http://www.vanderburghsheriff.com/recent-booking-records.aspx
Hoosier Veterans Effected By Federal Grant Money Cuts
Channel 44 News: Hoosier Veterans Effected By Federal Grant Money Cuts
by Tyrone Morris for Channel 44 News
Now there are fewer beds for them in transitional housing. Organizations like the Hoosier veterans assistance foundation are seeing the effects of cuts to federal grant money.
While volunteers say there’s some relief on the way from the state their current reality means a stricter limit on how many people they can each night.
“Our wait list has gotten bigger as our availability of beds has gotten lower. It is going to take some time for the resources to catch up with the requirement, the pent-up demand that`s out there,†says Brian Copes.
Indianapolis Mayor Joe Hogsett said creating permanent supportive housing for 400 homeless residents is a priority this year.
Drug Commission Echoes Governor’s Anti-Marijuana Position
By Makenna Mays
TheStatehouseFile.com
INDIANAPOLIS – The Indiana Commission to Combat Drug Abuse voted overwhelmingly Thursday to oppose efforts to decriminalize marijuana for medical or recreational use.
The 11-3 vote, with two abstentions, was taken at the commission’s regular meeting, echoing Gov. Eric Holcomb’s opposition to legislative efforts to relax Indiana’s marijuana laws.
“I think it’s really important that we’re talking about the most vulnerable population in this state, that we’re doing what we can to make sure that our young children are not taking edible marijuana and ending up in our emergency rooms and our hospitals,†said Dr. Kristina Box, the state’s health commissioner, after she made the motion.
However, not everyone on the committee agreed that the commission should vote on this issue.
“When I signed up for this commission, I signed up for a particular reason and that was to address the opioid epidemic,†said Sen. Gregory Taylor, D-Indianapolis. “This commission was never tasked with taking a position on marijuana, marijuana is not an opioid.†He was one of the no votes.
The commission took the vote a day after Holcomb was asked whether he would support efforts to relax the state’s marijuana laws. At least one lawmaker has said he will introduce legislation in 2018 to make it legal for medical use while a national veterans’ group is pushing for a study of the issue.
“The FDA is the organization that approves drugs in this country, and they’ve not yet, and so we’re not there in this state,†Holcomb said. “At this time right now, I’m trying to get drugs off the street, not add more into the mix. So, I’m just not supportive of that.â€
Meanwhile, state Rep. Jim Lucas, R-Seymour, has said he will introduce legislation that would legalize marijuana for medical purposes. Several medical marijuana bills were filed in the last legislative session and all failed.
Organizations such as the American Legion believe that there is some merit into researching the medicinal value of the drug. Many veterans suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder and chronic pain have told the Veteran’s Administration that their health has improved by using medicinal cannabis.
“We have never endorsed the use of marijuana for recreational or even medicinal purposes,†said John Raughter, communications director at the American Legion. “All we’re saying is we want the VA to do research into the area.â€
Currently, marijuana is listed as a Schedule I drug, which says it has no medicinal value. Other Schedule I drugs include heroin, ecstasy and LSD.
“We are saying that we want it to be removed as a Schedule I and be reclassified because we want the VA to study whether or not it has potential medicinal value,†Raughter said.
An independent public opinion research company recently released the results of a nationwide survey of veterans about the use of medical cannabis:
- 83 percent believe the federal government should legalize medical cannabis nationwide,
- 82 percent said they would want to have medical cannabis as a federally-legal treatment option,
- 92 percent support medical research,
- 100 percent aged 18-30 support federally legalized medical cannabis, and
- 79 percent age 60-plus support federally legalized medical cannabis.
At the last American Legion national convention in August, the organization passed a resolution proposing that VA doctors should be able to discuss with veterans the use of marijuana for medicinal purposes and recommend it in those states where medical marijuana is legal.
“If a doctor can provide it to a non-veteran outside the VA system in the state because of their state laws, we’re basically saying, you know, that’s something the VA should be able to do as well in cases that’s appropriate,†Raughter said.
The debate over medical marijuana comes as others states have legalized the drug for either medical or recreational use. California, Massachusetts, Maine and Nevada have already all passed measures legalizing recreational marijuana. It is also legal in Oregon and Colorado.
The debate is also taking place as communities across the state grapple with opioid addiction. State Sen. Jim Merritt, R-Indianapolis, is proposing bills for the 2018 legislation that would impose tougher penalties on some drug crimes.
FOOTNOTE: Makenna Mays is a reporter for TheStatehouseFile.com, a news website powered by Franklin College journalism students.
St. VINCENT PREPARES FOR DISASTER
Full-Scale Mock Exercise And Drills To Take Place In Mid-November
St. Vincent employees and local emergency responders will take part in a mock disaster drill on November 14 at St. Vincent Evansville Hospital, 3500 Washington Avenue, and November 16 at St. Vincent Warrick Hospital, 1116 Millis Avenue, Boonville. Both drills will begin at 9 a.m. and aims to test the preparedness and response of hospital medical staff and local responders should a real crisis occur.
The event is being staged by the St. Vincent Emergency Management Sub-Committee in partnership with the Evansville and Boonville Police Departments. At least 20 St. Vincent associates will play the roles of patients and family members in addition to local police officers and other community organizations who will participate in the event.
The scenario of the drill will involve individuals who have been injured and being held hostage due to an active shooter. Victims presented to the Emergency Room will be triaged and treated. Additional treatment will be monitored throughout the hospital as prescribed by physician orders. This may include medical imaging, operating room or surgeries and/or admission to medical floors. The Hospital Incident Command Team will also test communication for efficient patient flow and resource management.
“It’s always unfortunate when a tragedy occurs and recent events in cities like Las Vegas and New York make this training even more valuable,†said Keith Kahre, Safety Officer, St. Vincent. “These drills allow us to develop best practices and assurance that we have prepared ourselves for the worst if a disaster were to occur.â€
Emergency staff and drill participants with mock injuries may be seen by motorists and pedestrians during the drill. St. Vincent is urging the local media to alert the public not to be alarmed because everything will be based on fictional circumstances. Normal hospital operations and patient care will not be affected by the drill in anyway.
Hospitals are required by the Joint Commission to have disaster response plans in place and conduct periodic drills for improvement and training purposes.
Next Tuesday Old National Events Plaza Presents “The Price Is Right”
|
|
HOT JOBS IN EVANSVILLE
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Evansville Coliseum History Program
|
Topless woman’s complaint splits 7th Circuit
Marilyn Odendahl for www.theindianalawyer.com
A Chicago woman’s decision to celebrate “Go Topless Day†by baring her breasts has cleaved the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals over whether she can now cloak herself in the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of speech.
Sonoku Tagami was cited and fined $150 for violating the Windy City’s public nudity ordinance. She undressed from the waist up, applied not-opaque-enough paint to her chest and walked around Chicago in August 2014 in support of Go Topless Inc.’s advocacy for a woman’s right to bare her breasts in public.
After being found guilty of violating the ordinance, Tagami sued Chicago. She claimed the public nudity prohibition not only violated the First Amendment but also discriminated on the basis of sex in violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois granted the city’s motion to dismiss. Although the 7th Circuit affirmed in a decision handed down Thursday in Sonoku Tagami v. City of Chicago, et al., 16-1441, the panel was split with Judge Ilana Rovner writing a sharp dissent.
In the opinion written by Judge Diane Sykes and joined by Judge Frank Easterbrook, the majority held that Tagami’s act of appearing bare breasted in public was not expressive conduct as covered by the First Amendment. Her nudity alone did not communicate a message of political protest. And, the majority asserted, she acknowledged this in her amended complaint by offering an explanation of what and why she was protesting.
The majority then went a step further and contended even if her actions were protected by First Amendment, the district court was still correct to dismiss her complaint. Citing United States v. O’Brien, 391 U.S. 367, 376 (1968), the majority held the ordinance’s purpose of promoting moral norms and public order are self-evident and can survive scrutiny.
Rovner disagreed, countering that Tagami’s act was expressive conduct and therefore covered by the First Amendment. Offering an explanation of her protest did not turn her behavior into non-expressive conduct.
“There could not be a clearer example of conduct as speech than the one here,†Rovner wrote. “Tagami was not sunbathing topless to even her tan lines, swinging topless on a light post to earn money, streaking across a football field to appear on television, or even nursing a baby (conduct that is exempted from the reach of the ordinance). Her conduct had but one purpose – to engage in a political protest challenging the City’s ordinance on indecent exposure.â€
Rovner also dissented from the majority’s finding that the city’s ordinance withstands Tagami’s Equal Protection challenge. Even though the majority conceded the ordinance did impose a different set of rules for women and men, it held that the classification based on sex was permissible because of the city’s objective to, again, promote moral norms and public order.
Conversely, Rovner maintained the ordinance sexualized the female form and imposed a burden of public modesty on women alone.
“Women, like men, take their bodies with them everywhere, and when the law imposes a different code of dress on women, when it requires them to cover up in a way that men need not, it is quite possible that women will be treated differently – in the workplace, in the public square, on the subway – precisely because they are required to dress differently,†Rovner wrote.
In concluding her dissent, Rovner pointed out the question before the appellate court was not whether Tagami should prevail but whether she might prevail. This case should not have been dismissed on the pleadings.
“Like any other litigant with a viable case, (Tagami) should be permitted to develop the record in support of her claims, and the City in turn should be required to present evidence to justify its action,†Rovner concluded.