Home Blog Page 6646

Domestic Violence Call, Pursuit and Arrest

0

 

Sheriff LogoShortly after 8:00 AM yesterday, deputies were dispatched 117 Miller Rd in reference to a family dispute.The husband complained that his wife, Pamela Montgomery, had been upstairs “burning” his clothes. She fled the scene prior to the arrival of the deputies. Deputies were unable to locate and interview her at the time.
Later yesterday , at approximately 9:40 AM, deputies were again dispatched to the same residence. Deputies were told that Montgomery had returned to the address in her vehicle, a 1999 Chevrolet Blazer, and was sitting in the driveway. A deputy approached Montgomery while in her vehicle and directed her to exit. Instead, she put the vehicle in gear and backed out of the driveway. In doing so, Montgomery’s vehicle struck and damaged a sheriff’s patrol car.

Montgomery fled from deputies who were trying to stop her. She left the area east on Hogue Rd toward Boehne Camp Rd. She then turned south on Boehne Camp Rd and continued to Pearl Dr where she turned east and cut through several parking lots in the area.

Evansville police officers assisting sheriff’s deputies with the pursuit followed Montgomery into the parking lot of Walmart at 335 S Red Bank Rd. Montgomery continued east in the parking lot, past the main entrance of Walmart, before striking a Evansville Police car and finally coming to a stop. Once stopped, Montgomery still refused to exit her vehicle.

The driver side window of her vehicle was then broken out so she could be taken into custody.

ARRESTED:
Pamela S. Montgomery, 56, Evansville, IN
Criminal Recklessness, DF
Resisting Law Enforcement, DF
Resisting Law Enforcement, AM
Hit and Run, BM

Guest column: Use state funds to help hungry Hoosiers

6

By Rep. Greg Porter
Special to TheStatehouseFile.com

Rep. Greg Porter, D-Indianapolis

Rep. Greg Porter, D-Indianapolis

In November, millions of families in Indiana and across the nation saw their Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits cut through a planned phase-out of a temporary increase in funding that originally took place during the 2009 recession.

Guest columnUnfortunately, this cut in what used to be known as the food stamp program could not have come at a worse time for Indiana. Our state’s unemployment rate still exceeds the national average, and too many of the “new” jobs being created carry wages around the poverty level. Many do not include any essential benefits such as health care.

In addition, more ominous trouble for the SNAP program looms, as the Republicans in control of the U.S. House consider even more cuts over the next decade.

Under such dire circumstances, it would be good to report that our state is ready to step into the breach and offer some relief for those facing persistent hunger.

That is not the case. Those who control the executive and legislative branches in Indiana state government have done little to nothing, preferring to engage in symbolic gestures rather than take tangible steps to stop hunger.

Last February, the majority leadership of the Indiana House decided to ”highlight” an area of “charitable need” by having representatives provide daily testimonials about the great work that food banks do across our state and placing a drop-off box for food donations. In the days before Halloween, the governor chose to raise money for the hungry by selling pumpkins on the Statehouse lawn.

However, when it came to actually doing something substantive for the cause of food insecurity, there was a gigantic chasm between the rhetoric expressed and the actions that were actually undertaken.

Based on the governor’s recommendation, only $300,000 was appropriated to our state’s food banks for each year of the biennial state budget, despite repeated attempts by myself and other House Democrats to provide more. That is $300,000 in a $14 billion state budget.

These same leaders have shown a demonstrated zeal when it comes to bestowing tax breaks to those who do not really need them. But when it comes to addressing one of the most persistent un-met needs of our state, the silence from our leaders is truly deafening.

Hopefully, all hope is not lost, and we can try again to address a need that is NOT going away. I have two suggestions that could make a real difference in addressing the hunger problem in our state.

First, even though 2014 is not a budget year, our state has a $2 billion surplus in the bank. A small fraction of this surplus could be directed to food banks as a “supplemental appropriation.”  Even a ten-fold increase would be only $3 million. That wouldn’t be remotely enough money to make up the $98 million we are losing through reductions in SNAP, but it still would be a respectable start.

Secondly, the governor could ask the State Board of Finance at its next monthly meeting to transfer money to food banks. This group – consisting of the governor, state auditor and state treasurer – has almost unlimited power to transfer money between funds for almost any reason they choose.

In recent years, governors in our state have been very nimble in using this board for exactly this purpose. Not long ago, Gov. Pence secured a transfer of almost $150 million in Family and Social Services Agency (FSSA) funds to help clean up an accounting mistake involving local option income tax allocations.

If the State Board of Finance can make these transfers for political reasons, policy preferences or correcting clerical errors, surely the same approach can be undertaken to ensure that something as essential as alleviating the hunger pains of our residents.

Now that we are in the heart of the holiday season, I truly hope that public officials in our state realize that there is an opportunity here to take substantive action on a problem that afflicts too many people in our state.

Rather than empty public relations gestures, I think the time has come to take more direct action to help stop hunger. We have the chance…and the ability…to do so much more.

State Rep. Greg Porter, D-Indianapolis, is the ranking Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee. He’s served House District 96 since 1992.

 

Print Friendly

 

BREAKING NEWS: Councilman Lindsay And Friend Proposes Amendments To Sign Ordinance

39
City Councilman Al Lindsey
City Councilman Al Lindsey
Councilman John Friend, CPA: The man whose petition started the movement that led to teh NO VOTE for the Vectren fee
Councilman John Friend, CPA:

Dear Council,

Council Members, Lindsey and Friend have requested I immediately begin work on an Amendment to our Ordinance pertaining to the display of temporary signs by local merchants.  This is in response to numerous complaints from their constituents concerning the threat of enforcement action by the Area Plan Commission.  The following is a rough draft of what I have in mind:
Merchants shall not be required to obtain a permit or pay a fee for temporary A-frame or easel-style signs.  Said signs may not exceed 14 sq. ft. per side, must be located within 12 feet of the physical structure of the business , may only be displayed during normal business hours, may not be used for any purpose other than to advertise goods, services, and/or special events of the business, and may not obstruct or obscure pedestrian or vehicular traffic.

I am requesting any input you or your constituents might have before drafting the Amendment.  Of course, I will also be asking for input from the Administration.

 Council Members Lindsey and Friend have also requested that I ask the Administration not to take further enforcement action against merchants who are substantially in compliance with the above, until such time that the Amendment is brought before the Council. I am hereby doing so by including Ted Ziemer on this e-mail.
I hope to have the Amendment prepared and filed with the Clerk’s office this Wednesday, so we can have first reading on Monday, December 9th.
Your consideration is appreciated and I look forward to receiving any input you may have.
Scott Danks, Attorney
Attorney for Evansville City Council

Mary Cheney to host Indy event to oppose marriage amendment

10

Staff report
TheStatehouseFile.comstatehouse_logo_final-graybackground-003-1

INDIANAPOLIS – Mary Cheney, the daughter of former Vice President Dick Cheney, will help raise money for an effort to defeat a proposed constitutional amendment in Indiana to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman.

Mary Cheney, who is married to a woman and has two children, will host a reception from 5:30 p.m. to 7 p.m. on Dec. 11 at the Crowne Plaza hotel in downtown Indianapolis.

Basic tickets for the event are $30 for young adults under 30 years old and $100 for all other individuals. Sponsorships range from $500 to $5,000.

In an email announcing the event, Cheney said her opposition to the constitutional amendment “isn’t a matter of politics. It’s about family. It’s about everyone feeling welcome in the state they call home.”

The event is part of an effort by Freedom Indiana, a coalition of businesses, groups and individuals, to block the amendment, which will be considered by the General Assembly in the 2014 legislative session.

The Republican-controlled legislature has approved the amendment once but it must pass a second time before it can go on the ballot for ratification by voters. If that second approval doesn’t come in 2014, the multi-year approval process starts over.

A number of conservative lawmakers and organizations support the amendment and say protecting the institution of marriage from changes is important. But the proposed amendment goes farther and would ban civil unions as well.

Cheney said in her email that “freedom means freedom for everyone.”

“For me, that’s not just another saying,” she said. “It’s who I am – the core of what I believe. No one should be denied the fundamental liberties we all deserve.”

Federal judge blocks implementation of state abortion law

2

 

By Lesley Weidenbener
TheStatehouseFile.com

INDIANAPOLIS – A federal judge has blocked enforcement of a state law that imposes new restrictions on drug-induced abortions.

Lawmakers and anti-abortion activists joined Gov. Mike Pence in May as he signed a bill to put new regulations on clinics that administer abortion-inducing drugs. Photo provided by the governor's office.

Lawmakers and anti-abortion activists joined Gov. Mike Pence in May as he signed a bill to put new regulations on clinics that administer abortion-inducing drugs. A federal judge has blocked implementation of the law.  Photo provided by the governor’s office.

The decision from U.S. District Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson means that a Planned Parenthood clinic in Lafayette can continue – for now – to provide the abortions even though it does not meet the physical requirements of surgical clinics.

Magnus-Stinson issued a preliminary injunction, saying that Planned Parenthood – which sued to stop the new requirements – is likely to prevail with its argument that the law violates its equal protection rights. That’s because the law doesn’t impose similar requirements on physician’s offices that use abortion-inducing drugs.

However, the judge ruled against other arguments Planned Parenthood had used to try to block the law.

“This new law reflects the policy judgment of Indiana legislators elected by our citizens,” said Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller. “The court’s decision faulting the law for treating nonsurgical abortion clinics different from physicians’ offices must be thoroughly reviewed.

“Because of the narrow ruling, we will consult with our clients and decide how next to proceed in the case,” Zoeller said.

The law requires facilities that offer non-surgical abortions to meet the same licensing standards as those facilities that perform surgical abortions, including being equipped with separate procedure, recovery and scrub rooms. It exempts physician’s offices.

“The additional restrictions in this law are in no way related to patient safety,” Betty Cockrum, president of Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, said in August when the group sued to stop the law.

Non-surgical abortions involve the patient taking a pill with a physician present. The process – also called a medical abortion – has been used in the United States for more than 10 years. In Indiana, the Planned Parenthood location in Lafayette is the only clinic that offers the drug-induced abortions but not surgical procedures.

Supporters argued that clinics that offer abortion-inducing drugs should be equipped to deal with medical emergencies if they arise.

Indiana Right to Life President Mike Fichter called the court ruling a “temporary setback.”

“We believe this action proves once again that Planned Parenthood holds little regard for the health and welfare of its clients,” Fichter said. “Planned Parenthood simply does not want to cut into its profit margin by doing the renovations required by Indiana law.”

Fichter said he is “confident the state of Indiana will ultimately prevail.”

The Republican-controlled General Assembly approved the new requirements last spring and Gov. Mike Pence signed them into law.

Last year, 8,808 abortions were performed in Indiana. According to the Indiana State Department of Health, about 20 percent of them were done using abortion-inducing drugs. The number of those medical abortions increased by 7.8 percent from 2011.

IS IT TRUE November 29, 2013

13
Mole #3 Nostradamus of Local Politics
Mole #3 Nostradamus of Local Politics

IS IT TRUE November 29, 2013

IS IT TRUE that the power brokers of the City of Evansville could be a little miffed about the vibrant West Franklin Street association and all the activities that take place without the involvement of city government?…sicking the sign dogs over those street signs is a bit over the top and is yet another example of selective enforcement in open practice as ordered by local government?…The Arts Council of Southwest Indiana frequently puts one of these signs outside of its Innovation Pointe base retail outlet?…we guess they must have invested in one of the permits that cost nearly$400 per merchant per year?….we wonder if the coffers of the sign taxers are being filled by other downtown Evansville businesses like Piece of Cake that routinely uses sidewalk story boards to advertise their daily offerings?….they really have had some great activities on West Franklin Street that seem to be the envy of the sign police who take their orders from the “downtown Evansville is Evansville” crowd in the Civic Center?…maybe they should do a little PR and invite Mayor Winnecke across the Pigeon Creek to light the Christmas tree next year?

IS IT TRUE that one Downtown business operator who has been vocal in his efforts to start a merchants’ association was sent a message that it wouldn’t happen without the involvement of DMD, GAGE or the Chamber of Commerce? … this job creating business man just laughed at the thought of being forced to use these groups whose job it is to help merchants to actually do so?…this man has a very colorful description of how the message was delivered?…he hated to see the holiday parade and other activities off-loaded by GAGE and immediately moved out of the downtown area?…while we understand that there needs to be some rules with regard to signage the idea that government has the audacity to use the Area Planning Commission to extract  fines and fee permits from businesses is totally unexceptable…we expect and encourage the Evansville City Council to come out against such tactics and continue their leadership role in injecting sanity into the day to day governance of Evansville?

IS IT TRUE that today is Black Friday and across America people are poised to fight with each other over plastic trinkets to give to their relatives to celebrate the Christmas season?…some stores jumped the gun and were filled with shoppers yesterday to gain a slight edge on other Christmas shoppers?…this happened on Thanksgiving, a day that we have historically reflected on the bounty of the past year and basked in the love of family and friends to come together for a feast?…we guess this is progress but do prefer the old ways of all family and no shopping on Thanksgiving Day?…even President Obama was in marketing mode in trying to co-op Thanksgiving to get people to discuss the reasons to sign up for ObamaCare?…Sunday is the day that the website is supposed to work and we suspect its burden will be low because during the Wednesday news dump the small business mandate was delayed until after next year’s elections?…the website will also get an easy workout Sunday because the administration is actually encouraging people to stay away?…this is a far cry from the claims of “working like Amazon” that were coming from the White House at the October 1st debut before the fiasco of technical incompetence was exposed?…it is now 10:15 am CST and today Amazon in a mere 10 hours has already successfully handled more customers than the federal exchanges have in 60 days?…we shall see how things go for the Einstein’s in the Obama Administration come Sunday?…the odds are quite low that things will work this time?

Annual Jail Inspection Report

5

 

Sheriff Eric Williams

While the report indicates that there are some deficiencies when it comes to routine staffing levels and that the facility has been over its rated capacity on a regular basis, the overall report is very positive.

The Department of Corrections Jail Division inspects all jails in Indiana on an annual basis. The inspections are very thorough and review the vast majority of the standards set for jails in Indiana. The inspection report is required to be provided to the County Courts, County Commission and the County Prosecutor, which it has. Additionally, it is regularly provided to many other stakeholders in the local criminal justice system.

One of the county sheriff’s main responsibilities in Indiana is the operation of the county jail. The annual inspection by the Department of Corrections is a very important annual assessment by which the county and the sheriff are graded. This year, the inspection report included the statement, “excellent operation and should be used as a model for other facilities”.

Sheriff Eric Williams said, “Having the jail inspector say we are model facility for others to emulate is very rewarding. It speaks volumes about the manner in which the facility is operating and more importantly, the quality of the professionals working in the jail. While there are some weaknesses, the staff works hard and assures the continual safe and secure operation. I am very proud of the Sheriff’s Office team.”

A copy of the inspection report can be found at http://goo.gl/7EeRm8

Pet Of The Week

0

 

Jaina web small

This gorgeous girl is 8 years young. Don’t you even think about that “O” word – cats can live for twenty-plus years sometimes, and so she’s not even halfway through her lifespan! Her previous family was moving and could no longer keep her. They only had her for 2 years and got her from another shelter, so Jaina has never really had a truly permanent home. Won’t you give her one in time for Christmas? She promises to bring warmth to your house in this bitter cold. Her adoption fee is $30, and she is already spayed, microchipped, and vaccinated, ready to go home TODAY!