|
Hot Jobs in Evansville
Eric Holcomb Sworn In as 51st Lieutenant Governor of Indiana
Indianapolis – Eric Holcomb was sworn in today as the 51st Lieutenant Governor of Indiana in a ceremony in the south atrium of the Indiana Statehouse. Holcomb was sworn in by Indiana Supreme Court Justice Mark Massa, and both Holcomb and Governor Pence offered remarks. Lieutenant Governor Holcomb took his oath on President Benjamin Harrison’s personal bible that he used to be sworn in as president.
“Eric Holcomb is a Hoosier through and through, and I’m proud that he has officially taken his oath to join the administration as Lieutenant Governor,†said Governor Pence. “Eric has a heart for public service and a love for Indiana like few people I’ve ever met, and I’m grateful for Eric and his wife Janet’s willingness to serve this state. I know that Eric’s enthusiasm, integrity, and extensive experience at both the state and federal level will serve him well as he assumes the duties of the Office of the Lieutenant Governor. I’m looking forward to working with Eric in the coming months, and I know that he’s ready to get to work for the people of Indiana.â€
On February 9, Governor Pence announced his intention to nominate Holcomb as Lieutenant Governor. He formally nominated Holcomb on March 2, and on March 3, Holcomb was confirmed by majority vote in the House of Representatives and the Senate.
“I could not be more excited or more proud to serve as Lieutenant Governor of the state of Indiana,†said Lieutenant Governor Eric Holcomb. “I am grateful for the opportunity to work alongside Governor Pence to build on Indiana’s strong foundation and make tomorrow stronger. I’m eager to get started, and I look forward to hitting the ground running to serve the Hoosiers of this great state.â€
Eric Holcomb has spent his career in public service.  Most recently, he has served as State Chief of Staff to U.S. Senator Dan Coats. Prior to that role from 2003 to 2011, Holcomb served as Governor Mitch Daniels’ deputy chief of staff and managed the Governor’s 2008 re-election campaign. Holcomb has also served as chairman of the Indiana Republican Party and as a member of the Republican National Committee. Holcomb got his start in politics managing successful races for U.S. Congressman John Hostettler and a mayoral race in Vincennes, where he lived at the time. Holcomb earned his undergraduate degree from Hanover College and is a veteran of the United States Navy. Eric and his wife, Janet, live in Traders Point, Indiana.
Under Indiana law, the lieutenant governor serves as President of the Indiana Senate and Secretary of Agriculture and Rural Development. The lieutenant governor also manages six state agencies including the State Department of Agriculture, Office of Community and Rural Affairs, Office of Tourism Development, Office of Defense Development, Office of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, and the Indiana Housing and Community Development Authority. Additionally, the lieutenant governor chairs the Indiana Counter Terrorism and Security Council.
Photos from today’s swearing-in ceremony, as well as Lieutenant Governor Holcomb’s official headshot, can be found attached.
ICYMI: ‘King Coal’ losing crown, Coal industry in Daviess County dwindling
Stricter clean air regulations were put in place by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The moves were done without the consent of Congress and it led to a fight that went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. Eighth District Indiana Congressman Larry Bucshon was among 200 members of Congress who filed a brief with the Court claiming EPA overstepped its legal authority and defied the will of Congress by regulating carbon dioxide emissions.
“Congress has repeatedly tried to overturn these regulations through legislation; however, the President and his allies continue blocking our legislative efforts in order to protect their ideological climate change agenda,â€Â said Bucshon, a Republican.
“Now we’re taking the fight to the courts, because we believe the way forward is through innovation and technology advancements, not unlawful federal regulations that cannot be met, damage the economy and cost jobs. I’m proud to help file this amicus brief, in support of states like Indiana, requesting the D.C. Circuit Court vacate these regulations that have been temporarily blocked by the Supreme Court.â€
Â
King Coal losing crown
Coal industry in Daviess County dwindling
Mar 2, 2016
For a long time in most of southwestern Indiana coal was the king of the economy. Companies pulled the coal out of the ground providing landowners with additional income, trucks rumbled all over the county roads hauling their loads to power plants in Petersburg, Edwardsport and Princeton. Business sprang up to provide services to the mines, the trucking companies and even the power plants.
During the hey-day of coal Daviess County was a busy place.
“Coal was important to us and everyone else,†said former executive director for the Daviess County Chamber of Commerce Dave Cox. “There were times when we had 10 to 12 coal mines operating at once. There were the mines, the miners, the trucking, the service people. One thing led to another and then another.â€
Those days led the county commissioners to hold a meeting once a year with the coal companies. During those meetings, roads were closed and opened. Specific routes were set out to haul coal. The meetings could last for days.
This year’s coal meeting lasted only a few minutes. Daviess County has one active mine, Solar Sources Antioch Mine. Peabody is in the process of closing its Viking mine. Only a handful of people showed up to raise a few questions. Simply, King Coal has lost its crown.
“It just shows from our coal meeting there is not a lot going on,†said President of the Daviess County Commissioners Michael Taylor. “We’ve got some old road issues we’re working on. Everything is slowing down.â€
Two big factors have played into the demise of coal. One is the energy markets. Domestic discoveries of natural gas and oil have driven down, not just the price for those commodities, but also the price of coal. In addition, clean air regulations have been especially hard on the coal industry and Midwestern power generating companies that used to rely exclusively on coal.
“With all of the new EPA regulations, it is slowing them down and they’re not nearly as profitable as they once were,†said Taylor.
Stricter clean air regulations were put in place by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The moves were done without the consent of Congress and it led to a fight that went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. Eighth District Indiana Congressman Larry Bucshon was among 200 members of Congress who filed a brief with the Court claiming EPA overstepped its legal authority and defied the will of Congress by regulating carbon dioxide emissions.
“Congress has repeatedly tried to overturn these regulations through legislation; however, the President and his allies continue blocking our legislative efforts in order to protect their ideological climate change agenda,†said Bucshon, a Republican.
“Now we’re taking the fight to the courts, because we believe the way forward is through innovation and technology advancements, not unlawful federal regulations that cannot be met, damage the economy and cost jobs. I’m proud to help file this amicus brief, in support of states like Indiana, requesting the D.C. Circuit Court vacate these regulations that have been temporarily blocked by the Supreme Court.â€
About two dozen states including Indiana have sued to stop the Clean Power Plan, which aims to slow climate change by cutting power-plant emissions by one third by 2030. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled the Plan cannot be enacted until the legal cases are resolved and that is not expected until 2017.
While the fight goes on in D.C. in court, in Daviess County the impacts of coal are slipping further and further from the days when mines operated all the way from Epsom to Alfordsville.
“It’s really concerning,†said Daviess County Highway Supervisor Phil Cornelius. “Consider the amount of taxes the coal mines brought into the county. Over the next few years, the rest of the property tax owners will be picking up the additional cost from the loss of mine revenues.â€
But the impact will be much deeper than property taxes. It has hit wages, and businesses in southern Indiana.
“There is the loss of income for the people who used to work there and for the companies that supplied the mines,†added Cornelius. “It’s just a bad deal. I know they have some detrimental effects on the roads and tracking dirt. The pluses, though, far outweighed the minuses, and we are going to miss them.â€
Â
COA: man not entitled to relief under firearms statute
Scott Roberts for www.theindianalawyer.com
The Indiana Court of Appeals overturned a man’s request for summary judgment after he was fired for bringing a gun to work and instead granted summary judgment to his ex-employer after it found the man was not entitled to relief under statute or common law.
William Sudlow drove to work one day at Caterpillar Inc. and left his Ruger .357 Magnum handgun in sight as he went in. An employee noticed it and notified management, who first suspended and then summarily fired him for violating company policy.
The trial court granted summary judgment for Sudlow, saying that he did not violate the company policy in place at the time because there was not a policy that said he needed to keep his gun out of sight. That revised policy was posted the day after Sudlow was fired. The trial court awarded $85,000 in damages to Sudlow. Caterpillar appealed.
However, the COA had a different opinion. It said Sudlow was not entitled to relief under I.c. 34-28-7-2(a), the firearms statute, because Caterpillar’s firearms policy did not ban conduct protected by it, and the statute clearly says action under it is authorized only when an employer violates the statute, which Caterpillar did not do.
The COA also argued with Sudlow’s interpretation of the statute. “In other words, Sudlow believes that if an employer does not have a firearms policy in place, an employee could walk into the workplace with a loaded assault rifle and face no employment consequences as a result.â€
The court said the statute is not nearly that broad, and its plain language means Sudlow was not protected under the statute.
Sudlow is also not entitled to relief under common law, the COA said. Sudlow was an at-will employee and is not covered under the public policy exception, the only one the parties discussed. The firearms statute does give an employee the right to confer a weapon if it’s kept out of sight; it does not give the right to store a weapon in plain sight. Therefore, Sudlow’s actions were not protected under the statute.
The case is Caterpillar Inc. v William Sudlow, 79A02-1507-CT-801.
21st Annual Celebration of Leadership
Leadership Evansville presents the 21st Annual Celebration of Leadership
Brought to you by
|
|
Thursday, March 10, 2016
Old National Events Plaza
|
|
Doors open at 4:30 pm; Program begins at 5:30 pm
|
|
Reception to follow at
The Curtis Building 915 Main Street, Evansville
|
Congratulations to all of the nominees! Visit our website for a list of nominees |
Another person involved in the January YMCA parking lot assault is now wanted for Criminal Gang Activity and Battery
Evansville Police have obtained an arrest warrant for 22 year old ALLEN OWENS. Police believe OWENS assaulted a man in the parking lot of the downtown YMCA on January 28, 2016.
OWENS is homeless, but is believed to still be in the Evansville area.
Anyone with information on OWENS is asked to call 911 or WeTip.
Arrest made in connection with east side shooting that left one man dead
Evansville Police have arrested 40 year old BARON JERRELL LIGHTS in connection with the Thursday morning shooting at the Home Life Studios.
Police believe LIGHTS arrived at the hotel with 38 year old Jerome Wilkins and the two men attempted to rob several occupants in a room. Police believe LIGHTS and Wilkins were armed with handguns during the robbery. One of the occupants was also armed and a shootout ensued in the room. Investigators believe all 3 men fired their guns during the incident.
Wilkins and the armed occupant were injured by gunfire. Wilkins died at a local hospital shortly after being driven there by an acquaintance.
Jessy Suttle, 32, was the occupant who was injured during the robbery. He remains hospitalized. His current condition is not being released. Detectives are still investigating the incident. At this time, it is unknown who fired the rounds that caused Wilkins’ fatal wound or Suttle’s injury.
LIGHTS has been charged with:
Murder
Attempted Murder
Robbery with Serious Bodily Injury
Burglary
Criminal Confinement 4 counts
ICEMEN OWNER RESPONDS TO CHANNEL 25 REPORTER
ICEMEN OWNER RON GEARY TAKES CHANNEL 25 REPORTER JORDAN VANDERBERGE REMARKS HEAD ON
(UNEDITED Â E-MAIL CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN RON GEARY AND JORDANÂ VANDENBERGE)
From: Jordan T. Vandenberge , Eyewitness News
Mr. Geary,
This is Jordan Vandenberge from Eyewitness News (News 25 / Local 7). I sincerely hope this message finds you well. The reason I am contacting you today is to seek comment in regards to a story that we’re working on for our newscasts tonight.
I recently submitted a Freedom of Information Act request to the City of Owensboro for emails between city officials regarding the Evansville Icemen’s move to Owensboro that was announced on January 20th. The records request yielded several hundred pages of emails.
Through these emails and in our story tonight, we have established a timeline of how the team’s negotiations and eventual deal with Owensboro came to be. Furthermore, the emails show that the team reached out to Owensboro in mid-December and began negotiating soon thereafter. This appears to show that the team was simultaneously negotiating with Evansville and Owensboro. We will raise the question (and let viewers decide) of whether the team was trying to find the best business deal possible or whether the team was negotiating in poor faith with Evansville.
This is, in a nutshell, our story tonight. If you would like to send a statement, I would greatly appreciate it.
Feel free to call me if you have any questions.
Best Regards,
Jordan Vandenberge
————————————————————————————————-
From: Ron Geary
Jordan
You inquired whether the IceMen were trying to find the best business deal possible or whether the team was negotiating in poor faith. I would pose the same question as to the City, and will offer comment why that is the far more interesting question.
We phoned Mayor Winnecke in January 2015 to start negotiating a new lease and sent a February 5, 2015 letter to formally start the process. Throughout 2015, the IceMen told the City it needs a better lease and provided the City with all information it requested, but the IceMen never received a response from the City as to new terms. As a result, the IceMen sent proposed lease revisions to the City in October 2015. In November 2015, the City rejected the IceMen’s proposal but offered no new terms, all as the December 1, 2015 deadline with the ECHL approached.
The IceMen were told in mid-to late November 2015 that the City had a plan B and C if the IceMen deal fell through. We certainly accepted that as it sounds – the City had other options. We had no reason to doubt their word.
By mid-December, it was apparent the City did not want the IceMen in Evansville. For nearly a year, the City was told the IceMen needed a better lease. Instead, every City proposal was worse. Not just a little worse, but hundreds of thousands of dollars worse – but better for the City. Even the final offer from the City would have been six figures worse than the IceMen’s current lease.
In early January 2016, we even proposed to extend the existing lease for a year with some nominal changes that we believe would have a neutral impact on the City, all in the hopes something might be worked out during that year. That didn’t work either. As you can see, we wanted to stay in Evansville.
Since the City of Evansville had shown no willingness for almost a year to do anything but force a more onerous lease on the IceMen, and told us they had contingency plans several weeks earlier, I had no choice but to have a contingency plan of my own and did reach out to Owensboro.
In order to keep a hockey tenant in the Ford Center, it appears Venue Works became the 90% owner in the new hockey team. How is that good faith when Venue Works was in the room at nearly all meetings between the City and IceMen and participated intimately in all negotiations? In fact, Venue Works was in the room when the IceMen told them and the City we all needed to find clever and new ways to make this lease beneficial for all involved. Venue Works did nothing to assist the IceMen to better their position, but when its high fee paying client (I believe around a half million dollars a year), the City, demanded a hockey tenant, suddenly Venue Works was ready to get some skin in the game. If that were made available to the IceMen – a deal could likely have been cut.
As a result in putting skin in the game, Venue Works suddenly gets a five year extension on their contract for the Ford Center. At the same time, Venue Works compensation system changed. I don’t know how or why, but the fees changed. Seems to me they bought that five year extension by backing a new hockey team.
In sum, I can assure we were negotiating in the utmost of good faith during the year process. We never heard any proposals from the City – not one – until we went public in November 2015. Despite what the Mayor’s office will say – which will be his office was right and everyone else was wrong – the City did not want the IceMen to stay in Evansville and their negotiations show it. The documents and actions of the City speak for themselves. If you want any documents or emails, I will gladly provide you them.
Ron Geary
FOOTNOTE:  The e-mails between Mr. Geary and Jordan Vandenberge is posted by the CCO without opinion, bias or editing.
FOOTNOTES: Our next “IS IT TRUE” will be posted on this coming Friday?
Please take time and read our newest feature article entitled “HOT JOBS”. Jobs posted in this section are from Evansville proper.
If you would like to advertise in the CCO please contact us City-County Observer@live.com.
Todays “Readers Poll” question is: Do you feel that Evansville Brownfields Corp should be considered a public or private entity?
Copyright 2015 City County Observer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed