DANKS & DANKS
Attorneys at Law
Dear Ted:
I am sure that you will agree that there has been a tremendous amount of time wasted on what information/records the Council can receive from the administration and the confidentiality of the requested information/records. We all have more important things to do than engage in this continued bickering over information/records and, therefore, I am revisiting this issue.
I.C. 36-4-5-3(3) provides that the Mayor shall “provide any information regarding City affairs that the legislative body requests.†Likewise, Evansville Municipal Code 2.05.010(F) provides that “the Mayor shall provide any information regarding City affairs that the legislative body requests.†(emphasis added). Thus, there are no ifs, buts or maybes about it. If the Council requests information/records from the administration the information/records must be provided to the Council period.
Pursuant to State statute, information/records fall into one of three categories: 1) confidential, 2) discretionary, and 3) not protected. Regardless of the classification of the information/records it must be furnished to the Council upon request.
Confidential records are very few and are contained in I.C. 5-14-3-4(a). When requested, the information/records must be provided to the Council upon request. Upon receiving information/records identified as confidential, the Council must maintain the confidentiality of the information/records pursuant to I.C. 5-14-3-6.5. Failure to maintain the confidentiality is a Class A Infraction pursuant to I.C. 5-14-3-10.
Pursuant to I.C. 5-14-3-4(b), certain information/records are exempted from disclosure at the discretion of the agency in possession thereof. The “discretionary†information/records are the ones that seem to cause disputes between the Council and the Administration. Again, discretionary information/records must be provided to the Council upon request without any redactions. Once these records are received by the Council IT IS THE COUNCIL NOT THE ADMINISTRATION THAT HAS THE DISCRETION TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE INFORMATION/RECORDS WILL REMAIN CONFIDENTIAL.
On several occasions, the Council has received discretionary information/records stamped “confidential†with instructions that the information/records must remain confidential. The City has no legal authority to do this.
When providing discretionary information/records to the Council, the City may request that the Council keep all or part of it confidential. It would be very helpful to provide an explanation as to why the information/records should remain confidential. But, again, whether they remain confidential will be at the SOLE DISCRETION of the Council. If you can find any legal authority to the contrary, please advise.
I discussed my legal analysis with Mr. Joseph Hoage, Indiana Public Access Counselor, and he concurs 100%. Attorney Hoage provided me with an analogy that I think is helpful: a sheriff’s department conducting an investigation can exercise its discretion to keeps its investigatory files confidential. However, once these files are turned over to the prosecutor’s office, the prosecutor then has the sole discretion on whether or not to maintain the confidentiality of those records.
Recently, discretionary records have been provided to the Council but marked confidential. In effect, the administration is putting a gag order on the Council.
As you know, all Council business must be conducted in a public forum and it becomes problematic to for them to discuss various issues that the administration has deemed to be confidential. Most Members of the Council are of the opinion that rather than attempting to find ways to keep information/records confidential that the efforts should be redirected in finding ways to make records public. Transparency is very important to the Council as the lack thereof causes undo suspicion on members of the public as well as the news media.
The Council realizes that many governmental entities do not appreciate others meddling and many times do not welcome scrutiny. The Council is of the opinion that transparency and scrutiny makes for better government.
Therefore, in the future discretionary information/records will be made public by the Council unless in doing so it would be injurious to the City of Evansville, its employees or the public.
As always, your cooperation in this matter is very much appreciated.
Sincerely,
Scott A. Danks, Attorney at Law
for the
Common Council of the City of Evansville