Dr. Bucshon’s Statement on Financial CHOICE Act
On Thursday, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 10, the Financial CHOICE Act, the plan to replace the Dodd-Frank Act and protect the financial futures of Americans. This legislative overhaul prioritizes Main Street – farmers, small business owners, and middle-income families – over Wall Street.
Eighth District Congressman Larry Bucshon, M.D. released the following statement after voting in favor of the legislation:
“When the Democrats passed Dodd-Frank in 2010, we were promised an end to taxpayer funded bailouts and a system that protects consumers. Instead, this massive regulatory monstrosity enshrined “too big to fail†and taxpayer bailouts into law, led to the loss of community financial institutions while the big banks got bigger, and created a new, unaccountable and structurally unconstitutional government agency with the unilateral power to decided what type of mortgages, credit cards, and bank accounts Americans can have,†said Bucshon.
“Wall Street is doing just fine under Dodd-Frank’s status quo, while millions of Americans in the heartland are struggling to get ahead. The hardworking Americans who rely on community financial institutions to get a mortgage to buy their first home or take out a small business loan to start a business are being hit the hardest. These are our farmers, small business owners, and middle-income families. With the Financial CHOICE Act, we are offering a better way forward by putting Main Street ahead of Wall Street and unleashing America’s economic potential. This legislation ends unfair taxpayer bailouts, protects consumers by holding Wall Street accountable with the steepest penalties in history, increases transparency and accountability, and expands access to capital for small businesses and gives consumers more choice and options when it comes to credit so that Americans can plan their own financial futures.â€
Indiana Bankers Association (IBA) strongly supports CHOICE:
“The Indiana Bankers Association (IBA) stands in strong support of the Financial CHOICE Act (H.R. 10), a regulatory relief bill designed to usher in economic growth and prosperity for Americans everywhere. The Indiana banking community is supportive of much-needed and overdue relief from the choking regulatory burden that impedes banks’ ability to best serve the needs of their customers and local communities. Passage of the Act will bolster free-market choice for consumers, reform the overregulation that chokes business ventures and economic growth, and bring much-needed transparency to the regulatory process,†said Amber R. Van Til, President and CEO of IBA.
“The IBA joins with bank trade associations nationwide in advocating for passage of this key legislation. The Financial CHOICE Act is needed in order to reform overregulation in critical areas, including mortgage lending, call reports and data collection. Streamlining these systems and more will ultimately benefits consumers, as they enjoy more efficient financial services and financial freedom of choice. Passage of the CHOICE Act will help foster a more sensible and proportionate financial regulatory system that will facilitate economic growth and job creation. We urge lawmakers on the Hill to look at the needs of their constituents and vote in support of H.R. 10. Each vote for passage of the Financial CHOICE Act is a vote in favor of American prosperity.â€
MORE >>> Read the Bill
Summary of the Bill
Get the Facts: The Financial CHOICE Act
The Financial CHOICE Act: Opportunity for All, Bailouts for None
Top 10 Wins for the American People with the Financial CHOICE Act
Support Builds for the Financial CHOICE Act
What They’re Saying About the Financial CHOICE Act
Claims vs. Facts
Motorcycle Fatality
The Vanderburgh County Coroners Office and the Vanderburgh County Sheriffs Office are investigating the death of an Evansville man killed in a single vehicle motorcycle collision. The collision took place on US 41 at I69 on ramp. Pending notification of extended family his name will not be released. The Vanderburgh County Sheriffs Office can provide details of their investigation.
“READERS FORUM” JUNE 10, 2017
Whats on your mind today?
Todays “READERS POLL†question is: Are you pleased with the new layout and design of the City County Observer?
We urge you to take time and click the section we have reserved for the daily recaps of the activities of our local Law Enforcement professionals. This section is located on the upper right side of our publication.
If you would like to advertise or submit and article in the CCO please contact us City-County Observer@live.com
Top 10 Wins For The American People With The Financial CHOICE Act
 The Financial CHOICE Act will replace the failed Dodd-Frank Act with reforms that will deliver:
Protecting consumers and growing our economy requires accountability from both Washington and Wall Street. That’s why accountability is at the heart of the Financial CHOICE Act. It imposes the toughest penalties in history for financial fraud, it puts Washington’s financial regulators on budget, and requires rules to pass a cost-benefit test and holds them accountable to Congress for major regulations.
Dodd-Frank did not end “too big to fail.” Hardworking taxpayers still remain on the hook for Wall Street risk-taking thanks to Dodd-Frank’s bailout fund. The Financial CHOICE Act ends bank bailouts and “too big to fail” once and for all. There will be bankruptcy — not taxpayer-funded bailouts — for financial firms that fail. A “no more bailouts” policy also lays the foundation for a more resilient, stable financial system that creates economic opportunity for all Americans.
Dodd-Frank’s excessive regulatory complexity has produced a less resilient financial system and stifled economic growth. By reducing obstacles to credit and capital, the Financial CHOICE Act strengthens our financial system and promotes a dynamic economy with more jobs, higher wages and faster growth. These reforms “will allow the private sector to fuel economic growth in our 21st century economy,” the Small Business Investor Alliance said.
The “regulatory taxes” imposed by Dodd-Frank are passed on to consumers in the form of increased fees, fewer products and services, and more limited credit options. For example, since Dodd-Frank became law, the share of banks offering free checking accounts has fallen by almost half. The Financial CHOICE Act gives consumers more choices and options when it comes to credit, providing access to products and services they want and need. Consumers must be vigorously protected not only from fraud and deception, but also from the loss of economic opportunity and freedom. HELP FOR SMALL BUSINESS, AMERICA’S JOB CREATING ENGINE Even President Obama’s Small Business Administration director admitted Dodd-Frank’s regulations hurt small business lending. “Small banks have been laden with excessive costs and confusion from overlapping regulations, which are getting in the way of their ability to make small business loans,” she said. The Financial CHOICE Act includes numerous provisions — many of them strongly bipartisan — to eliminate unnecessary regulations in order to provide small businesses, start-ups, and entrepreneurs greater freedom to innovate, grow their businesses, and create jobs in our communities.
The best way for the Federal Reserve to help the economy is by adopting a transparent, strategy-based policy strategy that will provide more predictability for the American people. But currently, the Fed’s so-called “forward guidance” is vague and leaves hardworking taxpayers uncertain as they attempt to plan their financial futures. By promoting a more predictable and transparent rules-based monetary policy, the Financial CHOICE Act provides a stronger foundation for economic growth than the Fed’s improvisational approach of recent years. A MORE LEVEL PLAYING FIELD Dodd-Frank didn’t end “too big to fail,” but it did create “too small to succeed.” Unlike big banks, community banks can’t afford the armies of lawyers and compliance officers it takes to sort through Dodd-Frank’s red tape. This creates an uneven playing field. Since Dodd-Frank became law the big banks are bigger and the small banks are fewer. The Financial CHOICE Act provides desperately needed regulatory relief for Main Street banks and credit unions. This will help level the playing field and allow community financial institutions to devote more time and resources to meeting customer needs and free up resources for lending.
The Department of Labor’s Fiduciary Rule will cost working Americans billions of dollars in lost retirement savings. The Financial CHOICE Act repeals this misguided, unnecessary, and excessively complex regulation that makes it harder for working Americans to save and invest for retirement, college, and their future.
There are numerous provisions in Dodd-Frank touted as “investor protections” that actually increase costs, including rules that force companies to waste money on burdensome requirements rather than using that money to grow, thrive and create jobs. The Financial CHOICE Act will amend and eliminate provisions that restrict financial opportunity and investment options for hardworking Americans and make it harder for businesses to create good-paying jobs.
Despite its failures during the run-up to the financial crisis, the Federal Reserve gained extraordinary new powers thanks to Dodd-Frank but no corresponding increase in its transparency or accountability to the American people. The Financial CHOICE Act protects the Fed’s independence when it comes to the conduct of monetary policy, but demands greater oversight, accountability and transparency at the nation’s central bank. For example, the Financial CHOICE Act requires an audit of all aspects of Federal Reserve operations — not just those that the Fed wants us to see. This is a necessary antidote to the secrecy and lack of transparency that have characterized the Fed for far too long. This information was compiled by the House Financial Services Committee and can be access on the committee’s website here: https://goo.gl/vQDzJw.
|
Canvassers Charged In Fake, Fraudulent Voter Registrations
Canvassers Charged In Fake, Fraudulent Voter Registrations
IL for www.theindianalawyer.com
Twelve employees of a Democrat-linked group focused on mobilizing black voters in Indiana are accused of submitting fake or fraudulent voter registration applications ahead of last year’s general election in order to meet quotas, according to charging documents filed Friday.
Prosecutors allege that 11 temporary workers employed by the Indiana Voter Registration Project created and submitted an unknown number of falsified applications. According to a probable cause affidavit, a supervisor for those canvassers, Holiday Burke, was also charged, as was the group.
Marion County Prosecutor Terry Curry said State Police found no evidence of voter fraud or voter suppression and that the charges against the workers arose from “a very bad, ill-advised business practice” of setting canvassers what appears to be a daily quota.
The Indiana Voter Registration Project’s effort to register primarily black voters was overseen by Patriot Majority USA, which has ties to the Democratic Party, including Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid and former President Bill Clinton.
Patriot Majority has denied any wrongdoing. Spokesman Bill Buck on Friday declined to comment.
State Police began investigating the group in August after a clerk in Hendricks County near Indianapolis flagged about a dozen registration forms that had missing or suspicious information. That investigation expanded to 56 counties where Patriot Majority said it had collected about 45,000 voter registration applications before last November’s election.
All 12 defendants face one count each of procuring or submitting voter registration applications known to be false, fictitious or fraudulent. Eleven of them face one perjury count each, while the 12th — their supervisor — faces one count of counterfeiting.
If convicted on all the charges each defendant faces up to 2 ½ years in prison.
The Indiana Voter Registration Project faces the same charges as the supervisor. If convicted, the group could face a fine of $10,000.
During the campaign, then-Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump and his running mate, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence, raised the possibility of a “rigged” election. They offered no proof. Patriot Majority meanwhile asked the U.S. Department of Justice’s Civil Rights division to determine whether the police investigation was an attempt to suppress black voters.
In October, Curry, a Democrat, urged all sides to tone down the rhetoric.
The investigation found workers had submitted bogus applications on behalf of nonexistent residents, submitted new applications for people who were already registered, and at least one application was submitted on behalf of a minor, he said.
A search warrant unsealed on Nov. 14 says some workers admitted to falsifying registrations, saying they faced the possibility of losing their temporary job if they didn’t register at least 10 new voters a day.
The probable cause affidavit says supervisors told canvassers “to obtain their quota by any means necessary.” Canvassers were paid $10 an hour and worked five-hour shifts.
“By giving someone a financial motive to (meet a quota) is what caused these canvassers to cut corners and do things that not only undermined the goal of having legitimate registered voters but led to a situation where we allege it bled over into criminal conduct,” Curry said.
Patriot Majority President Craig Varoga said last year that canvassers weren’t paid according to a quota system and had been instructed that it is illegal to provide false information on voter registration forms.
The search warrant indicates that Patriot Majority submitted several hundred voter registration applications that included false, incomplete or fraudulent information. The warrant’s contents allowed State Police to raid the Indianapolis offices of Patriot Majority USA in October.
Curry said it’s unclear how many problematic applications were submitted, but that it was “a relatively small number.”