The following email from Kenneth Haney to the Evansville City Council regarding the questions directed at the agreement between his company Earthcare Energy and the City of Evansville with the recommendation of GAGE was supplied to us by 3rd Ward City Councilwoman Stephanie Brinkerhoff-Riley and is reprinted by the City County Observer with her approval. Both emails are published without edit, opinion, or bias and are for the education of the people of Evansville.
Mr. Haney’s Email to the Evansville City Council
Dear distinguished Councilmen and Councilwomen,
My name is Kenneth Haney and I am the Chairman and founder of Earthcare Energy. I hope to meet each and every one of you in the near near future but for now I would like to apologize for not being able to attend the recent council meeting in which Stephen Geldmacher (my CEO) did an outstanding job answering all of your excellent questions regarding our technology and our decision to put our first and only anywhere in the world Manufacturing and Assembly plant in Evansville.
Ladies and gentlemen please keep in mind that our TFG technology is not a new technology but an approved upon technology that has been proven efficient and reliable since the 1960’s.
It was around the time in the 1970’s that the technology was shelved only because energy prices were so cheap back then that it was not cost effective to even manufacture the Helical Screw Turbine technology.
Now we are living in an environmentally conscious society and a world of soaring energy prices which makes our Total Flow Generator (TFG) an in demand world wide clean and cheap energy technology making Solar and Wind virtually obsolete because the TFG provides base line power, meaning that unlike Solar and Wind our TFG provides 24/7 clean affordable energy.
Folks you can Google Helical Screw technology and see for your self this isn’t rocket science but proven technology.
I have sent over inventor’s Patents today to Debbie Dewey. I also want to be very clear folks that we have no competition period.
I cannot guarantee that there will not be copy cats in the future even though we have patents but when did that ever stop anyone determined enough to violate them. Even though I would be on them with a lawsuit that will make their heads spin I still cannot guarantee this won’t happen so I will never promise you that. What I can promise you folks is that Earthcare Energy will flood the market so fast that the copy cats can’t effect our market share enough to do us any damage. Being the first to market insures our success for the long term. As you good folks know this is business 101. This is why Earthcare Energy’s business is to License other qualified Agents and Dealers because our market is so enormous
that we can’t cover enough ground without recruiting all over the world. This is also the business model of tech giants such as Apple, Dell, HP. They all have licensees such as Best Buy and Resellers. I used to be a Reseller for all those brands myself.
I also want to address all the comments you are reading about from some citizens and so called engineers. One word folks (Haters).
Folks we at Earthcare have provided everything that we have been asked within reason for your due diligence and I appreciate the work you have put in this process. You have a powerful tool at your finger tips that I provided you with which is again attached to this email and that is a thorough Engineering report from the US Government Department of the Defense on our TFG. While Earthcare Energy is under a strict US Government NDA I have attached this report for your use. I see some of the comments the nay Sayer’s write or the so called engineers out there trying to make a name for them selves. The DOD brought in the worlds best engineering firm to evaluate our our technology. Folks you don’t get no higher than the Department of Defense and you will read in the report we passed with flying colors and you will see that the Author of the report recommends the Government moves on our TFG without delay. You will also read that Authors
Excellent Scientific BIO. If I had to choose I would certainly bet on the DOD engineers than a bunch of folks who don’t know anything about what they are saying but you have a high level engineering evaluation at your finger tips.
Folks this is about bringing jobs to your city for your citizens and to be clear it was I who offered to give Evansville $32M revenue sharing to show our support for the City in return for your support of Earthcare Energy’s Loan.
Yes, we had better offers from cities around the country especially South Carolina. So why Evansville then? It’s simple, we can have a significant positive impact on Evansville by eradicating the unemployment rate. Folks it’s not always about the money but where I am needed the most and I raised my kids in Evansville and my son lives there now with his wife and my grand daughter.
On the 26TH you will make in my opinion one of the most important Votes in Evansville history based on what Earthcare Energy can bring to Evansville. The US Government will smile upon Evansville and tell the rest of the country ” they need to do it like Evansville did.
Folks our backgrounds speak for itself. DOD does not deal with flakes or Conn artist.
I know you will make the right decision come the 26TH because you are all visionaries and you want to do the right thing for your great city. Earthcare Energy is the next Google where ever we go.
Thank you all for your service and consideration. The citizens of Evansville and Mayor Winnecke are blessed to have a great group of folks like you in office looking out on their behalf.
Please feel free to call me directly with any questions. I would be honored to speak with you all.
The Department of Defense report is attached.
Ken Haney
Chairman/Founder
Earthcare/Energy
RESPONSE BY EVANSVILLE CITY COUNCILWOMAN FROM THE 3RD WARD: STEPHANIE BRINKERHOFF-RILEY
Mr. Haney:
Thank you for your email. I really appreciate your interest in Evansville, and I am hopeful that you are able to build a manufacturing facility here. However, I am concerned about the representations that were made by Mr. Geldmacher Monday night and by your email. Both of you have stated with no uncertain terms that the total flow generator is patented technology of which you have the exclusive rights. Mr. Geldmacher also stated that Richard Langson owns the patent, and that Langson Energy is an agent for Earthcare Energy. My major concern with your statements is that you don’t actually have a patent. The information you sent to Ms. Dewey listed a patent application number. I looked it up, and I do see where Mr. Langson has applied for a patent, but it has yet to be issued. It is my understanding that there is no protection from copying until the patent is issued, and there is ultimately no guarantee that your application will be approved. There is a significant difference between a patent application and a patent. My concerns are heightened by the comments of Mr. Geldmacher that there are ownership issues and your statements that you wouldn’t be surprised if you were copied. When Mr. Geldmacher appeared on Monday and admitted ownership issues in response to one of the questions, I assume that he also knew that the patent application had not been approved. Without a patent, anyone is free to copy and market the machine you are calling a total flow generator. Under the circumstances, I do not understand why you and Mr. Geldmacher have represented that you have the exclusive rights to a patent. You actually claim more than one patent in your email. Your statements are unclear at best. Only one of 3 things can happen with this patent application. You could actually get a patent, or you could find out that there is prior art or that the technology is already in the public domain. If there is prior art, then your machine violates someone else’s patent, and if the technology is in the public domain, then anybody can manufacture and sell it. What possible assurances can you give us that this patent is going to issue? Given the misrepresentations that have been made, please understand that your verbal assurances aren’t enough. If you are confident that a patent will issue, then open up your patent prosecution and let us see the objections and search report. I would like for this to work, but you’ve created a hot mess with all these statements about having a patent.
Respectfully,
Stephanie Brinkerhoff Riley
