TheStatehouseFile.com
INDIANAPOLIS – Francois Rabelais said it best
“Nature abhors a vacuum.â€

John Krull, publisher, TheStatehouseFile.com
So, apparently, do the political and news cultures of the Western world. Even when pundits and politicians don’t know what’s going on – even when they acknowledge that they don’t know – that doesn’t stop them from speculating and talking, talking, talking even when they have nothing to say.
Consider the strange case of Malaysian Airlines Flight MH370, which vanished an hour after it took off for a flight from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing. There were roughly 240 people on board and not a peep has been heard from any of them since the plane disappeared.
The only things that are “known†about the disappearance – and those things aren’t known with sufficient firmness to call them facts – include some inconclusive and not well confirmed pieces of evidence that the plane altered course and that its automated communications and tracking systems either were turned off or seriously malfunctioned.
In fact, the things we don’t know far outweigh the things we do know.
We don’t have a plane, a crew, a passenger, a black box or any other person or piece of that flight, so we don’t really know what we’re looking for or even where we should be looking for it.
We don’t have a crash site because we don’t even know for sure that there was a crash.
We don’t have a landing site because we don’t even know for sure where or if the plane landed somewhere.
We don’t have a crime scene because we don’t know for sure that there was a crime.
The paucity of concrete evidence, though, hasn’t stopped the major news networks from exploring at endless length the possible outcomes or storylines. Nor has it stopped a steady stream of public officials and other “experts†who spin speculative tales about possible scenarios, as if they were pitching ideas for made-for-television movies.
I understand and to some degree accept that these forays into fantasy inadequately disguised as analysis are products of two ravenous appetites.
The first of those appetites is the hunger many political figures, consultants and hangers-on in the political world have for exposure. In a culture in which both clout and cash often are measured by face time on camera, many people are eager to speak at length when the red light goes on, even when doing so requires them to blather like the village idiot.
The other hunger is more basic – and more understandable. We try out answers even when we don’t have enough information to supply proper questions much less answers because not knowing scares us. If we don’t know enough to know how something happened, then we also don’t know enough to stop it – whether it is an accident or an attack – the next time it might occur.
No one likes to feel that vulnerable.
And in this era in which information that in years past would have taken months, years or even decades to compile now can be assembled with a few key strokes and about as many seconds, we tend to think that all matters of interest should yield themselves to our curiosity.
But they don’t.
There are some things we don’t get to understand, some mysteries we never unravel. We still don’t know where Jimmy Hoffa is buried or where Amelia Earhart died.
Speculating about what happened to them and why can be satisfying parlor games but that speculation shouldn’t be confused with newsgathering, scholarship or honest-to-goodness analysis.
It’s guessing and nothing more, but we try to use those guesses to fill the vacuum because the vacuum frightens us.
The famed journalist H.L. Mencken tried to rebut Rabelais. Mencken said, “Nature abhors a moron.â€
That statement is demonstrably not true, because nature has created so many morons.
And, right now, a lot of them are fighting for air time.
John Krull is director of Franklin College’s Pulliam School of Journalism, host of “No Limits†WFYI 90.1 Indianapolis and publisher of TheStatehouseFile.com, a news website powered by Franklin College journalism students.