IS IT TRUE JANUARY 10, 2017
IS IT TRUE the border between Mexico and the USA is about 9 million feet?…About 1/3 of it already has a wall leaving a maximum need for 6 Million feet of fence, wall, or whatever….Some of it will not be necessary because it is the Rio Grande river?…At $1,000 per foot this works out to $6 Billion for the whole darn wall?…For reference an 8 foot tall chain link fence is $10 per foot and a block wall is $80 per foot?…Hadrian’s Wall that was built by the Romans to keep the Scots out of England is only about 6 feet tall but it had guards stationed to prevent unwanted crossings?
IS IT TRUE there are fences and guard shacks at the border crosses and that fences away from border crossings are not much more sophisticated than the ones around a residence?…A halfway competent construction team should be able to build a wall for $6 Billion or less?…That would include trenching under it to make digging under difficult and a state of the art surveillance system?…From a pure construction perspective, a wall should be simple and the cost should be way less than the numbers being tossed about in the media?
IS IT TRUE just because a wall exists does not guarantee it will work to prevent illegal immigration?…most illegals come here through existing portals and not through the desert at night?…The wall would be a deter walking across the border away from border crossings, but not for air travel, day workers, or those who are smuggled in by coyotes (Slang for the usury jerks who essentially kidnap people into the country and exploit them for labor and sex trafficking)?
Is It True If a wall is to actually work, it would need a guard or two every mile with shoot to kill authority and/or bloodhounds to round people up?…An armed solution may work, but it is highly unlikely that the American public would support such a draconian process?
IS IT TRUE that from a construction perspective, even an idiotic government that pays $700 for a hammer and $500 for toilet seats should be able to build a 6M foot wall for under $25B and there is plenty of graft for friends, relatives, and patronage managers in that figure?… If they really want to save some money they should pay Mexico to build the wall as they could probably build it for less than a billion dollars and permitting wouldn’t even be an issue?
IS IT TRUE that working walls exist in many places including most newer schools, airports, private businesses, houses, gated communities, and even the White House?…the real question is whether or not spending good money on a wall is a wise thing to do given the process it takes to make it work and the ease of entry by other methods?
IS IT TRUE last night post concerning Justin Elpers ousting Jonathan Weaver from a leadership position on City Council had a whooping 6,394 reads on both the CCO and our Facebook in a 3 hour period?
FOOTNOTE: Todays “Readers Poll” question Is: Are you pleased that City Council elected 5th Ward Council member Justin Elpers as the Vice President of that body?Â
2017 Inaugural Address Eric Holcomb Governor of Indiana
“Pioneers Stillâ€
2017 Inaugural Address Eric Holcomb Governor of Indiana
Madam Chief Justice, Governors Bayh, Daniels, Pence, Lt. Governor Skillman, Speaker Bosma, Senator Long, fellow citizens:
I am honored to accept the privilege and duty to serve you and the state we all love.
At the outset, I want to recognize three people without whom I wouldn’t be here today, beginning with my wife, Janet.
All that I have accomplished has only been possible because of your love, your support, your wit and wisdom and, most importantly, your partnership.
I love you, and I look forward to sharing this next new adventure with you every step of the way. There are certain fields in life where the best harbinger of success is to follow great predecessors. By that measure, I’m one of most fortunate men ever to hold this office.
Twelve years ago, I sat side-by-side as Mitch Daniels became governor and—through his focus, vision and fearless leadership—Hoosiers came to not only accept change, but to expect it. The results of those early reforms fueled our current greatness.
Mike Pence took that momentum and kept it going with more Hoosiers employed in the private sector today than at any time in our history.
Our state’s loss is our country’s gain; it says a lot about Indiana leadership that Mike is the sixth Hoosier to go on to serve as Vice President of our great Nation.
You are two tough acts to follow.
The best way I know how to show my appreciation for the faith you both placed in me is to uphold the same courage, conviction and commitment you each showed in your own ways every day in this office.
Thank you both!
Ladies and Gentlemen, today marks the 51st time in our rich history that a new administration has taken this solemn oath, and for me it is an exciting opportunity.
Because I have the great fortune of being the first governor sworn into Indiana’s third century.
So it’s an entirely appropriate time to take stock of our past and look ahead to our future.
Our forbearers were pioneers.
They ventured into an uncertain, untamed wilderness where everything was at risk: their families, their futures, their very survival.
As daunting as the challenges were, they didn’t shrink from them. They faced them head on.
They built homes and communities, planted fields, constructed canals and roads to connect themselves to one another and to the new country, and established laws to govern themselves to spark the opportunity for prosperity for all.
We tend to think of pioneers as people who “settle” a new territory.
But pioneers are also people who come up with new ideas or better ways of doing things.
They’re trailblazers, inventors, innovators, visionaries.
Our forbearers were these kinds of pioneers, as well—with eyes always fixed on the future, wielding not only axes and ploughs but also ingenuity and a passion to improve.
Our very Constitution that our Hoosier Framers wrote in 1816 – the first year of statehood – is full of optimism, ambition, and generosity.
Among other things, it called for universal education and no slavery – far reaching ideas for the time.
And over the past two centuries, Hoosier pioneers blazed trails that have made a titanic difference to the people of Indiana and to the world.
We all know the story of…
- Civil War veteran Col. Eli Lilly helping to pioneer modern medicine
- Madam C.J. Walker paving the way for women in business
- Or Gus Grissom, who made the heavens our new horizons and primed Americans to firstland on the moon
And I’ve also met Hoosier modern day pioneers everywhere I’ve traveled throughout our state.
One who’s been on my mind lately was a young pastor who became this city’s longest-serving mayor, transforming what was derided as IndiaNOplace into IndiaSHOWplace—revitalizing our Capitol city and turning Indianapolis into a sports capital.
Such was Bill Hudnut’s vision and passion that he not only lured the Colts to Indianapolis but built a stadium before landing the team!
What all of these pioneers have in common are the same traits that have been part of our DNA for 200 years: self-reliance, grit, a can-do attitude, a sense of fairness, and a spirit of generosity.
Now, I know that sharing our strengths doesn’t always come naturally to us Hoosiers because of another trait we share: humility.
Ironically, Hollywood does it for us.
Think of Rudy or Breaking Away. One that’s less well known is Madison and, of course, there’s
Hoosiers.
They’re all stories of perseverance, of David not just taking on but slaying Goliath, of the underdog punching above its weight class through hard work, utilizing their strengths, playing by the rules, getting the basics right.
That’s become our story—the Indiana story—and what Indiana has globally grown to be known for.
Today we see the results:
- Our state’s finances are sound.
- We’re one of only 12 states with a triple-A bond rating.
- And, we’re keeping nearly 2 billion dollars in reserves in a rainy day fund, all the whilemaintaining a low cost of living and housing.
- Our unemployment rate is lower than the national average, and—as I mentioned at theoutset—there are more Hoosiers working today than at any other time.
These numbers tell a compelling story:
We’ve become national leaders in business growth, and we’ve been landing jobs and business relocations that—10 or 12 years ago—were going to Austin or Boston or the Silicon Valley— practically anywhere but here.
That’s no longer the case.
Today, Indiana has three times the high-tech job growth as the nation as a whole.Warsaw is the Silicon Valley of orthopedics, generating one-third of that industry’s worldwide business.
And our great state is among the nation’s leaders in life-science exports.
In fact, of the 50 industries the Brookings Institute says will drive growth in the 21st century, Indiana is a player in 45 of them.
They’re coming to Indiana now, because our costs of living and doing business are low and the quality of our workforce is high.
In fact, our employers can recruit and groom future employees right out of our world-class universities and colleges.
We’re not just competing any more; we’re winning!
But, as any champion will tell you, winning one year does not guarantee repeating the next.
Despite our standing, despite our ongoing momentum, we can’t afford to get complacent or take our eyes off the ball.
Too many Hoosiers and their families feel they’ve been left out or are in danger of being left behind.
Too many are not participating in today’s economy or getting a quality education—or are struggling with the strangling grip of drugs.
Too many Hoosier grads explore opportunities outside our state line.
And too many Hoosier businesses are having trouble finding the skilled workers they need to grow.
While Indiana remains an agricultural powerhouse, our average farmer is 58.
While we’re Number 1 in the nation in manufacturing, the competition is fierce—not only from 49 states but from countries around the globe.
Moreover, in the next 10 years, we’ll need to find one million new skilled workers to replace the 700,000 baby boomers who will retire—plus the 300,000 new jobs we will need to create.
Rather than ease up, we must hammer down and maintain that pioneer spirit.
This is where I will focus every day…on ways to take our state to the next level: To make Indiana a place where people thrive. Where they can get a good, fulfilling, well-paid job and a world-class education. Where our kids are well-taken care of. Where we have growing opportunities and the freedom to take advantage of them.
And even as we invest to make our state stronger, we will apply our proven and proud Hoosier drive and common sense to ensure we deliver good government at great taxpayer value.
In the weeks and months ahead, men and women from all across our state will answer the call of service to make sure we hit these targets.
Two hundred years ago, our pioneer forbearers came to this territory with little but their aspirations, determination, and—yes—their faith.
Over the intervening years, they endured epidemics and depressions, a Civil War, and even two World Wars.
Like the contentious debates and sharp divisions found in our political arena today, they didn’t always agree on which direction or which steps to take.
Yet they worked to forge a consensus and continually adapted by keeping their focus on ways to make life better for their families and their neighbors.
They transformed the economy to meet the changing world—evolving from agriculture to manufacturing to today include aerospace, life sciences, and advanced manufacturing based on high-tech automation—even artificial intelligence.
In 1821, just five years after we became our own state, a speaker at a Fourth of July celebration down in Martin County said, “The purest patriotism is to convert the gloomy woods into fields waving with luxuriant harvests.â€
Hoosiers have been practicing that kind of patriotism for 200 years. And, now we’re called to do it again.
Our harvests today might include driverless cars and pilotless barges, or stronger, more flexible metals, or breakthroughs for Alzheimer’s disease.
They include healthier citizens, students equipped for 21st century jobs, and stronger, more vibrant communities.
Whatever our harvests are, we Hoosiers will jump to work together, ploughing and sowing and nourishing—and making sure they too are luxuriant.
I thank everyone who is here today and all those listening from afar on your mobile device for your love of Indiana and the charge you’ve given me.
Together, we are the pioneers who will take our state to the next level. And I’m chomping at the bit to start!
ELPERS ELECTED VICE PRESIDENT OF CITY COUNCIL
JONATHAN WEAVER OUSTED FROM LEADERSHIP ROLE BY NEWCOMER JUSTIN ELPERS
 At last tonights City Council 2017 reorganization meeting a major political blow was handed to political power broker Jonathan Weaver (D) Councilman At-Large.
Firth Ward City Councilman Justin Elpers (R) outed former Vice President Weaver by a 6 to 3 vote Prior to the vote 3rd Ward and newly re-elected City Council President Missy Mosby (D) and Finance Chairman and 6th Ward Councilman Dan McGinn gave a passionate plea to persuade Council members to vote to re-elect Mr. Weaver Vice President of City Council. Their plea failed on deaf ears.
Newly elected City Council Vice President Justin Elpers has established himself as the leading conservative voice on City Council. Â He is also known as an independent thinker. He is extremely quiet but very personal. Â He is married and has 3 children. Â He is a teacher in the EVSC school system.
Council watchers are expecting Mr. Elpers to encourage Council to consider doing more research and have public and open discussion on issues that are important to the majority of the citizens of Evansville. Supporters of Mr. Elpers are also hoping that he will also persuade Council to make decisions based on “good public policy and not back room politics.
We are now hearing that a couple of members of Council would like to see current City Council Finance Chairman Dan McGinn replaced by 3rd Ward Council member Anne Hargis-CPA. Â They believe that Mrs Hargis CPA degree shall be extremely helpful this coming budget year because of the major financial over spending shortfalls facing Council in the 2017 budget year. Mr. McGinn has upset many in the business leaders and conservatives because of his tax and spend way of doing business.
USI Theatre picked to perform at Kennedy Center American College Theater Festival
The University of Southern Indiana Theatre production of Mr. Burns, a post-electric play has been selected as one of the Participating Productions for the 2017 Kennedy Center American College Theater Festival (KCACTF), Region III in Indianapolis.
Approximately 40 USI students, professors and staff members will travel to put on the production, which will close the festival on Saturday, January 14 in Clowes Hall located on the campus of Butler University.
“It is always exciting to be invited to perform at the Region III Kennedy Center American College Theater Festival, but we are especially proud this year to be given the special honor of being the final performance of the festival,†said Eric Altheide, USI assistant professor of acting and production director.
This will be the fourth USI Theatre production to present at the KCACTF, and the first to close the festival. In past years, students have won individual awards theatrical design in costuming and lighting and progressed to the national festival competition.
“This recognition is evidence of the hard work of the faculty and students to bring this thought-provoking and timely play to life and is a testament to the continued growth of our program,†said Altheide. “We thank the University, and especially the USI Foundation for their support, which made this opportunity a possibility.â€
For more information about the festival, visit www.kcactf3.org. Tickets for the upcoming USI Theatre production of Crumbs from the Table of Joy in February are on sale now. To purchase tickets or for more information, visit USI.edu/theatre or call the box office at 812-465-1668.
Hot Jobs in Evansville
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
YESTERYEAR: Winter of 1917-1918
Winter of 1917-1918
This view of Southeast Second Street was photographed from Main Street, across the street from the Strouse & Bros. store, in the early months of 1918. The men and women are employees of the Evansville Courier, which was located around the corner at 125-127 Main. That winter was one of the most frigid and brutal ever recorded in the Ohio Valley up until that time. In Evansville, a total of nearly 68 inches of snow fell, forcing schools and businesses to close. Transportation became nearly impossible, and when the Ohio River froze, the ice was so hard that pedestrians and wagons could cross over to the other side. A thaw finally set in, and by mid-February, steamboats – still an important mode of transportation – were finally able to leave the city for the first time in two months.
Gifts For Good Business launched!
Where Can You Buy Inexpensive Gifts That Help You And A local Youth-Serving, Not-For-Profit?
Forfeiture Bill Would Restrict Police, Prosecutors
Forfeiture Bill Would Restrict Police, Prosecutors
Marilyn Odendahl for www.theindianalawyer.com
A bill scheduled for a hearing before the Indiana Senate Corrections and Criminal Law Committee Tuesday would require law enforcement to get a conviction before moving ahead with civil forfeiture.
Senate Bill 8, authored by Republican Sens. R. Michael Young of Indianapolis and Philip Boots of Crawfordsville, also would repeal a provision in Indiana Code that permits the state to turn over seized property to the federal government.
The hearing will be at 10 a.m. Jan. 10 in Room 130 of the Statehouse. Young is the committee chair and Democratic Sen. Greg Taylor is the ranking minority member.
The bill would limit forfeiture of property to the state to only those incidents where the owner is convicted of a crime. Indiana’s current forfeiture law, Indiana Code 34-32-1, does not specify the property’s owner must be convicted before the items can be forfeited.
An analysis by the Legislative Services Agency found the revenue from assets that are seized and forfeited could be reduced under the bill, but the agency could not determine the level of reduction. Indiana Prosecuting Attorneys Council reported that $1.8 million was seized and forfeited during fiscal year 2016. The proceeds were distributed between prosecuting attorneys, law enforcement and Indiana’s Common School Fund.
Indiana’s civil forfeitures were the subject of two high-profile court cases last year.
In February 2016, Marion County’s forfeiture procedure was challengedby the Virginia-based Institute for Justice. The organization filed a lawsuit, claiming the Marion County police department and prosecutor’s office were keeping all of the forfeiture monies in a “policing for profit†scheme.
Marion Superior Judge Thomas Carroll denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss in July 2016 and in December granted the plaintiffs’ motion to compel discovery.
Also in September 2016, the Indiana Supreme Court affirmed that the state’s expungement statutes do not extend to civil forfeiture records. The case was D.A. v. State of Indiana, 48S02-1604-MI-183.
The Young-Boots bill would place additional limits on law enforcement’s ability to seize assets.
Currently, officers are allowed to seize the property of anyone who is arrested, searched or stopped as part of an administrative inspection. The bill would require that officers seizing property during an arrest or search must have probable cause to believe that the property is subject to seizure.
In addition, the bill requires the court to find substantial probability that the property is subject to seizure and that the state or municipality would prevail in a forfeiture hearing. Moreover, the court must find substantial probability that the property will be destroyed or made unavailable if it is not seized. Finally the court must also find that the need to seize the property outweighs the hardship to the owner and other parties.
The proposed legislation changes the procedures and criteria for pursuing a civil forfeiture of seized property.
Current law requires that prosecutors show the preponderance of evidence demonstrates that the property was used in the crime while the bill pushes prosecuting attorneys to show by clear and convincing evidence the defendant owns the property and was convicted of the crime.