Home Blog Page 832

“IS IT TRUE” NOVEMBER 6, 2023

2
question
question

City-County Observer Comment Policy. Be kind to people. No personal attacks or harassment will not be tolerated and shall be removed from our site.

We understand that sometimes people don’t always agree and discussions may become a little heated.  The use of offensive language, or insults against commenters will not be tolerated and will be removed from our site.

Any comments posted in this column do not represent the views or opinions of the City-County Observer or our advertisers

IS IT TRUE that several weeks ago a member of the CCO staff was harassed?  …that a couple of our computer-savvy “Moles” are working on identifying who harassed our staff member so we can turn over the information to the appropriate law enforcement agency for review and a possible indictment?

IS IT TRUE that when politicians are smarter than members of the media the political news is controlled by the politicians?
IS IT TRUE that we have been told not to be surprised to see blue-collar working-class people of Evansville who are fed up with the poor conditions of our parks, and streets, high Water and Sewer bills, high property taxes, out-of-control crime rate, the serious problems with our Public Transportation system voting in records numbers in the upcoming November 7, 2023 city election?
IS IT TRUE if you were The Chairman Of The Board Of Directors of a 480 million dollar corporation looking for a new CEO/President do you think that he would hire anyone who is currently working in local city government to run his corporation?  …that we wonder if you are aware that the City Of Evansville is a 480 million dollar not-for-profit corporation?
IS IT TRUE that we have been told by several reliable sources that Evansville is over one (1) billion dollars in debt?  …that we have been told it isn’t going to get any better because the new Sewer Treatment Plant is projected to cost somewhere around 300 hundred million dollars to build?
IS IT TRUE that we are told by a couple of local political movers shakers that they expect political Wards One (1) and Three (3) are too close to call but they give a slight edge to the challengers?  …that the race in Ward Two (2) the edge goes to the incumbent Missy Mosby (D)?  …that in the At-Large  City Council race, the political movers and shakers predict that Jonathan Weaver (R) will be re-elected by a comfortable margin?  …that Ron Beane (R) and political newcomers Paul Green (D) and Mary Allen (D) are expected to fight it out for the second and third Ai
t-Large seats?
IS IT TRUE that are told that many taxpayers of Evansville aren’t happy with the millions of dollars spent on non-essential and irrelevant capital projects during the last several years?
IS IT TRUE that local Government officials are doing for people that they can do for themselves?
IS IT TRUE that we were told by several political insiders that we could be seeing four (4) new faces on the 2024 Evansville City Council?
IS IT TRUE that several credible sources have told us that the members of the Evansville City Council recently adopted the 2024 city budget that has the following monies and stipend earmarked for all 9 (nine) members of the Evansville City Council?  …their salaries and benefits for 2024 are $192,158 in salaries, $212,090 in health insurance, $10,000 in travel and 0 in the past, and $32,541 in PERFs?
IS IT TRUE that “Lease/Rental Revenue Bonds” have quietly been used on other capital projects throughout Evansville during the last several years?  …that a couple of current Evansville City Council members publicly stated that “Lease/Rental Revenue Bonds” are creative financing?   …that the real truth is that “Lease/RentalRevenue Bonds” financing is a loan of last resort?
IS IT TRUE that we are hearing that the voters all over America are in the mindset to get rid of all of the tax and spend politicians?

IS IT TRUE that we are told that several members of the local Chamber Of Commerce are wondering how much membership money their Board of Directors spent on the “National Job Search” to replace the outgoing CEO/President of the Chamber?

IS IT TRUE that many City and County taxpayers are shocked to learn that Evansville and Vanderburgh County Commission donated 300,000 dollars each to help fund EREP marketing activities?  …that we are also told that Warrick and Posey counties donated only $60,000 each to EREP marketing activities?
IS IT TRUE that former Evansville Mayors Jonathon Weinzapfel and Frank McDonald Jr. not only lived within their budget restraints but when they left office they had comfortable cash balances in the “Rainey Day” fund to pass on to their successors?
…that Evansville taxpayers are hoping and praying that the current and outgoing Mayor will do similar?
IS IT TRUE that we are extremely disappointed to hear that two city officials recently called Mayoral candidate Micheal Daugherty a lair at a political gathering? …that all we can say to both individuals is that figures don’t lie especially when Mr. Daugherty got his figures from the City Controller’s office?
IS IT TRUE that United States Senator Mike Braun recently caused himself a serious political problem by endorsing Donald Trump for President of The United States?  …that many of his supporters wonder why a law and order arch-conservative would support someone who has been charged with trying to overthrow the Government of the United States Of America and also being charged with other crimes too numerous to mention?
IS IT TRUE that we would like to congratulate Stephen Schweikarth for being appointed as the new Nissan General Sales Manager for D-Patrick-Evansville?
IS IT TRUE that the recent CITY-COUNTY OBSERVER’s monthly “Speaker Forum” luncheon was extremely successful?  …that our extremely popular Vanderburgh Sheriff Noah Robinson did a masterful job as our guest speaker?  …that we give five (5) cheers to Co-Chairpersons Steve Hammer and Ben Shoulders for doing an excellent job in planning this most worthwhile community event.
IS IT TRUE that  CHIEF DEPUTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY WINSTON LIN is doing a remarkable job in his position?
IS IT TRUE that our “Readers Poll” is non-scientific but trendy?  …our current “Readers Poll” question is: If the Mayoral election was held today who would you vote for?
If you would like to advertise in the CCO on-line and printed editions please contact us at City-County Observer@live.com

 

 

JUST IN: Aces improve to 6-0 with a 93-74 win over SEMO

0

Aces improve to 6-0 with a 93-74 win over SEMO

Humrichous scores 27 in the win

NOVEMBER 25, 2023

CHATTANOOGA, Tenn. – Leading from start to finish on Saturday, the University of Evansville men’s basketball team improved to 6-0 with a 93-74 victory over Southeast Missouri State in the second game of the Coca-Cola Zero Sugar Classic inside McKenzie Arena.

With the win, the Purple Aces improved to 6-0 for the first time since the 1964-65 undefeated national championship season.  It also marked the first such instance since UE joined the Division I ranks in 1977.

“Our group was mature enough to handle them (SEMO) chopping away at the lead.  SEMO had a good game plan, but I credit our group with having a big start,” Aces head coach David Ragland said.  “We received contributions from each guy who stepped on the floor.  Yesterday was an extremely emotional game and for us to come back today and play the way we did was special.”

Once again, it was Ben Humrichous leading the way.  Converting 11 of his 13 field goal tries, Humrichous scored 27 points while adding six rebounds, two assists and two blocks.  He was 3-of-5 from long range.  Joshua Hughes recorded 21 points in an efficient 8-for-12 shooting day.  Hughes accumulated six boards, three assists and a pair of blocks.  Kenny Strawbridge Jr. finished with 17.  SEMO was led by Adam Larson’s 22 points.  He knocked down six 3-pointers.

Hitting their opening four attempts, the Purple Aces jumped out to an 8-0 lead just over a minute into the contest.  Kenny Strawbridge Jr. recorded five of the first eight points.  SEMO closed to within four points at 12-8 before the Aces retook control.  Joshua Hughes posted three points in a quick 5-0 spurt before adding another field goal to give Evansville its first double-digit lead at 21-10 with 12:22 remaining in the period.

As the game reached the midway point of the half, Chuck Bailey III connected on a triple in a run that stretched the lead to 28-12.  Five minutes later, it was another Humrichous basket that pushed the advantage to 20 points for the first time – 37-17.  Evansville’s lead reached 27 points inside the final two minutes when an alley-oop from Tanner Cuff to Hughes made it a 51-24 contest.

Southeast Missouri State never gave up as they scored the final five points of the stanza to trail by a 51-29 score at halftime.  Evansville scorched the nets, shooting 61.1% in the half with three players reaching double figures, led by Humrichous’ 15 points.  Strawbridge and Hughes scored 11 apiece.

After shifting the momentum to complete the first half, SEMO continued to rally in the early moments of the second.  A pair of triples saw them make it a 51-35 score before Strawbridge knocked down two free throws to temporarily end the stretch.  The Redhawks came right back with four in a row to get within 14.

Hughes’ sixth field goal of the day pushed the UE lead back to 15 tallies at 59-44, but the SEMO run continued as a 3-point play was part of another 5-0 spurt that made it a 59-49 game with 15 minutes left.  With 13:40 remaining, the Redhawks got within eight before the Aces regained control.  Antonio Thomas knocked down a pair of free throws to open a huge 9-0 run, which added some much-needed breathing room.  Bailey hit a layup during the rally while Humrichous completed it with a 3-point play.

Despite the run by UE, Southeast Missouri State continued to put up a fight, cutting the deficit to 12 at the 8-minute mark, but the Evansville attack proved to be too much.  The Aces never let SEMO any closer and would go back up by 21 in the final minute before earning the 93-74 win.  UE finished the game shooting 56.5% while SEMO shot 44.8%.  On the glass, the Aces finished with a 35-31 advantage.

Two Missouri Valley Conference games are on tap over the next week.  UE opens league play at Missouri State on Wednesday before returning home to face UNI on Saturday.

MICHEAL DAUGHERTY EXPLAINS WHY HE RAN FOR MAYOR OF EVANSVILLE

0
Dear Citizens Of Evansville
My opponents have realized my candidacy is as valid as their attacks have started. I’m here to put my campaign for Mayor of Evansville into perspective.
After much prayerful thought, and talking to family, friends, and supporters, I have decided to make the following public commitments to you, the citizens.
First of all, I joined the race for Mayor Of Evansville because I know Evansville is at the crossroads of economic and financial peril. I know that with the help of the citizens of Evansville and because of my educational background, life experiences, and business background and the strong desire to help make Evansville great again.
One of the reasons why I ran for Mayor of Evansville is to help stop the financial and economic decline of Evansville during the last twelve (12) years.
If elected, I hereby commit to the citizens of Evansville that I will be a (1) term mayor who will take a political non-partisan approach to revitalizing Evansville’s economy. I want to stress that I will not be a typical politician but practice “Good Public Policy” and therefore a “Good Steward Of The Public Trust”.
I hope that you understand that I understand that I work for you and that I will be an employee of you, the citizens of Evansville.
As your next mayor, you can expect to see me either in the neighborhoods looking at issues that need addressing, or behind my desk making sound business decisions within our budget restraints and not in front of the camera promoting myself or a self-serving political agenda.
My campaign slogan is “People Over Politics, which simply means, I will govern with the US in mind, not me! You can expect me to govern without bias or political affiliation. It is important to point out that if I’m elected, Mayor of Evansville  I am not going to be a good mayor. I WILL BE A GREAT MAYOR!
Your vote is not a vote for me, but a vote for yourself! The days of political patronage, nepotism, and “Party Over People” will end with my administration.
Finally, I would like to point out that there are many talented people currently working for the city and I will ensure you that they are retained and rewarded for their devotion to the citizens of Evansville. I will also commit to appointing the most qualified people for numerous boards and commissions, without regard to political affiliations.
However, I shall be appointing a new Police Chief and Fire Chief and expect to find their replacement within the current ranks.
When I am elected Mayor of Evansville, get ready to roll up your sleeves with me as we have a lot of work to do correcting our safety issues, and finances, revitalizing our parks, and repairing our streets and sidewalks that have been ignored during the last 12 years.

My administration will truly be an administration for ALL people of Evansville.

FOOTNOTE:  This article was posted by the City-County Observer without bias, opinion, or editing.

We also invited the other Mayoral candidate to send us an article about her final thoughts concerning her campaign.  When we receive her article we shall post it without bias, opinion, or editing.

REMARKS ABOUT A STEPHANIE TERRY ADMINISTRATION

0
REMARKS ABOUT A STEPHANIE TERRY ADMINISTRATION
Article Written By A Member Of Stephanie Terry Campaign Staff
November 6, 2023
As the campaign for Evansville Mayor comes to a close, political insiders, experts and many in the community agree that momentum is breaking in Stephanie Terry’s favor and she is on her way to becoming Evansville’s next Mayor.

Terry, a Democrat, is running against Republican Natalie Rascher and Libertarian Michael Daugherty.

A few weeks ago, Indianapolis-based political analyst Brian Howey changed his rating for the race from “tossup” to “leans Democrat.” And just last week, Politico reporter Adam Wren wrote that dust-ups between Rasher and Daugherty are clearing a path for Terry.

Those in the know say it’s not only Terry’s positive message and detailed plans that are resonating with voters, it’s the fact that they feel she has the experience that’s necessary to serve as Mayor.

Terry serves on the Vanderburgh County Council and leads the Children’s Museum of Evansville.

So what could people expect in a Terry Administration?

“I have said it all along…this campaign is not about me…it’s about the “We.” I intend to use my experience as a leader to bring people together to take on the tough issues our city is facing,” said Terry.

Terry outlined some of those issues in her Forward Together Plan for the city’s future. They include taking a broader approach to public safety by addressing housing, neighborhood revitalization, mental health, and education.

“It’s not just about policing, it’s about preventing crime by providing opportunities for people that help them envision and achieve bright futures here in our city,” said Terry.

Terry says she’ll also work on improving the quality of life in our city by freshening up public spaces and parks, creating cultural districts, and improving city services.

As she was building the Forward Together plan this summer, Terry hosted a Together with Terry Listening Tour to bring residents together to talk through thoughts and priorities.

“It was important, and is important to me that the people in Evansville have a say in the future of their city,” said Terry. “And so, I intend to continue those Listening Tours as Mayor. Let’s face it, to help position our city for the next quarter century, we will need everyone’s ideas, creativity, and energy.”

If it sounds like a lofty agenda, Terry says it is. But she says she knows it’s possible to do lots of things all at once.

“If we are going to lift up our entire city, we can’t just focus on one area at a time. We have to be able to balance work in all of these areas,” said Terry. “In my career and life, I’ve shown I can do that.”

Terry won’t be doing it alone. She says she’s committed to building a team of talent that understands its role is not only to lead but to serve the people of Evansville.

That gets back to her reason for running in the first place.

“I decided to run for Mayor because I felt called to serve. Now, ten months later, I still feel that, but I’m even more inspired,” said Terry. “I met so many incredible people on the campaign trail…it’s made me realize just what a special place we have here. I am even more committed to making a difference.”

Terry says she hopes that as Evansville’s next Mayor, but even if it’s not, she’ll forever be a community champion and servant leader.

FOOTNOTE:  This article was posted by the City-County Observer without bias, opinion, or editing.

We also invited the other two (2) Mayoral candidates to send us an article about their final thoughts concerning their campaigns.  When we receive their articles we shall post them without bias, opinion, or editing.

DEFIANT RESPONSE: AG Rokita accepts misconduct reprimand

0

DEFIANT RESPONSE: AG Rokita accepts misconduct reprimand, says decision ‘will save a lot of taxpayer money’

By Marilyn Odendahl

The Indiana Citizen

November 2, 2023

Even as he was slapped with a public reprimand from the Indiana Supreme Court, Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita is still defiant, maintaining his statements were “truthful” in his public remarks about an investigation into an Indianapolis OB/GYN and saying he agreed to the punishment to save the taxpayers money.

In a six-page opinion issued Thursday, a majority of the Supreme Court accepted a conditional agreement reached by Rokita and the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission – citing Rokita’s “acceptance of responsibility” – which settles a disciplinary case that had been opened against the attorney general. Under the agreement, Rokita is being publicly reprimanded and ordered to pay $250 in fees.

The majority found Rokita’s public statements about Dr. Caitlin Bernard, an OB/GYN at IU Health, in which he called her “an abortion activist” and accused her of failing to properly file medical reports, had no purpose “other than to embarrass or burden the physician.”

In his response to his reprimand, Rokita blamed the disciplinary action on “liberal activists” and said he decided the best thing to do was to accept the punishment.

“Having evidence and explanation for everything I said, I could have fought over those 16 words, but ending their campaign now will save a lot of taxpayer money and distraction, which is also very important to me,” Rokita stated. “In order to resolve this, I was required to sign an affidavit without any modifications.”

Indiana Chief Justice Loretta Rush and Justice Christopher Goff dissented, believing the discipline was too lenient for Rokita, because he is the state’s top lawyer and based on the “scope and breadth” of his misconduct. Neither wrote a separate opinion to explain their stance.

The Supreme Court majority of Justices Derek Molter, Mark Massa and Geoffrey Slaughter pointed to previous disciplinary cases, including one against the late Marion County Prosecutor Carl Brizzi, and concluded a public reprimand was appropriate.

“(Rokita’s) acceptance of responsibility is a mitigating factor, as are his cooperation with the disciplinary process and his lack of prior discipline over a lengthy career,” the majority wrote. “But that same length of experience also ‘counsels that he should have known better’ than to conduct himself in the manner he did.”

However, in his response, Rokita said that his comments about Bernard were “truthful” and “factual.”

“I deny and was not found to have violated anyone’s confidentiality or any laws,” Rokita stated in the press release. “I was not fined. And I will continue as Indiana’s duly-elected attorney general.”

Bernard’s attorney, Kathleen DeLaney of DeLaney and DeLaney, said Rokita should be contrite, instead of combative.

“As part of the settlement agreement, Mr. Rokita admitted to violating two attorney ethics rules by attacking Dr. Bernard on national television,” DeLaney said in an emailed statement. “His public statements should reflect that fact and we expect a prompt and sincere apology to Dr. Bernard.”

A single comment

The disciplinary action focused on an interview Rokita gave on Fox News in July 2022.

A media firestorm was ignited after Bernard confirmed to an Indianapolis Star reporter that she had performed an abortion on a 10-year-old rape victim who had to travel to Indiana from her home state of Ohio because of that state’s restrictive abortion laws. In May, the Medical License Board of Indiana found Bernard had violated patient confidentiality, and reprimanded her as well as imposed a $3,000 fine.

Immediately after the story broke, Rokita  appeared on television, publicly released a letter he sent to Gov. Eric Holcomb related to Bernard, and gave a press conference on Facebook, making statements about Bernard and saying his office was investigating her and looking at taking her medical license.

However, the Supreme Court’s opinion focused on a single statement he made in July 2022, while appearing on Fox News. Rokita said, “We have this abortion activist acting as a doctor – with a history of failing to report.”

As part of the conditional agreement, the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and Rokita agreed he had violated two rules of professional conduct by making that statement. He violated Rules 3.6(a) and 4.4(a) by talking about his office’s investigation into Bernard before it was completed and by making comments meant only to “embarrass, delay, or burden” Bernard.

The Supreme Court majority found during the Fox News interview, Rokita’s comment could have unfairly influenced any proceeding against Bernard. Specifically, the majority wrote that Rokita’s “statement was of a type rebuttably presumed to have substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing an adjudicative proceeding.”

A violation of a third rule was dismissed by the Supreme Court, presumably pursuant to the settlement.

After the disciplinary complaint was filed in September, Rokita filed a response with the Supreme Court. He acknowledged his statement “could reasonably be considered to have violated” the two Indiana Rules of Professional Conduct.

More remarks about Bernard

With the case now decided, the attorney general is not backing down from his original comment on Fox. He stated in his press release that his words “are factual” and that Bernard “is by her own actions an outspoken abortion activist” and “her full-time patient practice focuses exclusively on performing abortions.”

“Bernard also claims a tattoo – an image of a coat hanger – that she displays and openly discusses with the national media,” Rokita stated. “Whether you think this behavior is good or bad, I challenge any objective Hoosier to conclude that she isn’t an ‘abortion activist,’ as I stated.”

In addition, Rokita pointed to unidentified “media accounts and complainant press releases” as making the allegations – well before his television appearance – that Bernard had failed to properly file the required reports with the Indiana State Department of Health.

Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawai’i, Alaska, Idaho, Indiana, and Kentucky, said it was pleased with the reprimand given to Rokita for his “repeated attempts” to harass “Dr. Caitlin Bernard just for doing her job.”

“Rokita’s attacks have no basis in medicine or health care; they are deliberate attempts to scare, silence, and shutter abortion providers in the state,” Planned Parenthood stated. “Two of the Justices in the decision believe the reprimand wasn’t far enough, and we agree. The stigmatizing, shaming, and harassing has to stop and Rokita has made it clear he won’t.”

Taxpayers’ money

Rokita was represented before the disciplinary commission by Schaerr Jaffe, a law firm based in Washington, D.C. Those attorneys also represented the attorney general in Marion County Superior Court in a lawsuit filed by Bernard against Rokita and helped represent the state at Bernard’s hearing before the medical licensing board.

To date, Rokita has not revealed how much public money has been spent defending his law license before the disciplinary commission. A review of invoicesfrom July 2022 through April 2023 shows Rokita’s office has paid Schaerr Jaffe $180,504.94 for all of its work. The Indiana Comptroller has not provided the invoices filed by Schaerr Jaffe since April.

In a previous statement to The Indiana Citizen, Rokita defended the use of taxpayer money in his disciplinary proceeding.

”Of course, public money is involved in any matter which defends the work of a state attorney whose efforts are performed on behalf of the state,” Rokita stated in an email.

FOOTNOTE:

The case is In the Matter of Theodore E. Rokita, 23S-DI-258.

This story has been updated to clarify The Indiana Citizen’s characterization of Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita’s response to being publicly reprimanded. Rokita sent out a press release defending his remarks about Dr. Caitlin Bernard during his investigation of her as being “truthful” and “factual,” and he also said he “was not found to have violated anyone’s confidentiality or any laws.”

Dwight Adams, a freelance editor and writer based in Indianapolis, edited this article. He is a former content editor, copy editor and digital producer at The Indianapolis Star and IndyStar.com, and worked as a planner for other newspapers, including the Louisville Courier-Journal.

 

 

CORRECTION OF THE CCO AWARDS LUNCHEON SPEECH BY WILLIAN MOREAU, PUBLISHER OF INDIANA CITIZEN

1

CORRECTION OF THE CCO AWARDS LUNCHEON SPEECH BY WILLIAN MOREAU, PUBLISHER OF INDIANA CITIZEN

 NOVEMBER 6, 2023

John, many thanks for the kind introduction.  I have so enjoyed our work together and I look forward to many more years of collaboration.  At some point, I suppose I’ll have to retire—truly retire–but if Ron Cosby is any example, I have another decade to go.  You know, the City-County Observer—which was founded in 2002—was really ahead of its time.  From its inception it was “Evansville’s True Watchdog” and its content was always free to everyone, sustained by advertisers, subscribers and supporters.  Twenty-plus years later, most of the new entrants into journalism are following a version of Ron and Marilyn’s model, with most forming as non-profits, surviving on the generosity of civic-minded people and organizations like those here today.  My message today is that journalism and, I submit, our version of democracy won’t survive without “civic philanthropists” like the people in this room.

In his intro, John mentioned I had the great privilege to work for both Birch and Evan Bayh early in my career.  So when I asked John for some advice for this speech, he said, “Well, Bill, I have heard you speak and you come off a bit, well, pedantic.”  “Pedantic?” I said.  “Okay, you can sound stilted and academic,” John said.  “Not helpful.”  “Well, let me put it this way, less Evan and more Birch.”

Hmmm, “less Evan and more Birch.”  Please lower your expectations.

A quick word about our nonprofit, The Indiana Citizen Education Foundation.  We’re supported entirely by civic philanthropists.  If you look at our list of donors, posted on indianacitizen.org, you will see names you recognize, including folks from Southwest Indiana.  Our supporters are among the most active, engaged, informed citizens in our state.  These are Hoosiers who support something they don’t need and may rarely use, because they are committed to bringing millions of other Hoosiers into the civic life of our state.

And make no mistake, the civic health of our state is poor.

I need to cover a bit of ground in a short amount of time, so let me begin by seeing if we agree on some key ideas:

-we live in a constitutional republic, to be sure, but it’s okay to use the word “democracy” to describe how we choose our leaders, okay? So, 

-voting is a good thing

-See if you agree: I never miss the chance to vote; no one can suppress my vote; heck, I’d walk barefoot over broken glass in a blizzard to vote if I had to.

-how about this: information is power

-an informed electorate is a good thing

-journalism plays a vital role in ensuring an informed electorate

-with all its flaws, a healthy, competitive two-party system has served our country pretty well 

-and Libertarians have something to say!  

-the greatest singer-songwriter of all time is Jackson Browne [just checking if you were listening]

-municipal elections really matter, and I wish more people voted in them

-how about this: competitive elections lead to greater turnout

-one of my pet peeves: why do we elect the County surveyor and coroner in partisan elections, right? 

-and finally this one, “Bill, if you guys are successful in significantly increasing the number of informed voters, I am great with that, because it means more of my preferred candidates will win by bigger margins because we have better ideas.”   Let me repeat that one, because if you disagree with it, well, search your civic soul. [repeat]

So let’s run through some data:

-In the 1970s, 80s and 90s, Indiana’s voter registration and turnout numbers put us at or slightly above the national average.

-Beginning in 2000, Indiana has consistently been below and sometimes well below the national average for registration and turnout.

-According to the Indiana Civic Health Index, our national ranking for turnout was 48th in 2010, 38th in 2012, 47th in 2014, 41st in 2016, 43rd in 2018, 46th in 2020. 

-In 2020, Indiana had record turnout, but we dropped from 41st to 46th because our turnout went up 9% when the country went up 15%.

-Oh, for those who believe that “higher turnout favors Democrats,” in 2020 in Indiana President Trump and Governor Holcomb both substantially increased their vote over 2016 and the House Republicans picked up four seats.

-My sense is that turnout in the Evansville city elections will go up substantially this year, right?  Does anyone think it’ll hit 30,000? 

-We appear to be losing the next generation of voters.  A national study of new registrants right before the 2020 election in the 18-19 age cohort showed Indiana dead last in the country, with 54% fewer registrants than four years earlier.

-So Hoosiers are not showing up to vote, and we’re not well-informed when we do:  When the American History questions on the naturalization exam were given to Americans in every state, Indiana ranked 41st, with 64% receiving an F and 14% a D.

-At the same time our civic metrics are headed in the wrong direction, traditional sources of information are drying up.  More than 2500 US newspapers have shut down since 2005.  Since 2008, more than 65% of local journalism jobs have disappeared.  This community can bear witness to what happens when its newspapers are bought by a national chain.  Remember when the Indianapolis Star was considered almost a statewide newspaper?  The Star’s total editorial staff is around 50, down from more than 200.  One of its recent departees told me the Star cannot adequately cover Indianapolis, much less statewide news.

-In 1989, 43 credentialed journalists covered the Indiana Statehouse full-time during the General Assembly session.  They included reporters from Terre Haute, Muncie, Bloomington, South Bend, Elkhart, Gary, Hammond, Louisville, and 2 from Evansville, because the Courier and Press each had one.

-In 2023, no one maintains that number, but fewer than 10 journalists are in the Statehouse full time when the General Assembly is in session.  That’s why Franklin College’s TheStateHouseFile project is so important.

-Most in this room can remember when you could rely on your local newspaper to provide a voter guide in advance of an election.  Those have disappeared, which is why so much of our time and energy at The Indiana Citizen is devoted to producing unbiased information on the candidates and the issues.  When you go to CCO’s landing page this week, you will see “Explore Evansville’s Virtual Ballot,” which is our address-driven tool that will take voters to the information they need about the candidates on their ballot. 

At the same time what’s called “traditional journalism” is dying, there’s more access to information than at any time in our history, BUT many Americans get all their information from their social media feeds.  BTW, it might not surprise any of you that I am a “late adopter” of social media.  It’s only been since retirement I’ve gotten connected to Twitter, now called “X,” I guess.  More sheer nonsense now hits my eyeballs than at any time in my life, but I have sufficient education and access to traditional media to separate truth from fiction.  Many Americans don’t.  Commentators and social scientists have coined the termed “tribalization” to describe what’s happening to America.  

And here’s a scary look inside tribalization through a new study from the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia:

They surveyed more than 2000 registered voters in August and September.  The respondents were asked to pick their preference for president between President Biden and former President Trump.  70% of the Biden voters and 68% of the Trump voters believed electing officials from the opposite party would result in lasting harm to the United States.  

Roughly half of the Biden and Trump voters viewed those who supported the other party as threats to the American way of life.  About 40% of both groups at least somewhat believed that the other side has become so extreme that is acceptable to use violence to prevent them from achieving their goals.  41% of Trump supporters at least somewhat agreed with the idea of red states seceding from the Union to form their own separate country, while 30% of Biden supporters thought blue states should do the same.  Nearly one-third of Trump supporters and about a quarter of Biden supporters at least somewhat agree that democracy is no longer a viable system and that the country should explore alternative forms of government to ensure stability and progress.

The survey probed many other core beliefs of Americans, all with disturbing results.  The head of the Center for Politics summarized the findings this way: “We stand on the precipice of a developing emergency.  Dislike of the other side combined with a pervasive disregard for the fundamental freedoms contained in the US Constitution poses a grave threat.  If these sentiments go unchecked and grow, our nation could face disastrous divisions.”

I think it’s high time I inject some good news.

There’s a startup local journalism initiative that includes both The Indiana Citizen and thestatehousefile.com.  It’s been named “Free Press Indiana” and it’s the product of years of study and fundraising by the American Journalism Project.

During the research phase, it became clear that while the volume of original news reporting has decreased across the state, some audiences — particularly Indiana’s Black and Hispanic communities as well as immigrant communities, Hoosiers with relatively low incomes, rural communities and small-town residents — have long been underserved by local news. Free Press Indiana will prioritize these overlooked and underserved communities, focusing on relevant news and information that reflects their perspectives. All at no cost to readers.

Existing Indiana news outlets are struggling to meet the needs of even those they say they serve. Much of the reporting that does exist is in English, behind paywalls, and focused on Indianapolis. There is even less accountability reporting/investigative reporting outside Indy, and Indiana’s historically underserved communities — including Hispanic and Black communities — continue to be among the least served audiences. 

There’s a consensus the state lacks a critical mass of sustained coverage that makes the goings-on in government, the economy, and other aspects of life, relevant and accessible to most people. Poorly funded community papers aren’t positioned to inform residents of rural areas or small towns about what their representatives are doing, how state policies are impacting their lives, or any other issues that fall outside the purview of major metro newspapers. 

I urge you to keep an eye out for the rollout of Free Press Indiana.  Its first platform, focused on Gary, launched yesterday.  Mirror Indy will be the next to launch.

Another bit of good news comes in the area of civic literacy.  

The Indiana Bar Foundation has been the leading force behind civics education for more than 20 years, under the leadership of the able Chuck Dunlap.  I’ll bet many of you here are familiar with Chuck and the Bar Foundation’s great work with such school programs as We the People and Mock Trial.  They’re the driving force behind the biennial Indiana Civic Health Index, which has become the definitive work on how Indiana ranks across a range of civics metrics.  The 2019 edition called for the creation of a task force to study ways to improve civics education.  The task force was quickly formed, led by Lt. Gov. Suzanne Crouch, who’s pretty well-known around these parts, right?  The final report was turned into legislation which created the first-ever sixth-grade civics requirement which is being rolled out next semester.  From recommendation to implementation in a little more than three years, and the task force continues its work under the Lt. Gov’s leadership.  

Let me conclude with some suggestions about concrete things we can all do to improve Indiana’s civic health.

When non-voters are surveyed, the most common excuse is some version of “My vote doesn’t count; my vote doesn’t make a difference.”  These are expressions of powerlessness, of disconnection, of apathy.  It’s also a self-fulfilling cop-out, right?  So, our first priority is to ensure we pass on to those we love our love for this great country and our “walk barefoot over broken glass” attitude toward voting.  And as we think about all the other communities we touch, are we doing everything we can to get our neighbors registered and to the polls?  Registration couldn’t be easier.  If your neighbor has one of these,[LICENSE] you can register them online in minutes.  And you can connect them to trustworthy sources of information like the Indiana Citizen voter guide and you can help them get to the polls.  So let me lay down a challenge.  Between now and next Tuesday, round up and take to the polls five people who might otherwise not have voted.  Next year, make a goal of registering 10 new voters and taking responsibility for getting them to the polls.

But here’s something to consider, when the excuse “my vote doesn’t matter” is supported by hard evidence, democracy is at risk.  And here’s where we need to be open to structural reforms.

Here are some examples:  

If you live in Indiana—or in most state that’s isn’t a battleground state–it’s hard to say my one vote is going to sway our electoral college votes one way or the other.  So, channeling my very best Birch Bayh, it’s time to do away with the Electoral College and make every citizen’s vote in every state equal.

Gerrymandering inhibits voter participation, which is exactly what it’s intended to do.  When the outcome of an election is pre-determined by the way the map is drawn, it causes non-voters to say, “Why bother?”  Gerrymandering is wrong whether it’s done by Republicans in Indiana or Democrats in Illinois.

Also, Indiana could adopt some of the policies enacted in states that consistently rank in the top 10 for voting, like automatic voter registration, same-day voter registration, no-excuse absentee voting, heck, and even longer hours on Election Day.  

We could move our municipal elections to an even-numbered year, preferably a presidential year.  We could ask ourselves whether some of our offices should be elected at all, and if so, why are they partisan elections?  We permit the County Commissioners to appoint the County Engineer, but we insist upon electing the County Surveyor in a partisan election.  Would we get more candidates for judge, sheriff, and prosecutor if we elected them on a non-partisan basis?  Should the quality of the administration of justice—which at its core is based on impartiality–depend upon which political party wins the election?

And we need to stand up to those who are undermining the public’s confidence in the integrity of our elections.  I’ll bet the majority of folks in this room have spent time helping to administer an election.  It’s hard, thankless work, but when the polls close on Election Day, you don’t have any doubt that the vote tallies are accurate, because you have seen the system work first-hand, up close, administered honestly by your friends and neighbors, even those with whom you disagree politically. 

 Case in point: Four years ago, you no doubt followed the mayor’s race in Tell City, decided by two votes.  After the mandatory recount, the incumbent mayor, Jim Adams, was the first to congratulate his opponent.  Not for a moment did he say the election was “stolen.”  

These attacks on the integrity of voting results have reached the point where there’s now a national campaign to restore public confidence in voting.  You may have seen the news article.  It was front-page in the Indianapolis Star last week:  “Instilling trust in elections is big challenge; Fearmongering has spurred calls to overhaul process across nation” was the headline. 

 The lede of the story was: “Ahead of an election cycle already shaping up to be contentious, federal and state election officials are waging campaigns of their own to convince wary voters of the integrity of casting their ballots.”  

So is there an antidote to Indiana’s civic health crisis?

Indiana needs more journalism.  Think of journalism like you think about public broadcasting.  If you take advantage of their programming—which I suspect most of you do—are you a “free rider” or do you send in an annual contribution?  You obviously support the City-County Observer, bless your hearts, right Ron?—and if you consume journalism from other sources—which you all do–send them a check, too.  More journalism requires more money from more sources.

Indiana needs more voters. That, my friends, begins at home.  Are you raising the next generation of “walk barefoot across broken glass” voters?  Are you supporting initiatives and organizations that promote civic values?  Are you backing candidates who promote policies to encourage voting?  Are you standing up for the integrity of the administration of elections?

Let me leave you with a challenge that has been attributed to both John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan.  When it comes to revitalizing democracy in Indiana by adding more journalism and more voters, the people in this room, the civic philanthropists of Indiana are going to make a difference.  

Because…If not us, who?  If not now, when?

 

 

Judge Heather Welch retiring from Marion County bench, continuing career in the law

0

Marion County Superior Court Judge Heather Welch, a judicial leader who is known for carrying a heavy caseload and writing thorough opinions, will be stepping down from the bench in February after serving more than 20 years.

Welch started her legal career in the Marion County Prosecutor’s office then worked for Indiana Attorney General Pam Carter, before moving into private practice. At the age of 34, she became a magistrate judge and was elected as a judge to the Marion County Superior Court in 2006.

She said she never intended to remain in the judiciary until the end of her legal career.

“The time kind of arrived and, after about a year of thinking about things and talking with different people, I decided it was the right decision for me,” Welch said.

Welch will be joining Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, a national alternative dispute resolution provider. She will serve as a mediator and arbitrator, handling cases in Indiana and other parts of the country.

Retired Indiana Supreme Court Justice Frank Sullivan has been a colleague of Welch’s with both serving in the state judiciary and in national organizations as well as teaching at Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law. When Welch applied to fill a vacancy on the Court of Appeals of Indiana in 2021, Sullivan wrote a letter of recommendation, describing her as “among the most accomplished and qualified individuals ever to seek appointment” to the appellate court.

Sullivan called attention to Welch’s part in helping transform the judicial system through her work in developing the Indiana commercial courts and, subsequently, being appointed as the first judge of the Marion County Commercial Court, which, Sullivan said, has “quickly become the state’s most preeminent.”

Welch served as presiding judge of the Marion County Superior Court, while the city of Indianapolis was building the $575 million Community Justice Center. She helped the judges plan and prepare for the new courtrooms as well as addressed concerns over the toxins and pollutants at the former industrial site where the CJC was built.

Nationally, Welch served in leadership positions for the National Conference of State Trial Judges and the National Association of Women Judges. Also, she has overseen the American Bar Association’s Judicial Clerkship Program, which provides mentoring for underrepresented law students to encourage them to apply for judicial clerkships.

‘An unusual work ethic’

Sullivan praised Welch’s adjudication of her court cases. She presides over complex litigation and puts in the extra time to write clear, comprehensive opinions, which, he said, “demonstrates an unusual work ethic.”

Among her more recent cases, she has presided over the lawsuit filed against Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita by Dr. Caitlin Bernard, an Indianapolis OB/GYN, and lawsuit claiming Indiana’s near-total abortion ban violates the state’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

Sullivan said a great many lawsuits are closed with a one-sentence judgment, because trial judges are not required to explain their reasoning or conclusions of law when issuing a ruling. But, he continued, these one-liners are unsatisfactory to the litigants and their attorneys. Moreover, if the case is appealed, the Court of Appeals’ judges and Supreme Court justices do not have the benefit of the trial judge’s “eyewitness view on the finding of fact and conclusions of law that led the judge to rule in the way that he or she did.”

“So it is of enormous benefit to people having confidence in their courts, to people’s lawyers and to courts of review, to have a judge who takes her work with the degree of seriousness that Judge Welch does and provides them with a comprehensive explanation of why she has reached the decision she has,” Sullivan told The Indiana Citizen.

Welch traced her commitment to writing complete judicial rulings and orders to her time handling family law cases as a magistrate judge for retired Marion County Superior Court Judge David Dreyer. She said she wanted to explain how she reached those “life-changing decisions” that resulted in things like a parent losing custody of a child.

During her time as a judge, Welch said she has seen how listening to the both and issuing a written ruling will make the parties feel like they were treated fairly and increase their confidence in the judicial system. She gave the example of someone who recognized her on an elevator. Welch said the incident was “a little nerve-racking,” but the individual told her that she had been very fair, even though she had ruled against that individual’s family member.

“You have to give the parties an opportunity to give their side,” Welch said. “In my experience as a judge, it’s so important to give people the opportunity to talk about their case and what they think about it. Sometimes, I think that’s more important that what the final outcome is.”

John Floreancig, general counsel and CEO of Indianapolis Legal Aid Society, remembered his attorneys often appearing before Welch when she heard family law matters.

“She was a fantastic family law judge,” Floreancig said. “She was consistent, you knew what she thought. It was a pleasure to work in her court, because you knew what to expect.”

Valparaiso grad

Welch grew up in a blue-collar home in Kokomo. Her parents, both factory workers, made sure she completed her Saturday chores like mopping the kitchen floor, doing laundry and mowing the lawn, before she joined her friends for an afternoon of fun.

Those rules, she said, coupled with the advice and guidance from her grandfather, who held a Ph.D. degree in engineering, taught her “there is absolutely no replacement ever for hard work.”

Welch decided as an eighth-grader that she wanted to be a lawyer, seeing the profession as one that helped people. After working a few years after completing her bachelor’s degree at Indiana University, Welch enrolled in the now-closed Valparaiso Law School.

“I feel like I was very fortunate to have some really talented people who mentored me and kind of molded me,” Welch said of her time at Valparaiso, mentioning, in particular, professors Rosalie Levinson, Ivan Bodensteiner and now-senior federal judge Jon DeGuilio. “I’m sure I couldn’t have done it without them.”

Sullivan sees the influence of Valparaiso Law School on Welch.

“I think her reputation for integrity and her evenhandedness, her reputation for being fair to both sides, I would say her non-adjudicative commitments to things like diversity and inclusion in the profession all trace to this commitment to ethics and engagement that I thought characterized a Valpo legal education,” Sullivan said.

The Marion County Judicial Selection Committee has begun the process of selecting a new Superior Court judge to fill Welch’s position when she retires on Feb. 2, 2024. Applicants will be interviewed by the committee Dec. 15 and the top three nominees will be sent to Gov. Eric Holcomb who will make the final selection.

Welch said she is excited to begin her work in arbitration and mediation, where she will be able to interact with the parties more than she can, now, as a judge.

“I thought it would be a great opportunity for me to expand my net and learn more and more in a different capacity,” Welch said.