Home Blog Page 5823

Indiana Bar Foundation celebrates anniversary by awarding grants

0

Marilyn Odendahl for www.theindianalawyer.com

At its 65th anniversary celebration dinner Nov. 6, the Indiana Bar Foundation announced more than $1 million in grants to legal aid and pro bono districts, marking the first time the statewide nonprofit had been able to award such a large amount since the economic recession.

The Friday evening event was held at the Scottish Rite Cathedral in Indianapolis and featured a keynote address by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Bob Woodward. An estimated 225 attorneys from around the state attended.

The foundation used the dinner to announce the recipients of the Bank of America settlement monies. Indiana received $584,646 from the national agreement reached between the financial institution and the U.S. Department of Justice.

The money is targeted for foreclosure assistance and community redevelopment.

In reviewing applications from seven nonprofits, the foundation’s committee, chaired by Indiana Court of Appeals Judge Melissa May, decided to provide some funding to all rather than fully funding only a few.

“We wanted to reach as many people as possible,” said Charles Dunlap, executive director of the foundation. “It seemed appropriate to give everybody something.”

The organizations receiving awards and the amounts are as follows:
•    Indiana Legal Services – $275,000
•    Indianapolis Legal Aid Society and Indiana Landmarks – $229,646
•    Neighborhood Christian Legal Clinic – $25,000
•    Whitewater Valley Pro Bono – $20,000
•    Indiana Pro Bono District D – $15,000
•    Indiana Pro Bono District E – $15,000
•    Indiana Pro Bono District H – $5,000

Coupled with the $800,000 annual grant going to the 12 pro bono districts from the Interest on Lawyers Trust Account program, the foundation is awarding $1.4 million for civil legal assistance. This is the first time in six years the foundation has given out more than $1 million to legal aid and pro bono organizations.

The highlight of the evening was Woodward, who with his reporting colleague Carl Bernstein broke the Watergate scandal that led to the resignation of President Richard Nixon. He spoke for an hour, answering questions and recounting stories about the politicians he has met and interviewed during his career at the Washington Post.

His most compelling anecdotes were about Watergate.

Woodward described his initial meeting with Alexander Butterfield, the Nixon aide who disclosed the secret taping system the president used in the White House. The Butterfield interviews and the treasure trove of previously unknown and historically significant documents he took from the administration is the basis for Woodward’s latest book, “The Last of the President’s Men.”

In particular, Woodward talked about a 1972 memo that included a handwritten note from Nixon to then-national security advisor Henry Kissinger. The president wrote the 2.9 million tons of bombs dropped on Southeast Asia had achieved “zilch.”

Further research of other documents and transcripts from the tape recordings reveal Nixon decided to sustain the bombing campaign because it was popular with  a majority of the voters and seen as key to helping him win reelection.

“It is one of the most brazen cases, I think, in history of a president conducting a war … and acknowledging the bombing achieved zilch and to continue the war at that point is worse than shocking,” Woodward said.

Woodward also discussed his changing view of Nixon’s pardon. When President Gerald Ford announced he was pardoning his disgraced predecessor in September 1974, Woodward deemed it was the “final corruption of Watergate.” He was sure Ford had made a deal and agreed to let Nixon walk away while several others went to jail.

However, when he interviewed Ford more two decades after, Woodward learned his original conclusion was wrong.

Ford explained that Nixon’s chief of staff Alexander Haig had approached him about making a deal that included a pardon, but he rejected it because he felt the agreement would have been improper.

But after Nixon had left the White House, Ford received a memo from the Watergate prosecutor who was predicting that Nixon would likely stand trial and probably go to jail. The former president told Woodward that prosecuting Nixon would have continued the Watergate saga for another two years, and that was something he felt the country could not stand. Ford said he wanted to start anew and the pardon was the best vehicle to do that.

“For years I was sure it was the final act of corruption, and then you subject it to a neutral inquiry many years later and discover what looked like corruption is actually an act of courage,” Woodward said.
 

Governor Pence Spokesman Statement on House Democrats Infrastructure Plan

0

Following the Indiana House Democrats infrastructure proposal today, Matt Lloyd, a spokesman for Governor Mike Pence, issued the following statement.

 

“Governor Pence welcomes House Democrats to the conversation about infrastructure funding. Sadly, the plan presented today by House Democrats forces Hoosiers to choose between cutting $500 million from the general fund for vital services like K-12 tuition support, teacher pensions, Medicaid and state hospitals or going broke in four years. That is irresponsible and not serious. Governor Pence proposed a responsible plan that  provides vital infrastructure funding without raising taxes or cutting vital services for Hoosier families.”

Governor Mike Pence will offer remarks at “Elevating Work & Learn in Indiana

0

Governor Mike Pence will offer remarks at “Elevating Work & Learn in Indiana,” an event sponsored by the Indiana Career Council focusing on successful work-and-learn programs for students and educators across the state. Later in the day, he will hold a community conversation with Hoosiers in Fair Oaks. Details below.

 

Tuesday, November 10:

 

10:25 a.m. EST – Governor Pence will offer remarks at “Elevating Work & Learn in Indiana,” an event sponsored by the Indiana Career Council

*Media are welcome to attend.

Herman B Wells Community Center, Lebanon High School, 510 Essex Drive, Lebanon, IN

 

12:30 p.m. CST – Governor Pence will host a community conversation with Hoosiers in Fair Oaks and the surrounding communities

*Media are welcome to attend.

Fair Oaks Farm, Farmhouse Restaurant, 754 N. 600 E., Fair Oaks, IN

 

Vanderburgh County Recent Booking Records

0

 

SPONSORED BY DEFENSE ATTORNEY IVAN ARNAEZ.
 DON’T GO TO COURT ALONE. CALL IVAN ARNAEZ @ 812-424-6671.

What Is Your Journalism Challenge?

6

  WHAT PROBLEM ARE YOU WORKING TO SOLVE?

Like every industry, journalism has a labor problem. As media companies have grappled with digital disruption, they’ve responded by cutting jobs and salaries, but not necessarily cutting “content.” That work has instead been assigned to a growing legion of freelancers and contractors — independent work that has always existed, but that has taken on a more vital role to the survival of many cash-strapped media institutions, both new and legacy.

With so many opportunities yet so few resources, freelancers are by nature pitted against one another in a race to the bottom. This doesn’t work particularly well for anyone: for editors, who need a consistent and high-quality pool of writing, staffers, who risk being undercut at their jobs, or readers, who want to support living wages for workers.

This is not to say that freelance journalism can’t work! But it can’t work like this.

How Would Solving This Problem Help Journalism?

While the Internet has done much to lower the entry barrier to media work — which is great — it’s also lowered the standards of that work — which is not great. Many freelancers report that they receive little to no editing or fact-checking. In a race to pump out more “content,” this has the potential to result in huge errors — and to promote a different kinds of journalism altogether.

In an industry that prides itself on transparency and ethics, there are no standards as to how these workers or their work should be treated. Living wages and ethical work standards are in everyone’s best interest.

Who Is Tackling A Similar Problem And How Is Your Approach Different?

There are many efforts aimed at supporting independent workers across industries. Projects specific to journalism — such as Contently, Beacon and WordRates — have largely centered on gig-matching, which has its own strengths, but does not address many of the issues facing freelancers.

A single tool or platform can’t fix such a complex problem. I believe organizing of freelancers is best done in small cooperative affinity guilds, where problems such as lack of administrative and legal assistance, libel insurance, press passes, and tools, and service fees can be better solved. The first step toward this vision is promoting more transparency and cooperation in a field that’s traditionally very individualistic and competitive. I plan to negotiate with writers, editors, and publishers to find common ground on these issues. I’m also talking to creators of digital payment and publishing tools about how those might better work for independent journalists.

What Are The First Questions You Plan To Pursue?

  • Is this employment shift in media to more contracts and fewer jobs actually indicative of and part of a larger shift in work across industries? If so, what does that mean for freelance journalists, and how might we work in solidarity with freelancers in other industries?
  • Who are the freelance journalists working in the U.S. today? Where are they, how are they working, and for how much?
  • In what ways does contract journalism work and not work for editors and publishers? How do they perceive freelancers? Who do they think we are, and how do they think we work?

What Are The First Steps You Plan To Take In Working On Your Challenge?

I’m interviewing freelancers, editors and publishers about these labor issues and will be publishing some of that work on Patreon for my subscribers. Those funds will support some of my more ambitious plans for this project. The first batch will go toward making Who Pays Writers, a project of Manjula Martin and Scratch Magazine, into a searchable database.

Who Pays is an unmatched resource for freelancers — users submit not just rates, but also information about how long payment took, the terms of their contracts, and any other issues that arose. Overall, this data shows that there are no standard terms or rates for writers, even at the same publication.

We also have some more ambitious plans for using this data to better promote wage transparency.

Unexploded Ordinance found in White River Greene Co.

2

 

 

Indiana Conservation Officers were conducting an evidence dive in White River today when they found a little more than what they were looking for.  Divers were searching the White River just south of Spencer for evidence from an ongoing investigation when they came across what is believed to be an unexploded ordinance.  The mortar round is approximately sixteen inches long and weighs about five pounds.

 

Members of Indiana State Police EOD team were called in to assist with the ordinance.  After examining the round, members of the EOD team felt that it was very possibly still a live, viable round.  The EOD team exploded the ordinance on the riverbank.

 

Indiana Conservation Officers Scuba Team is called on for many types of underwater evidence recoveries.  While most of the searches revolve around vehicles, firearms and other items people may try to hide underwater, today’s recovery shows that divers must remain vigilant in safety procedures.  The public is also reminded that if you should come across something like this, do not try to move the ordinance.  Old ordinances can be very unstable and may explode simply from being moved around.

 

Companies’ agreement not a requirements contract, 7th Circuit holds

0

Jennifer Nelson for www.theindianalawyer.com

The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals vacated judgment in favor of a company that sued its carbon black supplier after it was unable to fulfill orders, holding the lower court erred in ruling in favor of the purchaser after finding the agreement between the companies was a requirements contract.

BRC Rubber & Plastics Inc. entered into a contract with Continental Carbon Co. for Continental to supply carbon black to the rubber products manufacturer. Continental was unable to complete orders for BRC in April 2011 based on high demand for carbon black and refused to fill subsequent orders by BRC. BRC sued, arguing that Continental had to fill every order BRC placed because it had a requirements contract with Continental. This type of contract is one in which the purchaser agrees to buy all of its needs of a specified material exclusively from the particular supplier and the supplier in turn agrees to fill all of the purchaser’s needs during the contract period.

The District Court agreed with BRC that the companies had a requirements contract, so Continental’s refusal to confirm and ship some orders was a breach and repudiation of the agreement. It awarded BRC nearly $1 million in damages.

“The parties’ agreement was not a requirements contract unless BRC was both obligated to buy some amount of carbon black from Continental and prohibited from buying carbon black from any other seller. In our view, neither condition is met, so we hold that the parties’ agreement was not a requirements contract,” Judge Ann Claire Williams wrote in vacating the lower court Thursday.

The 7th Circuit rejected BRC’s claims that certain language in the contract supported the requirements contract finding. The judges also declined to address BRC’s cross-appeal regarding the exclusion of certain testimony from the damages trial because it is premature. The District Court will need to revisit the lawsuit and make a decision that isn’t premised on the agreement being a requirements contract.

The case is BRC Rubber & Plastics Inc. v. Continental Carbon Company, 14-1416, 14-1555.

Randy Houser “We Went” Tour November 28

0

Tickets can be purchased at our Box Office, online or at 1-800-745-3000

Watch Randy Houser’s video!

Saturday, November 28 at 7:30pm

RANDY HOUSER

“We Went” Tour featuring 

Frankie Ballard and Craig Campbell

We Went Tour named one of Rolling Stone’s Essential Country Events of the Season!

Houser’s We Went Tour, hitting cities across the country starting in November, has been named one of Rolling Stone’s Essential Country Events of the Fall.

The We Went Tour, featuring Frankie Ballard and special guest Craig Campbell, is among other milestone events such as the Grand Ole Opry’s 90th Birthday Bash and the Pilgrimage Festival in Franklin, TN.

Rolling Stone states that the We Went Tour “should be an example of everything that’s right in today’s country music.”

More Information
Price: $49.50, $39.50, $29.50
Book a Dinner and Show before the Randy Houser concert!

Call 812-435-5770 ext. 202 or

ext. 302 for details!