Home Blog Page 2968

EPD REPORT

0

EPD REPORT

IS IT TRUE January 30, 2020

4

We hope that today’s “IS IT TRUE” will provoke honest and open dialogue concerning issues that we, as responsible citizens of this community, need to address in a rational and responsible way?

IS IT TRUE we give 5 cheers to District 77 State Representative Ryan Hatfield for convincing the Indiana House of Representatives to approve his amendment to lower prescription drug costs?

IS IT TRUE we are hearing that there is a long list of extremely talented and qualified practicing attorneys who will be applying for the Vanderburgh County Superior Court Judge position?

IS IT TRUE we wonder if you would spend $251,000 of your own money to purchase and renovated a house located at 101 East Tennesse Street, Evansville? …we bet your answer is a resounding  ‘Hell No”

IS IT TRUE that a CCO poster said “I have lived in this area for over 55 years and this home has been in disrepair since I was a kid.  This is totally ridiculous. We have senior citizens, veterans and poor working-class homeowners that need new roofs, HVAC, windows, etc. This is a slap in our faces. This money can buy a least 3 Habitat homes. The majority of my Jacobsville/Jimtown neighbors are tired of DMD forcing this type of spending and projects down our throats, we don’t like the taste of it”?

IS IT TRUE that another one of our posters made the following comment that we felt worth reposting concerning the property located at 101 East Tennesse Street?  …he said “they could build a new home for a hell of a lot less than $240,000 and there is no way that this house would ever be worth what u people are talking putting into it? …he also said: that’s why our government is in the shape it’s in is because of people that are willing to spend taxpayers money an not give a dam how they spend it”!

IS IT TRUE it looks like the last time HOPE OF EVANSVILLE filed their Annual Report was in 2016?  …the reason why we assumed that this statement is accurate is that the 2016 Annual Report was posted on their website?

IS IT TRUE that Hope of Evansville has come under intense pressure to own up to just how and why it makes any sense whatsoever to spend over $240,000 on refurbishing a  house that was purchased for $11,000? …look at today’s “READERS POLL” and you shall quickly see that the general public is totally opposed to this type of wasteful spending of there taxpayer’s dollars?

IS IT TRUE that Hope OF Evansville responded with a public statement in their ONLINE NEWSLETTER by stating that they tried hard to repurpose that $240,000 HUD grant to building a duplex or other shelter solution only to be denied that opportunity by our federal government?

IS IT TRUE our federal government routinely spends $700 on hammers and $500 on toilet seats and apparently $250,000 on refurbishing $11,000 house?…these types of wasteful expenditures of taxpayers dollars are insane and is a prime example of  “PORK BARREL” projects at its worse?

IS IT TRUE that HOPE OF EVANSVILLE recently stated in their on-line Newsletter that they have contracted with Crescent Valley to complete the work?…this is the name of the business located in Innovation Pointe that bought 101 East Tennessee for $5,000 and sold it to HOPE OF EVANSVILLE  a month later for $11,000?…it is worth asking the question how can a business that sold a dilapidated house located in a seedy area for a 120% profit can then be hired by HOPE OF EVANSVILLE to refurbish the shack they sold earlier for a 120% profit?

IS IT TRUE last week the of the Evansville Director Kelly Coures stated on local TV that over a period of time that $200,000 plus homes located in less than attractive neighborhoods have been rehabilitated over the years?  …we hope that Mr. Coures made a non-thinking remark that his organization spent $200,000 plus to rehab additional dilapidated homes in less than attractive neighborhoods?…just in case Mr. Coures statement was correct we would like to see a complete list of the homes that he recently made reference to on live TV?

IS IT TRUE that “Mole” #3 alleges that there could even more such deals in the making? … the CCO would like to see the public informed of just how many projects like this are in the queue and how much more money is going to be wasted through the efforts of this group?

IS IT TRUE when the people fear the Government we have Tyranny!  When the Government fears the people we have Liberty

Today’s “Readers Poll” question is: Would you spend $251,000 of your own money to purchase and renovated a house located at 101 East Tennesse Street?
If you would like to advertise on the CCO please contact us at City-County Observer@live.com
Footnote: City-County Observer Comment Policy. Be kind to people. No personal attacks or harassment will be tolerated and will be removed from our site.”
We understand that sometimes people don’t always agree and discussions may become a little heated.  The use of offensive language, insults against commenters will not be tolerated and will be removed from our site.
Any comments posted in this column do not represent the views or opinions of the City-County Observer or our advertisers.

 

 

 

 

INDIANA HOUSE APPROVES HATFIELD AMENDMENT TO LOWER PRESCRIPTION DRUG PRICES

0

State Rep. Ryan Hatfield (D-Evansville) today offered an amendment to House Bill 1005, that allows Indiana to import certain prescription drugs, already used in the United States, from Canada to help lower prescription drug prices.

“Hoosiers have been crippled by the high cost of prescription drug prices for far too long,” said Hatfield.

“This amendment will allow us to import certain prescription drugs from Canada to ensure that Hoosiers have a safe and effective pathway to more affordable health care.

“Promoting competition in the prescription drug industry, through similar legislation, has already been implemented by the Republican governor in Florida and supported by President Trump,” continued Hatfield. “Accessible health care is not a partisan issue.”

Currently, Colorado, Florida, Maine and Vermont have passed similar legislation to create a drug importation program.

This amendment passed with a vote of 49-44.

LINKS OF TAX FILINGS OF “HOPE OF EVANSVILLE” PUBLISHED BY PRO PUBLICA

0

THE ATTACHED LINKS ONLY COVERED THE FISCAL YEAR OF 2016.  WE ARE EXTREMELY CURIOUS WHY PRO PUBLICA HASN’T RECORDED ANY ANNUAL TAX FILINGS OF “HOPE OF EVANSVILLE” FOR 2017 TO 2019.

THIS LINK IS FROM PRO PUBLICA SHOWS THE SUMMERY OF THE TAX FILING OF THE NON- PROFIT HOPE OF EVANSVILLE, INC.

https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/356075575

THIS LINK FROM PRO PUBLICA SHOWS THE TAX FILINGS FOR THE NON-PROFIT HOPE OF EVANSVILLE 

https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/356075575/201802269349301885/full

 

Who Are The Never Trumpers?

1

Who Are The Never Trumpers?

Globalists and Soft Progressives AKA: the Republican Establishment

By Richard Moss MD

One could perhaps have excused them their earlier indiscretions of November 2016.  He was, after all, an unknown quantity, an outsider of questionable conservative pedigree.  Indeed, Donald Trump had been a fairly typical New York liberal Democrat for much of his life.  And he had led a less than stellar moral life.  And so the pile on at the time by National Review and others could perhaps have been forgiven, although not really when one considered the alternative.  As I had written at the time:

“Do we not grow weary of the sanctimonious ones?  The Never Trumpers that endlessly hector and scold, and hold themselves up as paragons of moral virtue? They display their good taste by showing contempt for Trump and his supporters.  Some of them claim they will vote down-ballot, skipping the Presidential slot, or vote for Evan what’s his name (McMullin).  Some will write in a candidate or go Libertarian, neither of who will have any chance of winning.  Other pious Republicans will even cast their vote for Hillary. 

But how much more compelling is the argument today, three years later, in light of the horrendous behavior of the Left, their naked will-to-power and demonic “rule or ruin” ethos?  And what of Trump, his incredible and unexpected victory in 2016, and then his very favorable performance as President and conservative standard-bearer?  What accounts for the odd and self-immolating behavior of the Never Trump crowd, most if not all of them former card-carrying members of the right?  

Never Trumpers go under many labels including Globalists, neo-Cons, “moderate” Republicans, RINOs, Democrat-lites, Davos types (the “Daveoisie”), the Open Borders Crowd, and the “GOP establishment.”  Some of its better-known members include William Kristol, Mona Charen, the Koch brothers, John Podhoretz, Jeff Flake, Steve Schmidt, the Bushes, Peggy Noonan, George Will, Bret Stephens, Jonah Goldberg, Mitt Romney, John Kasich, David Frum, Gabriel Schoenfeld, Rick Wilson, David French, Max Boot, and others.  

  Many Never Trumpers, furthermore, are of Jewish persuasion, as I am, and supporters of Israel, as I also am.  One would have thought that actions taken by the President, our modern-day Cyrus, and defender of the Jews, would have persuaded them.

Perhaps, it is that many of them, along with liberal associates, are part of what Angelo Codevilla describes as the “ruling class.”  These are individuals in higher-level positions in government, academia, the media, think tanks, non-government organizations (NGOs), unions, non-profits, corporations, and the courts.  They compose an extra-constitutional elite system, operating outside of the usual democratic mechanisms, that, in effect, run the country. 

The ruling class believes themselves of superior cultural, moral, and intellectual temperament; they view with disdain the unwashed living in the vast swaths between the coasts over whom they feel entitled to rule. Although superficially embracing democracy, they prefer government by experts, or, as it may occur, judges, but reject the elected branches unless, of course, they deliver the proper outcome.  They are, in other words, “progressives.”

Ruling class elites place great faith in the “New World Order,“ “globalism,” and “world government.”  International bodies such as the European Union, the United Nations, and NATO are highly favored and critical to their vision of the world.  They abhor primitive “tribal” notions of nationhood such as love of country, its culture and heritage, and national sovereignty.  Appalled by “Brexit” and efforts by Trump to “build a wall,” they embrace open immigration and amnesty while spurning borders.  Some advocate policies that can loosely be described as “invade the world, invite the world.”  They support “criminal justice reform,” single-payer healthcare, and the Paris Climate Accord and maintain that Europe is better than America.  Many are not particularly fond of religion or biblical values, in particular, Christianity.  They are socially “liberal” or “libertarian” even when fiscally conservative.  The Second Amendment repulses them. 

It is a single class that includes Democrats and Republicans but not exactly.  The Democrats are the ranking members and Republicans are subordinate. Democrats enjoy prestige and power; their media organs are dominant; they have cultural gravitas.  Republicans do not.  They seek acceptance and recognition but know that they serve at the pleasure of liberal superiors. 

Republican ruling class members seek to preserve their lucrative media presence, affirmative pats on the head from leftist betters, and, of course, dinner invitations from liberal friends.  They do this by promoting certain foundational policies beloved by the left (particularly on immigration).  In this particular era, however, they have found a far better meal ticket to ensure continued membership in this exclusive club: denouncing Trump and everything he stands for including those who voted for him.  Republican country clubbers recognize that Trump is, in effect, a giant middle finger from the “deplorable” to them and their liberal cocktail lounge comrades.  Indeed, it is the failure of Republicans to enact policies that they fundraise and campaign on every election cycle (defending our borders, ending Obamacare, law, and order) only to abandon them once ensconced in power that drove voters to the outsider, anti-establishment Trump in the first place.  It is from the ranks of the second tier of the “ruling class,” of the cowering, pseudo-right aristocracy, that many if not most Never Trumpers arise.       

“The so-called conservative, Holier than thou Never Trump crowd cannot abide by supporting Trump, or even keep from insulting him and his many followers in the most vicious ways.  They must then recognize that they are complicit in a possible Hillary presidency that will bring the nation to its knees.  Although an imperfect candidate, Trump is the only one that can prevent a likely 16-year Obama-Clinton continuum that will alter the nation irreversibly.  The moral and principled choice is to stop Clinton by embracing Trump.  By failing to do so, Republican Never Trumpers betray the nation and the conservative cause they claim to be a part of, and place themselves alongside the vile Left who actively seek to destroy the country.” 

We have long been burdened by what Lenin described as “useful idiots,” referring to leftist intellectuals in the West sympathetic to Marxist Socialism despite the abysmal failures and atrocities.  Now we have our “useful idiots” on the pseudo-right in the form of the Never Trumpers.  These pearl-clutches and malcontents, closet socialists and soft-progressives, are every bit as despicable as the leftist followers they once decried.  They cover themselves in shame.

FOOTNOTE: Dr. Richard Moss is a board-certified head and neck cancer surgeon and was a candidate for Congress in 2016 and 2018.  He has written A Surgeon’s Odyssey and Matilda’s Triumph available on amazon.com.  Find more of his essays at richardmossmd.com.  Visit Richard Moss, M.D. on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.

Bill To Give Attorney General Power To Prosecute Local Cases Advances In Senate

0

TheStateHouseFile.com

INDIANAPOLIS—County prosecutors and defense attorneys were united Tuesday in opposition to legislation that would allow the attorney general’s office to pursue criminal cases that locals decline.

In spite of overwhelming testimony against Senate Bill 436, the proposed legislation passed the Senate Corrections and Criminal Code Committee by a 6-3 vote. It now heads to the full Senate for action.

Sen. Michael Young, R-Indianapolis, right, chairs the Corrections and Criminal Code Committee and authored the bill allowing the attorney general’s office to assume jurisdiction over local prosecutors in some cases. Photo by Victoria Ratliff, TheStatehouseFile.com.

The amended version of the bill, authored by Sen. Michael Young, R-Indianapolis, would allow the state’s attorney general to name a special prosecutor to pursue criminal cases when local prosecutors decide against filing charges.

David Powell, a senior council of Prosecuting Attorney’s Council, was adamant in his opposition to the bill.

“The one thing I can say without hesitation, having been involved for almost four decades in this business, is prosecutorial discussion is the holy grail,” Powell said, adding that it should be up to the local prosecutor to decide what to charge or not charge.

Much of the discussion about the bill focused on the decision last year by Marion County Prosecutor Ryan Mears to not prosecute people arrested with small amounts of marijuana in their possession.

David Powell of the Indiana Prosecuting Attorneys Council opposed legislation that would usurp the authority of local prosecutors. Photo by Victoria Ratliff, TheStatehouseFile.com.

Michael Moore of Indiana Public Defender Council said that SB 436 overrides the voices of local voters who might have selected a prosecutor because he or she declined to prosecute certain low-level crimes. He noted that many times people of color or living in poverty are disproportionately affected by the prosecution of low-level crimes.

Young said he began working on the bill after learning some prosecutors are failing to pursue some crimes.

“What gives me concern is this growing trend throughout the country where prosecutors aren’t simply prosecuting crimes as a whole, as a policy,” Young said. Some examples he gave were damage to one’s property by rioting and stealing less than $900 from a business or person among other crimes.

During the hearing, 15 people testified and only Parvonay Stover of the attorney general’s office wasn’t opposed to it. She said the attorney general is neutral on it.

“That being said, if the General Assembly decides to move ahead with this concept, then we are ready and willing to help in whatever way we can,” Stover said. “But we think it’s merely a band aid to the underlying problem.” She did not elaborate.

Katie Blair, director of Advocacy and Public Policy for the American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana, said the legislation would undermine the power of voters to hold local prosecutors accountable for their actions.

Sen. Karen Tallian, D-Ogden Dunes, said that she found the bill to be “amazingly wrong” and unconstitutional. She is a member of the committee and voted against the bill.

“It’s going to be incredibly hard to determine what is an announced categorical refusal versus a practice that may be done quietly, and not be announced,” she said. “I think one of the things this bill will do is to encourage prosecutors to do something and not make it transparent.”

FOOTNOTE: Lacey Watt is a reporter for TheStatehouseFile.com, a news website powered by Franklin College journalism students.

 

House Advances Hostettler’s Bill Adding Magistrate In Gibson County

0

House Advances Hostettler’s Bill Adding Magistrate In Gibson County

 STATEHOUSE (Jan. 29, 2020) – The Indiana House of Representatives on Tuesday unanimously supported State Rep. Matt Hostettler’s (R-Fort Branch) legislation allowing Gibson County to hire a new magistrate.

Hostettler said, unlike judges who are elected, magistrates are hired to preside over minor civil and criminal cases and conduct preliminary hearings. They also assist with judicial caseloads by administering oaths, compelling the attendance of witnesses, setting bail, conducting hearings and trials, and imposing criminal sentences.

“Our judges in Gibson County are handling more and more cases, and adding a magistrate would provide much-needed assistance and support to our judges and those waiting for their case to be resolved,” Hostettler said. “This will give Gibson County judges more time to spend on complex cases, especially those impacting children.”

According to Hostettler, Gibson County recently implemented a pre-trial release program, and the county is still adjusting to this new process. A magistrate would help the county more efficiently handle its cases.

House Bill 1145 now moves to the Indiana Senate for further consideration. Visit iga.in.gov for more information about this legislation.

 

 St. Benedict Cathedral School (St. Ben’s) Host “Come and See Night” This Evening

0

 St. Benedict Cathedral School (St. Ben’s), located at 530 S. Harlan Avenue, Evansville, IN 47714 will open its doors this Thursday evening, Jan. 30th, to welcome families who are interested in learning more about the school which offers faith-based education to children Preschool through 8th grade. Come and See Night is an Evansville diocesan-wide effort to showcase its parochial schools. 

“At St. Ben’s, we strive to form Christian disciples who proclaim the Catholic faith, achieve academic excellence and serve others,” said Kari Ford, school principal. “We welcome families between the hours of 5-7 pm to come to tour our school, learn about financial assistance options and ask questions that are important to them.” 

St. Ben’s recently participated in an accreditation assessment by the Indiana Catholic Schools Consortium (ICSC), in partnership with the Indiana Diocesan Accreditation Quality Assurance Board (IDAQAB) and scored above network averages on nearly all measured criteria.  The assessment is meant to gauge educational and cultural competencies against the Effective Learning Environment Observation Tool, otherwise known as ELEOT, which considers seven observation standards. 

“We are extremely proud of our students, faculty, and staff for displaying attributes which reflect the core values of St. Ben’s, every day,” added Ford. “It is with great pride that we invite others to Come and See.” 

To learn more about St. Benedict Cathedral School or to schedule a private tour, visit https://www.saintbenedictcathedral.org/school/. 

EPA Remains Committed To Restoring And Protecting Chesapeake Bay

0

Threatened Litigation Distracts Focus And Resources From Bay Restoration

Yesterday, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 3 sent a letter to Members of Congress emphasizing the agency’s commitment to protecting the Chesapeake Bay (Bay). The Bay is a unique and important national resource, and EPA is fully committed to the restoration of the Bay.

EPA’s actions to protect and restore the Bay match the promise EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler made at his confirmation hearing where he said that “I am very much committed to the Chesapeake Bay and to the Chesapeake Bay Program.”

The mischaracterization of the EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Director’s recent remarks is unfortunate and distracts from the good work that is being done by agency employees. The question of whether the Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) itself is enforceable by a court was answered by the previous administration in court filings defending the Bay TMDL. In 2016, the Obama Administration told the U.S. Supreme Court that a TMDL is an informational tool that “does not impose any binding implementation requirements on the States,” and that “the Bay TMDL does not directly regulate any sources or require any permits.” The Trump administration agrees with these statements from the prior administration.

“Nothing more clearly signifies the EPA’s ongoing commitment and accountability to the restoration of the Bay than our most recent Phase III Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) evaluations,” said Regional Administrator Cosmo Servidio.

In the evaluations, EPA identified that five of the Bay jurisdictions, including Maryland, must do more to achieve their goals. Our evaluations also identified targeted and extensive EPA support to assist the jurisdictions in their efforts to implement the WIPs.

The full letter is here.

EPA and the Bay jurisdictions, together, have the legal authority to ensure the implementation of Bay TMDLs. As has been done since the Bay TMDL was issued, EPA will continue to use our existing authorities under the Clean Water Act to ensure that all six Bay states and the District of Columbia are accountable for implementing their share of the Bay TMDLs’ nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment reductions.

EPA’s authorities come from the Clean Water Act. These authorities have not changed. Threatened litigation against EPA will undoubtedly distract from efforts to restore the Bay. The partnerships’ resources are better spent on continued enhancement and implementation of plans that will improve water quality. EPA, with the partnership, is committed to having all practices and controls in place by 2025.