IS IT TRUE THAT PRESIDENT OBAMA IS ON A RECKLESS POLICY MISSION TO THE DETRIMENT OF AMERICA AND ITS ALLIES? When George W. Bush left office, Libya was a halfway ally, which had dropped its nuclear weapons program at the insistence of the Bush administration.
That was a victory for sanity over extreme danger – i.e., the risk that nukes would fall into the hands of suicide-glorifying gangs like al-Qaeda and ISIS.
Today, Obama has overthrown Gaddafi for no particular reason, causing tens of thousands of deaths and a raging civil war in Libya.
When George W. Bush left office, Egypt was still a stable country at peace with its neighbors. Â So were Saudi Arabia, Syria, Yemen. Â Even Iraq and Afghanistan were taking precariousÂ
steps toward stability.
After six years of Obamanismo, Egypt is at civil war with the Muslim Brotherhood and with ISIS/al-Qaeda terrorists in the Sinai Desert. Â Egypt has blown up a reported sixty smuggling tunnels to Hamas in Gaza, because Hamas is the terrorist group spun off by the Brotherhood. Â Obama has consistently supported the MooBros in the battle against Egyptian stability.
Now Syria is being torn apart between Iran-supported Shi’ites and Saudi-supported Sunnis, notably the Al Nusrah murder gang, now part of ISIS.  ISIS itself exploded into power after Obama told Americans during the election that al-Qaeda is “decimated.† Al-Qaeda is alive, all right, and now its big brother ISIS is laying claim to parts of Iraq and Syria to set up a caliphate – a Muslim sharia empireâ€.
“When George W. left office, the most threatened and yet the most modern nation in the Middle East, Israel, was feeling reasonably safe.  So were Saudi Arabia and the other Sunni powers like Egypt.
Today they are all frightened to death by Obama’s obsessive surrender to Iranian nukes.
All over the Middle East, people see the United States as an enemy rather than a friend.  The only exception is the two anarchic forces Obama has supported over and over again: the Iranian war priests, the mullahs, and their fanatical troops; and on the Sunni side, the Muslim Brotherhood, which has a dozen known loyalists in high positions in this administration.â€
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/03/how_many_more_allies_have_to_be_sacrificed_for_obamas_ego_.html
“We see the Chicago way with Iran as well. In the midst of negotiations, Iran’s supreme leader chants the tired mantra “Death to America.†The Iranian military builds a mockup of a U.S. carrier to practice attacks on it. The Obama position proves more lenient than that of either the U.N. or our European partners, which is not an easy thing to do. Yet Obama doubles down and continues full bore to squeeze out any kind of agreement he can — even if that means it might be merely oral, not written, and a bastardized treaty somehow designed to avoid Senate scrutiny. The point is not that all this is outrageous, but rather that it is deliberately outrageous, again begging the question, “So what are you going to do about it?†Obama’s Chicago sense appeals to the lowest common denominator: The more brazenly he is making a point, the more he thinks he will earn a certain admiration from his base, a sense of some sort that he is capable of anything and that progressive morality trumps antiquated laws.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/416199/obamas-chicago-presidency-victor-davis-hanson?utm_source=taboola&utm_medium=referral
“Just hours after the announcement of what the United States characterized as a historic agreement with Iran over its nuclear program, the country’s leading negotiator lashed out at the Obama administration for lying about the details of a tentative framework.
Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif accused the Obama administration of misleading the American people and Congress in aÂ
fact sheet it released following the culmination of negotiations with the Islamic Republic.  Zarif braggedÂ
in an earlier press conference with reporters that the United States had tentatively agreed to let it continue the enrichment of uranium, the key component in a nuclear bomb, as well as key nuclear research.  Zarif additionally said Iran would have all nuclear-related sanctions lifted once a final deal is signed and that the country would not be forced to shut down any of its currently operating nuclear installations.â€
http://freebeacon.com/national-security/iran-accuses-u-s-of-lying-about-new-nuke-agreement/“It is impossible to overstate the potential catastrophe of the emerging deal. If the terms reported by the Associated Press, the Wall Street Journal and others become final, it would mean the United States and leading UN powers give their blessing for the world’s largest sponsor of terrorism to have the ultimate weapon, effectively rewarding Iran for decades of criminal behavior and acts of war against America, Israel and others.
The deal also would launch a new round of nuclear proliferation among Arab states, with Saudi Arabia long promising to get a bomb if Iran does. Others fearful of Iran’s dominance are sure to follow, escalating the tit-for-tat patterns in the region into a nuclear nightmare.
In addition, an unbound Iranian nuclear industry and spreading enrichment technology make it likely that one or more of the Islamic terror groups, including Hamas, Hezbollah, al Qaeda, Boko Haram and Islamic State, is likely to get the bomb. And there is no doubt they would use it.
In short, the unfolding nuclear landscape presents the whole of mankind with unprecedented peril.
The terms of the developing agreement, as explained to reporters by negotiators, vindicates concerns that Obama would surrender to Iranian demands while claiming otherwise. He caved in with a deal that envisions a decade-long phase-out of restrictions, allowing Obama to say that there will be no bomb on his watch.
In reality, that is meaningless. The American stamp of approval for a nuclear Iran instantly reshapes geopolitical strategies.
http://nypost.com/2015/02/25/obamas-nuclear-vow-to-iran-a-potential-catrastrophe/
“Roll out a map of the Middle East these days, close your eyes, and place a finger down on any spot. You’re likely to land on some area of turmoil encouraged by the Obama Administration’s blunders. So we’re relieved to be able to praise President Obama this week for moving to repair relations with Egypt.
On Tuesday Mr. Obama lifted an arms freeze he had imposed after the military overthrew the government run by the Muslim Brotherhood two years ago. The move freed the delivery of F-16 fighters, Abrams tanks and Harpoon missiles. The White House also let it be known that Mr. Obama had assured Egyptian President Abdel Fattah Al Sisi that he’ll no longer block the $1.3 billion in annual military aid that Congress has authorized.
Ending the embargo will help to improve ties with an ally who has contributed to stability in a region roiled by Shiite and Sunni Muslim extremists. The U.S. arms blockade was merely pushing Mr. Sisi and the generals toward closer ties with Russia or China, which would be only too happy to replace the U.S. as arms supplier.
The former general is certainly no liberal, which has the usual American suspects calling for his excommunication from U.S. relations. (These are the same American liberals who see wondrous reform potential in Iran’s mullahs.) Mr. Sisi has cracked down brutally on the Muslim Brotherhood and put former President Mohammed Morsi in prison.
Yet Mr. Sisi also spared Egypt from the slow-rolling Islamic coup that Mr. Morsi was seeking to impose. An Islamist terror campaign continues in the Sinai Peninsula and sometimes in Egypt’s cities. He has stopped Muslim assaults on Egypt’s Coptic Christians. He is welcoming foreign investment and seems to understand that Egypt needs much faster economic growth to provide jobs for its millions of young people.
Mr. Sisi has also helped Israel control the flow of arms from Iran into Gaza from the Sinai. He has helped to fight Islamic State in Libya, and he has been a rare Muslim leader willing to tell Islamic clerics that the religion needs reform that disavows murder in the name of Allah.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/obama-reconciles-with-egypt-1428100080According to a recent Center for Immigration Studies report, America between 2010 and 2013 imported more people from Muslim countries than Central America and Mexico combined. And now, with the president’s executive amnesty, the welcome mat is bigger than ever.
That’s a major shift in immigration flows — and one that poses a major national security threat.
If just a fraction of these nearly 300,000 new Muslim immigrants follow in the footsteps of the Franco-Algerian brothers who just terrorized Paris, we could be facing chronic terror. The main homeland threat from groups like the Islamic State comes through our immigration system. If they also use our loose policies as a vehicle for jihad, we will face the same crisis as France and the rest of Eurabia.
If enough trained jihadist fighters get into the country, they could band together and launch regular car bombings and tactical assaults, effectively orchestrating insurgencies in our cities, including the capital.
It’s not far-fetched. Just 19 foreign Muslims killed some 3,000 Americans and crippled the economy within just two years of entering the U.S.
Fifteen of them were Saudi nationals. Yet Obama welcomed 43,878 more Saudis from 2010 to 2013, mostly young men here on a student visa deal Obama cut with the Saudi king. At least 88,894 Saudis now live here.  If some never show up on college campuses or they overstay their visas, it doesn’t matter. Obama is no longer enforcing deportations.  And if they qualify for amnesty, many can now get the kind of documentation — including Social Security cards, driver’s licenses and work permits — that the 9/11 Commission warned against. Would-be foreign terrorists are freer than ever to conduct surveillance, coordinate operations, receive funding, go to flight school, obtain weapons and materials, and execute attacks.
Over the 2010-2013 period, Obama let in an additional 41,094 from war-torn Iraq and 38,644 from Egypt. Meanwhile, he’s cut Israeli immigration by 817. Â While America ushers in Islamic immigrants, Europe is pulling up the welcome mat.
In recent months, both France and Britain have proposed imposing curbs on immigration out of fear of importing more terrorists. The bills will likely pass in the wake of the Paris massacre. Â Thanks to mass immigration from North Africa, France’s Muslim population has swelled to 6.5 million, or 10% of its population. More than 1,000 French Muslims have joined IS. A recent poll found that 27% of French Muslims ages 18-24 support the Islamic State. Â Growing pockets of radicalism are spreading in towns throughout France. There are no-go zones for police, not just in Paris but all over the country. Authorities say that they’ve lost control of the situation. Muslim attacks on police and synagogues are now regular events.
The problem has been that many of these Muslim immigrants refuse to integrate into Western society. And now some are killing their hosts. Â Why are we letting foreign Muslims flood our shores when most of Europe now regrets liberalizing immigration from Muslim countries? We are just setting ourselves up for the same internal security crisis.
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/010815-733901-america-ushers-in-islamic-immigrants-while-france-pulls-up-welcome-mat.ht
CCO POSTER JOE BIDEN’S OPINION:
President Obama, in my opinion, has wholly failed as Commander-in-Chief to act in the best interests of the United States. The only question is whether Obama failed out of incompetency or clear purpose. Putting all this together, clear purpose can be the only answer. Obama declassified information on the Israeli nuclear program while simultaneously working to ensure the Iranian nuclear program is protected from bombing by any of our former allies like Israel, Egypt or even the Saudis. Obama tries to force Israel to accept a permanent Palestinian State when Hamas routinely attacks Israel from Gaza,  while Obama ignores the Iranian promises to wipe Israeli off the map and Mullah’s chants of “Death to Americaâ€.  The Iranians then accuse Obama about lying to the American people about the Iranian concessions. It’s sad when the Iranians have more credibility than Obama and John Kerry. Obama was until Tuesday punishing Egyptian President Sisi for rooting out the radical Egyptian Brotherhood by freezing US military aid.  Egypt and Jordan had been bravely and effectively fighting against ISIS barbarism, until the ISIS problem became so severe that Obama was forced to help our former ally. Egypt and Israel had even worked together against the radical Hamas terrorists.   It is striking that secular and elected governments of Israel and Egypt draw Obama’s ire, while the radical Islamic Iranian Mullahs and radical Islamic Egyptian Brotherhood are to be coddled and nurtured toward a patch of secular and elected government. With all this global strife, Obama greatly expands immigration into the US from countries rife with radical Islamic terrorists. Obama gifted Al Qaeda with 5 of their most dangerous military leaders from Gitmo, in exchange for a known US deserter and then Obama holds a press conference at the White House where the deserter’s father thanks Allah and they walk away arm in arm. Strange days indeed. Our next Presidential election will be perhaps the most critical election ever for the United States. Will we continue on a intentionally reckless pass to allow the seeds of radical Islam to grow both worldwide and in the United States? Or will we elect a leader with the courage to tirelessly work for protecting the national security of the United States and allies worldwide? If you really care about this Country and want the best for your children and future generations, the choice is clear. Vote for a real conservative. It’s the only hope we have.  It really is.
