months to describe this chapter of life.

And she said her husband’s absence reminds her of his importance and contribution to the family.

“I miss him terribly. Caring for the girls is difficult without my teammate there,” Amanda Banks said. “This serves as a reminder that we weren’t meant to do parenting things alone, and I have great respect for those who do. It reminds me how God created males and females differently and how they bring different things to families. We miss Daddy, miss my husband, and we miss the man in our lives.”

Amanda Banks said that while the experience is a challenge for her, she knows other military families are going through the same thing. She said the experience has given her a new perspective.

“I have gained such an appreciation for military families who do this all time. I feel lonely, but I know they are too,” Amanda Banks said. “Prior to Jim’s service, I had an appreciation for the military – a great respect. I just had no idea the sacrifice that they and their families make.”

Banks knows her young daughters feel their dad’s absence as well. Her two oldest daughters, Lillian, 5, and Elizabeth, 3, both started preschool the same week their father left, which helped the family establish a weekly routine.

Her youngest daughter, Joann, 1, goes to the local YMCA two mornings a week so Banks has some time to herself to run errands, do chores or just take a few moments to breathe.

One of the most challenging things for Amanda Banks isn’t necessarily balancing a new schedule – it’s been explaining her husband’s deployment to her young daughters.

“Lillian understands that Daddy is gone for a long time and is appropriately emotional and expresses it,” Amanda Banks said. “Elizabeth doesn’t understand it. She asks frequently if Daddy is coming home today which is quite hard.”

The family is able to see each other face-to-face sometimes. With about an eight hour time difference, this means Amanda Banks and the girls use Skype to call Jim Banks during their lunch time while he is getting ready for bed.

The family’s daily schedule will change when Amanda Banks comes to the Statehouse. The girls will be spending a lot more time with her mother during the day while she works.

Amanda Banks said balancing being both a mother and a senator will be a challenge, but said it is a challenge all women with children who decide to join the work force face.

Jim Banks agrees and said his wife can handle the day-to-day schedule of being a mother and senator. In fact, he said that may help her when it comes to relating to Hoosiers.

“The challenge for Amanda to balance life during the session is not unlike the challenge that any other legislator faces in striking the best balance with work, home, family, etc.,” her husband said. “We are fortunate to have a strong cast of family around us during this experience to help in many ways. I also believe that balance will make Amanda a better legislator in understanding the complicated and challenging lives that some Hoosiers face.”

And she said taking her husband’s seat creates a “silver lining” in his deployment.

“This is an opportunity for me to do something meaningful and do something for my own community and represent the people” while her husband is away, Banks said. “To take on a leadership role is a wonderful opportunity.

“The best advice I have for significant others going through a deployment is to look for something meaningful to put yourself into. For me, it’s pursing the Senate seat.”

Hannah Troyer is a reporter for TheStatehouseFile.com, a news website powered by Franklin College journalism students.

Justices order adoption petitions moved to juvenile division based on local rule

0

The Indiana Supreme Court noted Thursday that the parties and both of the previous courts involved in an adoption matter were partly correct in their analyses as to where the petitions needed to be filed. But the Lake Superior Court, Civil Division should have transferred the petitions from its court to the juvenile division, where a local rule requires adoption petitions to be filed.

N.E. sought to adopt her cousins, J.T.D. and J.S. She filed her petitions in 2013 in Lake Superior Court 2, part of the court’s civil division. Statute divides Lake Superior Court into four divisions and says that the civil division includes probate. But Lake County’s Caseload Allocation Plan indicates that the adoption of minors should be exclusively filed in the juvenile division.

The Department of Child Services moved to intervene and asked that the adoptions be transferred to the juvenile division. Lake Superior Judge Calvin D. Hawkins denied the motion, saying local rules do not trump statute. The judge believed the case could be filed in his court. He then certified the order for interlocutory appeal.

The Court of Appeals affirmed, but in In the Matter of the Adoption of Minor Children: J.T.D. and J.S.: Ind. Dept. of Child Services v. N.E., 45S03-1406-AD-387, the justices pointed out that the local rule doesn’t impermissibly expand jurisdiction beyond statutory bounds, it simply prescribes venue. Like all local rules, it is binding on the courts and litigants, Chief Justice Loretta Rush wrote.

“The parties and both of the previous courts were all partly correct in their analyses. The trial court was correct that it did have subject matter jurisdiction over adoptions and that the Caseload Allocation Plan was a matter of venue and not jurisdiction. Yet DCS was correct that the trial court was bound by the Caseload Allocation Plan and therefore obligated to transfer the adoption to the Juvenile Division,” Rush wrote. “Because nothing in Indiana Code chapter 33-33-45 restricts the probate jurisdiction of any of the Lake Superior Court’s divisions, each division — including the Juvenile Division — is imbued with the same jurisdiction as the court at-large. Therefore, even though the Caseload Allocation Plan’s provisions establish only venue and not jurisdiction, they are binding on the court and litigants. Lake County was free to adopt a Caseload Allocation Plan establishing exclusive venue for adoptions in the Juvenile Division as a matter of administrative convenience and efficiency, and that Rule is binding on the court and litigants.”

Rep. Sullivan Eager To Serve

1

STATEHOUSE – House Speaker Brian C. Bosma (R-Indianapolis) announced standing committee assignments for the 119th General Assembly. Standing committee assignments are made biennially after each election.

State Representative Holli Sullivan (R-Evansville) has been appointed to the Ways and Means and Roads and Transportation Committees.

“The most important job of the Ways and Means committee is to craft the state’s biennial budget,” said Rep. Sullivan. “Having the opportunity to help craft this essential piece of legislation and provide a perspective from southwest Indiana is an honor.”

Standing committees are an integral part of the legislative process. Committees with specific expertise receive public testimony and work out the details of proposed legislation before it is heard on the House floor.
“I am confident in the abilities of each of these leaders, and I know they are all eager to begin their work,” said Speaker Bosma.
To view the committee assignments please visit: http://www.in.gov/legislative/house_republicans/newsroom/2015/2015committeeassignments.pdf
-30-

Obama’s Lobbyist Problem

12

Democrats cheered when Senator Barack Obama promised them that if he were elected President, no lobbyists would “work on regulations or contracts directly and substantially related to their prior employer for two years.”
On his first day in office, President Obama propagandized this campaign deceit with a press conference broadcasting him signing an executive order to that effect.
Back in the Oval Office, President Obama’s team devised a scheme to circumvent this “promise.” That scheme became “The Waiver.”
Americans were promised that presumably unscrupulous, untrustworthy and despicable lobbyists would be banned from influencing policy under Obama.
What most Americans don’t know is that Obama shrewdly broke his promise to them on just his third day in office by appointing William Lynn, a former lobbyist for Defense contractor Raytheon, to Deputy Secretary of Defense.
This is not just some little government job. This is a major position.
Obama justified this with a “waiver” that says, well, this guy is an exception. He’s really smart, so just this once, okay?
Within one year in office, he appointed not only three Cabinet Secretaries and the Director of Intelligence who were all lobbyists, but over 30 lobbyists as political appointees.
By the end of 2013, over 50 Obama appointees were former lobbyists.
That’s quite a few waivers. Some didn’t even have waivers to get the job. Being a Democrat seems to help quite a bit.
Have you noticed the silence from liberals on this extraordinary violation of trust they extended him?
His reported preference for John Ashton as Secretary of Defense should be no surprise, as his employment record fits Obama’s mold for appointing high-dollar lobbyists to important cabinet positions.
Remember, the disgraced Eric Holder was a lobbyist at Covington and Burling, whose client list includes legal, defense and civil servant organizations.
Mr. Ashton has an impressive resume: bachelor’s degrees in physics from Yale, where he graduated Summa Cum Laude and Phi Beta Kappa, a Rhodes Scholar doctorate in theoretical physics at Oxford where he also taught physics. He’s worked on defense matters with Democrats and Republicans from Clinton to Bush.
Mr. Ashton is certainly a qualified and bipartisan choice for Secretary of Defense, but his selection is another blatant Obama corruption of his promise to voters.
If a Republican who made the same promise as Obama were in the White House, every mainstream news program, online news site and Sunday news show would be splattered with partisan outrage that this President just cannot keep such an important promise as keeping lobbyists out of the administration.
Why?
The Washington Times writes:
“Mr. Carter received almost as much money from defense consulting work as he did from Harvard University before he joined the Obama Administration in 2009…”
According to the waiver, he ‘provided specific business advice’ on a weapons system called the Sensor Fused Weapon. The last year of Defense funding for the weapon system was in fiscal 2007.
In 2011, a White House spokeswoman said Mr. Carter would be recused from two years from participating in matters involving Harvard because he resigned his tenured position there in 2011.”
There is a photo from 2008 in which Barack Obama, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi promised “the most ethical” administration and Congress in history while standing at a podium in front of a gigantic poster that reads, “Honest Leadership. Open Government” that is now priceless as a laugh-out-loud, self-mocking satirical commentary on what has become one of the most corrupt and unethical presidencies in history.
This Ashton incident is really just a small example of President Obama’s audacity of smoke and insincerity.
——-
© Copyright 2014 Rick Jensen, distributed exclusively by Cagle Cartoons newspaper syndicate.