Home Blog Page 6311

Commentary: Challenges before colleges and universities

0

By Mitch Daniels
TheStatehouseFile.com

The once serene and secure world of higher education has been shaken in recent years by challenges few saw coming. Enrollments have dropped, layoffs have become common, and a few colleges have closed down entirely. There has been a stunning drop, from 75 percent to 44 percent, in Americans saying that “a college degree is very important.”

A barrage of unprecedented questions now is asked every day: Are too many young people going to college? Are they learning anything meaningful or useful while there, or just enjoying a four-year party of prolonged adolescence? Can as good an education be delivered more conveniently through the new technologies of the internet? And loudest of all, the question, “Why does it cost so much?”

Some leaders of higher ed have reacted defensively and critically, disputing the premises of these critiques and perhaps believing that this storm will all blow over soon. At Purdue University, we take a different view: We accept the legitimacy of the concerns now so prevalent, and the responsibility to provide education of indubitable quality, at a price our students’ families can afford. As we phrase it, “Higher Education at the Highest Proven Value.”

First, ours is a place of rigor. As Indiana’s most STEM (science, technology, engineering, math) centered university, we teach a lot of very difficult subjects. Whereas the phenomenon labeled “grade inflation” has seen average grades skyrocket across the country, until employers and graduate schools are in some cases unsure what a high GPA means anymore, As and Bs are still hard to come by at Purdue, where the mean GPA has barely moved for decades.

We accept the challenge to deliver quality that cannot be acquired simply sitting in one’s living room in front of a laptop. Boilermakers are much more likely than students elsewhere to be involved in undergraduate research, to work on team-based projects in addition to conventional homework, to study abroad or in off-campus internships as part of their experience. They are far more likely to encounter “active learning” courses taught in new ways. Increasingly, lectures are watched on personal computers or handheld devices, with class time devoted to projects, exercises, or individual instruction aimed at those aspects the student found most difficult.

And we don’t ask people to take our word for it. In partnership with the world-renowned Gallup Research organization, we launched the Gallup-Purdue Index, the largest-ever survey of how college graduates are succeeding in life, and why. We simultaneously studied Purdue alumni, and now can prove what we already suspected: Boilermakers do better in later life, not just financially but also in other, as Gallup terms them, “domains of wellbeing.” But the data also pointed to ways, like more one-to-one mentoring by our faculty, where we can do better, and we are determined to apply those lessons.

Our commitment to accountability will next extend to measuring the intellectual progress of students while they are at our university. Starting next fall, we will check the growth in critical thinking of our students, again with an eye to constant improvement.

We are investing heavily in building even further the disciplines on which Indiana’s economic future so greatly depends. Our College of Engineering, already one of the top-ranked in the world, will grow by another 1000 students. Our Department of Computer Science, which was the first of its kind in the world and just marked its 50th anniversary, will grow by almost 30%. And our College of Technology is working to transform itself into a new Purdue Polytechnic Institute, producing 21st Century degrees such as robotics, sensors and embedded devices, cloud computing, and unmanned aerial systems. The PPI will employ innovative methods such as a heavily project-based curriculum, regular work-study internships, and a competency-based system in which students will move as fast as their demonstrated mastery permits, instead of on the traditional semester-by-semester calendar.

Another way we seek to deliver proven value to our fellow taxpayers is by more often and successfully converting Purdue research into things of value in the marketplace. We have totally restructured our policies and practices to remove any possible obstacles, and to support to the maximum extent possible, those of our brilliant faculty who wish to commercialize their discoveries, and it’s working: 2014 saw a record number of patents and licenses, and 24 new Indiana companies, twice the all-time record and four times the Big Ten average. Purdue was named the international Best Incubator Network of the Year.

Lastly, that matter of cost. Citizen concern on this count is well-founded. Nothing, not even health care costs, has risen so rapidly as the cost of higher education. Schools everywhere have raised tuition and other charges at almost three times the rate of general inflation. Student debt, which helps fuel and mask this increase, skyrocketed past a trillion dollars.

Purdue was not by far the worst offender, but we did participate in this escalation, with both tuition and room and board costs going up every year for decades. We broke from this pattern in 2013, by freezing tuition and cutting food costs 5%. We followed this up with a second 5% reduction, and two more years of frozen tuition. Total cost of attendance has dropped for two straight years, the first time on record, and student debt is down 18%, or some $40 million.

When Abe Lincoln and his allies created land grant colleges like Purdue, their goal was to expand knowledge in those areas of learning most directly contributing to the economic growth of the nation, and to throw open the doors of higher education beyond the wealthy elite, to young people of all incomes and backgrounds. At Purdue, we believe passionately in the nobility of that continuing mission, and in our duty to respond effectively to the concern of students, parents, and taxpayers.

America is home to the world’s finest higher education system, and it’s essential that it stay that way. We Boilermakers hope to do our part in forging the changes that will preserve and strengthen that system, by providing what so many are now rightly demanding: Higher Education at the Highest Proven Value.

Mitch Daniels is president of Purdue University and a former Indiana governor.

IS IT TRUE December 16, 2014

51

IS IT TRUE yesterday is an official day of substance to citizens of the United States of America?…223 years ago the first 10 amendments to the Constitution were ratified?…these amendments have come to be known as the BILL OF RIGHTS?…people of this modern day seem to get very confused about the BILL OF RIGHTS as the entitlement programs have blurred the stark reality between a “right” as granted by the Constitution an certain “entitlements” that are only part of laws and are subject to change?…there is one very critical attribute to the BILL OF RIGHTS and that is RIGHTS are not about taxation or redistribution of income or wealth?…no RIGHT granted by the Constitution costs another citizen any property, income, or wealth?…entitlements on the other hand are completely predicated on the law allowing the government to take taxes from one and give it to another?…your freedoms of religion, speech, or the press does not cost another citizen one dime?…your choice to buy and bear arms does not cost another citizen one dime?…your RIGHT not to be forced to quarter soldiers does not cost any other citizen a dime?…and so it goes with all of the freedoms that our founding fathers designated as RIGHTS?…another feature of RIGHTS is that they cannot be bought and sold, yet entitlements are all about buying and selling?…this writer learned these things in middle school?…it is a shame that many others do not seem to have learned this lesson?

IS IT TRUE last night the Evansville City Council finally took up the proposal to require all appointed members of boards and commissions to be residents of the City of Evansville? …in all fairness, for commissions that have responsibility exclusively within the city limits and appointed by city entities, this does make sense? …a great example of such a commission is the Evansville Redevelopment Commission?…the makeup of the embodiment of the 2014 ERC board includes 2 appointees that are not residents of the City of Evansville?…examination of Indiana statutes reveals that these people should have never been appointed and serve in violation of Indiana law?… if other past ERC boards had similar makeup  this could mean that projects like the Ford Center, the McCurdy Hotel, the downtown convention hotel, and the IU Medical School were ratified by an illegitimate governing body?…that may negate all of the actions taken by the ERCs of recent memory?…we of course cannot un-build the revenue gobbling Ford Center, but it may well be a technicality to vacate the approvals for the hotel and the medical school along with the bonding authorizations granted by the City Council with regard to illegitimate votes by the ERC?…the people of Evansville may have just been granted a mulligan on these projects which should be reopened by a newly appointed ERC early in the new year?…the number of people who are or will be ineligible to serve on these boards and commissions was rather shocking last night?…it is equally shocking at how low the percentage of people who currently serve actually live in the City Limits?…at the end of the meeting, the Evansville City Council did choose to avail themselves of the knowledge and experience of anyone who resides outside the city limits including one man who allegedly pays $55,000 in taxes in city located 35 properties?…if they want to extend this trend their next step should be to eliminate all city grants and tax abatements for outsiders?

IS IT TRUE we are really pleased that City Councilman Conor O’Daniel responded with anger to rebuke Councilman Weaver last night when he offered an amendment to the “HOME RULE” ordinance?…Mr. O’Daniel told Mr. Weaver that he considered his amendment to Connie Robinson’s HOME RULE” ordinance was a personal attack against 6th Ward Councilman Al Lindsey?…we totally agree that Mr. Weaver’s amendment to the proposed ‘Home Rule” ordinance was indeed a petty personal attack against 6th Ward Councilman Al Lindsey and was totally unacceptable?…political wisdom tells us that Mr. Weaver’s attempt to be re-elected to one of the At-large City Council position is now in jeopardy?…his political side kick 2nd Ward Councilwoman Missy Mosby better start to distance herself from Mr. Weaver or she may find herself in political jeopardy too because she now faces a serious primary battle against Steve Davis?…if Mosby and Weaver think they can be re-elected with the support of the Mayor that is a major political mistake?

IS IT TRUE there are several cost saving measures that the candidates for Mayor of Evansville can and should discuss and the first is the effect that a land based casino may have on the need for hotel rooms?…to be specific approval of land based casinos may well be the edge that Tropicana needs to expand their current room numbers by enough to cover any needs that may arise from a dying convention business?…the second discussion would be to openly seek a private buyer for the Centre, like a mega church and put the whole convention hotel nonsense to rest?…divesting of The Centre would hopefully raise enough cash to pay the thing off liberating the $450,000 per year in bond payments that we are currently saddled with?…the savings associated with selling The Centre and ending the Quixotic quest for a hotel will save the taxpayers of Evansville a present value of roughly $25 Million?

IS IT TRUE that the Russian Central Bank raised its interest rates to 17% yesterday afternoon from the previous rate of 10.5%?…the reasons given were devaluation of their currency which has been tumbling on world markets at a similar rate to a barrel of oil?…this is the kind of thing that happens when a currency is shunned by free markets due to the underlying value being shown to be a house of cards?…along the same lines the supply and demand issues associated with the plunge in oil prices was cited by Christine LaGard who has been the Managing Director (MD) of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) since July 5, 2011, despite her upbringing in a culture that has often behaved as though supply and demand were not market forces?…it warms this writers heart to know that even the most adulterated deniers of market forces really understand markets when a classic supply side deflation is being driven by global production?…the real loser in the oil price slide is of course Russian President Vladimir Putin and that gives very few Americans any heartburn as they drive more and spend more since a tank of gas is now under $0 for most vehicles?

Please take time and vote in todays “Readers Poll”.
Copyright 2014 City County Observer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

BREAKING NEWS: City Council’s Attorney Danks Gives Opinion On Ordinance-Residency Requirements

25

Dear Council Members,

As you may know, Indiana statute already requires that members of many of our boards/commissions be residents of the City of Evansville. It appears that these statutes have been overlooked in the past and that some of our boards/commissions have members that are not residents of the city and are therefore serving in contravention of Indiana law.

Other statutes concerning various boards/commissions are more expansive in that they allow members to be residents of the county. This does not prohibit the Council from enacting the proposed ordinance further restricting residency requirements to being a resident of the City of Evansville.

Concerning interlocal agreements (city/county agencies), this ordinance will not prohibit residents of the county from being appointed to their boards/commissions so long as the appointments are made by the County and NOT the Mayor or City Council.

Thanks,

Scott Danks

Evansville City Council Attorney

Please take time and vote in todays “Readers Poll”.

This letter has been posted without opinion, bias or editing.

Copyright 2014 City County Observer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

VANDERBURGH COUNTY FELONY CHARGES

0

SPONSORED BY DEFENSE ATTORNEY IVAN ARNAEZ.
DON’T GO TO COURT ALONE. CALL IVAN ARNAEZ @ 812-424-6671.
Below is a list of felony cases that were filed by the Vanderburgh County Prosecutor’s Office on Friday, December 12, 2014

Charity Cardiff              Unlawful Possession of Syringe-Level 6 Felony

Braden York                   Dealing in Marijuana-Level 6 Felony

Daniel Brown               Domestic Battery-Level 6 Felony
Disorderly Conduct-Class B Misdemeanor

James Coon Jr               Domestic Battery-Level 6 Felony

Clarence Moore            Auto Theft-Level 6 Felony
Invasion of Privacy-Level 6 Felony

Austin Smith                Possession of Methamphetamine-Level 6 Felony
Unlawful Possession of Syringe-Level 6 Felony

David Stoermer           Theft-Level 6 Felony
For further information on the cases listed above, or any pending case, please contact Kyle Phernetton at 812.435.5688 or via e-mail at kphernetton@vanderburghgov.org
Under Indiana law, all criminal defendants are presumed to be innocent until proven guilty by a court of law

Vanderburgh County Recent Booking Reports

0

SPONSORED BY DEFENSE ATTORNEY IVAN ARNAEZ.
DON’T GO TO COURT ALONE. CALL IVAN ARNAEZ @ 812-424-6671.

http://www.vanderburghsheriff.com/recent-booking-records.aspx

EPD Activity Report December 15, 2014

0

SPONSORED BY DEFENSE ATTORNEY IVAN ARNAEZ.
DON’T GO TO COURT ALONE. CALL IVAN ARNAEZ @ 812-424-6671.

EPD Activity Report

Analysis: Education funding depends on upcoming fiscal forecast

0

By Lesley Weidenbener
TheStatehouseFile.com

INDIANAPOLIS – Republicans are talking big about boosting state funding for public schools over the next two years, but it’s not clear yet whether the cash will be available to make that happen.

Already, House Speaker Brian Bosma, R-Indianapolis, has said that his caucus wants to provide a larger overall increase for schools than the 2 percent boost they received in Fiscal Year 2014 and the 1 percent increase they’re receiving this year.

Analysis button in JPGHe also wants to shift the way that money is distributed among districts. But he said those changes can be mitigated if there’s more money put into education overall.

Republican Gov. Mike Pence also said recently that additional money for education will be key for the 2015 session.

“I believe the coming session of the Indiana General Assembly should be an education session and we should focus on our kids and our teachers and what’s happening in the classrooms of Indiana,” Pence said at the Indiana Legislative Conference.

But he acknowledged that his administration won’t put a dollar amount on its education commitment until state leaders find out how much they have available to spend. That answer – or at least a projection – should come next week when a bipartisan committee forecasts state tax revenue through Fiscal Year 2017.

The numbers will be important because K-12 education funding makes up nearly half of the state’s $15 billion budget. Nearly $6 billion alone goes into what’s called tuition support, which is the money distributed to schools to pay teacher salaries and other basic expenses.

Boosting that funding by 3 percent over two years will cost about $560 million. That’s right. That’s more than half a billion dollars to merely keep up with inflation, let alone provide districts with enough new money to significantly improve programs. It’s also the increase that Democratic Superintendent Glenda Ritz is proposing to give schools for their general funds.

But it’s not clear the state will have enough money even for that kind of increase.

So far this fiscal year – which started July 1 – tax revenue is running about 2.6 percent behind the projections used to write the current budget. That may not sound like much but it totals nearly $148 million with about seven months left in the fiscal year.

Tax receipts are ahead of last year, which means the state is taking in more revenue than it did in Fiscal Year 2014. That’s good news. But because the budget is based on the estimates, the Pence administration must either spend less or take money from the state’s surpluses to make ends meet.

“Revenue hasn’t exactly performed in the last year and a half the way we thought it would,” said State Budget Director Brian Bailey. “And we’ve been able to manage that.”

Bailey said the new projections – scheduled to be released on Thursday – are “absolutely critical for our discussions” about the next budget.

“So much of what we can do depends on what that forecast says,” Bailey said.

It may be most critical to those budget leaders who are hoping to rewrite the formula that distributes revenue to schools. Republicans plan to close the gap between the schools that receive the highest per-pupil funding – which tend to be urban schools with declining enrollments – and those that receive less per-student, which tend to be suburban, growing districts.

That could cause budget shifts from urban districts to suburban ones. But if there’s a lot more money to go around, the urban schools are less likely to feel a lot of pain. That’s the hope at least, one that’s tied to the revenue projections coming next week.

IS IT TRUE December 15, 2014

43

IS IT TRUE the Vanderburgh County Democrat Party seems to be healing itself rapidly under the hope that Indiana Representative Gail Riecken may enter the race for Mayor of Evansville?…with the family of former candidate Rick Davis firmly standing with a Riecken candidacy, the path to the Civic Center for Riecken is to capture only 4.1% of the democrats who defected to Lloyd Winnecke when the pinky shake deal of 2011 was sealed?…for those of you who have forgotten, the pinky shake deal was a loose pact taken by nearly every democrat office holder in Evansville to join Team Winnecke to keep Rick Davis from becoming Mayor after he trounced the old boy networks hand picked successor to machine Mayor Jonathan Weinzapfel in the primary?…the keys to the corner office on the 3rd floor of the Civic Center may well be in the hands of politically connected 4th Ward City Councilwoman Connie Robinson?…had the 4th Ward voted heavily democrat in 2011 as they typically do, Rick Davis would have become Mayor?…the same is likely to be true in 2015?

IS IT TRUE while the democrats in Evansville are mending fences, the democrats in the United States Congress are fracturing in a style befitting a pinky shake coalition?…the issue that has split the congressional democrats has been the omnibus funding bill to keep the government open?…the President favored the compromised bill which does indeed have some objectionable features but was attacked by the left wing of the democrats including his ACA allies Nancy Pelosi and Harry Ried who have both come within a breath of calling him a traitor?…perhaps the most fiery rhetoric against the President and the bill has come from Senator Elizabeth Warren who seems to be in full presidential campaign mode herself?…the most liberal of legislators were joined by the tea party republicans in opposing this bill making for some very interesting bed partners?…we will know by the time this is published whether the moderates and the President prevailed or if the extremists of both parties tantrum worked in their favor?

IS IT TRUE there are those who are wondering which candidate that former Mayor turned Chancellor Jonathan Weinzapfel will support?…the answer to that question is neither, if he wishes to remain in his comfortable Chancellorship?…the Boards of Regents of Indiana’s public universities specifically prohibit Chancellors from engaging in partisan political activities so, the former Mayor will be essentially under a gag order with respect to the job he once occupied?

IS IT TRUE the other item of interest is just which candidate the unions will support?…the Indiana State Democrat Party will do what they have to including funding Democrat campaigns to keep unions from openly supporting a Republican?…the unions also owe Riecken a major political favor for fighting against “Right to Work”  laws?…like it or not the reality is that local unions do not have the votes to determine the next mayor of Evansville and will be neutered by outside political powers when it comes to vocal support of Mayor Winnecke?

IS IT TRUE there is a loud whisper campaign already playing itself out to try and intimidate Riecken from running?…the article in the CP about her effect on the race is another veiled attempt to discourage a Riecken candidacy?…the intensity with which the Winnecke supporters are trying to discourage Riecken is strong testimony to just how much they fear a candidate that can unify the local democrat party that former Mayor Weinzapfel’s minions decimated by their pinky shake politics?

IS IT TRUE that former short term Director of DMD turned real estate agent Phillip Hooper has asserted in an oped piece in the CP that Haynie’s Corner is thriving?…we think that Mr. Hooper needs to understand the meaning of the word thriving before making such a proclamation?…a neighborhood program to build 17 houses with federal money meant for business support for $230,000 each to sell them for $120,000 each does not constitute thriving?…selling an old Victorian house at a loss of $175,000 in government money does not constitute thriving?…when all of the improvements in any area are done by or incentivized by government money, the correct term for the economic state of what is going on is DEPENDENCE?…thriving areas do not need government handouts?…if the day ever comes that private investors are bidding against each other for the privilege to invest in Haynie’s Corner the word thrive may apply?…until then Haynie’s Corner and our old downtown are simply the target location for redistribution of wealth created elsewhere?…that is the very definition of DEPENDENCE?…to assert otherwise is simply misinformed?

IS IT TRUE the revelation that the state is not pleased with the meeting of five democrat members of the City Council who gathered to discuss “political strategy” that was negated by the Facebook posts of two council members validates the City Council Observer calling them out for violating the Brown Act the very next day?…while the CP may have filed a complaint after the fact, they never published a word about the meeting when it happened?…it is one thing to be 2 months late, it is quite another to attempt to take credit for outing an illegal meeting after the state has provided cover and during the week that a democrat might  announce a candidacy for Mayor?

IS IT TRUE that we encourage our readers to take a moment to honor and remember the University of Evansville basketball team that lost their lives in plane crash 37 years ago last Saturday?

Please take time and vote in todays  “Readers Poll”.

Copyright 2014 City County Observer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

EVANSVILLE REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MEMBERS MAY BE IN VIOLATION OF STATE LAW

19

Some of the Evansville Department of Redevelopment Board membership may be in violation of Indiana Code 36-7-14. Research shows that ERC was created pursuant to 36-7-14-1 et seq.  

IC 36-7-14-1 states that Application of this chapter; jurisdiction in excluded cities to be governed by this chapter.

IC 36-7-14-3Sec. 3 (a) states  that a unit may establish the Department Redevelopment controlled by a board of five (5) members to be known as “Evansville Redevelopment Commission”, designating the name of the municipality.

IC 36-7-14-6.1 entitled Commissioners; appointment states in Sec.6-1. that (a) The five (5) Commissioners for a municipal Redevelopment Commission shall be appointed as follows:

(1)  Three (3) shall be appointed by the Municipal Executive.

(2) Two shall be appointed by the Municipal Legislative body.

IC 36-7-14-7 is entitled Commissioners; terms of office; vacancies; oaths; bonds; qualifications ; reimbursement for expenses; compensation.

Sec. 7 (d) states a Redevelopment Commissioner must be at least 18 years of age, and must be a resident of the unit he serves.

Sec. 7 (e) states if a Commissioner ceases to be qualified under this section, he forfeits his office.

Sec. 7 (f) states that Redevelopment Commissioners are not entitled to salaries but are entitled to reimbursement for expenses necessarily incurred in the performance of their duties.

Sec. 7 (g) states a Redevelopment Commissioner who does not otherwise hold a lucrative office for the purpose of the Article 2, Section 9 of the Indiana Constitution may receive:

  1. a salary; or
  2. a per diem and is entitled to reimbursement for the expenses necessarily incurred in the performance of the Redevelopment Commissioners duties.

FOOTNOTE:  this section about salary or per diem since the last two DMD Directors told us that ERC Commissioners never receive any compensation for their service on the ERC Board because State Law doesn’t allow this.  We consider this a developing issues and shall inform you of our findings about this issue at a later date.

Our research of 2012, 2013 and 2014 minutes show that the following individuals served as ERC Commissioners during these times.  We have also included if the ERC Board members lived in the City or County.

ERC Commissioners for 2012 were:  Ed Hafer-County,  Jay Carter-City,  Randy Alsman-City, Sara Miller-County and Stan Wheeler-City.

FOOTNOTE:  Looks like two 2012 ERC Board members served illegally because they lived in the County.

ERC Commissioners for 2013 were:  Ed Hafer-County, Randy Alsman-City, Stan Wheeler-City, Pat Lowery-County and Jennifer Raibley-City.

FOOTNOTE: Looks like two 2013 ERC Board members served illegally because they lived in the County.

ERC Commissioners for 2014 are: Randy Alsman-City, Vernon Stevens-County, Stan Wheeler-City, Pat Lowery-County and Jennifer Raibley-City.

FOOTNOTE: Looks like two 2014 ERC Board members are serving illegally because they live in the County. 

LEGAL QUESTIONS 

Legal questions to consider since the ERC Commissioners membership makeup didn’t comply with State Residency Law or City Ordinances requirements.

Would all the capital project approvals, loans,  grants,  property purchases, approved bond issues,  negotiations to build new downtown Hotel and IU Med School approved by the ERC board between 2012 and 2014 could be in jeopardy?

ANOTHER DEVELOPING STORY—-ACCORDING TO IC 36-4–9-2  EVANSVILLE  BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS AND SAFETY BOARD MEMBERS MUST LIVE IN EVANSVILLE.

we also found out that members of the Evansville Board of Public Woks and Evansville Safety Board also are require that its board members be a resident of the City of Evansville.  This is a developing story because we must go back and see if past and present  Board of Public Works members live in the City limits of Evansville over the last several years.

FOOTNOTE: WE ARE PRESENTLY SEARCHING TO SEE IF EVANSVILLE BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS AND EVANSVILLE SAFETY BOARDS ARE SUBJECT TO AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT.

Please take time and vote in todays “Readers Poll”.

Copyright 2014 City County Observer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Commentary: A stain on our national honor

5

By John Krull
TheStatehouseFile.com

INDIANAPOLIS – Pretty, it isn’t.

The U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee’s report on the Central Intelligence Agency’s post 9/11 torture activities reads a bit like a medieval catalogue of horrors.

Among other things, the Senate’s investigators found that CIA interrogators threatened detainees with sexual violence with broomsticks, used forced rectal Column by John Krullfeeding, resorted to forced rectal rehydration, made frequent use of waterboarding, inflicted beatings and deprived their captives of sleep for prolonged periods. One “interrogator” even threatened to rape a prisoner’s mother.

Despite the CIA’s protestations to the contrary, the report found that we often held these prisoners illegally and kept them in “black sites,” or secret prisons where no one could monitor what was done to them – and no one could hold accountable the mid-level CIA personnel and private contractors who oversaw their captivity and their interrogations.

Perhaps worst of all, the CIA – or perhaps I should say “we,” because the CIA was operating in the name of U.S. citizens, in our name – threatened to kill, without trials, not just the detainees, but their wives and their children.

To make the travesty complete, the Senate investigators also found that CIA officials routinely misled – actually, “lied to” might be a more precise term – elected officials in both the White House and Congress about both the nature of and the scope of these illegal activities.

That means, of course, that they also “misled” the American people.

There doubtless are Americans who will not find these revelations disturbing. (That view was best summed up by former George W. Bush spokeswoman Nicole Wallace, who said, “I don’t care what we did.” Perhaps she missed the part of the report that showed that the CIA often withheld information from her former boss, the commander-in-chief.)

These defenders of torture will use the classic child’s defense of bad behavior – that the other side started it. They will argue that terrorists and terrorist states honor neither the law nor human rights in carrying the fight to the United States.

If the people with whom we fight don’t respect the rules of civilized conduct, why should we?

The answer to that question is simple.

We don’t let thugs and terrorists determine our standards of conduct.

We’re supposed to be the good guys.

That means we’re supposed to operate by a higher standard than the bad guys.

The murderers in Al Qaeda, the Islamic State and elsewhere never have claimed they respect individual rights, the rule of law or the human spirit.

But individual rights, the rule of law and the human spirit aren’t just pawns in some geopolitical chess game for us. For Americans, individual rights, the rule of law and a defense of the human spirit are the whole ball game.

They are the reason we are a country.

If we don’t stand for preserving individual rights, for protecting the rule of law and for defending the human spirit, then what do we stand for?

The saddest thing about the Senate report is that it shows that we betrayed some of our most sacred principles for no good reason. The intelligence gleaned from what the CIA called “enhanced interrogation techniques” all too often proved to be worthless.

What the report demonstrates is that people subjected to torture will say anything to make the abuse stop. They will say whatever they think the torturer wants to hear, regardless of whether it is true or not. Even if they have no information of value, they’ll spit something out – spin out some fanciful tale – because all they are thinking about is making the pain stop.

So, in resorting to using torture on captives, we not only betrayed our best selves, but we also wasted a lot of time chasing wild geese.

I don’t always agree with Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona – he rarely seems to find a war into which he does not want to plunge this country – but his response to the revelations in this report is perfect.

McCain, who was tortured himself as a prisoner of war in Vietnam, said resorting to torture ourselves, regardless of the provocation, “stained our national honor.”

Amen.