Home Blog Page 5874

BREAKING NEWS: STATE DEMOCRATIC PARTY CHAIRMAN REQUEST ALL RECORDS CONCERNING THE INVESTIGATION OF FORMER AT-LARGE CANDIDATE JACK SCHRIBER INVESTIGATION

29

October 26, 2015

Mayor Lloyd Winnecke
City of Evansville
1 NW Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd., Suite 301 Evansville, IN 47708

Dear Mayor Winnecke,

Pursuant to Indiana Code §5-14-3-3, I am making a public records request of your office concerning the investigation of former City Council At-Large candidate Jack Schriber (“Schriber investigation”). According to the law, you have 24 hours to acknowledge that such a request has been made.

I am requesting copies of public records that contain the following information:

  • ï‚·  Records, including but not limited to written correspondence and emails, between the officeof the mayor (including you) and any and all law enforcement officials involved in theSchriber investigation from the time the investigation began until present.
  • ï‚·  Records, including but not limited to written correspondence and emails, between the officeof the mayor (including you) and any non-law enforcement staff of the City of Evansville, orany other person regarding the Schriber investigation.
  • ï‚·  Records, including but not limited to written correspondence and emails, between or amongyou, your official staff, your campaign staff and any officials with the Vanderburgh County Republican Party regarding Jack Scriber during 2015.For purposes of clarity, we are hopeful that by seeking this information, the people of Evansville, of Vanderburgh County, and of the state will have answers to the following questions by reference to the requested records:
  1. At what date did you, Mayor, first learn of the Schriber investigation? What information were you told about the nature of the investigation?
  2. How often were you kept apprised of the progress or new details in the investigation? From the time it has been reported that Mr. Scriber “confessed”, what work was done on the investigation prior to its closure?
  3. Did you give any direction to investigators as to what you wished to learn or not learn during the course of the investigation?
  4. After you learned of the investigation, did you continue to make personal or campaign committee contributions to Mr. Schriber’s political campaign? Did you publicly support his candidacy in general following the investigation being opened and your knowledge of it?
  5. What conversations did you have with Vanderburgh County Republican Party officials regarding Mr. Schriber standing as a candidate for public office while there was an active investigation?6. Similarly, what conversations were held about how the investigation’s outcome might impact Mr. Schriber’s chances for election? Were there conversations about whether, if victorious, he would serve or resign, and how such a vacancy would be filled if a resignation occurred?

The nature of the investigation and the subject matter involved are sensitive. However, to maintain the integrity of our democratic system, it is critical that the people of Evansville, specifically, have a full and transparent understanding of the conduct of their elected and political leadership.

With respect to the records requested, in conformance with your obligations under Indiana law, we hereby expressly request that you provide partial responses where documents are immediately available. Further, to the extent you make any claim of exception to production of responsive records, we request in accordance with your obligations under Indiana law that you identify each subsection of the Indiana Access to Public Records Act upon which such exception purportedly is based. Moreover, we remind you that records for which you claim an exception to disclosure may not be withheld in whole, but rather must be redacted only as to the parts of such records for which the exception is asserted.

Finally, we realize that there may be charges associated with producing copies of responsive records and hereby provide you advance notice of our willingness to make immediate payment for such charges upon identification by you of a complete or any partial response.

Thank you for your attention and prompt response.

Sincerely,

John C. Zody

Chairman of the Indiana Democratic Party 

 

 

ST. MARY’S HEALTH OFFERS FALL INSURANCE ENROLLMENT EVENT

0

St. Mary’s Health is offering application assistance appointments for health insurance plans.

Representatives from St. Mary’s Health Access Advocates, Anthem, MedAssist, and St. Mary’s Senior Connection will be available to assist the uninsured. They will offer education and help navigating the application process on ACA plans, Hoosier Healthwise, HIP 2.0, Medicaid and Medicare. There is no charge for these services.

Low-income, non-disabled adults ages 19 to 64 with incomes of up to $16,297 annually or $33,307 for a family of four are generally eligible to participate in the Healthy Indiana Plan.

Those interested are encouraged to schedule an appointment for a guaranteed spot by calling 812.485.5806. Walk-ins are welcome.

St. Mary’s Center for Advanced Medicine

Fourth Floor, Room 4

901 St. Mary’s Drive, Evansville, IN

Catch the Latest Edition of “The Indiana State Police Road Show”

0

Catch the latest edition of the “Indiana State Police Road Show” radio program every Monday morning at your convenience.

This week’s show features Indiana State Police Public Information Commander Captain Dave Bursten and ISP Museum Curator Lauren Baker. Bursten and Baker discusses the upcoming Trunk or Treat event being held at the ISP Museum on October 31st and offer tips for a safe Halloween.

Download the program from the Network Indiana public websites at www.networkindiana.com.  Look for the state police logo on the main page and follow the download instructions. The ISP Road Show can also be viewed via YouTube.

Go to https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCu5Bg1KjBd7H1GxgkuV3YJA or visit the Indiana State Police website at http://www.in.gov/isp/   and click on the YouTube link. This 15 minute talk show concentrates on public safety and informational topics with state wide interest.

The radio program was titled “Signal-10” in the early sixties when it was first started by two troopers in northern Indiana. The name was later changed to the “Indiana State Police Road Show” and is the longest continuously aired state police public service program in Indiana.

Radio stations across Indiana and the nation are invited to download and air for FREE this public service program sponsored by the Indiana State Police Alliance and Cops for Kids, a subsidiary of the Indiana State Police Alliance.

USI visiting artist to discuss “commodification of water”

0

The University of Southern Indiana Art Department will host visiting artist, curator and environmentalist, Sant Khalsa. Khalsa is professor emeritus from California State University, San Bernardino, and will be speaking about her work at 3:30 p.m. Thursday, October 29 in the Liberal Arts Center, Room 1003.

In Khalsa’s 60-photo series, “Western Waters,” she addresses the “commodification of water,” based on the public’s consumption of bottled water, due to concerns over drinking tap water. “Western Waters” is a photograph installation piece featuring images of water stores in southwestern states, and arranged like a road trip map. “Today, plastic bottles have replaced earthen vessels,” Khalsa said, “and to fetch our water, we travel in polluting automobiles to and from this fabricated representation of a river, well or spring.”

Khalsa’s work has been exhibited internationally and acquired by permanent museum collections, such as the Los Angeles County Museum of Art, Center for Creative Photography in Tucson and Nevada Museum of Art. She is represented by Kopeikin Gallery in Los Angeles.

Sponsored by the Society for Arts and Humanities, the USI College of Liberal Arts and the USI Art Department, the lecture is free and open to the public.

For more information contact Kristen Wilkins at kswilkins@usi.edu or 812-464-1746.

Court should decide if nephew is uncle’s dependent next of kin

0

Jennifer Nelson for www.theindianalawyer.com

The Indiana Court of Appeals reversed summary judgment in favor of the driver in a deadly car accident on the decedent’s nephew’s wrongful death action, finding questions exist as to whether the nephew is his uncle’s dependent next of kin.

Edward Lomax lived with his nephew, Robbie Lomax and his wife, and regularly would contribute financially to household expenses, even when Robbie worked, and helped take care of his nephew’s animals. Edward was his nephew’s last living relative on his father’s side. The uncle was killed while riding his bicycle in 2010 after he was struck from behind by a vehicle operated by Jennie Michael.

Robbie brought a wrongful death action against Michael, alleging he was his uncle’s dependent next of kin. The trial court granted partial summary judgment to Michael on this issue, concluding the evidence didn’t establish Robbie as a dependent next of kin for purposes of the General Wrongful Death Statute.

The Court of Appeals reversed in Robbie Lomax v. Jennie L. Michael, 12A05-1503-CT-124, finding the case to be similar to Necessary v. Inter-State Towing, 697 N.E.2d 73 (Ind. Ct. App. 1998), trans. denied, in which the decedent’s son filed a wrongful death action after his mother was killed in an automobile accident. The mother lived with her son and grandson for several years before her death and they shared household expenses.

“Given the facts as designated to the court, a reasonable trier of fact could conclude that Robbie was dependent on Edward, at least in part, or that Robbie was not, in fact, a dependent next of kin to Edward,” Judge Robert Altice wrote in remanding the matter for further proceedings.

LETTER TO THE EDITOR: TIMELINE & ANALYSIS OF THE JACK SCHRIBER SCANDAL

40

 

TIMELINE & ANALYSIS OF THE JACK SCHRIBER SCANDAL

By Laura Blackburn

I am offering a review of information as we have learned it over the past few days, in order to aid the public in evaluating the material on this matter and forming individual opinions about the affair.

The “background information” is foggy at best.  What we do know that Jack Schriber had built an illustrious career with EVSC from 1970 for over 30 years, as a teacher and supervisor.  Even after retirement, he and his wife Sue continued to work on the EVSC summer musicals.  The Schribers have been the recipients of numerous awards from local civic groups and were very popular with the public in general. We know that Schriber claims to have had a sexual relationship with a student for about two years, and the student was somewhere between 15 and 18 years old, and that it was not consensual according to the victim.

The following is a timeline of the incidents exposed in a news release made by the Evansville Courier just before noon on October 20, 2015, which revealed that Schriber had admitted to having a sexual relationship with a male student in the early 1970’s.  Schriber’s comments, police reports, the Mayor’s and others’ statements are reported in the hopes of clarifying what took place in the very sad incident.

December 8, 2014 – Schriber announced his candidacy for City Council-At-Large on the Republican ticket.  He was recruited by his longtime friend and former student, Mayor Winnecke, along with other prominent Republicans.  It was anticipated that he would lead the ticket because of the respect he commanded in the community, and he was considered a big asset to the GOP ticket.  In his statement to the Courier shortly after the story broke on October 20, Schriber said that “rumblings” began about the incident very soon after he announced his candidacy.

July 15, 2015 – This date was the last day that it was possible for a candidate to withdraw his name from the ballot for the November City Election.

July 20, 2015 – The investigation of the complaint against Schriber began, according to EPD Sex Crimes Unit Detective Brian Turpin.  The Mayor was informed about the investigation of Schriber by EPD Chief of Police, Billy Bolin shortly after the inception of the investigation. No statement has been forthcoming from Chief Bolin as to the details of his communications with Mayor Winnecke in the matter.

August 8, 2015 – A confession had been obtained from Schriber and he had signed a letter of apology to his victim and turned it over to Det. Turpin.  That is the approximate time when it was announced that Jack Schriber has suffered a heart attack in Orlando, FL, and it was unknown whether he would be able to continue his candidacy for City Council. A few weeks later it was announced that Schriber had recovered and returned to his campaign.  I am unable to furnish exact dates, as I have not been able to access the Courier’s archives in the matter.  We do wonder if the time that Schriber was “out of action’” may have also been used to consider options and the decision to move forward was made.

October 20, 2015 – The Courier website featured breaking news that Schriber had confessed to being a sexual predator, but would not be prosecuted because the Statute of Limitations was expired on his offense.  The breaking news came shortly before noon, and by 2 pm, the Mayor had issued a statement asking Schriber to suspend his campaign and saying that he had been informed of the investigation shortly after it was initiated, but that he had remained silent in order to protect the integrity of the investigation.  Shortly after the Mayor’s statement, GOP County Chairman Wayne Parke also weighed in, echoing Winnecke’s plea for Schriber to step aside.

October 21, 2015 – Schriber released a statement suspending his campaign, reproaching Det. Turpin for not destroying the letter to his victim, and apologizing to his own family and supporters for the anguish he had caused them.  No apology was extended to the victim and his friends and family.

Probably more importantly, Mayor Winnecke’s statement evolved to include his contention that he did not know of Schriber’s confession until the news broke.  He stated that he had been told of the confession by a “non-police source” and had only acted to preserve the integrity of the investigation.  He has never clarified the source of his information about the confession.

October 22, 2015 – Demo County Chair Rob Faulkner released a statement criticizing Winnecke and Parke for failing to make clear to the voters that a “straight” Republican vote will register a vote for Schriber, and in the event that he is one of the top three vote getters, the GOP will caucus to choose a replacement.  He went on to say that he believed Schriber’s campaign funds should be donated to Holly’s House.  Republicans have tried to vilify Faulkner for this statement, saying that he is guilty of “politicizing” the scandal.

October 24, 2015 -  Rep. Riecken made her statement concerning the handling of the incident, in which she pointed out that the Mayor’s credibility is again in question due to  his handling of the scandal.  It is to her credit that she had not spoken out on the issue until she had time to weigh the actions of Mr. Winnecke.   She observed that the “evolution” of his explanation for keeping Schriber in the race for as long as he was is suspect, to say the least.

October 25, 2015 – The Courier quoted Lloyd Winnecke’s reply to Mrs. Riecken’s statement, in which he said called her campaign “desperate” and accused her of “cynically” using the incident to further her own campaign, while holding to his statement about guarding the integrity of the investigation.

No one really wants to delve deeper into the details of Jack Schriber’s behavior toward his victim.  I certainly hope that the victim and his family can move on and that Sue Schriber and her family recover from this pain and embarrassment as soon as possible.  We do, however, need to know the details of who knew what and when they knew it, so far as the investigation goes.  This is a matter of the public trust and the character of those who wish to lead the City for the next four years. I believe we are owed answers that we do not have.  The “defending the integrity of the investigation” defense does not hold up against the information that we have been given.  At this point, we have more questions than answers due at least in part to the repeated “canned” explanation that the Mayor has continued to try to feed us.

Finally, Winnecke and his party need to be more transparent about their plans for the possible replacement for Schriber on the City Council.  The rumors that Wayne Parke will be the replacement if one is needed are disturbing, and I would challenge the GOP leaders to announce who they would encourage their caucus to choose in Schriber’s place in case he wins a seat.

FOOTNOTE: this article was posted without opinion, bias or editing.

BIDEN AND 2016 RUN

0