We are re-posting this eDebate because our traffic has more than doubled since the original publishing, and we wanted to give our new readers a chance to view this exchange between our 5th Ward City Council candidates.
“eDebate” is a platform which we have engineered to allow candidates of an election to voice their goals of the future for the city of Evansville and allow readers to compare their answers to their electoral opponent.
-Each candidate is given the same 5 questions, and the same amount of time to prepare their answers.
-Neither candidate may read their opponents’ response, and all responses are kept hidden until the scheduled release date.
-300 word maximum per response.
-This eDebate is between the two candidates for the City Council 5th Ward election. The purpose of this eDebate is to educate, and to inform our readers about the major dividing issues facing our city today.
-Comments are currently enabled to encourage discussion. Please be civil and constructive.
2/28/2011 eDebate
City Council 5th Ward
| John Friend (D) | Brent Grafton (R) | |
Question #1: What is your opinion of the proposed Evansville – Vanderburgh County consolidation? |
|||
Efficiencies in local government must be improved, if we are to stay competitive in attracting and maintaining commerce. As has been illustrated in the census data over the past two decades, we have been not only declined in population but have not kept pace with improving household incomes. In 1995, the average household income was $28,800, now it is approximately $37,000. Cities like Lexington, KY, Nashville, TN, Jacksonville, FL upon adopting combined city/county governments saw their population and average household incomes dramatically increase. As vice-chair of the NFIB Leadership Council (National Federation of Independent Business), I have had the opportunity to discuss these issues amoung local councils, concluding that the current system of divided local government is not user friendly and has it’s array of inefficiencies. For this reason, I supported the ordinance to let the people choice what form of local government in the upcoming referendum. In my opinion, the most important issues in the consolidation debate is public safety, taxing districts, and codification of city/county ordinances. Whatever form that is chosen, it must provide adequate safety for our citizens; those who receive services are fairly charged, and commerce that will be enhanced. As I have always proclaimed, “Evansville needs the World, but, the World probably will get along without Evansville” | As the last census shows, the demographics of our area have changed rather dramatically. It is essential that we adjust our way of governing to reflect our community’s needs today. I do not believe that our present form of government is up to the task presented by our shift in population and the incredible advances in technology. The structure of law enforcement in our community should not be changed by the stroke of a politician’s pen. The mission of the Sheriffs department and the EPD are very different and over the years have developed their own method of both dealing with crime and rewarding those who put their lives on the line to keep that crime from hurting us. We as a community have made different promises related to advancement, training, promotions, retirement, to these dedicated Officers and above everything else we must keep those promises. Once consolidation is in place, it would then be appropriate for our law enforcement agencies to work out how to tackle the new challenges brought on by the change in demographics and a change in government structure. If the mission changes, it is appropriate that those who are responsible to fulfill that mission have the opportunity to plan, together or separately, how to best fulfill their common goal of keeping us safe from crime. If there are any changes in opportunity or reward, they should be offered to new officers and not to those who have already committed to giving us their dedicated service. If I were on City Council today, I would propose removing the Law Enforcement clause from the current plan. |