SPONSORED BY DEFENSE ATTORNEY IVAN ARNAEZ.
DON’T GO TO COURT ALONE. CALL IVAN ARNAEZ @ 812-424-6671.
http://www.vanderburghsheriff.com/recent-booking-records.aspx
SPONSORED BY DEFENSE ATTORNEY IVAN ARNAEZ.
DON’T GO TO COURT ALONE. CALL IVAN ARNAEZ @ 812-424-6671.
http://www.vanderburghsheriff.com/recent-booking-records.aspx
SPONSORED BY DEFENSE ATTORNEY IVAN ARNAEZ.
DON’T GO TO COURT ALONE. CALL IVAN ARNAEZ @ 812-424-6671.
Marilyn Odendahl for www.theindianalawyer.com
Property owners along Lake Michigan will have another chance to make their arguments in a dispute over which part of the beach belongs to them and which belongs to the public.
The Indiana Court of Appeals overturned an order for summary judgment in LBLHA, LLC, Margaret L. West, and Don H. Gunderson v. Town of Long Beach, Indiana, Alliance for the Great Lakes and Save the Dunes, Long Beach Community Alliance, Patrick Cannon, et al., 46A05-1404-PL-146. The unanimous panel found the LaPorte Circuit Court had improperly granted summary judgment to the town.
Lakefront property owners filed a complaint against Long Beach after the municipality adopted a resolution in 2012 which set the boundary between the public and private beach. The landowners charged the town was unlawfully claiming rights to the lakefront.
After a hearing on pending motions, the trial court entered summary judgment in favor of the town. The court ruled the town’s resolution does not constitute a taking. Instead, the court found the matter of ownership is a pure question of law and more properly dealt with by the Indiana General Assembly or an appellate court with the state of Indiana as a party.
Lakefront owners responded by filing a motion for leave to file an amended complaint in order to add the state of Indiana as a defendant. The chronological case summary does not show the trial court having ruled on the motion but the property owners did appeal.
The Court of Appeals said the issue was whether the state should have been added or joined as a party to the proceedings under Indiana Trial Rule 19 prior to the rulings on the claims of the owners.
“… the trial court did not determine the ownership rights of the Lakefront Owners or public rights to the beach area at issue and thus did not rule on the substantive allegations set forth under Count I of the Lakefront Owners’ complaint,†Judge Elaine Brown wrote. “While the trial court stated that it did not reach that determination because it had determined there was no taking, we observe that the Town did not establish that the Lakefront Owners are precluded from requesting the court to determine their relative property rights notwithstanding whether the designated evidence may or may not establish as a matter of law that there was not an impermissible taking.â€
Consequently, the Court of Appeals concluded the trial court should have joined the state as a party to the proceedings. Indeed, the panel noted even the town and the intervening defendants, Alliance for the Great Lakes and Save the Dunes, asserted the owners’ claims are actually against the state.
Yet, the court maintained that adding the state as a defendant does not mean the property owners have no separate claim against the town. The 2012 resolution is a policy for enforcement of the town’s public property ordinances in the disputed area, the appeals court held, and the owners are objecting to the town’s ordinances.
The Court of Appeals remanded for further proceedings with the state of Indiana to be added as a party.
SPONSORED BY DEFENSE ATTORNEY IVAN ARNAEZ.
DON’T GO TO COURT ALONE. CALL IVAN ARNAEZ @ 812-424-6671.
Below is a list of felony cases that were filed by the Vanderburgh County Prosecutor’s Office on Wednesday, March 25, 2015
Lajerald Carr                  Maintaining a Common Nuisance-Level 6 Felony
Possession of Marijuana-Class B Misdemeanor
Edward Duckworth      Dealing in Methamphetamine-Level 2 Felony
Possession of Marijuana-Class B Misdemeanor
Geoffrey Finn                Operating a Motor Vehicle after Forfeiture of License for Life-Level 5 Felony
Jeffrey Martin               Possession of Methamphetamine-Level 5 Felony
Resisting Law Enforcement-Level 6 Felony
Legend Drug Deception-Level 6 Felony
Obstruction of Justice-Level 6 Felony
James Webster    Operating a Motor Vehicle after Forfeiture of License for Life-Level 5 Felony
Krishawn Harvey Operating a Motor Vehicle after Forfeiture of License for Life-Level 5 Felony
Omar Leyva                 Dealing in Methamphetamine-Level 2 Felony
Possession of Marijuana-Class B Misdemeanor
Michele Miller          Theft-Level 6 Felony
Daniel Motteler           Operating a Motor Vehicle after Forfeiture of License for Life-Level 5 Felony
For further information on the cases listed above, or any pending case, please contact Kyle Phernetton at 812.435.5688 or via e-mail at kphernetton@vanderburghgov.org
Under Indiana law, all criminal defendants are presumed to be innocent until proven guilty by a court of law
Governor Mike Pence today issued the following statement after signing the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (SEA 101) in a private ceremony.
“Today I signed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, because I support the freedom of religion for every Hoosier of every faith.
“The Constitution of the United States and the Indiana Constitution both provide strong recognition of the freedom of religion but today, many people of faith feel their religious liberty is under attack by government action.
“One need look no further than the recent litigation concerning the Affordable Care Act. A private business and our own University of Notre Dame had to file lawsuits challenging provisions that required them to offer insurance coverage in violation of their religious views.
“Fortunately, in the 1990s Congress passed, and President Clinton signed, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act—limiting government action that would infringe upon religion to only those that did not substantially burden free exercise of religion absent a compelling state interest and in the least restrictive means.
“Last year the Supreme Court of the United States upheld religious liberty in the Hobby Lobby case based on the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act, but that act does not apply to individual states or local government action. At present, nineteen states—including our neighbors in Illinois and Kentucky—have adopted Religious Freedom Restoration statutes. And in eleven additional states, the courts have interpreted their constitutions to provide a heightened standard for reviewing government action.
“In order to ensure that religious liberty is fully protected under Indiana law, this year our General Assembly joined those 30 states and the federal government to enshrine these principles in Indiana law, and I fully support that action.
“This bill is not about discrimination, and if I thought it legalized discrimination in any way in Indiana, I would have vetoed it. In fact, it does not even apply to disputes between private parties unless government action is involved. For more than twenty years, the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act has never undermined our nation’s anti-discrimination laws, and it will not in Indiana.
“Indiana is rightly celebrated for the hospitality, generosity, tolerance, and values of our people, and that will never change. Faith and religion are important values to millions of Hoosiers and with the passage of this legislation, we ensure that Indiana will continue to be a place where we respect freedom of religion and make certain that government action will always be subject to the highest level of scrutiny that respects the religious beliefs of every Hoosier of every faith.â€
INDIANAPOLIS – State Rep. Gail Riecken (D-Evansville) today issued the following statement after Gov. Mike Pence gave final approval to Senate Enrolled Act (SEA) 101:
“While the supporters of this misguided act may think that today’s bill signing should put everyone’s fears to rest, I think our problems are only just beginning. I think we are opening a Pandora’s Box that will have lasting implications for our state for years into the future.
“The governor and other advocates for SEA 101 already have ignored the pleas for common sense that have come from a variety of sources. It is not very often that you see the mayor of Indianapolis, Cummins Engine, Eli Lilly, the Disciples of Christ, the Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce, and the organizers of the Gen Con convention in perfect harmony, but they are in their belief that this measure sends the wrong message to people about Indiana.
“SEA 101 will allow individuals to ignore any law they choose, simply because they feel it conflicts with their religious beliefs. It will pave the way for intolerance of others.
“Others have noted in great detail the kinds of problems that will result for people in same-sex relationships. During debate on this bill in the House, I added my concerns that it would hinder our efforts to protect the health, safety, and welfare of our children.
“These concerns have been roundly ignored by the supporters of SEA 101. We are told that we should not worry about such things.
“But there have been incidents in other states that mirror what I feel could happen here. Not long ago, I read an account of a same-sex couple in Michigan who were denied pediatric care for their 6-day-old daughter because of the physician’s beliefs. There were no laws to protect the couple from this discrimination.
“I fear that with passage of this bill, we are going to make it easier for people to use the guise of religious freedom to abuse and neglect others, refuse medical service, deny others employment or housing, and even say they won’t serve others in a restaurant.
“There will be one group of people I see benefiting from today’s passage. I imagine the legal community is looking forward to having a field day with lawsuits that address various aspects of what will result from this bill. That should not make anyone happy.â€
Marilyn Odendahl for www.theindianalawyer.com
For law schools not occupying the front seats in the U.S. News & World Report’s national ranking, this year’s release of the annual “how prestigious is my school†evaluation brought another twist to the rollercoaster ride the assessment has come to resemble.
Volatility is a hallmark of the rankings. The recent publication of the 2016 Best Law Schools survey continued the trend of law schools making wild climbs up and down the list from one year to the next, inciting a fresh round of criticism along with cheers or tears – depending on the result – from law school deans.
Schools listed in the Top 14 see relative little movement compared to the rankings of their colleagues below that mark. Those schools outside of the Top 14 surge and plunge year to year for seemingly little reason.
Two Hoosier law schools – Indiana University Maurer School of Law and Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law – declined in the just-released 2016 rankings while the state’s highest-ranked school – Notre Dame Law School – improved its position.
The 2016 rankings returned the Notre Dame Law School to its former 22nd ranking. For several years, the private school has hovered between Nos. 22 and 23, but in the 2015 rankings it slipped to 26th place.
Deans of the IU law schools said the recent survey results did not reflect the quality of education and support that the students receive. They also pointed to U.S. News’ higher rankings of their focused programs in areas such as tax law and health care law.
“U.S. News has created a system where very small changes in any category can have an impact on the overall number,†IU McKinney Dean Andrew Klein said.
The Indianapolis law school has posted big swings in recent years. IU McKinney was ranked as No. 98 in the 2014 survey and rose to No. 89 in the 2015 listing before tumbling to its current No. 102 rank.
IU Maurer fell to No. 34 in the 2016 survey, down from No. 29 in the prior evaluation. However, over a longer period, the Bloomington school has experienced broad movements in the rankings. IU Maurer was ranked at No. 39 in the 2000 survey then, following a dip to No. 42, the school began a fairly steady climb after 2006 into the high 20s.
U.S. News director of data research Robert Morse was not available for an interview.
Brian Leiter, director of the Center for Law, Philosophy and Human Values at the University of Chicago Law School, has researched the criteria and calculations that U.S. News uses and concluded the overall rank is a “nonsense number.â€
Questioning the methodology
Leiter in his blog has been critical of the publication’s methodology, calling the rankings inexplicable and arguing there is no rationale for the weighting of the different categories measured.
Echoing Klein’s contention, Leiter pointed to the change of factoring the cost of living into the per capita expenditure by law schools. This recalculation, he said, greatly helped the University of Alabama climb to a mid-20s ranking.
“In general, a significant move up or a significant move down usually is not correlated to anything in the real world,†Leiter said.
At IU Maurer, Dean Austen Parrish was surprised by his school’s 2016 placement. The law school has improved in every category measured with the exception of the admission criteria, he said. But even there, the institution only lowered its LSAT acceptance from the 85th percentile to the 84th or 83rd percentile which accounts for roughly a drop of one number in the raw score.
Bloomington’s drop might be a reflection of the change in leadership and focus, Leiter said. The school’s decline might be an indication that either the schools ranked higher than it engaged in more puffery in reporting their data than usual or IU Maurer was too honest about its data for its own good, he said.
For IU McKinney, Leiter said the concern is greater. Slipping from the 80s or 90s could reinforce any negative perceptions of the school and might dissuade students from enrolling, he explained.
Klein criticized the U.S. News system as being strongly weighted toward inputs like entering students’ LSAT scores and GPAs, and toward expenditures. These elements do not provide a picture of the outcomes or what the school is doing to educate students, he said.
He then pointed to other surveys where IU McKinney captured a better position. For example, the U.S. News ranking of yield rates found the Indianapolis school was the eighth highest in the country with 49.9 percent of applicants accepting offers for admittance. Also, graduateprograms.com ranked IU McKinney as 25th in the nation in terms of how students rated their experience at the school.
Klein is proud of his law school, the support of the alumni and the work of the faculty. He has no plans to bring about changes because of the U.S. News ranking.
“This law school does not exist to compete in rankings,†Klein said. “We exist to provide a good education for people who are going to be leaders and serve this community for many, many years.â€
Notre Dame Dean Nell Jessup Newton was unavailable to comment for this article.
Can’t ignore the rankings
Alfred Brophy, professor at the University of North Carolina School of Law, has also studied the U.S. News methodology. He maintains the volatility is not related to changes in quality, noting that a system where some schools change places by as much as 20 points in a single year says more about how the rankings are calculated than it says about the law schools.
In a 2014 published paper, Brophy ranked law schools based on three elements: the median LSAT scores of the class entering in 2013; the percentage of students in the class graduating in 2013 who had full-time, permanent, J.D.-required jobs nine months after graduation; and the number of citations to each school’s main law review.
His analysis ranked Notre Dame at No. 22 while IU Maurer placed at No. 33.5 and IU McKinney at No. 117.5. Also, he listed Valparaiso University Law School, a school which U.S. News lists in its unranked category, at No. 166 out of 194 schools.
Despite the objections to the U.S. News rankings, law school deans cannot ignore them. College presidents are paying attention. Interviewing and hiring decisions by law firms of a school’s graduates may be impacted. In addition, students considering a career in the law give strong credence to the rankings and sometimes turn down better scholarship offers in order to attend a higher-ranked school.
“If it matters to prospective students, it has to matter to deans,†Brophy said.
Since becoming dean, Parrish has established partnerships with prestigious undergraduate colleges to identify and recruit the best students for IU Maurer. He expects in two years this move, which is designed to bring quality applicants to Bloomington, will raise the school’s ranking.
Still, he noted, if U.S. News changes its criteria, the initiatives to enroll well-qualified students and to help graduates find jobs may not bring much upward momentum. The school wants to improve its ranking, Parrish said, but it also does not want the tail to wag the dog.•
BOARD OF PARK COMMISSIONERS
REGULAR MEETING
KEVIN WINTERNHEIMER CHAMBERS
ROOM 301, CIVIC CENTER COMPLEX
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 1, 2015
12:00 NOON
REVISED AGENDA
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. MINUTESMarch 18, 2015
3. CONSENT AGENDA
a. Â Request Re:Â Approve and Execute Park Use Application with March of Dimes for March
for Babies Walk at Sunrise Park April 24 & 25, 2015. – Hayes
b. Â Request Re:Â Approve and Execute Park Use Application with Franklin Street Events
Association for Charity Run on the Greenway October 17, 2015. – Hayes
c. Â Request Re:Â Approve and Execute Land Use Permit with North Evansville Youth Baseball
for Kleymeyer #2 Ball Field. – Holtz
d. Â Request Re:Â Approve and Execute Agreement Extension with Maxitrol for Swonder Ice
Arena. – Holtz
e. Â Request Re:Â Execute Catering Agreement with Lauer Power LLC, for Helfrich Golf Course
and Swonder Ice Arena. – Holtz
f.  Request Re: Execute Grant with Kaboom for Jacobsville Park. – Holtz
g. Â Request Re:Â Execute Use Agreement with Total Package Hockey, LLC for Swonder Ice
Arena. – Nadeau
4. Â Â Â Â OLD BUSINESS
a.  Request Re: Open Quotes for a Cargo Van for Mesker Park Zoo & Botanic Garden. – Beck
b. Â Request Re:Â Award and Execute Contract with E & B Paving, Inc. for Road Repairs at
Mesker Park Zoo & Botanic Garden. – Beck
c. Â Request Re:Â Approve and Execute Change Order for Happe & Sons for Site Work at
Petting Zoo Barn Site at Mesker Park Zoo & Botanic Garden. – Beck
5. Â Â Â Â NEW BUSINESS
a.  Request Re: Consideration of State Cup Proposal by SWISA Soccer Club. – Rick Weber/Joe
Beavin
b. Â Request Re:Â Approve and Execute Land Use Permit with the Evansville Soccer Club for
Price Park. – Holtz
c. Â Request Re:Â Discussion Regarding Sunday Night Public Session at Swonder Ice Arena. –
Crook
d.  Request Re: Approve Budget Transfers and CIP Reprioritizations. – Holtz
e. Â Request Re:Â Any Other Business the Board Wishes to Consider and Public Comments.
6.    REPORTS
a. Â Brian Holtz, Deputy Director
7.    ACCEPTANCE OF PAYROLL AND VENDOR CLAIMS
Â
8.    ADJOURN
(WASHINGTON, DC) – On Thursday, Congressman Larry Bucshon, M.D. spoke on the House floor urging his colleagues to support H.R. 2, the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act. H.R. 2 replaces Medicare’s flawed physician payment formula, the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) with bipartisan, bicameral reforms that help protect the Medicare promise. This unprecedented effort removes the imminent threat of draconian cuts to Medicare providers and moves Medicare away from a volume-based system towards one that rewards value, improving the quality of care for seniors. A section by section analysis of the bill is available here.
“Mr. Speaker today is a great day for America’s seniors.
“After years of flawed Medicare policy, we are finally creating a stable system that ensures Medicare patients will have access to their doctors.
“This new policy will move our Medicare system to one that is based on quality of care that is provided to our nation’s seniors.
“In fact, for the first time in decades, we actually achieve real, structural reforms in the program that will help save this critical program for future seniors.
“I would also like to highlight that this legislation repeals CMS’s flawed policy to eliminate bundled surgical payments.
“Eliminating surgical payment bundles would force doctors to spend more time billing CMS that could be used caring for patients.
“I would like to thank Chairman Pitts and I would also like to congratulate Speaker Boehner, Minority Leader Pelosi, Chairman Upton and Ranking Member Pallone for putting politics aside and putting America’s seniors first.
Â
Congressman Larry Bucshon, a physician from Southern Indiana, is serving his third term in the U.S. House of Representatives. In the 114th Congress, Bucshon will serve on the influential House Committee on Energy and Commerce.  The 8th District of Indiana includes all or parts of Clay, Crawford, Daviess, Dubois, Gibson, Greene, Knox, Martin, Owen, Parke, Perry, Pike, Posey, Spencer, Sullivan, Vanderburgh, Vermillion, Vigo, and Warrick counties.
IS IT TRUE that Safety Board member Steve Bagbey accused Police Chief Billy Bolin of attempting to fix a speeding ticket in Wednesday’s safety board meeting? …that in response, Chief Bolin posted the following message on his Facebook page: During the March 25th Safety Board Meeting, I was accused of “fixing” tickets in Newburgh, IN. I did not “fix” a ticket. I did contact a Newburgh Police Officer, whom I had met on prior occasions, about a car stop. I asked if the violation could be handled with a warning. The officer explained why the violation warranted a ticket instead of a warning and I agreed with his reasoning. The ticket was submitted to the courts for the driver to address.
IS IT TRUE that Mr. Bagbey criticism may have been warranted? …Chief Bolin has now acknowledged that attempting to intervene on behalf of a “friend†to have a ticket reduced from a citation to a warning was a decision “that I regret†and that he “completely understand where it would look inappropriate�
IS IT TRUE that it would look even more inappropriate if the Chief’s friend is a person who describes himself as “a local Republican leader†who has close ties to Chief Bolin’s boss?
IS IT TRUE that IIT has previously reported that some people have felt that the Riecken for Mayor campaign was underperforming and was having trouble getting organized? …that we have learned that the campaign has recently hired an experienced and battle proven campaign director? …that in addition, the campaign has hired a seasoned Media Relations Director and a knowledgeable Policy Director? …that the Mayor’s campaign has been up and running for the last four years? …that from all indications, the 2015 race for Mayor is going to be one hell of a political dog fight? …that neither candidate can afford to take any votes for granted?
IS IT TRUE that as we reported on March 18th, that the Evansville Police Department has not adopted the use of Narcan to address Opiate Overdoses? …that Congregations Acting for Justice and Empowerment (CAJE) attempted to meet with Chief Bolin to discuss their vision that every squad car in Evansville be equipped with a Narcan Rescue kit? …that despite the Warrick and Vanderburgh County Sheriff’s Departments use of the kits, Chief Bolin indicated that he had no intention of utilizing the kits prior to having the eleven member delegation from CAJE escorted out of his office?
IS IT TRUE that Chief Bolin has indicated that it would cost approximately $6000 every two years to equip every Evansville Police vehicle with Narcan? …that $6000 pales in comparison to the cost of losing one’s life or the life of a loved one? …that we have no doubt that donations solicited from groups or individuals would more than cover the costs?
IS IT TRUE that we reported in the March 24th IIT that Chief Bolin had 11 representatives from CAJE escorted from his office after refusing their requests to discuss their Narcan proposal? …that we mentioned how disappointed we were that Chief Bolin had insulted the members of CAJE and we predicted that this cavalier approach would cost Mayor Winnecke votes in his upcoming election? …that we urged the Mayor to force Chief Bolin to sit down with the members of CAJE to discuss this potentially lifesaving project? …that last night it was reported that both sides will sit down tomorrow to discuss the proposal?
IS IT TRUE that a Sheriff’s deputy in Warrick County has already saved a life using Narcan? …that we predict that every Evansville Police car will be equipped with a Narcan Rescue kit by the time that the mayoral election comes around this fall?