|
||||||||
VANDERBURGH COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY UNITY DINNER
Buffalo Trace Council Names its 2018 Distinguished Citizens
Buffalo Trace Council Names its 2018 Distinguished Citizens
The Buffalo Trace Council serves 5,000 youth in the area and has been recognized as one of the best boy scouts councils in the midwest.
Their mission is to prepare young men and women to make ethical choices by instilling positive character development skills in a fun and safe environment.
Holcomb to Unveil New Basketball Court at Governor’s Residence
Gov. Eric J. Holcomb will dedicate the newly constructed basketball court at 11 a.m. on Saturday, August 18 at the Governor’s Residence. After a short ceremony, the gold medal-winning DeKalb County Special Olympics basketball team will play the inaugural game.
Traditionally, each family that lives in the Governor’s Residence finds a lasting improvement to make to the buildings and/or grounds. This court, which was funded by private donations via the Governor’s Public Building Foundation, will provide opportunities to host youth league games and community events.
WHAT:           Governor’s Basketball Court Unveiling
WHO:Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Gov. Eric Holcomb
DeKalb County Special Olympics basketball team
Other special guests
WHEN:Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 11 a.m., Saturday, August 18
WHERE:         The Governor’s Residence
4750 N. Meridian St.
Indianapolis, IN 46208
AG Curtis Hill asks U.S. Supreme Court to prevent abuses of public-nuisance laws
Attorney General Curtis Hill is leading a multistate amicus brief contesting a California court’s ruling that stretches the bounds of public-nuisance law. The ruling holds three companies liable for costs associated with mitigating the dangers of all lead paint existing in all homes and buildings constructed since 1951 within 10 cities and counties in California.
Although California has not shown that the three companies are responsible for any of the lead paint throughout the region, the California Court of Appeal accepted arguments that because of the companies’ past involvement in the promotion of lead paint, the companies were sufficiently involved in creating a public nuisance to be held liable for removing all existing hazards – an undertaking estimated to cost many hundreds of millions of dollars. The three companies are Sherwin-Williams Co., ConAgra Grocery Products Co. and NL Industries Inc.
“Once again,†Attorney General Hill said, “we see here a form of judicial activism that spotlights a problem everyone would agree to be regrettable – in this case, lead-paint poisoning – and then recklessly uses such a premise to justify penalizing industry in an illogical manner.â€
Even when originating in other states, such practices could prompt higher prices for Hoosier consumers as companies are forced to cover costs imposed upon them by courts, Attorney General Hill said. Further, unjustified punitive actions against industry causes harm to companies that employ people in Indiana and elsewhere, potentially forcing job cuts and factory closures. Finally, erroneous reasoning prevailing in courts anywhere in the United States creates precedents that could lead to additional bad decisions in other jurisdictions.
The states’ brief asks the U.S. Supreme Court to decide whether the Constitution imposes any Due Process limits on the expansive use of public-nuisance law, Attorney General Hill said, adding that this case provides a perfect opportunity for such an assessment.
In the brief, Attorney General Hill elaborated as follows: “Cases such as this that enable courts to impose liability arbitrarily with no proof that the defendants caused any harm or can abate it in any recognizable way denigrate the appropriate power of attorneys general to abate legitimate public nuisances. . . . This theory of liability goes far beyond any traditional understanding of public nuisance law.â€
Other states joining Indiana in the brief are Louisiana, Texas, Utah and Wyoming.
Prosecutors cite ethics rules to Hill in abortion lawsuit
Olivia Covington for www.theindianalawyer.com
Three Indiana prosecutors are renewing their calls for Indiana Attorney General Curtis Hill to concede on their behalf the merits of lawsuit that blocked a 2018 abortion law and told the AG’s staff in an email that Hill is obligated under the Indiana Rules of Professional Conduct to follow their directive as his clients. Hill, however, maintains he is authorized to defend the statute on behalf of his “ultimate client:†the people of Indiana.
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky sued the commissioner of the Indiana State Department of Health, the members of the Indiana Medical Licensing Board and the prosecutors of Marion, Lake and Monroe Counties in April after Gov. Eric Holcomb signed Senate Enrolled Act 340 into law the previous month. SEA 340 required abortion providers to report all “abortion complications†and to submit to annual inspections. A judge issued an injunction enjoining the law from taking effect, but Hill filed an answer a day later in which the prosecutors are named despite their objections.
Marion County Prosecutor Terry Curry again asked Hill’s office to admit the allegations of the complaint on behalf of him, Lake County Prosecutor Bernard Carter and Monroe County Prosecutor Chris Gaal. In an email sent Thursday to Aaron Negangard, Hill’s chief deputy, Curry said the prosecutors asked Hill’s office May 2 to admit the allegations on their behalf and file an amended answer that admits the allegations of the complaint on behalf of the prosecutors.
“In response on May 3, you sent a copy of the Attorney General’s press release which stated in part: ‘While prosecutors Curry, Gaal and Carter share the opinion that this case should not be defended, they also share no authority to make that call,’†Curry wrote in the email, which was provided to Indiana Lawyer.
“… Contrary to the AG’s release, we did not state that the ‘case should not be defended,’†Curry continued. “We fully expected that the AG would defend the constitutionality of the abortion-related bill on behalf of the other state defendants.
“By statute, the AG is our attorney in such civil actions. We are the client of the AG as named defendants,†he said. “Pursuant to Rule 1.2(a) and Comment (1) of the Indiana Rules of Professional Conduct, an attorney must abide by the client’s ‘ultimate authority’ to decide the objectives of the attorney’s representation.â€
But in a statement to Indiana Lawyer, Hill held his ground.
“The Attorney General is authorized to defend state statutes in court as he works on behalf of his ultimate client, the people of Indiana,†Hill’s office wrote in an email to IL. “Prosecutors cannot unilaterally veto legislation passed by the General Assembly.
“If these prosecutors choose not to enforce the statute, they are accountable to their voters,†he said.
story continues below
According to the complaint, which the ACLU of Indiana filed on behalf of PPINK, SEA 340 violated constitutional protections under the 14th Amendment’s Due Process and Equal Protection clauses. That’s because the “abortion complications†reporting requirements was vague and the annual inspection requirement was not imposed on other medical facilities, PPINK said.
Shortly after the complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Curry, Carter and Gaal — all Democrats — released a statement saying they had directed Hill, a Republican, to concede the merits of the case on their behalf. The three prosecutors are named as defendants in the suit because PPINK operates abortion clinics in their counties.
“We are tired of being drawn into the annual act of legislative futility to pass abortion-related bills, which inevitably results in lawsuits at taxpayer expense,†Curry said in May, referencing the fact that every abortion-related bill passed in Indiana since 2016 has been struck down by federal courts. Curry also said in May that Indiana had paid nearly $300,000 in legal fees to the ACLU of Indiana after courts struck state abortion legislation as unconstitutional.
“When we took office, we swore a duty to uphold both the federal and state constitutions, and this law appears just as unconstitutional as the last few attempts to impose such restrictions,†Carter said in May.
Hill immediately hit back, claiming the three prosecutors “share no authority†to make the decision not to defend the state against the lawsuit. “Mr. Curry’s ‘directive’ to me to concede the constitutionality of an Indiana statute has zero force or effect,†Hill said at the time.
Southern District of Indiana Judge Richard L. Young granted PPINK’s motion for a preliminary injunction against SEA 340 – which was scheduled to take effect on July 1 – on June 28, and the next day the AG’s office filed an answer to complaint that denied the allegations against the bill. The answer was filed on behalf of all of the named defendants, including the three prosecutors.
Online court records show little substantive action has been taken in the case of Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc. v. Commissioner, Indiana State Department of Health, et al., 1:18-cv-01219, since the state filed its answer on June 29. A pretrial phone conference has been scheduled for Aug. 31 before Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor.
In a separate case, Hill has come under fire from Indiana Secretary of State Connie Lawson for his intervention in the Marion County early voting case. Hill is seeking to appeal a consent decree entered by parties in that case while Lawson, whose office is charged by law with overseeing elections, has asked Hill to withdraw. He said he would not.
The embattled Hill has been asked to resign by Gov. Eric Holcomb and Democratic and Republican leaders over allegations he groped a lawmaker and legislative aides. Hill has denied the allegations.
Ellis Park Debutante: Bivian B just hitting the board would be bonus
- Lucky Girasol (118)       Esquilin/Gorostieta      30-1
- Spice It Up (120)         Hill/Catalano           12-1
- Kristizar (120)            McMahon/Asmussen    12-1
- Profound Legacy (122)     Hernandez/Wilkes        5-1
- Wakeeta (120)           Perez/Gorham          20-1
- Somewhere (120)         Albarado/Bradley        9-2
- Bivian B (120)            Morales/Hancock        8-1
- La Coyota (120)          Camacho/Gonzalez      30-1
- Serengeti Empress (120)   Lanerie/Amoss           3-1
- Include Edition (120)      Graham/V. Foley         10-1
- Shanghai Rain (120)       Saez/Calhoun            4-1
- Pradar (120)            Gilligan/Yanakov         20-1
- Lady’s Weekend (120)     Rocco/Demeritte         15-1
- SS Trooper (120)         Castanon/Johnson        20-1
- Manny Wah (120)         Hill/Catalano              5-1
- Giant Act (120)           Camacho/Helmbrecht     30-1
- Veritas (120)             Pedroza/Wohlers         15-1
- Shanghaied Roo (120)     Saez/Calhoun             8-1
HOT JOBS IN EVANSVILLE
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||