In anticipation of the 2012 audit being made public on Friday we wanted our readers to have the findings of the 2011 audit available to peruse in advance of learning if the 2011 issues have been corrected and to see if 2012 was a better year for reconciliation and compliance at the Civic Center.
Excerpts Describing deficiencies.
“Fund balances were not reconciled to bank balances for the entire year of 2011. As of July 31, 2012, City officials were still unable to reconcile the ledger to the bank account and were still making adjustments to
the December 31, 2011 fund balances.”
“A materially correct annual report for 2011 was not presented for audit. Also, the City filed their annual report past the deadline.”
“The City’s accounting information system was not equipped to produce the following forms or their equivalent:Â
1. City and Town Form No. 208 – Ledger or Receipts, Disbursements, and Balances
2. City and Town Form No. 209 – Ledger of Appropriations, Encumbrances, Disbursements and Balances
Officials and employees are required to use State Board of Accounts prescribed or approved forms in the manner prescribed.”
“We were unable to obtain records in which the detail matched the control for the year 2011. The City also kept 2011 open through at least July 2012 which caused year end fund balances and total receipts and total disbursements of some funds to materially change. We also noted several instances in the utility funds where accrual entries were being made in the cash basis system.”
“The controls over the receipting, disbursing, recording, and accounting for the financial activities were insufficient for the following reasons:  1. Weaknesses in input controls.  2. Oversight deficiencies in the reconcilement process.”
“As stated in several prior reports, the City entered into a contract with SMG, effective January 1, 2006, to manage Roberts Stadium, Victory Theater, and Mesker Music Theater. The contract required an independent audit of SMG. An addendum to the contract was added on September 5, 2007, amending the contract from requiring an audit to requiring a review. As of July 2012, a review had not been completed for the years 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, or 2011. Without the independent review of SMG’s financial records the accuracy of amounts paid to or received from SMG cannot be verified.”
“The cash balance of the General Fund, Purchasing Internal Service Fund, Information Technology Services Fund, Miscellaneous Grant Fund, Sports Non-Reverting Fund, Home Admin Investment Trust Fund, Community Dev Block Grant Fund, Old Post Office Fund, Emergency Shelter Grant Fund, General Obligation Bond 2006 Fund, Park District Bond Refunding 2010 Fund, Redevelopment Bond Retirement Fund, Workers Compensation Fund, Evansville Civil City Payroll Fund, Accounts Receivable Clearing Fund, Electronic Tax Payments Fund, SRFWW – Evansville 09 Fund, SRFWW Evansville 0610 Fund, Sewage 2010B-1 Construction Fund, Water Utility-Operating Fund, and Water Utility – Consumer Meter Deposit Fund were overdrawn in 2011.”