Zoeller calls on FDA to regulate e-cigarettes, prohibit sales to minors
Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller and 39 other attorneys general are calling on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to place restrictions on the sale of electronic cigarettes.
In a bipartisan letter, the attorneys general urged the FDA to take all available measures to regulate e-cigarettes as tobacco products under the Tobacco Control Act. E-cigarettes are battery operated products that heat liquid nicotine, derived from tobacco plants, into a vapor that is inhaled by the user.
“Some smokers see e-cigarettes as a way to wean themselves off of other tobacco products, but the health effects of these popular alternatives have not been adequately studied and the ingredients are not regulated,†Zoeller said. “Nicotine is highly addictive and, if e-cigarettes are left unregulated, our state’s youth may use them as a gateway to smoking.â€
State Attorneys General have fought for years to protect people from the dangers of tobacco products. In 1998, the attorneys general of 52 states and territories signed a landmark agreement with the four largest tobacco companies in the United States to recover billions of dollars in costs associated with smoking-related illnesses, and restrict cigarette advertising to prevent youth smoking.
Zoeller said unlike traditional tobacco products, there are no federal age restrictions that would prevent children from obtaining e-cigarettes. Noting the growing use of e-cigarettes, and the growing prevalence of advertising, the letter highlights the need to protect youth from becoming addicted to nicotine through these new products.
A survey conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows that from 2011 to 2012, the percentages of youth who have tried or currently use e-cigarettes both roughly doubled. The survey estimates that nearly 1.8 million middle and high school students have tried e-cigarettes in 2012.
According to the U.S. Surgeon General, nicotine is highly addictive and has immediate bio-chemical effects on the brain and body at any dosage, and is toxic in high doses.
E-cigarette manufacturers are using marketing tactics similar to those big tobacco used in the last 50 to 100 years to attract new smokers. Celebrity endorsements, television advertising, cartoons, fruit flavors, attractive packaging and cheap prices all serve to encourage youth consumption of these dangerous products.
Additionally, some marketing claims that these products do not contain the same level of toxins and carcinogens found in traditional cigarettes, cigars, and other tobacco products. These claims imply that e-cigarettes are a safe alternative to smoking, when in fact nicotine is highly addictive, the health effects of e-cigarettes have not been adequately studied, and the ingredients are not regulated and may still contain carcinogens.
Benji- Pet of the week
Benji is an 11-month-old beagle mix puppy! He has been through a lot in his young life, so he is looking forward to someone with the patience and desire to raise him to be the amazing dog we know he can be. He has lots of energy, but is a very well-behaved and friendly boy. His adoption fee is $100, which includes his microchip, vaccinations, and a bag of food. He is also neutered, so he can go home with you TODAY!
Amanda Bienhaus
Public Relations, Media, and Special Events
Vanderburgh Humane Society
(812) 426-2563 ext. 211
Radiation Oncology Services Receives ACR Accreditation Oncology Services Receives ACR Accreditation
Evansville Cancer Center/Vantage Oncology (ECC/VO), a Tri-State Radiation Oncology Center (TROC), and Deaconess Chancellor Center for Oncology were recently awarded a three-year term of accreditation in radiation oncology as the result of a recent review by the American College of Radiology (ACR). Radiation oncology (radiation therapy) is the careful use of high-energy radiation to treat cancer. A radiation oncologist may use radiation to cure cancer or to relieve a cancer patient’s pain.
The ACR is the nation’s oldest and most widely accepted radiation oncology accrediting body, with over 500 accredited sites, and 25 years of accreditation experience. The ACR seal of accreditation represents the highest level of quality and patient safety. It is awarded only to facilities meeting specific practice guidelines and technical standards developed by ACR after a peer-review evaluation by board-certified radiation oncologists and medical physicists who are experts in the field. Patient care and treatment, patient safety, personnel qualifications, adequacy of facility equipment, quality control procedures, and quality assurance programs are assessed. The findings are reported to the ACR Committee on Radiation Oncology Accreditation, which then provides the practice with a comprehensive report they can use for continuous practice improvement.
“ACR’s accreditation of Evansville Cancer Center/Vantage Oncology and Deaconess Chancellor Center for Oncology is a credit to our dedicated team of nurses, radiation therapists, dosimetrists, physicists and radiation oncologists who are committed to providing outstanding radiation therapy treatments to our cancer patients,†said Jon D. Frazier, M.D., radiation oncologist and medical director of ECC/VO. “We are extremely proud to have received this accreditation and will continue to hold ourselves to an extremely high standard so that our patients receive high quality cancer care.â€
The ACR is a national professional organization serving more than 36,000 diagnostic/interventional radiologists, radiation oncologists, nuclear medicine physicians, and medical physicists with programs focusing on the practice of medical imaging and radiation oncology and the delivery of comprehensive health care services.
For more information about the Chancellor Center for Oncology, please visit www.deaconess.com and for more information on the Evansville Cancer Center/Vantage Oncology, please visit www.evansvilleradiationoncology.com.
Study Finds No Connection Between Autism, Celiac Disease
Research casts doubt on practice of placing children with autism on a gluten-free diet, experts say
HealthDay News) — A large, new study finds no linkage between the digestive disorder celiac disease and autism.
One theory about autism is that it may start in the gut, because some children with the disorder also suffer from gastrointestinal problems. Many are put on strict gluten-free diets in the hopes that avoiding wheat proteins will improve their behavior.
“Studies have not really shown that this works, but it is a common belief,” said Dr. Daniel Coury, chief of developmental-behavioral pediatrics at Nationwide Children’s Hospital in Columbus, Ohio.
The new study, which was published online Sept. 25 in the journal JAMA Psychiatry, offers the most definitive proof yet that many autistic kids don’t benefit from restrictive, wheat-free diets.
The study comes from Sweden, a country that keeps careful records on the health of its citizens. Sweden also has rates of celiac disease that are about twice as high as in the United States, said study author Dr. Joseph Murray, a celiac disease specialist at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn.
Researchers pulled the health records on almost 290,000 people who’d had intestinal biopsies. Intestinal biopsies are tests where doctors take a tissue sample of the small intestine and examine it under the microscope to look for signs of damage. Intestinal biopsies are considered to be the most reliable way to check for celiac disease.
Based on the biopsy results, about 27,000 of those people had full-blown celiac disease. More than 12,000 had signs of inflammation without celiac disease. And another 3,700 had blood tests that indicated that they were having an immune reaction to wheat proteins, as people with celiac disease do, but their biopsies showed no intestinal damage.
Researchers then compared the rates of autism diagnoses in those groups to autism rates among more than 213,000 others who had biopsies with normal test results. Individuals in the normal comparison group were carefully matched to be the same age and sex as those with suspicious tests. They also lived in the same part of the country and had their biopsies done the same year as the others.
The result: Researchers say they found no convincing evidence that autism and celiac disease are linked.
“If there was a connection between these two diseases — either hidden celiac disease causing autism or autism causing celiac disease, it should have shown up in the study of this size. So, I think that’s the big message,” said Murray. “This brings some finality to that debate.”
When researchers restricted their results to a smaller subset of children who were diagnosed with celiac disease before their autism was spotted, they found that a prior diagnosis of celiac disease boosted the odds that child would be diagnosed with autism down the road by roughly 40 percent.
“An increased risk doesn’t mean it causes it in everybody,” said Coury, who was not involved in the study. “I think that’s important to note.”
One finding from the study that can’t be easily explained involved children who had immune reactions to wheat proteins that were picked up by a blood test, but no signs of intestinal damage. In other words, their blood tests for celiac disease were positive, but their biopsies were not.
The study found that those children were about three times more likely to be diagnosed with autism later in life than children who had negative blood test results.
Coury said it could be an important clue to the biology behind autism.
“We don’t know what causes autism. So the question is, what’s going on there?” he said. “We do know there are some inflammatory markers or immune issues involved with autism and this might help explain some cases of autism.”
The study authors, however, said that the finding should be interpreted with caution.
It is possible, Murray said, that these children were just sick from an early age. Sick children are probably more likely to have blood tests ordered for them. And he noted that the blood tests for celiac disease are sometimes falsely positive, so that might have muddied the results.
Another explanation may be that children with autism simply have more allergies than those who don’t. Or they might have disease where the same underlying defect causes both an immune disturbance and behavioral problems, as Coury speculated.
“I don’t think our study was really addressing that,” Murray said.
Other experts agreed.
“This study shows that autism is not related to celiac disease,” said Dr. Peter Green, director of the celiac disease center at Columbia University Medical School.
“All these kids are on a gluten-free diet,” Green said, even though “there’s no evidence it’s a causal relationship.”
More information
For more on autism spectrum disorders, visit the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Hotel’s Prospects are looking Like a Yes Vote is Coming
It has been learned by the CCO that Councilman John Friend has announced that he will be voting yes on the new hotel deal. The Mole Nation indicates that a unanimous vote of 9 – 0 may well be the tally next Monday night.
The total of the public money in the deal will consist of $7.5 Million as a direct subsidy to the hotel, $5.4 Million for a parking garage, and $3.6 Million for upgrades and infrastructure all contributed by the City of Evansville and none of which will be coming from the Innkeeper’s taxes.
An additional $3.5 Million will be contributed by the CVB and the County for improvements to the Centre and other infrastructure needed to tie the components of the project together. Sources have informed the CCO that all three sources of funds secured.
This is a developing story.
John Dunn Answers the Question, “What would it take to make a deal acceptable”?

We have recently been asked a very difficult question. Specifically that question is “what would it take to make this deal acceptableâ€? This is equally difficult to answer. We have never said we don’t want a downtown hotel. We have said we just don’t want to pay for it. I think we are going to get a hotel but I don’t think we have the best deal yet.
Our thoughts are a total contribution of the city and county should not exceed $12.5 million but that would have HCW owning and operating the garage, paying for its up keep and maintenance, and its 1/3 part of the connectors to the center and arena. It is estimated the operating costs including utilities to be over $125,000 per year. If the city has budget restraints now how will they fund the garage operations, maintenance, and heating and cooling of the connectors?
HCW, the Centre and the Ford Center would each be responsible for the building and maintenance of their part of the connector and the CVB money of $1 million not $2 million would be used for the upgrades at the Centre.
We strongly believe that all owners of interests in the deal should be made public including members of a corporation, LLC, partnership or whatever entity is a part owner. We demand to know who it is that we are gifting over 30 million dollars to, including the Executive Inn purchase and the property for the hotel and apartments.
Does this make everyone happy?…..no….and remember the local hotels will have to compete with this hotel that will not turn a profit and will cost the taxpayer more money in the future or we will have another Executive Inn to deal with in 8 to 10 years.
Ii strongly feel that if the Winnecke Administration displayed real leadership, they would commission a real urban study company like Fort Wayne has had to do to set our community on the right track for a viable progressive city and not just a failing downtown.
Coachella Valley Innovation Hub Headed by Joe Wallace selected by Obama Administration for Planning Grant TO REVITALIZE AMERICAN MANUFACTURING
OBAMA ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS ANNOUNCE $7M IN GRANTS AND INVESTMENTS TO REVITALIZE AMERICAN MANUFACTURING
Departments of Commerce and Agriculture, along with the Environmental Protection Agency and Small Business Administration, release first round of “Investing in Manufacturing Communities Partnership†funding
WASHINGTON—U.S. Secretary of Commerce Penny Pritzker, along with U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Gina McCarthy, and Acting Small Business Administrator Jeanne A. Hulit, today announced the winners of the first funding phase of the “Investing in Manufacturing Communities Partnership†(IMCP), an Obama Administration initiative that will help accelerate the resurgence of manufacturing in the United States and create jobs in cities across the country. The $7 million in grants and other investments being announced today are the first round of funding in a major reform effort to reward communities for creating globally competitive environments that attract, retain, and expand investment in manufacturing and spur international trade and exports. These grants and investments will help communities develop plans to build strengths in specific industries through:
• Workforce training
• Specialized research
• Strengthened supply chains
• Improved transportation and energy infrastructure
• Export promotion
• Better access to capital
“The IMCP is a program that challenges communities around the country to coordinate their resources for strategies on economic development,†said Secretary of Commerce Penny Pritzker. “These planning grants and investments provide an opportunity for communities to design plans that help revitalize American manufacturing, attract investment, and strengthen our economy.â€
“There is unlimited potential in the years ahead to create good, new manufacturing jobs in rural America,†said Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack. “Through the work of the White House Rural Council, this Administration has been working hard to magnify economic opportunities in rural areas. Today’s announcement is one more example of how federal agencies are successfully partnering to create jobs while expanding the nation’s manufacturing output.â€
“EPA’s role in the development and implementation of the IMCP program and our focus on Brownfields Area-Wide Planning efforts will help communities support manufacturing and create jobs,†said U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Gina McCarthy. “This partnership will make a visible difference in communities across the country.â€
“IMCP is a vital resource for small manufacturers that are ready to grow, expand and create jobs in their communities,†said Acting U.S. Small Business Administrator Jeanne Hulit. “These small manufacturers help drive our economic growth, and SBA’s investment helps build stronger supply chains here at home to strengthen small businesses in communities across America.â€
This first phase of the program provides 44 planning grants and investments totaling $7 million to support the creation of economic development strategies that recognize the community’s comparative advantages as a place to do business, invest in public goods, and encourage collaboration between multiple different entities to expand the area’s commercial appeal to investors.
Grants and investments awarded in 2013 will help communities undertake the strategic planning necessary to compete for the IMCP Challenge being launched in fall 2013 and awarded in the spring of 2014. In the 2014 Challenge competition, the Administration will designate stand-out “Manufacturing Communities†and give them an advantage in securing grants and investments through programs offered by 10 federal departments and agencies across the government. Moreover, top “Manufacturing Communities†may receive large IMCP Challenge grants and investments to finance – in partnership with industry and localities – substantial economic development investments such as workforce training, business parks or incubators, or infrastructure.
IMCP was first announced in April 2013.
More information on the FY14 IMCP Challenge will be available in the Federal Register in fall 2013.
The following is a list of winners of the 2013 strategy grants and investments. Descriptions of each project can be found at www.commerce.gov/IMCP.
The U.S. Department of Commerce ($4.4 million)
1. Bi-State Regional Commission and the Quad Cities Chamber of Commerce, Rock Island, Illinois
2. Burke Partnership for Economic Development, Morganton, North Carolina
3. Butte Local Development Corporation, Butte, Montana
4. California State University at Fresno, Fresno, California
5. Campus Research Corporation, Tucson, Arizona
6. Centralina Council of Governments, Charlotte, North Carolina
7. China Lake Technologies, LLC, Ridgecrest, California
8. Coachella Valley Economic Partnership, Palm Springs, California
9. Commonwealth Center for Advanced Manufacturing, Disputanta, Virginia
10. Development Projects, Inc., Dayton, Ohio
11. Economic Development Council for Central Illinois, Peoria, Illinois
12. Georgia Tech Research Corporation and the Northwest Georgia Regional Commission of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia
13. Greater Phoenix Economic Council, Phoenix, Arizona
14. Mid-Columbia Economic Development District of The Dalles, The Dalles, Oregon
15. Northern Maine Development Commission, Caribou, Maine
16. Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
17. Piedmont Triad Partnership, Greensboro, North Carolina
18. Rhode Island Economic Development Corporation, Providence, Rhode Island
19. Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
20. South Carolina Council on Competiveness, Columbia, South Carolina
21. South Sioux City, Nebraska
22. Tech20/20, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
23. University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
24. University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
25. Wichita State University, Wichita, Kansas
26. Yuma County, Arizona
The Environment Protection Agency ($1.3 million)
1. North Branch Works/ LEED Council, Chicago, Illinois
2. Atlanta, Georgia
3. Toledo, Ohio
4. The Enterprise Center, Chattanooga, Tennessee
5. The Environmental Health Coalition, National City, California
6. Lowell, Massachusetts
7. Monaca, Pennsylvania
The Small Business Administration ($766,000)
1. Entreworks Consulting, Clarion, Crawford, Erie, Forest, Lawrence, Mercer, Venango, Warren, Pennsylvania
2. Hickory Ground Solutions, LLC, Elizabethton, Kingsport, and Johnson City, Tennessee
3. Hickory Ground Solutions, LLC, Calumet, El Reno, Geary, Hinto, Kingfisher, Minco, Okarche, Piedmont, Union City, and Watonga, Oklahoma
4. Hickory Ground Solutions, LLC, Mecklenburg County, Halifax County, and Brunswick County, Virginia
5. The Flynt Group, Inc., Kansas City, Kansas
The U.S. Department of Agriculture ($528,000)
1. Clear Water Economic Development Association, Lewiston, Idaho
2. Makoce Waste Development Corporation, Inc., Rapid City, South Dakota
3. Massachusetts MEP, Worcester, Massachusetts
4. Northern Forest Center, Essex County, Orleans County, and Caledonia County, Vermont
5. Northern Maine Development Commission, Caribou, Maine
6. Quinault Indian Nation, Taholah, Washington
Advisory: Evansville man arrested during on-going counterfeit money investigation
Evansville Police arrested 34 year old Brian Acker on Forgery charges after officers found $740 in counterfeit $20 bills in his home.
Officers received a tip that Acker was invovled in the recent increase of fake bills being circulated in the Evansville area. While serving a search warrant at Acker’s home at 842 Jackson, officers seized the counterfeit bills.
Investigators believe Acker received the fake money from another individual, but that he was aware that the money was counterfeit.
The investigation into the counterfeiting operation is on-going and more arrests are expected.
For full details, view this message on the web.
City Government will have “Skin in the Game†and an ROI on the Convention Hotel: by Joe Wallace

City Government will have “Skin in the Game†and an ROI on the Convention Hotel
Joe Wallace
The game of deal or no deal that is playing out in downtown Evansville with respect to the proposed convention hotel has a full gamut of opinions ranging from unconditional support at any price to not a dime of public money without equity. From a private investment perspective the return on investment of such a deal easily defined by traditional business metrics based on probability and outcomes.
When calculating the ROI of public dollars the return portion becomes much more derivative in its beneficial components. Placing a value on something like how many more lunches will be sold at any particular Main Street restaurant and how that accrues to the City is real but the range of possibilities is too wide to hang your hat on. The basic direct ROI on the other hand can be grasped fairly easily if the direct tax revenues are the return and the subsidy is the investment.
In the case of the deal put on the table at Monday night’s city council meeting where it was stated that the direct hotel subsidy would be $7.5 Million, the direct return would be the incremental property taxes paid by the hotel plus the county option income tax of 1% collected on the wages paid by the hotel alone.
The property taxes on the hotel by Indiana law will be capped at 3% of the assessed value. The assessed value according to Indiana law is the fair market value of the property as opposed to what the construction cost may end up being. For analysis purposes let’s assume that the fair market value of a 253 room 3-Star hotel will be $100,000 per room or $25.3 Million. The maximum property tax on the property will therefore be $759,000. The reality is that the actual tax will be less so let’s assume the tax is $650,000.
For the COIT using a $100/day room rate, 60% occupancy, and a payroll that is 35% of the net revenue which is typical of lodging businesses, the payroll can be expected to be about $2 Million. That would work out to a COIT collection of 1% or that amount or $20,000 per year making the incremental direct return on the $7.5 Million subsidy bring in $670,000 per year in a highly probable scenario.
The return to the City on this $7.5 Million works out to 8.9% of the subsidy per year which exceeds the interest rate anticipated that the bonds will pay by a significant amount. The most recent payment estimate on the bonds is just over $500,000 so in this likely scenario the cash generated would not only pay the bonds off but would have some margin to cover indebtedness for associated infrastructure. Similar analysis can be done for the apartments and the parking tower and should be done as this week comes to a close and Monday’s vote approaches.
This same analysis applied to a $20 Million direct subsidy as was pushed for last week results in a payment of $1.4 Million per year against revenue of the same $670,000 making that proposal result in a negative return on investment as well as coming up short on the payments. In short last weeks deal would have been a financially poor decision and this weeks has a good return.
The recent reduction in the City subsidy has no only made this hotel contribute to the City’s bottom line it has eliminated the need to tap the Innkeeper’s tax and maybe even riverboat funds to pay for the subsidy.
Of course the businessmen with the $11.5 Million needs to be verified as does the down payment and financing of HCW before the City should pony up with a $7.5 Million direct subsidy. The tortured process if it really works out seems to have resulted in a deal that is good for the people of Evansville, HCW, and the unknown local investors.