A Study In Contrasts: The Representatives Versus The Represented In Indiana


A Study In Contrasts: The Representatives Versus The Represented In Indiana

By Bill Theobald and Janet Williams

The Indiana Citizen

The face of Indiana is changing rapidly, less white, more Black, brown, and Asian.

But whether the faces of the state’s representatives in Indianapolis and in Washington, D.C., will better reflect that growing diversity depends on what the GOP-controlled Indiana General Assembly does over the next few weeks to redraw the boundaries of Indiana’s state legislative and U.S. House districts.

Based on what happened when the Republicans controlled the map drawing after the 2010 Census and the similar process they have outlined for the 2020 Census, the focus seems to be more on maintaining the partisan advantage created by the 2011 maps. One study found the districts created then to be among the most gerrymandered of any state.

People wait in line for early voting at the Johnson County Courthouse in October 2020. Photo by Isaac Gleitz, TheStatehouseFile.com.

If that is what happens this year, then the gap between the representatives and the represented in the state will grow. The result, some believe, will be a further increase in political conflict, a decline in trust in political institutions and in participation in the process, and an overall weakening of our democracy. Indiana consistently ranks in the bottom 10 of states for voter turnout.

“I hate to paint a very gloomy picture, but I do think that American democracy is at a very fragile place, and the fragility of this democracy rests on the question of how citizens view political institutions,” said Emmitt Riley III, associate professor of political science and Africana studies at DePauw University in Greencastle, Indiana.

“This threat that we see manifesting itself … a lot of it boils down to the question of representation,” Riley said, “What does our government look like?

Riley also sees a repeat of a phenomenon identified in a seminal 1949 book called “Southern Politics in State and Nation” that argued that an increase in minority population leads to greater white hostility.

“We’ve studied this to suggest that in areas where there are an increased minoritized population, we typically see white voters voting more conservative,” Riley said.

And the increase in minority population is striking.

About one of four Hoosiers is a minority, according to the 2020 census. The number of minority citizens has nearly doubled since 2000.

Overall, Indiana’s population grew by a little more than 300,000, or 4.7%. But the white population dropped more than 200,000 while the minority population grew by nearly a half million.

The same trend is true nationwide, said Yurig Rudensky, redistricting counsel for the Brennan Center for Justice.

“The reality is that this multi-racial, multi-ethnic America is not some faraway future destination, but it is who we are already, it is who we are today,” Rudensky said.

In Indiana, the state’s multi-racial population grew 240%. Its Asian population grew more than 60% over the decade while the Hispanic population grew more than 40% and Black population by about 10%.

And the people representing this rapidly diversifying population?

One of the 11 members of the Indiana congressional delegation,, Rep. Andre Carson of Indianapolis, is a minority. Sixteen of the 150 members of the Indiana House and Senate are members of a minority group.

The representation gap is likely even greater than the 2020 Census numbers show because historically, minorities have been undercounted.

William O’Hare, a longtime expert on census data, testified in a 2019 lawsuit brought by Hispanic groups against the Trump administration, challenging its plan for the 2020 census. In his written testimony, O’Hare cited research showing that the rate at which people voluntarily return their census forms can be a proxy for underreporting.

“Census tracts where Hispanics and Blacks are the plurality of the population have lower self-response rates in the 2020 Census than tracts where NonHispanic Whites are the plurality of the population in the 2020 Census. This indicates Hispanics and Blacks are likely to have higher net undercounts and omissions rates than Non-Hispanic Whites in the 2020 Census,” O’Hare wrote in his testimony.

An analysis of voluntary response rates in Indiana by the Indiana Business Research Center found many census tracts—the smallest geographic areas measured by the census—in high minority urban areas of the state were also those with voluntary response rates of below 50%.

State Sen. Fady Qaddoura, a Democrat from Indianapolis, argues that poor representation of minorities ultimately causes the state economic harm.

Qaddoura, a Muslim Arab American, said it undermines the state’s ability to attract a diverse workforce, which leaves Indiana “regressing and not competing on a national level.”

In addition to race, the other major trend that map drawers will face is the decline in rural Indiana and the shift in population to suburban and urban areas.

In fact, the 11-county central Indiana metro area, including Indianapolis, Carmel, and Anderson, added 223,163 residents between 2010 and 2020, or nearly three-fourths of the state’s entire net population gain.

Andrew Downs, associate professor of political science at Purdue University Fort Wayne, said the shift creates a challenge for the rural interests that have wielded great political power in Indiana.

“Will they lose influence, or will they change their approach?” Downs said of rural interests.

Those like Majorie Hershey, professor emeritus of political science at Indiana University in Bloomington, who see Indiana’s political boundaries as clearly drawn to diminish the power of Blacks and other minorities, point to Monroe County as an example.

The county is carved up among five state House districts and two state Senate districts.

“Well, that’s called cracking, taking where the minority party is dominant and breaking it up into as many districts as possible,” Hershey said. “If you were to have Monroe County split among two state House districts, there will be the chance for Democratic candidates to win or at least be competitive in both of them.”

Hershey said that while Hoosiers may share common interests at a certain level, such as having safe communities, different groups will support different policies to achieve those goals.

“Do we, for example, get to a safe community by having larger and better funded police force and locking up as many people who might be thought to have criminal characteristics as possible?” she said, “Or do we get to a safer society by emphasizing opportunities for all people and providing remediation and help for people who are having difficulties so that they do not turn out to be as likely to commit crimes?”

Women also remain greatly underrepresented in Indiana’s state legislative and congressional delegations. While women comprise about 51% of the state’s population, they hold less than one in four of the state legislative seats and two of the 11 congressional seats.

“Many of our issues don’t advance in the Indiana General Assembly because we are underrepresented,” said Rima Shahid, executive director of Women4Change. The nonpartisan group has been pushing for fairer maps and commissioned the study released last month that found the high degree of gerrymandering in the 2011 maps.

If the growth in the minority population continues at the same pace as it has for the past 20 years, by 2040, about 42.5% of Indiana’s population will be a minority.

But it is the current situation that requires a response from the Indiana General Assembly, said Hershey with IU.

“It’s pretty clear the bottom line here is that a democracy is supposed to permit popular control of the institutions of government,” she said. “When you systematically give more of that control to one group of people than another, you can assume that the interests of that part of the population that has been given control will be much better represented.”

Added Rudensky with the Brennan Center: “Our country was founded on the principle that our legislators and Congress should reflect the people, that there be a close connection between policymakers and the people who have to live with the policies.

“Where redistricting doesn’t capture the evolution of the population and the changes that are occurring, the principle is subverted, and there are all sorts of negative consequences that come with that,” he said.

“People are less engaged in political life, in public life. People are disconnected from their government and representatives, and that leads to an overall degradation of our democratic systems.”

FOOTNOTE: This article was published by TheStatehouseFile.com through a partnership with The Indiana Citizen (indianacitizen.org), a nonpartisan, nonprofit platform dedicated to increasing the number of informed, engaged Hoosier citizens.

Bill Theobald is a veteran Washington, D.C.,-based journalist who most recently worked in the USA TODAY Washington Bureau and for the nonprofit news website The Fulcrum, which focuses on democracy reform efforts. He was a reporter and editor for The Indianapolis Star from 1990 to 2005.

Janet Williams recently retired as executive editor of TheStatehouseFile.com at Franklin College. She formerly worked in corporate communications for Cummins and as a reporter and editor at The Indianapolis Star.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email