Home Blog Page 5745

IS IT TRUE DECEMBER 30 and 31, 2015

18

IS IT TRUE  the Evansville Brownfields Corp. has been engaged in holding blighted properties for years? …Brownfield have owned currently blighted properties as long as ten years without developing them?  …the City of Evansville thru its Department of Metro Development bought a house at 309 Madison in 2006? … this house was transferred to the Evansville Brownfields Corp. in 2013?   …this house is now listed with a group of 110 very interesting properties the city purchased with Community Development Block Grant Funds (CDBG)?

IS IT TRUE the sales disclosure shows that a lot located at 405 Jefferson was purchased by  Brownfields (DMD) for $40,000 in 2009?   …they bought the almost identical neighboring vacant lot, 407 Jefferson, for $3,000 in 2011? …the City of Evansville (DMD) also bought the neighboring lots at 413 and 415 Jefferson for $400 in 2011? …that these vacant and undeveloped lots are on the list of properties the City DMD and Brownfields DMD purchased with CDBG funds and were supposed to be dispose of in the past two years but they still own them?

IS IT TRUE it was reported in the Evansville Courier and Press 2 years ago that City of Evansville and DMD could no longer land bank with CDBG funds and had to dispose of the 110 blighted properties?   …that this was supposed to be done in two years? … the two year deadline is up and the majority of these properties have not been disposed or developed?  …we wonder what HUD is going to penalize the City of Evansville and DMD for non-compliance?

IS IT TRUE  when all said and done we predict that HUD will want some of their CDBG money back that was mismanaged by DMD to purchase blighted properties?  … the Mayor now proposes a gift of $1.7 million from Riverboat Fund  to promote new land banking projects but we project most of this money will be used to pay for the sins of past mismanagement of DMD and Brownsfields?

IS IT TRUE we strongly suggest that the City of Evansville needs total transparency, financial controls and oversight on how the $1.7 million given to Brownsfield Corp. will be spent to fight blight in Evansville proper?   …in order to achieve this task maybe the $1.7 million gift to Brownfield should simply be budgeted within the Building Commission or DMD accounts?

IS IT TRUE the once defeated idea of the city gifting the Brownfields $1.7 million in Riverboat funding is back on the table?….that in addition the city plans to collaborate with the county, without an opportunity for public comment, and give the Brownfields control of valuable tax sale properties?…..that tax sale reform measures are being ignored to justify diverting valuable resources to the Brownfields special interest?…..that these resources may or may not be used efficiently and effectively to fight blight.

IS IT TRUE the Brownfields Corp. is operated by the Department of Metropolitan Development but not required to follow government procedures?  …that a few individuals decides what properties are bought and what price is paid?  ..that these individuals also decides who is allowed to develop properties and what the properties cost?

IS IT TRUE todays “Readers Poll” questions; Do you feel that City Council should gift $1.7 million dollars to Brrownfield Corp. without strings attached?

EVANSVILLE FACES SYCAMORES AT WEST SIDE NIGHT WITH THE ACES

0

CONCUSSION

0

Adopt A Pet

0

 This squirmy guy is Wiggles, a 6-month-old male solid gray Russian Blue mix! He’s very sweet & social. If you’re looking for a lap cat, he’s your guy! His $30 fee includes his neuter, microchip, vaccines, and more. Call (812) 426-2563 or visit www.vhslifesaver.org for adoption details!

 

VANDERBURGH COUNTY FELONY CHARGES

0
SPONSORED BY DEFENSE ATTORNEY IVAN ARNAEZ.
DON’T GO TO COURT ALONE. CALL IVAN ARNAEZ @ 812-424-6671.

 

Below is a list of felony cases that will be filed by the Vanderburgh County Prosecutor’s Office today.

Randall Allen Wright Resisting law enforcement, Level 6 felony

Misty Marie Love Operating a motor vehicle after forfeiture of license for life, Level 5 felony

Phillip Wayne Noblin Jr. Domestic battery, Level 6 felony

Tina Marie Browning Possession of methamphetamine, Level 6 felony

False informing, Class B misdemeanor

Ikeem Ramone Minor Operating a vehicle as a habitual traffic violator, Level 6 felony

Bryan Wendell Henard Robbery resulting in bodily injury, Level 3 felony

Residential entry, Level 6 felony

Battery resulting in bodily injury, Class A misdemeanor

Amanda Mechelle Miles Residential entry, Level 6 felony

Justin Lee Gunther Strangulation, Level 6 felony

Domestic battery, Class A misdemeanor

Paul Bernard Ransom Theft, Level 6 felony

Nicholas John Chaffin Operating a vehicle while intoxicated endangering a person with a passenger less than 18 years of age, Level 6 felony

Harcourt Lee Alton Battery, Level 5 felony

Domestic battery, Class A misdemeanor

Warren Lee Fox Dealing in methamphetamine, Level 2 felony

Unlawful possession of a syringe, Level 6 felony

Courtney Tyler Weinzapfel Battery against a public safety official, Level 6 felony

Criminal mischief, Class B misdemeanor

Taylor Morgan Ingram Child molesting, Level 1 felony

Child molesting, Level 1 felony

Child molesting, Level 1 felony

Melissa Dawn Farrington Theft, Level 6 felony

Criminal trespass, Class A misdemeanor

Lauren Michelle Greubel Neglect of a dependent, Level 6 felony

Frank Paul James Lewis Battery against a public safety official, Level 5 felony

Intimidation, Level 6 felony

Impersonation of a public servant, Level 6 felony

Resisting law enforcement, Level 6 felony

Resisting law enforcement, Class A misdemeanor

John Keith Crow Criminal confinement, Level 5 felony

Battery with moderate bodily injury, Level 6 felony

Resisting law enforcement, Class A misdemeanor

Candice Dashay Barnes Theft, Level 6 felony

Joseph Lee Rayburn Possession of a destructive device, Level 5 felony

Criminal recklessness, Level 6 felony

Possession of methamphetamine, Level 6 felony

Possession of a controlled substance, Class A misdemeanor

James Morris Wisdom Jr. Intimidation, Level 5 felony

Pointing a firearm, Level 6 felony

Coriyahvon Lamont Outlaw Possession of a narcotic drug, Level 6 felony

Possession of a controlled substance, Class A misdemeanor

Possession of marijuana, Class A misdemeanor

BREAKING NEWS: Vanderburgh County Roads Closings Due To High Water

0

BREAKING NEWS: Vanderburgh County Roads Closings Due To High Water

The following Vanderburgh County roads are closed due to high water:

Seminary from Bayou Creek to Old Henderson Rd.

Happe Rd from Duesner Rd to Old Henderson Rd.

King Rd from Old Henderson Rd to Happe Rd.

Hickory Ridge Rd from Old Henderson Rd to Happe Rd.

Golden Rule Rd from Old Henderson Rd to Seminary Rd.

Waterworks Rd from Veteran’s Memorial Parkway to US 41.

W. Franklin Rd from Smith Diamond to Seminary Rd.

Roth Rd from Seminary Rd to Cypress Dale Rd.

Shore Rd from Roth to Dead End.

Cypress Dale Rd from Seminary Rd to West Franklin Rd.

S. Weinbach Ave from Levee to River Rd.

Newman Rd from Hickory Ridge Rd to Old Henderson Rd.

VANDERBURGH COUNTY FELONY CHARGES

0
SPONSORED BY DEFENSE ATTORNEY IVAN ARNAEZ.
DON’T GO TO COURT ALONE. CALL IVAN ARNAEZ @ 812-424-6671.

 Below is a list of felony cases that will be filed by the Vanderburgh County Prosecutor’s Office today.

Jennifer Marie Sharp Theft, Level 6 felony

Joshua D. Carter Intimidation, Level 5 felony

Justin Steven Steele Theft, Level 6 felony

Michael Edward Carter Theft, Level 6 felony

Angel R. Helm Possession of methamphetamine, Level 6 felony

Possession of paraphernalia, Class C misdemeanor

Misty Lynn Voyles Obstruction of justice, Level 6 felony

Resisting law enforcement, Class A misdemeanor

Possessing a look-alike substance, Class C misdemeanor

Vanderburgh County Recent Booking Records

0
SPONSORED BY DEFENSE ATTORNEY IVAN ARNAEZ.
DON’T GO TO COURT ALONE. CALL IVAN ARNAEZ @ 812-424-6671.

THE FREE SPEECH SILVER LINING IN THE BUDGET CLOUD

1

By Phil Kerpen

The massive omnibus package of tax and spending changes recently passed by Congress was mostly a defeat for free-market economics. It extended expensive giveaways for the wind and solar industries, allowed President Obama to fund his Paris climate agreement, funded the president’s aggressive regulatory agenda, and even green-lit his IMF reform.

But the deal is actually a triumph in the single most important policy area: the First Amendment. And as long as we are free to speak and engage in the political process, we can come back and reverse course on the economic issues.

A detailed analysis by the Center for Competitive Politics identified no less than seven free speech victories in the deal. They include a ban on anti-speech regulations from the Securities and Exchange Commission and a ban on a potential executive order that might seek to control the political speech of people who have contracts with the federal government — as well as many critical measures to rein in the IRS.

In 2012, Democrats won a national election by turning the IRS into a political intimidation agency, systematically destroying the vitality of the tea party movement that delivered a conservative wave in 2010. Given the level of scrutiny the agency is now under as a consequence, you might think there was no way they could use the same playbook to tilt the playing field for 2016. But the IRS was actually poised to propose official rules that would have been facially neutral but would have had the effect of silencing precisely the same groups that were sidelined by targeting in 2012.

This deal takes that risk off the table by expressly prohibiting such rules.

The deal also includes a comprehensive package of IRS reforms authored by Rep. Peter Roskam of Illinois that enjoy broad support but that until now had failed many attempts to be attached to a legislative vehicle that would be signed by the president.

That package includes a prohibition on IRS employees using private email address, as we know Lois Lerner and her coconspirators often did when orchestrating targeting, a mechanism for nonprofit groups to challenge IRS determinations in court so that they cannot be held indefinitely in limbo, and a provision requiring any IRS employee engaged in political targeting to be fired. (In the recent scandal nobody was: Even Lois Lerner was allowed to retire with her full pension.)

Most significantly, Roskam’s reform package bans the IRS from trying to assess gift tax on contributions to nonprofit organizations, which they infamously attempted against conservative donors.

In 2011, donors to conservative groups were told that despite decades of clear legal understanding and practice, they could be found liable for gift tax on their contributions. While the IRS never did impose such a tax, the threatening letters they sent likely had a chilling effect on contributions to conservative groups, which was the point.

Taxing contributions to nonprofits would do nothing to advance the intended purpose of the gift tax — enforcing compliance with the federal estate tax — and would serve to dramatically diminish the ability of nonprofit groups to educate and mobilize citizens in the public policy process. Yet some liberal advocates continued to praise these abusive letters and even call for more of them to be issued.

Now donors have an ironclad legal guarantee that their contributions to nonprofit groups will not be subject to threatening IRS audit letters and arbitrary taxation.

The bottom line is that on a wide range of issues the omnibus deal is deeply disappointing, but the First Amendment provisions are an enormous silver lining because they mean activists will not be IRSed in 2016 the way they were in 2012. And that assures conservatives an honest opportunity to effectively engage the political process and come back to win on all the other issues.