Home Blog Page 5311

State Auditor Suzanne Crouch to visit Mayse Farm Market Bicentennial Maze Ribbon Cutting

0

 

STATEHOUSE – On Saturday, State Auditor Suzanne Crouch will visit the Mayse Farm Market in Evansville, offering brief remarks about Indiana’s bicentennial at the ribbon cutting for the Indiana-shaped corn maze.

What:                   Ribbon Cutting
When:                 Saturday, September 17, 2016 at 9:15 C.T.
Where:               Mayse Farm Market

6400 N St Joseph Ave

Evansville, IN 47720, USA

Hot Jobs in Evansville

0

 

Dick’s Sporting Goods  2,026 reviews - Evansville, IN
Cash register ringing & general cash handling. Promote company programs including warranty sales, Scorecard (loyalty program), private-label credit cards, and…
 
090 – Jay C Stores (Ruler Foods) - Evansville, IN
That means greeting them with a smile, a genuine “Hi” and offering to assist. Our team members all share a common goal of welcoming and serving customers with…
Kroger - 
Securitas  5,071 reviews - Evansville, IN
Must be able to meet and continue to meet any applicable state, county and municipal licensing requirements for Security Officers….
 
Helzberg Diamonds  128 reviews - Evansville, IN
Helzberg Diamonds’ guest. Retail Sales Associates at Helzberg Diamonds are responsible for….
 
Valvoline Instant Oil Change  441 reviews - Henderson, KY
Your role is to help the service center manager keep the store running smoothly, and that guests (customers) are highly satisfied with their service….
We’re looking for a caregiver who likes being active outdoors. We need a nanny for our 3 children in Wadesville. And we’re looking now!…
Care.com - 

VANDERBURGH COUNTY FELONY CHARGES

0

Below is a list of the felony cases filed by the Vanderburgh County Prosecutor’s Office today.

Joshua Lawrence Gahagan Unlawful possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon, Level 4 felony

Theft of a firearm, Level 6 felony

Michael David Chamness Possession of methamphetamine, Level 6 felony

Possession of paraphernalia, Class C misdemeanor

Antonio Rodriquez Walters Disarming a law enforcement officer, Level 5 felony

Domestic violence, Class A misdemeanor

Resisting law enforcement, Class A misdemeanor

Jacob Bryce Henshaw Unlawful possession of a syringe, Level 6 felony

Richard Timothy Faulconer Forgery, Level 6 felony

Possession of a synthetic drug or synthetic drug look-alike substance, Class A misdemeanor

Criminal trespass, Class A misdemeanor

Possession of paraphernalia, Class C misdemeanor

Korey Lee McDowell Dealing in marijuana, Level 6 felony

Operating a motor vehicle with registration number belonging to a different vehicle, Class C infraction

Karrie Leeanne Wolfe Possession of methamphetamine, Level 6 felony

Possession of a narcotic drug, Level 6 felony

Unlawful possession of a syringe, Level 6 felony

Possession of paraphernalia, Class C misdemeanor

Taziah Elshaun Hopson Intimidation, Level 5 felony

Lisa Lynn Clark Unlawful possession of a syringe, Level 6 felony

Possession of marijuana, Class B misdemeanor

Kimberly Ann Terry Domestic battery, Level 6 felony

Domestic battery, Level 6 felony

Pierre Dandre Roberts Dealing in methamphetamine, Level 4 felony

Edward Merritt Lowery Auto theft, Level 6 felony

Possession of paraphernalia, Class A misdemeanor

COA reverses decision to deny woman’s expungement request

0

Olivia Covington for www.theindianalawyer.com

The Indiana Court of Appeals has reversed a Jay Circuit Court decision to deny a woman’s petition for expungement of her records after she was convicted of forgery and dealing in methamphetamine.

In Mindy M. Cline v. State of Indiana, 38A04-1512-XP-2221, Cline filed a petition for expungement of her 2003 forgery conviction and 2004 dealing in methamphetamine conviction on Oct. 16, 2015, and the state did not oppose.

However, on Nov. 13, 2015, Cline’s petition was denied, with the trial court saying it was “based largely on the nature of the convictions, the severity of the offenses and the relatively short duration since release from probation/parole on the most recent convictions.” At that time, Cline had been out of supervision for five years.

At a hearing one day before Cline’s petition was denied,  Jay Circuit Judge Brian Hutchinson had told Cline that he remembered her convictions, particularly her methamphetamine conviction, and that he was tired of dealing with meth and heroin offenders.

“I’ve had a belly full,” Hutchinson said of drug offenders. “I’m not doing favors for people that are causing these problems in Jay County.”

Cline appealed, saying the trial court abused its discretion by relying upon circumstances that are not statutory bars to expungement – specifically, the type of offense and length of time elapse.

The state wrote that Cline was asking for the Court of Appeals to reweigh the evidence and invade the province of the fact-finder, but in its reversal on Thursday, the court wrote that the state’s argument ignores the fact that the existing evidence given to the trial court pointed toward expungement.

Further, the court wrote that it seemed the trial court thought Cline had eight convictions, rather than two. Although her original expungement petition stated that she had four forgery convictions and four dealing in methamphetamine convictions, the evidence at the expungement hearing showed that she only had one conviction each.

Cline was young when she was convicted and has now satisfied the prerequisites for expungement, the court wrote. Further, the Court of Appeals said she has been consistently employed and has earned various degrees, licenses and certifications, including an associate’s degree in business administration.

However, Cline testified that she lost her job as a store manager when the store owners learned of her record. She testified that she would like to return to management and would be more able to do so if her record were expunged.

The Court of Appeals called Hutchinson’s remarks about Cline’s past convictions and drug offenders as a whole “troubling.”

“Undeniably, methamphetamine and other illicit drugs are a burden upon communities and judicial resources,” the court wrote. “That said, our legislature has provided a second chance for individuals who have in the distant past committed drug-related crimes.”

The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the denial of Cline’s petition for expungement, with Judge Michael Barnes dissenting.

Barnes wrote in a separate opinion that although Hutchinson’s comments were “not exactly artful and (were) unnecessarily harsh,” the trial court was within its parameters to deny the expungement petition. Further, Barnes wrote that state statute is silent on what factors trial courts may consider when deciding how to exercise its discretion.

However, Barnes wrote that he would remand the case to trial court to clarify how many convictions it believed Cline had and reconsider its denial.

History Programs at Willard Library

0
Willard Library
Automotive History of Evansville
Just click on the images to register!
History of Local High School Football
The History of Local High School Football
September 22, 2016
6:30 – 8:00 p.m.
Lizzie Borden Story
The Lizzie Borden Story: The House, the History, and the Mystery
October 11, 2016
6:30-7:30 p.m.
Hours: Monday, Tuesday 9:00-8:00 ◊ Wednesday, Thursday, Friday 9:00-5:30
Saturday 9:00-5:00 ◊ Sunday 1:00-5:00
Willard Library ◊ 21 First Avenue ◊ Evansville, Indiana 47710 ◊ 812-425-4309 ◊ willard@willard.lib.in.us

If Trump Supporters Are A “Basket of Deplorables”, Then Hillary’s A ‘Basket Case’

9

If Trump Supporters Are A “Basket of Deplorables”, Then Hillary’s A ‘Basket Case’
BY D W WIBER FOR T
OWNHALL

During a private fundraiser hosted by Hollywood celebrity Barbara Streisand, Democrat presidential nominee Hillary Clinton referred to half of the supporters of her opponent, businessman and Republican nominee for president Donald Trump, as “a basket of deplorables”. And while her rhetoric may have been music to the ears of all those attending Bab’s little soiree’ in New York, millions of Americans who happen to support Donald Trump find it insulting and disrespectful to say the least.

The former Secretary of State called these Trump supporters all “racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, and Islamophobic”, which for her translates into “a basket of deplorables”. Hopefully this is not the way she will govern if elected, making a value judgment on literally millions of Americans that she hasn’t a clue about, but simply because they might disagree with her on a certain issue.

One can almost hear the Queen of Hearts from the other side of Alice’s looking glass screeching “off with their heads”! But then we realize that it’s just Hillary Clinton giving another campaign speech ridiculing her opponent’s supporters in her ‘fingernails on the blackboard’ tone of voice.

Apparently according to Hillary, if a person holds traditional Christian values which teaches them that certain lifestyle choices and other behaviors are immoral, and that they should love the sinner but hate the sin, then they suffer from some sort of “phobia”. Democrats like to accuse Republicans of using ‘code words’ to cover for racism and anything else they disagree with, so is ‘phobia’ just a ‘code word’ for “deplorable”?
CARTOONS | GARY VARVEL
VIEW CARTOON
Traditional values and religious teachings appear to have no place in a “progressive” America led by Hillary Clinton. And considering her husband’s activities over the years, it’s pretty obvious that she’s been very accepting of at least Bill Clinton’s immoral choices and behavior.

Likewise if a person believes that the United States as a nation has the right to protect its borders and prevent illegal immigration and violations of our national sovereignty, then that makes them “xenophobic”. At least according to Hillary Clinton and the progressive left. It apparently is of no concern to her that protecting our borders and stopping illegal immigration is a matter of national security. Which as president and Commander in Chief would be her foremost responsibility, to protect America from all enemies foreign and domestic.

Any American questioning the wisdom of allowing tens of thousands of “refugees” from areas in the world where Islamic terrorists also come from is “Islamophobic” under Hillary Clinton’s definition, and also “deplorable”. Common sense options such as creating safe spaces for these refugees in, or closer to their country of origin apparently isn’t even considered. Simply wanting to enforce current immigration laws on the books is “phobic” and obviously “deplorable” in some way, according to Hillary Clinton.
And criticizing the Black Lives Matter movement must make one a racist, even though the Black Lives Matter movement was built on the proven lie of “hands up, don’t shoot” which never happened, yet continues to be propagated by Democrats and Hillary Clinton as they beg for votes. Yes, it would seem that for Hillary Clinton and her party there is no room for a diversity of opinion or beliefs. It’s either their way or the highway, so-called “progressivism” at its very best.

But historically it’s always been a short step from one being described as “deplorable” to them eventually being judged as “undesirable”. In World War II the Nazis practiced that kind of rhetoric extensively, which ultimately led to the incarceration in concentration camps and the eventual murder of millions of undesirable and “deplorable” people. In Soviet Russia, dissent and disagreement with the government also led to a quick bullet to the back of the head, or long years of torture in the Soviet Gulags. Is that the “progressive future” that Hillary Clinton envisions for those she considers “deplorable”, simply because they view issues differently and disagree with her?

Well, Hillary Clinton might consider Trump supporters to be a “basket of deplorables”, but I suspect coming from the most dishonest, corrupt, and despicable politician in American history to ever run for the presidency, all those deplorable Trump supporters will wear that moniker like a badge of honor!

Ivy Tech Plans ITT Information Event Sept. 19

0

Ivy Tech Plans ITT Information Event Sept. 19

Students from the now closed ITT Technical Institute will have an opportunity to learn more about attaining their college degree or certification at an Information session planned just for them.

Ivy Tech Community College Southwest will host an ITT Information Event on Monday, Sept. 19, from 3-6 p.m., in Room 107 at the Evansville campus located at 3501 N. First Avenue.

While a direct transfer of credits is not possible due to accreditation guidelines through the Indiana Commission for Higher Education, there are other options for awarding credit in certain cases. Some ITT students may qualify through Prior Learning Assessment pathways, especially for students in some majors in Ivy Tech’s Technology Division, Health Division, and in our Business and Public Services Division.

At the event, students will learn more about the process to investigate their options, and receive personal help with the application process. Deans and Program Chairs will also be available at the event. Following application, individual meetings will be arranged to walk through credit and financial aid opportunities.

Students unable to attend the event should contact Ivy Tech Southwest Assistant Director of Admission Sarah Heath, at 812-429-1431. Additional information regarding transcripts, and student loans is available by going to https://www.ivytech.edu/itt

Transgender Mexican Citizen Sues Indiana To Change Name To Match Gender Identity

2

Transgender Mexican Citizen Sues Indiana To Change Name To Match Gender Identity

Olivia Covington for www.theindianalawyer.com

A transgender Mexican man with asylum in the United States is suing the state of Indiana for a law that prohibits him from legally changing his name to match his gender identity as a man.

The plaintiff, John Doe, formerly and legally known as Jane Doe, filed a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Tuesday over a state law that bars him from legally changing his name from “Jane” to “John” because he is not a naturalized U.S. citizen. Doe has also filed a motion to move through the legal proceedings anonymously.

Doe, 31, who was born female but now identifies as a male, moved from Mexico to Indiana with his family in 1990 and has lived here ever since.  He told his family in 2012 that he was transgender and identified as a man, and subsequently began using the name John.

Although Doe states in court documents that his family accepts him as a man, the United States granted him asylum from Mexico in August 2015 because he would be persecuted for being transgender in his native country. Doe’s court filing says he will apply for permanent U.S. residency this month, but will have to wait at least six years before becoming a naturalized U.S. citizen.

Doe wrote in the court filing that he is recognized as male on all official U.S. documents, including his Indiana I.D. and his immigration documents, which both show the gender marker “M.” However, his name is still listed as Jane on those documents, a fact that he wants to change but cannot do so unless he legally changes his name from Jane to John.  Under Indiana House Bill 1047, which was passed and added to the state code in 2010, a person must prove that they are a legal U.S. citizen when seeking a legal name change.

Doe alleges that the language in that portion of the Indiana Code — which prohibits him from legally changing his name for at least six years while his naturalization is pending — violates his First Amendment right to free speech and his 14th Amendment due process rights to liberty and privacy with respect to personal information. Being forced to legally use a traditionally female name has resulted in heightened symptoms of anxiety and gender dysphoria, he said.

“Mr. Does’ inability to change his legal name and update his I.D. has caused him serious emotional distress and difficulty in his day-to-day activities every time he is required to present his government-issued I.D.,” Doe’s counsel wrote in Tuesday’s filing.

According to court documents, Doe was aware that he did not feel like a girl at a young age, but was not diagnosed with gender dysphoria until 2010. With the help of a licensed mental health clinician, the plaintiff says he has been following a treatment plan for his condition, including a gender-affirming surgery. Part of the treatment also includes living in accordance with his gender identity in all respects, including the use of a male name and pronouns.

The law that prohibits Doe from legally changing his name from Jane to John has inhibited his ability to freely and fully live in accordance with his gender identity, he said.

In 2011, Doe was pulled over for a traffic violation and was asked to provide his state-issued I.D. When the officer saw that Doe’s name was listed as Jane, he did not believe the I.D. belonged to Doe and threatened to take him to jail.

Doe then produced a letter from his therapist explaining his transgender status, and although the officer seemed to believe him, the plaintiff wrote that the officer said Doe’s “weird situation” was annoying. Doe did not have a valid driver’s license at that time, so he called his now-wife to pick him up. When she arrived, Doe said the officer told her, “You can take ‘I-don’t-know-what-it-is’ with you.”

In another incident in 2013, Doe said he went to the emergency room and was asked to show his I.D. When he did so, Doe wrote that the nurses were initially confused, then later began to ridicule him when they realized he was a transgender man.

Also in 2013, Doe was asked to show his I.D. when he ordered a drink at a family celebration at a restaurant. According to the court documents, the waiter laughed and asked why his name was listed as Jane, putting the celebration on hold while his family and friends tried to convince the waiter that the I.D. was actually his.

These situations, and others, have caused Doe “significant psychological distress, anxiety, and dysphoria,” his counsel wrote. Further, they wrote that although Doe has never been subject to a physical attack because of his transgender status, he lives in constant fear of physical danger.

Unless he is asked for his I.D., which lists his name as Jane, Doe said he is generally not recognized as transgender. Thus, he alleges that the Indiana law requiring U.S. citizenship for a legal name change is one of the last remaining things that prohibit him from living fully in his gender identity.

Further, Doe wrote that being forced to legally identify as Jane violates his equal protection right, his right to liberty regarding personal decision and his right to privacy regarding personal decisions under the 14th Amendment, as well as his rights to express his name and gender in accordance with his gender identity as free speech under the First Amendment.

His suit seeks declaratory judgment of the violation of his Constitutional rights, as well as an injunction permanently barring enforcement of the Indiana law preventing non-citizens from legally changing their names.

In a statement through his office, Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller, who is named as a defendant in the case along with Gov. Mike Pence and Marion County Clerk Myla Eldridge, said he plans to file a response to Doe’s complaint. He also noted that the burden of proof in this case would be on Doe, not the state.

“As state government’s lawyer, the Attorney General’s office is obligated to represent state government officials and agencies and defend the statutes the legislature has passed,” Monica Hernandez Billman, spokeswoman for Zoeller, said.

The case is John Doe, formerly known as Jane Doe v. Michael Pence, et al., 1:16-cv-02431.