
IS IT TRUE the PRICING PIXIES for the Evansville Regional Airport must have been getting into the stash of medical marijuana when deciding what to charge for a short notice round trip ticket from California to EVV Monday?…this writer had an emergency situation come up that required a rapid trip and ALWAYS tries hard to use EVV for loyalty and convenience purposes?…those PRICING PIXIES must have been thinking that Evansville is some exotic tourist destination when coming up with the fare that was quoted on multiple travel websites for the hours of arrival that were necessary?…the fare quoted for this round trip ticket was $1003.00 compared to $380.77 to Nashville?…that is over a $600.00 difference which is beyond the envelope of sanity in pricing?…the first flight coming in and the last flight going back are THE EXACT SAME FLIGHT?…that means the entire $602.23 difference was for the Dallas to Nashville portion of the travel?…we know that the PRICING PIXIES are not employees of the Evansville Airport but need them to realize that if they even want to have such flights at all the fares have to be close to competitive?…the writer would have been more than willing to have paid in the mid $500 range for the convenience of flying into EVV?…all things considered the arrival time including the drive from Nashville was the same as it would have been anyway?…that it would be easy to conclude based on this non-competitive pricing that the PRICING PIXIES are trying to kill EVV?
IS IT TRUE that it has now been 5 full days since the deadline for the City of Evansville to file a repair plan with the EPA to mitigate the discharges into the Ohio River due to having a combined sewer system was due?…we have not even been advised yet as to whether or not permission to file the plan late has been granted?…if the EPA is nice (fat chance) and grants the City of Evansville the 6 month extension that has been requested that there are now 175 days until the plan is due again?…the City of Evansville whistled Dixie for 730 days and did not produce a plan so we are really intrigued to see what will happen in 175 days?…in the meantime the high level of fines can legally be started any day at the whim of the EPA?
IS IT TRUE that the question brought up in IS IT TRUE yesterday regarding the ability or lack thereof of a sitting Mayor to bypass a City Council in Indiana to spend money on a parks got the legal minds on the CCO comment section into a frenzy?…the key seems to be on whether or not the issuance of bonds is required?…there is an opinion in place from outgoing City Attorney John Hamilton on this that states “My research indicates that bonds issued by the Board of Parks Commissioners require approval by the City Council. The statute is I.C. 36-10-4-35(g).â€?…this means that a Mayor cannot borrow money without the approval of the City Council to do such a project?…there are opinions that state the loophole to allow such projects has to do with entering into leases and that Mayors though a contortion of activities have indeed built things without so much as asking their City Councils through the LEASE LOOPHOLE?…in a town divided as Evansville is to exploit such a loophole to circumvent the will of the City Council would rank right up there with building a downtown arena without a referendum, tearing down Roberts on the recommendation of an appointed Kangaroo Committee, or handing out crony deals for refurbishment projects?…we strongly advise Mayor Winnecke to do his spending the old fashioned way and that is to get City Council approval for all bonds, leases, or even cash expenditures?…if he can’t sell his ideas to 9 people he will surely be challenged to sell them to 117,000 people?




![photo[1]](https://city-countyobserver.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/photo1-e1354570743121-150x150.jpg)