- On Saturday, June 25, 2016 at approximately 7:08pm the Vanderburgh County Sheriff’s Office responded to South Weinbach Avenue north of the I-69 overpass upon report a of vehicle crash involving injury.
- On scene investigation indicated that a silver 2010 Kia Forte passenger car had been traveling north on South Weinbach Avenue before leaving the roadway and striking a tree. The driver, later identified as Mr. Robert Wesley Burton III, sustained a broken forearm as a result of the crash. Two other passengers also sustained injuries. The front passenger sustained a broken forearm and broken lower leg and the rear passenger sustained an internal abdominal injury as well as a broken wrist.
Mr. Burton appeared visibly intoxicated to the investigating sheriff’s deputy. A deputy attempted to obtain Mr. Burton’s consent for a blood sample at the hospital, but he refused. A warrant was then obtained with the assistance of the Vanderburgh County Prosecutor’s Office. The Sheriff’s Office later compelled a blood sample from Mr. Burton. Preliminary hospital testing revealed Mr. Burton’s blood alchol content (BAC) to be more than three (3) times the legal limit of .08.
Mr. Burton’s injuries prevented his immediate arrest for Operating a Motor Vehicle while Intoxicated Causing Serious Bodily Injury as a Level 6 Felony. An arrest warrant will be sought at a later date.
Indiana’s implied consent law provides for up to a two year drivers license suspension for refusing a chemical test for intoxication, but carries no criminal penalty. Local procedures for obtaining blood samples from intoxicated motorists were unaffected by a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling. That ruling affected warrantless blood draws in states that criminalize the refusal of a breath or blood test. A driver who refuses a breath or blood test in Indiana faces only a suspension of his or her driving privileges, which is considered a civil penalty. When investigating crashes involving death or serious injury in which a driver has refused testing, Indiana law enforcement officers first attempt to secure a search warrant before compelling a blood draw.
DRIVER:
Robert Wesley Burton III, 54, of Evansville.
A thread on the question-and-answer website Quora discussed the stark differences between dog ownership in the 1970s compared with today.
That made me remember the time my family’s beloved dog, Jingles, ran away.
Jingles was part collie, a touch of Irish setter and goodness knows what else —- and I had no idea how lucky my family was to have her.
Throughout much of American history, according to LiveScience.com, only the wealthy kept pets as companions.
Before the 1960s and ’70s, few people in cities could afford dogs, particularly during the Depression years.
But after World War II, as Americans became more affluent and moved to the suburbs, more families had the means to care for dogs.
By the early ’70s, the family dog was fairly common —- though it was an era of the rough-and-tumble dog, like Lassie and Old Yeller, not the pampered pets that are commonplace today.
Jingles was loved unconditionally, but the only pampering she got was a rub on her belly —- she loved that —- or having her coat combed with a wire brush.
Though she never got treats from the gourmet pet aisle at the supermarket, she loved her daily can of Ken-L Ration and the occasional leftover burger.
She also enjoyed a freedom that few pets ever get to know.
My father was adamant that Jingles never be chained. He only agreed to get her if we taught her stay in the yard as our neighbor, Mr. Bennett, taught his dog to do.
We followed Mr. Bennett’s techniques and Jingles learned the boundaries of our yard well enough. But she suffered from wanderlust and felt the need, now and then, to set off for the hills.
If she wasn’t home by dusk, my father, grumbling, would get into our Plymouth station wagon and drive around the neighborhood calling her name. He’d usually find her within 30 minutes —- usually outside the convenience store soliciting treats from customers.
“You get home right now, girl!†he’d say, pointing his finger. She’d sprint home ahead of him and greet him as he pulled in the driveway, her body shaking, her tail wagging.
But one night, after she ran off, my father couldn’t find her. He called the police and animal rescue, but there had been no reports.
My five sisters and I sobbed most of the night, worrying about Jingles’ fate.
I rode my bike several miles the next day searching for her. That night my father and I drove around for several hours more, but we couldn’t find her.
By the third day of her absence, a tremendous funk settled over our home —- was she gone forever?
As I lay in bed sobbing that night, I heard the faucet dripping in the kitchen, a couple squabbling a few blocks away, Johnny Carson’s monologue playing on someone’s television over the next hill.
Then I heard her barking.
I jumped out of bed and raced downstairs and out the front door. I met her in front of the Kerns’ house. I was crying as I held her in my arms, the two of us rolling around under the street lamp.
She was covered with mud and burrs. She smelled like a skunk. I didn’t care.
Soon, the rest of my family was awake and outside hugging her, overcome with incredible relief.
That happened in the summer of 1974, when dogs were free to roam and sometimes break our hearts, but always fill us with joy and happiness.
In any event, Jingles’ life reflects the stark differences between dog ownership in the middle-class ’70s and the incredibly pampered purebred dogs of today that often are owned by Americans with incredible affluence.
With our declining middle class, regrettably, there aren’t as many rough-and-tumble mutt dogs like Jingles around anymore.
—–