Home Blog Page 6032

TRI-STATE MOTHERS OF MULTIPLES ANNUAL FALL RUMMAGE SALE AND CAR SEAT CHECK TO BE HELD AT ST. MARY’S

0

St. Mary’s Health is pleased to once again host and sponsor this year’s Tri-State Mothers of Multiples Annual Fall Rummage Sale and car seat check. The event is open to the public on Saturday, August 22nd from 7:00 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. in the St. Mary’s Manor Auditorium. Admission is $1.

Tri-State Mothers of Multiples is a local support group for mothers with twins, triplets, quadruplets, and quintuplets. Having multiple babies presents many challenges, such as providing several car seats, clothes, strollers and much more. Whether it’s emotional or financial support, Tri-State Mothers of Multiples reaches out to mothers who may be having trouble raising their babies. The rummage sale will include gently used strollers, car seats, premature infant clothes through elementary age, toys and furniture.

St. Mary’s and Safe Kids Vanderburgh/ Warrick certified car seat technicians will also be available in the first level of the parking garage from 9:00 – 11:00 a.m. Families are encouraged to get cars seats checked for proper installation and fit , as well as to ensure children are in the proper restraint for their size and weight.

ST. MARY’S MOBILE MAMMOGRAPHY OFFERS FREE MAMMOGRAMS FOR THOSE WHO QUALIFY

0

 

(Evansville, IN) – St. Mary’s Mobile Digital Mammography is coming to your community soon. Digital pictures can be magnified, adjusted and previewed to see certain areas that regular film cannot. There are fewer retakes and sharper images. Digital mammograms use less radiation, making them safer for patients.  All screenings include mammograms and education about breast health and early detection of breast cancer.

Participants must meet the following criteria to be eligible:

  • You must be between 35 to 40 years old to receive your baseline (or initial) mammogram.
  • Annual mammograms should begin at age 40.
  • It must have been at least one year since your last mammogram.
  • Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurance are accepted.
  • Assistance is available for those who qualify.

St. Mary’s received the “Sharing the Vision: Early Detection of Breast Cancer” grant from the Greater Evansville Affiliate of the Susan G. Komen For the Cure Foundation, and the Indiana Breast Cancer Awareness Trust “Power of  Hope” grant,  which helps fund the screenings.

To schedule your screening or for more information, please call St. Mary’s Wellness Center at 1.877.580.3883 or 812.485.5723.

Here is the Mobile Digital Mammogram schedule for September/October 2015.

  • Tulip Tree Family Health Care, 123 N McCreary St., Ft. Branch, IN

Thursday, September 3rd

9:00 a.m. – 2:00 p.m.

  • Oak Grove General Baptist Church, 805 W. Morton St., Oakland City, IN

Tuesday, September 22nd

9:00 a.m. – 2:00 p.m.

  • Amish Community Health Fair, Cannelburg, IN The Timbers, 2909 Howard Drive, Jasper, IN 

Saturday, October 24th

9:00 a.m. – 2:00 p.m.

Vanderburgh County Recent Booking Records

0
SPONSORED BY DEFENSE ATTORNEY IVAN ARNAEZ. 
DON’T GO TO COURT ALONE. CALL IVAN ARNAEZ @ 812-424-6671.

EPD Activity Report

0
SPONSORED BY DEFENSE ATTORNEY IVAN ARNAEZ. 
DON’T GO TO COURT ALONE. CALL IVAN ARNAEZ @ 812-424-6671

North Soccer Teams to Host “Kick for the Cure” Games

0

Nearly every family knows someone who has been touched by cancer and students at North High School are doing their part to help raise money for research. On Wednesday, August 19, and Wednesday, August 26, the North High School girls varsity and junior varsity soccer teams are hosting their annual “Kick for Cure” games that helps raise money for Susan G. Komen.

 

The girls varsity soccer game will be against Central High School and will begin at 5:30 p.m. Wednesday, August 19 at EVSC Fields. The junior varsity game against Central is scheduled for Wednesday, August 26, at 4:30 p.m. at Central High School. At both games, the team will be selling “Kick for the Cure” t-shirts, wristbands, megaphones and more that will help support Komen.

 

Renting, the New American Dream

0

By Tom Purcell


Get this: Renting is the new American dream. And that doesn’t bode well for America.

According to a report by the Urban Institute, American homeownership rates are the lowest they’ve been in years and will continue to decline.

Homeownership, which peaked in 2006 at 67.3 percent, now sits at 63.6 percent, according to the U.S. Census American Community Survey. It’s been dropping ever since the financial collapse of 2008.

Between 2010 and 2030, the Urban Institute estimates, 22 million new households will form. The majority of them, 59 percent, will be renters, while just 41 percent will be homeowners.

Which means more households will vote for Democrats over Republicans.

According to a University of Virginia Center for Politics study, you see, “homeowners are much more likely to vote for Republicans than renters (34 to 18 percent), while renters are more likely to vote for Democrats than homeowners (44 to 35 percent).”

That’s because the responsibility of homeownership — the continuous hassles, expenses and taxes — brings out the conservative in even the most diehard liberal.

Boy, did I learn that lesson the hard way.

I had my first taste of ownership 17 years ago after buying a fixer-upper that made Herman Munster’s place look like the Trump Palace. The house nearly killed me.

When I tore off a rickety porch enclosure, I was stung multiple times by angry hornets.

It took me weeks to catch the mice in my attic, which woke me every morning at 3 a.m. as they scratched the ceiling, building their nests.

I nearly died the day ground bees attacked me. I poured a big cup of gasoline down their hole and nearly burned my house down when, after lighting it, flames shot out, 20 feet high.

I haven’t mentioned the snake incident, the electrical problem (I had to rewire most of the house) or how, every time it drizzles, the water in my basement makes Niagara Falls look like a lap pool.

Nor have I mentioned the battle with the septic tank, or the moron who dug it up and broke the lid — causing me to hand-dig a couple of tons of earth surrounding it while straddling the stinky thing for three days.

These are just some of the many miseries common to homeowners — miseries renters don’t know the first thing about. Add to these the constant trips to the hardware store to fix the things that break, as well as the taxes and other expenses that make homeownership a costly pain, and the typical homeowner will vote for more conservative principles.

Homeowners are more likely to vote for people who won’t raise our already costly utilities and property taxes. We’ll vote for the candidate whose policies will lower, rather than increase, the cost of building materials.

We want the person who will put an end to federally mandated low-flow toilets and washers and dishwashers — toilets, washers and dishwashers that don’t flush or clean very well.

My vote is for the politician who initiates pro-growth policies that will get homeownership back up to 2006 levels.

As homeownership increases, America will become much grumpier, thus much more likely to vote Republican.

We’ll demand simpler and lower taxes and other commonsense reforms. The economy will boom. Our property values will soar.

Then we can sell our homes at great profit, become renters and vote for Democrats — and finally start to enjoy life for once while we mooch off the people dumb enough to still own homes.

Fired Polaris technician wins reversal at 7th Circuit

0

Marilyn Odendahl for www.theindianalawyer.com

A former Indianapolis lab technician presented enough evidence to support her claims of discrimination and retaliation that the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals overturned summary judgment in favor of her former employer.

Chontel Miller filed a lawsuit against Polaris Laboratories after she was fired for not meeting performance goals. She was required to process 260 samples daily and over eight months, she never hit that level of productivity.

Miller, who was the only African-American processing technician, claimed racial discrimination caused her work to suffer. She charged her supervisors made racially derogatory comments about her and manipulated her trays of samples so she had more difficult work to do which slowed her down.

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana granted Polaris’ motion to dismiss. Initially, the District Court denied summary judgment to Polaris on the discrimination claim, finding Miller had presented sufficient evidence under a cat’s paw theory that the racial bias of supervisors led to management’s decision to terminate her employment.

On reconsideration, the District Court agreed with Polaris that Miller had no evidence supporting her claim that the manipulation of her work by her supervisors could systematically reduce her productivity.

The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals did not agree. It found Miller had demonstrated a dispute of material fact on both her claims and reversed the ruling in Chontel M. Miller v. Polaris Laboratories, LLC, 14-2621.

Polaris countered that Miller’s firing was a direct consequence of her poor job performance. Miller did not dispute she was not meeting her quota but she argued her supervisors, acting upon their racial animus, tampered with her work.

The Chicago panel concluded Miller had cleared the hurdle by showing a dispute of fact on the question of whether the actions of the middle managers were motivated by racial animus. She presented evidence the supervisors referred to her in racially inappropriate terms.

On the more difficult question of whether her supervisors purposefully sabotaged her work and caused her termination, the 7th Circuit found Miller was also successful. In particular, the judges noted, Miller does not have to prove systematic tampering at this point. Rather, she only needs to produce evidence that raises an inference that such tampering occurred to the extent it slowed her productivity.

“It may be difficult to marshal evidence that coworkers and lower-level supervisors harbored discriminatory animus against a plaintiff and thwarted her ability to perform her work effectively, and it may be even harder to show that this is what lies behind a decisionmaker’s adverse job action,” Chief Judge Diane Wood wrote for the court. “Taking the summary judgment record in the light most favorable to Miller, however, as we must, we conclude that she has made it over the line. Although Polaris has some evidence that Miller’s work could not have been manipulated to the extent she claims, it is not ironclad.”