Home Blog Page 6131

OUR FATHERS TRIED TO TELL US

1

Gavel Gamut

By Jim Redwine

(Week of 30 March 2015)

OUR FATHERS TRIED TO TELL US

Keep government out of religion and religion out of government and never form a habitual passion for or against any other country: sage advice from our Founding Fathers.

The first clause of the First Amendment is:

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;”

The Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments, and the brilliant separation of powers doctrine were the foundation upon which George Washington, truly the Father of Our Country, and his fellow freedom fighters built our Constitution.

They knew from history and personal experience governments could not be trusted to do the right thing. We humans cannot long restrain our desire to impose our beliefs on others. Therefore, our Nation of Laws must keep our passions in check.

Washington feared another danger to our country as much as he feared mixing religion and government. His Farewell Address of 1796 could just as well be given in 2015 in warning that the greatest danger to America is our current, “[I]nveterate antipathies against particular nations (Iran, Iraq, Syria, etc.) and passionate attachment for others (Israel) …”

“The nation which indulges towards another a habitual hatred or a habitual fondness is in some degree a slave. It is a slave to its animosity or to its affection.

….

… a passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation into the quarrels and wars of the latter without adequate inducement or justification. It leads to concessions to the favorite nation of privileges denied to others which is apt doubly to injure the nation making the concessions, by unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained, and by exciting jealousy, ill-will, and a disposition to retaliate, in the parties from whom equal privileges are withheld.”

As if either convoluting government with religion or passionately hating Iran, et. al., while passionately loving Israel were not danger enough alone, we have combined these two chimeras. Our Founding Fathers would be trembling.

(Portions of this article were previously published in Gavel Gamut articles July 2010. Considering current events you can see how influential they were.)

March 27 th, 2015 Sobriety Checkpoint Results

0

 

SPONSORED BY DEFENSE ATTORNEY IVAN ARNAEZ.
DON’T GO TO COURT ALONE. CALL IVAN ARNAEZ @ 812-424-6671.

The Evansville-Vanderburgh County Traffic Safety Partnership conducted a sobriety checkpoint on Friday, March 27, 2015 at W. Franklin Street and N. Lemcke Avenue. The checkpoint ran from 11:30pm to 02:30am.

A total of 43 vehicles were diverted from W. Franklin Street into the checkpoint. The traffic safety partnership is pleased to report that although some of the motorists we checked had been drinking, none were over the legal limit. One motorist made the mistake of having a passenger throw his beer can out of the window before entering the checkpoint. The driver was cited for having an Open Container and the passenger was cited for Littering.

One motorist was arrested outside the checkpoint by a deputy assigned to patrol the perimeter area.

ARRESTED:

George Kenneth Edwards (pictured above), 22, of Evansville. Operating a Motor Vehicle while Intoxicated as a Class C Misdemeanor (.087 BrAC)

The Vanderburgh County Sheriff’s Office, the Evansville Police Department and the Indiana State Police conduct sobriety checkpoints to help detect and deter drunk driving.  All sobriety checkpoints are conducted in strict accordance with all applicable Indiana Supreme Court guidelines.

 

Vanderburgh County Recent Booking Records

0

SPONSORED BY DEFENSE ATTORNEY IVAN ARNAEZ.
DON’T GO TO COURT ALONE. CALL IVAN ARNAEZ @ 812-424-6671.

http://www.vanderburghsheriff.com/recent-booking-records.aspx

EPD Activity Report

0

SPONSORED BY DEFENSE ATTORNEY IVAN ARNAEZ.
DON’T GO TO COURT ALONE. CALL IVAN ARNAEZ @ 812-424-6671.

EPD Activity Report

Protecting religious freedom

0

 

Over the past couple of weeks, there has been a powerful debate taking place at the Statehouse. At the core of this debate is Senate Enrolled Act (SEA) 101, also known as the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). This piece of legislation was passed by both the Senate and the House and has since been signed into law by the governor.

You have likely heard me speak in the past about how truly difficult it is for any piece of legislation to become law. In fact, when a legislator introduces a bill, the chances of it dying are much greater than its chances for survival. There are many layers that bills must be vetted through, which is great for Indiana and ensures that only the best policies move forward.

As I do with every topic that comes across my desk, I invested a great deal of time researching what the RFRA does – and alternatively, what it does not do. Now that this is law, I think it is important to clear up some misconceptions that I have been hearing regarding this issue.

First and foremost, I want to emphasize that SEA 101 does not allow, encourage or endorse discrimination. Rather, it will establish a judicial standard of review which protects religious liberties for Hoosiers of all beliefs.

While this may be a new concept for the state of Indiana, it has actually been around for quite some time at the federal level. In 1993, then President Bill Clinton signed into law the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act. In addition, 30 other states, including all that surround Indiana, have some form of religious protection currently in statute.

This standard will guide judges and ensure that decisions affecting religious practices are made uniformly and fairly throughout the state. It will ensure that a government entity does not substantially burden a person’s exercise of religion, unless they have a compelling interest to do so and it is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling interest.

Because Indiana is not the first to adopt such a standard, we are able to look towards examples of where this standard has been applied in the past. One instance where this was used happened in 2012 when a court ruled that the Pennsylvania RFRA protected the outreach ministry of a group of Philadelphia churches, ruling that the city could not bar them from feeding homeless individuals.

In the 30 other states that have religious protections, there have been no manifestations of discrimination, and my intent in supporting this legislation is not to see that change here in Indiana. Whether we are talking about religion or public health, it is commonly accepted that our rights end when they infringe upon the rights of others. Under this law, every Hoosier, regardless of their religious affiliation or lack thereof, will have the ability to invoke these protections and practice their religious beliefs as our founding fathers intended.

When it comes to something as significant as the issue of religious freedom, it is important to go to the source for information and to get involved in the legislative process. The best way to do that is by reading the law itself. I encourage anyone who is interested in doing so to visit our website at iga.in.gov.

 

Hangers to Host Free Prom Dress Giveaway

0

With prom season just around the corner, the Evansville Area Council PTA clothing bank, Hangers, is out to help EVSC students who plan to attend prom this spring by hosting a free Prom Dress Giveaway. The dress giveaway is scheduled for Friday, April 3, from 3 to 6 p.m. and again on Saturday, April 4, from 9 a.m. to noon. At the giveaway, eligible EVSC students will be able to select from more than 200 free dresses.

 

In addition to possibly receiving a free prom dress, attendees will also have the opportunity to win a free tuxedo rental, hair, makeup and flowers through a drawing that will take place Friday, April 3.

 

Students who would like to participate for the Prom Dress giveaway will need to get a referral from their school counselor or social worker.

 

To ensure as many students as possible can find a dress that works for them, Hangers is still accepting prom dress donations. Individuals interested in donating can drop off a dress or any other gently used clothing at Hangers, Tuesday through Thursday, from 8 a.m. to 1 p.m. Hangers is located in the AIS-Diamond building at 2319 Stringtown Road.

 

About Hangers
Created by the Evansville Area Council PTA, Hangers has helped more than 800 EVSC students. The child-benefit clothing bank has the main goal of providing EVSC K-12 students with clothing and hygiene items allowing students to attend school with self-confidence. For those who are unable to afford necessities like clothing and hygiene supplies, Hangers has been the support for all EVSC families in need.

Wanted: An Emotionally Secure Leader

0

BY MARK SHIELDS

The late Rep. Morris Udall of Arizona, who finished second in the campaign for the 1976 Democratic presidential nomination, warned his fellow citizens with the wisest of advice: “Beware of the presidential candidate who has no friends his own age and confidants who can tell him to go to hell.”
That same year, an emotionally secure President Gerald Ford more than passed the Udall test. Having already put his presidency in mortal jeopardy by pardoning his resigned and prosecutable predecessor, Richard Nixon, Ford trailed Democrat Jimmy Carter by 33 percent in polls. After Ford’s shrewd pollster, Bob Teeter, discovered in his surveys that when Ford had personally campaigned in the primaries his national numbers actually slipped, it fell to Stu Spencer, the campaign’s peerless strategist, to deliver the blunt consensus of Ford’s closest advisers: “Mr. President, you are a very good president. But as a campaigner, you are no (expletive) good.”
According to two people who were in that small meeting, the president first scowled but then smiled. As leader of his party in the House, he had campaigned nationally for Republican candidates. But these men in the room were his friends and confidants who were telling him a bitter truth. Thus was born the Rose Garden strategy, in which Ford would surge within an eyelash of pulling off the greatest comeback in U.S. political history by being president full time.
Recent events in Washington reminded me of Mo Udall and Jerry Ford, two exceptionally admirable Americans. Whatever else we ultimately learn about the relevance or irrelevance of undeclared 2016 Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton’s emails, it’s pretty clear that among her intimates, there was no Stu Spencer to say to her: “Excuse me, but are you out of your (expletive) mind? You, as secretary of state, want to set up and use your own private email account and eventually delete thousands of messages? That is morally and politically unacceptable.”
Does President Barack Obama see or talk to anyone who tells him bluntly: “Mr. President, politics, you do not seem to understand, is about a lot more than winning a national election. Politics is a relentlessly personal business. People thrive on just being called on, being asked for their help or opinions, and being recognized and appreciated for what they do.”
Where is Obama’s Stu Spencer to tell him about why Lyndon B. Johnson, when he was Senate majority leader with only a razor-thin majority, never lost a single showdown vote to the toweringly popular Republican President Dwight Eisenhower? LBJ was always able somehow to persuade that one wavering colleague to come his way. Johnson once explained that all he needed to know about any senator whom he was wooing was whether that senator’s mother had married up or married down — intellectually, economically or socially.
If the mother had married down, then — according to Johnson — she had transferred all her hopes and ambitions to her son. All Johnson had to do was to assure the hesitating senator that by this vote, the senator was going to make his mother proud of her son.
To find out more about Mark Shields and read his past columns, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2015 MARK SHIELDS
DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM

Hollywood Targets the Catholic Priest

0

BY L. BRENT BOZELL AND TIM GRAHAM

TV and movie producers rarely focus on Catholic priests in their plots, let alone use them as central characters, as in “The Father Dowling Mysteries” or “Father Murphy” in the 1980s. Maybe that’s a good thing, because when Catholic priests are part of the plot these days, there is an unmistakable odor of aggression — mocking, vilifying, and disparaging not just Catholic priests, but the priesthood itself.
On March 4, on the nation’s most religion-mocking channel, Comedy Central, the late-night game show “@Midnight” featured the comedian Neal Brennan. Host Chris Hardwick asked a question about confession, to which Brennan responded, “Forgive me, Father, for I have sinned, I went to Catholic school growing up. While I was never molested, I did f—- a few priests.”
The Catholic League points out this isn’t original for Brennan. On the premiere of his own standup show on Comedy Central, which aired Jan. 19, 2014, Brennan commented that he went to Catholic school for 12 years. “No, I didn’t get molested, I f—– a few priests, but I didn’t get molested.”
The Fox comedy “The Mindy Project” on March 10 featured a priest played by … Stephen Colbert. Colbert’s priest was a man who turned away from a very sinful past, which is certainly possible. A turn from moral degradation to holiness might even be inspiring. Not so with this one. This priest began his sermon by boasting he’d had sex with 275 women and had used “crazy drugs.” He chest-thumped about this at a funeral Mass.
Colbert’s priest was the usual Catholic nightmare, all about punishing, even excommunicating believers for using birth control and having premarital sex. “Trust me,” he sermonized, “these little sins are just a straight a path to hellfire as all that really cool stuff I used to do.”
Then there was the Feb. 26 season finale of the ABC drama “How To Get Away with Murder.” A priest was accused of murdering another priest. The guilty priest told the defense team he killed an older priest in his parish by pounding his skull in with a blunt golden object — the thurible, which holds the incense used in the Mass. They showed one of the show’s law-student characters insisting, “Not all priests are pedophiles,” with another shooting back, “Since when?”
The priest who was killed had confessed to abusing a teenage boy who later hung himself. The plot is not just offensive. It’s dishonest. After a decade-plus of reform by the Catholic Church — including an order to priests to break the seal of confession to report child abuse — the priest still says, “I thought about breaking the sacrament, reporting what he told me, but I know they’d just transfer him.”
TV producers insist their stories “reflect reality, claiming even they’re “ripped from the headlines.” Well, there are other religious traditions that collide with human frailty.
In recent weeks, newspapers have reported some eye-opening stories: the Washington rabbi who admitted to taping a large number of married women getting naked in the ritual bath called a mikvah; the female Episcopalian bishop in Baltimore with a history of drunk driving who struck and killed a bicyclist; and a Chicago imam charged with a pattern of sexual abuse of women and girls.
There will be no Hollywood plot lines based on these headlines. Tinseltown tradition suggests these real-life plots just aren’t “real” enough — which is to say, interesting enough — for television. Were these offenses committed by Catholic priests, it would be a different story altogether. They are in the Hollywood bull’s-eye at all times.
L. Brent Bozell III is the president of the Media Research Center. Tim Graham is director of media analysis at the Media Research Center and executive editor of the blog NewsBusters.org. To find out more about Brent Bozell III and Tim Graham, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2015 CREATORS.COM

‘TXT L8R’ Social Media Contest Offers $5,000 Scholarships

0

In partnership with the Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT) the Indiana State Police is sharing this important traffic safety related message.

‘TXT L8R’ Social Media Contest Offers $5,000 Scholarships

INDIANAPOLIS (March 27, 2015) – Indiana high school and college students have a choice: Use their smartphones behind the wheel and make a tragic mistake, or engage their social media followers to “Drive Now. TXT L8R.” and earn a $5,000 scholarship.

Lt. Governor Sue Ellspermann, the Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles, Indiana Criminal Justice Institute, Indiana Department of Labor, Indiana Department of Transportation and Indiana State Police are again partnering to award $5,000 scholarships to students who compose the most creative and viral social media posts on Twitter, Instagram and Vine.

Contest Rules

Students may register their public Twitter accounts through April 10 and read contest rules at www.txtl8r.in.gov. Entries must be posted during April, which is Distracted Driving Awareness Month, and use the hashtag #TXTL8RIN.

Keeping one’s hands on the wheel and eyes on the road is not just a safe driving practice – it’s the law. Social media posts that are composed while driving will be disqualified.

High school and college entries will be awarded separately, and up to three students may work together on the same social media account. The state will deposit $5,000 into the CollegeChoice 529 savings plans for the winners of five categories:

  1. Twitter – most tweets/retweets/favorites
  2. Vine – most likes
  3. Vine – most creative
  4. Instagram – most likes
  5. Instagram – most creative

OBAMACARE: FIVE YEARS OF BROKEN PROMISES

7

Rick McKee / Augusta Chronicle

This week marked the infamous five year anniversary of Obamacare, the most detrimental piece of legislation enacted by the Obama Administration to this day.  It’s hard to believe that health care in the United States, once the envy of the world, has now been converted into an unfavorable and flawed system, affecting every household in the nation.

Obamacare, also known misleadingly as the Affordable Care Act, has not shown any compassion to the public or their healthcare needs.  Over the past five years, promises made by the Obama Administration have been false or broken.  Original costs were projected at $900 billion over a ten year span.  Since spending provisions didn’t kick in until 2014, costs were adjusted to around 1.7 trillion dollars over ten years, causing another hit to our seemingly permanent federal deficit.   God only knows how much this albatross will end up costing us in the long run.

We were promised that more Americans would receive lower healthcare premiums.  This too was a false promise.  Because of tighter regulations on insurance companies and policies, we’ve seen an average increase of up to 30% in out of pocket expenses.  The Society of Actuaries estimated that by spring of 2017 all premiums would be increased by 37%.  In 2014, the National Bureau of Economic Research demonstrated that all but six states had premium increases up to 85%.  This is especially upsetting considering that we are paying higher premiums while being coerced out of our preferred insurance program and providers due to large cuts in hopes of offsetting rising costs.

And let’s not forget the way Obamacare was passed, that left most of America speechless.  I was recently reminded of the famous quote from Nancy Pelosi, “We have to pass the bill to see what’s in it.”  This lack of transparency seems to be contagious among liberals.  Conceived behind closed doors, written in ridiculous length with impossible language, the administration forced a law on the public which 59% opposed during its passage.

As we continue into the 2016 presidential cycle, there is significant hope that Obamacare will be stopped either by the U.S. Supreme Court or by a newly elected Republican president of the United States.  The strong Republican majorities in Congress should be prepared to pass an innovative, free market based proposal that replaces Obamacare.

Many potential GOP presidential candidates have announced that one of their top priorities is to repeal and replace the law, one being Senator Ted Cruz during his announcement speech at the Liberty University.   It is imperative that the Republican presidential candidate is someone who will  follow through on this pledge if he or she is elected.   Not every candidate will want to deal with Obamacare in 2017, so be careful who you support!

Why is this so important?  In combination with the out of control growth of the federal government, the assault on our personal privacy with unwarranted access to healthcare records, and higher costs for plans we can’t afford and don’t want, a law of this dangerous scope leaves us one step closer to European socialism.  We need to return to the Founder’s original intent which makes us stand out as the most exceptional country in the world:  individual liberty, pro-growth economics, and limited government.  The American health care system needs to once again reflect these ideals.