Home Blog Page 6372

Judges reject property owner’s interpretation of tax sale statute

0

Jennifer Nelson for www.theindianalawyer.com

The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed that the purchaser of property in a tax sale substantially complied with the statutory requirement that the owner of record is notified about the buyer’s intent to petition for a tax deed.

Properties 2006 acquired property located at 219 Kenwood Ave. in Hammond through a tax sale in April 2013. 219 Kenwood Holdings LLC was the owner of record of the property when it was put in the tax sale.

Properties 2006 sent Kenwood notice of its purchase and intent to petition for a tax deed, saying “A petition for a tax deed will be filed on or after August 24, 2013.” Properties 2006 later notified Kenwood it had petition for the tax deed.

In September 2013, Kenwood objected to the petition, arguing the first notice sent did not meet the requirements of I.C. 6-1.1-25-4.5(e). The part of the statute at issue says: “The notice that this section requires shall contain at least the following: (1) A statement that a petition for a tax deed will be filed on or after a specified date. (2) The date on or after which the petitioner intends to petition for a tax deed to be issued. …”

Kenwood argues the first notice does not comply with subdivision (2) because it does not contain a statement as to the date on or after which the petitioner intends for a tax deed to be issued. The appellate judges pointed out Kenwood’s interpretation, which seems to require a petitioner to predict the date the court would actually issue a tax deed, is only possible if the words “to petition” are omitted from the statute.

“It is the date of petitioning that the statute is concerned with, not the date of issuance. Properties 2006’s statement informed Kenwood of the date on which it planned to petition for a tax deed. The statement makes clear that Properties 2006 intended to file this petition on August 24, 2013. Therefore, Properties 2006 fully complied with subsection (e),” Judge John Baker wrote.

The judges also rejected Kenwood’s assertion that the requirements of subdivisions (1) and (2) cannot be satisfied by one statement alone but must be broken into two sentences.

The purpose of the statute was achieved in this case, 219 Kenwood Holdings, LLC v. Properties 2006, LLC, 45A03-1401-MI-49 , so there was no error by the trial court in finding Properties 2006 substantially complied with the statute.

UNANIMOUS FOR MURDER, A NOVEL CHAPTER EIGHT

0

Gavel Gamut

By Jim Redwine

(Week of 27 October 2014)

UNANIMOUS FOR MURDER, A NOVEL

CHAPTER EIGHT

Malcolm Settles hated white people. This might have been more understandable had he, himself, not been a white person. In reality, it was not white people but white women he hated, particularly pretty, young white women whose unforgivable sin was to be nice to him until they realized he was not to be pitied but feared.

His first encounter with the perplexing phenomenon of a pretty girl who smiled at him until he cornered her in a dark hallway occurred at the North Posey Junior High School. What she meant as sympathy he took as encouragement. And when she pushed his hand away from her breast and reported the incident, Malcolm, also, had his first encounter with the juvenile justice system and Judge Eagleson’s probation department. The matter was handled informally at the girl’s request, but Settles saw her actions as a betrayal of their deep love for one another.

Over the next ten years he managed to evade the notice of the law, but he did so by doing his stalking across the Ohio and Wabash rivers in Kentucky and Illinois. Then, in August of 2014, he met Elaine Carnes who was working at the Subway store in Wadesville, Indiana.

Elaine was proud of her real job and tried hard to treat customers the way she wanted to be treated. She was five feet tall with short brunette hair and radiant skin, a happy girl who smiled easily and felt sorry for anyone who seemed to be on the outside looking in. When she smiled at Settles, he felt their special bond.

Settles stopped by the Subway to say hello to Elaine so often the other workers started calling him her groupie. Then he saw Elaine get in the assistant manger’s pickup at the end of her shift at seven p.m. on September second. Malcolm could not believe Elaine would betray him that way. He followed the pickup from Wadesville on Highway 66 to Springfield Road to the small country church on Oliver Road. Settles stayed far back and followed the lone pickup’s lights along the isolated country road.

When the couple pulled into the deserted parking lot of Mt. Zion Baptist Church and turned out the truck’s lights, Settles seethed with jealousy. As he raced into the gravel parking lot, he reached for the sawed off baseball bat beneath the driver’s seat and slammed his Toyota Camry into the rear of the pickup.

Malcolm jumped out of his vehicle and began to beat the windshield of the pickup with the ball bat. Gordie Mohr, the young assistant manger, was able to get the truck started and yell for Elaine to call 911. When Settles saw the flashing lights of the deputy sheriff’s car approaching the church, he ran to his car and backed away from the pickup.

Officer Haney Creswell of the Posey County Sheriff’s Department had been patrolling the rural area watching for meth heads who had recently been stealing anhydrous ammonia from farmers’ nurse tanks. When dispatch called, he was able to get to the scene before Settles could escape. Haney blocked Settles’ car in and ordered him at gunpoint to drop the club and sprawl upon the gravel lot. Creswell called for backup using his radio transmitter attached to his uniform blouse as he placed plastic cuffs on Settles. Other officers arrived within minutes.

Settles’ court-appointed attorney was able to convince the prosecutor that Posey County would be a lot better off if Settles were allowed to plea to a misdemeanor and take a year in jail. But she could not convince her client who demanded an early jury trial. Settles knew a fair jury would see how his actions had been justified by Elaine’s disloyal behavior. He would face the felony charges with confidence. And he demanded to testify in his own defense in spite of his lawyer’s advice.

Jack had issued the summonses for forty-five potential jurors. Because they only received a two-week notice, there were always a few who asked to be excused for medical appointments or pre-paid vacations. But Posey County citizens rarely shirked their duty to serve. Thirty-nine reported to the third floor of the courthouse where Jack signed them in and showed them the Jury Orientation film required by the Indiana Supreme Court.

Jack kept them occupied as the deputy sheriffs hustled Malcolm Settles through the courthouse basement sally port in chains and cuffs, which they removed when Settles reached the courtroom. Eagleson was amused by the appellate courts’ litany of procedures ostensibly designed to protect criminal defendants from unfair inferences by jurors.

A trial judge could grant search and arrest warrants and handle numerous pre-trial hearings that divulged a miscreant’s current and past deeds yet could still, according to the higher courts, fairly determine guilt or innocence. But one glimpse of a handcuff supposedly interfered with a lay person’s objectivity. The appellate courts spent little time explaining how a black robe magically inoculated one human mind from the frailties supposedly suffered by the rest of the world.

Such rules Eagleson found not only insulting to the citizens whose tax monies greased the wheels of justice, he also, found them unnecessary. If a judge could make a decision based on the evidence, so could jurors. The body of law that called for such devices as a change of venue smacked of the disdain appellate court judges and especially federal judges held for the people whom they were supposed to serve.

But, there he was again musing about non-issues when he needed to be concentrating on the case in front of him. Malcolm Settles and his alleged victims, Elaine Carnes and Gordie Mohr, deserved his full attention.

“Jack, bring the venire panel down and seat them in the courtroom.”

As the potential jurors filed in, the Prosecuting Attorney, Tom Rachels, and his prosecuting witness, Haney Creswell, as well as Malcolm Settles and his attorney, Rayanne Simms, stood at attention. Eagleson asked the venire to raise their right hands and swore them for the voir dire: “Do you swear or affirm to honestly answer all questions concerning your qualifications to be a juror?”

Eagleson found his mind wandering to the arcane system that had developed when an oath meant something. In his entire career he had never heard of a juror being punished for lying during voir dire. And almost nobody in contemporary America felt a religious or any other restriction on whether they answered anyone’s questions honestly.

Eagleson gave the panel a synopsis of the case and asked if they had any knowledge of it. He inquired as to whether they knew anyone involved and his favorite question, “Could they be fair and impartial?” Everyone could. Then he placed twelve potential jurors in the antique oak juror box and turned them over to the attorneys for further questioning.

As the lawyers cautiously attempted to plow the jurors for future planting of anticipated evidence favorable to their side, Eagleson occupied himself by once again observing the huge old courtroom with its antique fixtures such as the jury box with its modesty screen put in place after women got the right to vote. He never tired of drinking in the balcony and the unique chandeliers that sometimes had his mind drifting to thoughts of Phantom of the Opera.

“Objection! Judge, Mr. Rachels is treading dangerously close to violating my Motion in Limine concerning Rule 404(B).”

Eagleson returned to the present and tried to summon up what had just been asked by the prosecutor. He played for time and fished for clues.

“Please be a little more specific, Ms. Simms. Or better yet, why don’t the attorneys approach the bench.”

At the bench Rayanne Simms was spitting fire as she whispered: “Your Honor, Mr. Rachels just asked if the jurors would consider a person’s reputation for truth and veracity in weighing a witness’s testimony. He knows about my client’s juvenile record, and he is trying to imply Malcolm’s testimony can’t be believed when I call him to the stand.”

“You’re going to put him on the stand? I had no idea he might testify. I was laying a foundation for Gordon Mohr’s testimony. You know you will try to get the jury to disbelieve him because of the employee/manager relationship you assert he abused in dating Elaine.”

“I am not putting him on the stand. The idiot demands to testify. I am just trying to keep out as much of his past as I can.”

Rayanne smiled at Eagleson and said, “Sorry, Judge, I have no control over this guy. I just am trying to save him from himself.”

“Alright, counsel, let’s get on with it. The objection is overruled. Mr. Rachels, you may proceed.”

New area code, 10-digit dialing to take effect in Southern Indiana early next year

0

By Lesley Weidenbener

TheStatehouseFile.com

INDIANAPOLIS – Residents in Southern Indiana will be required to use 10-digit dialing – even for calls across town – starting Feb. 7, with a new area code implemented one month later.

The Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission said Thursday that residents of the 812 area code will have to start using 10-digit dialing on Feb. 7.  A new area code - 930 - will be added to the area one month later. Both area codes will be used throughout the region. Map courtesy of the Indiana Office of Utility Consumer Counselor.

The new dialing requirements mean an area code must be used to place all calls. And the later change means that newly assigned numbers will start with 930, meaning next-door neighbors could have different area codes.

Both changes had been scheduled to go into effect this fall. But the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission postponed the implementation after concerns that businesses and telecommunications weren’t prepared for the switch. Officials said Thursday they were particularly worried about the medical and law enforcement industries.

The changes impact what is now the 812 area code, which covers roughly the southern third of the state. The IURC is adding the 930 code because 812 is running out of numbers.

In anticipation of the mandatory dialing period, the IURC is urging customers to check with alarm service providers or providers of other services that use the telephone network to ensure the customer’s equipment is capable of using 10-digits.

Customers should also update medical records, business materials, personal contacts, and pet I.D. tags with all 10 digits of their phone numbers.

Currently, customers can voluntarily use 10-digit dialing even for local numbers.

Vanderburgh County Recent Booking Report

0

SPONSORED BY DEFENSE ATTORNEY IVAN ARNAEZ.
DON’T GO TO COURT ALONE. CALL IVAN ARNAEZ @ 812-424-6671.

http://www.vanderburghsheriff.com/recent-booking-records.aspx

EPD Activity Report October 24, 1014

0

SPONSORED BY DEFENSE ATTORNEY IVAN ARNAEZ.
DON’T GO TO COURT ALONE. CALL IVAN ARNAEZ @ 812-424-6671.

EPD Activity Report

TODAYS CCO ANNUAL AWARDS LUNCHEON AT TROPICANA IS A TOTAL SELL OUT

2

After 10 years City County Observer “MOLE”  finally breaks his silence.  We are pleased that CCO “MOLE” decided to publicly comment on our 5th Annual Community Service Awards luncheon to be held today at Tropicana-Evansville.  CCO “Mole” is pleased to announce the Outstanding Community Services Award winners for 2014.

This 5th annual Awards Luncheon will be held on today at the Tropicana-Evansville Walnut Rooms A&B on October 27.  Registration will begin at 11:30, and the event will officially begin at 12:00 noon.

This luncheon is a totally sold out event.  We have 200 guests attending this event which makes this the largest “Awards Lunch” ever.

Please check the link below to hear CCO “MOLE” comments about tomorrow award luncheon.

YWCA completes long-anticipated shelter renovation project

0

Due to the generosity of Verizon HopeLine and many other supporters, the YWCA of Evansville has completed a much-needed refurbishment of its common area for shelter residents.

This communal space is used by YWCA domestic violence victims and their children to complete the everyday tasks of living such as reading, watching TV, filling out paperwork, doing homework, and simply relaxing.

Prior to the renovation, the room had not seen improvements in decades. The space was worn, inefficient, and the furnishings and layout were not conducive to its purpose.

The room has been transformed into a soothing area with a fresh coat of paint, new flooring, new furniture and lighting, lockable storage space for clients, and a new play area for children. In addition, the new couch and side chairs fold out into beds that can be utilized by overflow clients when all of the shelter bedrooms are full.

The project was completed in early October, and open houses for donors, project supporters, employees and board members have been held throughout the month.

In 2013, the YWCA’s domestic violence shelter provided 7,426 nights of safe shelter to over 300 women and their children.

The YWCA has invited some of its community partners to attend a special open house on Friday, October 24th between 10:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m. This is by invitation only for these partners and for media. For more information about this project or to schedule a media ONLY tour at another time, please contact Erika N. Taylor, YWCA CEO, at 422-1191 or etaylor@ywcaevansville.org.

Open House Planned at Southern Indiana Career & Technical Center

0

The EVSC’s Southern Indiana Career & Technical Center (SICTC) open house for current 10th and 11th graders and their families is planned for November 3 from 6:00 – 7:30 p.m. and on November 22 from 10:30 – noon. SICTC is located at 1901 Lynch Rd. The open house is for students who want to learn more about enrolling in Career and Technical Education classes at the Southern Indiana Career and Technical Center.

The Southern Indiana Career and Technical Center, which serves public, private, and parochial students from Vanderburgh, Warrick, Posey, North and South Gibson counties, and the southern half of Spencer county, offers 21 courses of study in 10 different career clusters. All of the programs prepare students for high skill, high wage, or high demand careers including 35 of the Hoosier Hot 50 jobs.

SICTC offers 20 different courses including programs in: advanced manufacturing, agricultural education and veterinary science, computer network technology (CISCO), building construction technology, culinary arts, Project Lead the Way engineering, graphic communication/digital media technology, health sciences, public safety/law enforcement/fire safety, telecommunication, and transportation technology

The Career Center is identified by the National Research Center for Career and Technical Education as one of the top five secondary career centers in the United States. Students may also receive dual credit for 78 different college courses at six different colleges and universities as well as earn industry recognized certifications.

Individuals with questions may call the Southern Indiana Career and Technical Center at 435-8438 or go to www.evscschools.com/sictc.

Democrats push to be on Marion County judge ballot

0

Dave Stafford for www.theindianalawyer.com

Marion County Superior judge elections ruled unconstitutional this month should not proceed Nov. 4 as the current ballot is drawn, according to court pleadings from candidates who were left out of the general election.

“We’re going to keep pressing,” said Greg Bowes, who along with fellow Democrat Christopher K. Starkey has asked Chief Judge Richard Young of the Southern District of Indiana for a preliminary injunctionordering their names be placed on the ballot in light of Young’s ruling Oct. 9 in Common Cause v. Indiana Secretary of State, et al., 1:12-CV-1603. Young has not yet ruled on the injunction request.

“This is a really serious right we’re trying to vindicate here,” said Bowes, a private practitioner and former Marion County assessor and city-county councilman. “We’re pressing as hard as we can as soon as we can before this election happens.”

Bowes, Starkey and David R. Hennessy were candidates for Marion Superior judge in May’s Democratic primary but were not among the top-eight vote recipients. Because the election statute limits general election ballot access to eight Democrats and eight Republicans for 16 judgeships evenly divided among parties, the three aren’t on the ballot. Bowes and Starkey, representing themselves, argue the three should be, and that Young’s ruling bolsters the federal suit they filed in August seeking ballot access.

While Young declared the Marion Superior judicial election scheme unconstitutional, he stayed the order until after the matter is ruled on by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, so the ruling doesn’t affect the Nov. 4 race. Young ruled the judicial election statute doesn’t provide voters a meaningful choice in the general election.

Bowes argues that staying the ruling also will violate his First Amendment rights, because each party should be allowed to nominate a candidate for each contested judgeship under Young’s ruling. Bowes argues that if injunctive relief isn’t issued, the Nov. 4 vote should be invalidated and a special election conducted.

“How can you have an election under an unconstitutional statute?” Bowes said.

The motion for injunction asserts that based on Marion County voting patterns, 11 Democratic candidates likely would win more votes than the eight Republican candidates, if Bowes, Hennessy and Starkey were placed on the ballot. Therefore, if additional candidates aren’t on the ballot, U.S. Supreme Court precedent suggests relief is warranted, Bowes said.

“If these 16 judges get elected under a law that’s unconstitutional,” he said, “any of those judges would have a constitutional challenge to any action they take” basing the assertion on Clark v. Roemer, 500 U.S. 646, 654 (U.S. 1991).

Bowes acknowledged the injunction request may be a long shot with now less than two weeks before the election, but he said it was important for candidates left off the general election ballot to preserve their rights in light of Young’s ruling and reassert claims for ballot access.

State defendants have not yet formally responded to the injunction request. The case is Gregory Bowes and Christopher K. Starkey v. Indiana Secretary of State, et al., 1:14-CV-1322.

Why we need Term Limits in Congress

3

As Election Day quickly approaches, I am constantly reminded by news stories and voter concerns that many of our elected officials have simply been in Washington for too long. This is exactly why I propose a change to the Constitution limiting the terms of members in both the House and Senate. We have constitutionally term-limited the presidency—why can’t we do so with those who represent us in the legislative branch?
Many times, people tell me that they believe Washington changes people. The power, the legalized bribery, the complacency; these along with many other factors can lead even the most well-intentioned people to become corrupted. And can you blame them? We have injected millions of dollars into a system that works to keep people in a job that pays $174,000 a year with disastrous results.
One of the first things I highlighted in my candidacy was that, if elected, I would only serve two terms in Washington, D.C. I believe this is the way our Founders intended it—with farmers, small business owners, and average citizens going to represent us without becoming career politicians. Instead, we are stuck in a government that includes individuals serving as many terms as they possibly can, until a better opportunity arises or some scandal forces voters to become fed up just enough to vote them out of office.
When you go to the polls in a few weeks, please remember my promise. My promise that I have no intention of becoming a career politician. Regardless of how many issues you agree or disagree with me on, regardless of what party you belong to, you will be safe in knowing that you have a choice of voting for someone who has your best interests at heart. I was not drawn to this journey of running for Congress because of the stature of the job or any sort of power and notoriety that comes with it. I was simply drawn out of a desire to serve people, along with my frustrations with constantly re-electing the same people and expecting different results.
Help me send a message to the rest of the country: that career politicians are no longer acceptable and money cannot buy your vote. Let’s tell America that it’s time for term limits and less corruption from our government.
To learn more about my campaign to represent Indiana’s 8th District in Congress, visit my website at www.spanglerforcongress.com.