
Connie,
There has been some confusion regarding our supposedly increase in the City Council budget. Obviously, there are some on council that do not have the proper knowledge in interpreting the sources of our funding. In order to properly interpret  our budget, one has to derive the total funding from two locations. The first is Fund 4 account number 1011401 and second is fund 907 account number 4745801. For everyone convenience, I have attached copies of those sources. As such, please note that account 1011401 for 2013 was $476,163 and account 4745801 for 2013 was $125,500, totaling $601,663 for 2013.  In review of the 2014 budget, account 1011401 for 2014 is $583,091.60 and account 4745801 for 2014 is now only $15,000, totaling $598,091.60 for 2014.
Now, I assume that everybody can do this simple math problems: $598,091.60, total budget for 2014 less $601,663.00 total budget for 2013 = $-3,571.40 Divided by $601,663.00 total for 2013 = .59% decline in our budget for 2014. So, if anybody voted against the overall budget due to an alleged 22% increase, please consult the finance chair prior to the vote next time.  As I recall, I made it a point to contact each and everyone of you the Monday afternoon before council  asking  if you had any concerns and nothing about our supposedly increase in the City Council budget was mentioned. I regret if any  of your constituents were mislead by not understanding the proper sources of our budget.
Why the administration chose to confuse the issue by transferring the normal funding from account 4745801 to 1011401 and the result, confusion to the masses, only they can answer.
In the future, please do not hesitate to consult with me regarding any aspect of our budget.
John Friend, CPA
5th Ward City Council Member and Budget Chairman
Click below to open budget  documents  then you may print it out for review:
City Council Budget – 2014 copy 2
POSTED BY CITY COUNTY OBSERVER WITHOUT BIAS, OPINION AND OR EDITING