My Fellow Council Members:
Per your email concerning SBOA findings, the Board has broad authority in regards to who performs GASB audits (133-A, yellow book) and is the authority in granting outside CPA firms which, in my opinion, would cost the City and Utility upwards of $250k, and, when asked, during the exit conference, out of hand, rejected the request.
In regards to the comment that the City Council should have over-sighted the process is expected and normal under the separation of powers doctrine. Congress over-sights the executive branch, but, they have the GAO at their disposal and, of course, subpoena power. Up to now, no other City Administration has given the City Council funds to perform their apparent responsibilities. Per my request, in July, before this unfortunate situation was exposed to any member on council, including me, my request for Council City funding was honored; thus, we now can be expected to do our separation of powers responsibility. During the salary debate, you probably remember that the City has an internal auditor which reports to the Mayor and the controller office. Surprisingly, the SBOA does not mention the failure in reporting this disturbing state of affairs, maybe she did, but, regardless, nothing was done, no request for any additional appropriations from the Mayor to help with the exit of the only CPA due to underpay, no qualified replacement, and, obviously, lack of planning and over-sighting by Tyler and our contracted IT vendors. Thus, my three year concern of the IT situation and the requested assessment went un regarded by the past administration. You and Missy both supported my IT concerns over those years. During our meeting with Mark Rolley, weeks ago, you, Jonathan Weaver, and I heard the issues, seemingly uncontrolled acquisitions of software and peripherals and lack of involvement of IT in the process, among other issues.
What corrective actions by the Council, in my opinion, should be suggested? Well, first of all, the internal auditor needs to report to the council, not the executive branch. In corporate American, the IA reports, generally, to the board of directors, we should be the board of directors in the public since. If she had knowledge, and should have, her failure of reporting the condition of the accounting reporting system would have repercussions? Obviously, this smacks of either a cover-up or incompetence, neither one not inviting. If she properly would have informed us, would her job be in jeopardy? Second, as an ordinance, a required IT Assessment every three years including the establishment of a central authoritative committee concerning IT, and finally, our own over-sight coordinator, which I have nominated David Garrett. He is a CPA, former CFO of Pacific-Press, has IT project credentials, (Keller-Schraeder), probably should be on the short list for the CIO position.
We were all elected to oversee the affairs of the City, to appropriate funding were critically necessary, in safety and the supporting functions, etc. To execute those functions, it is the purview of the Mayor. For any one of us to perform those duties is not in the separation of powers doctrine. For instance, you are a cardiovascular surgeon, so, if our employee healthcare issues drive our costs upwards, our you responsible? Or, as we all are aware, this City has from time to time, entered into unfavorable contracts, would Dan McGinn, Connor O’Daniel, and Stephanie Brinkerhoff-Riley who are all attorneys, be held responsible? and likewise, as a CPA, would I be held responsible for the controller’s office failures. We all happen to be ordinary citizens elected to see to it that our community is a good place to call home and where we see the necessity for corrective action, we will respond. With this said, I strongly urge you and our colleagues to consider the aforementioned corrective actions. If you and others have additional recommendations, please bring forth.
Thanks, John
POSTED BY THE CITY COUNTY OBSERVER WITHOUT OPINION, BIAS OR EDITING! POSTED WITH PERMISSION OF 5TH WARD AND BUDGET CHAIRMEN AND CITY COUNCILMAN, JOHN FRIEND, CPA.