Aces men’s soccer keeps Mayor’s Cup in 3-1 win over USI
Aces women’s soccer blanked by Louisville
USI falls in the Mayor’s Cup to Evansville, 3-1
EVANSVILLE, Ind. – University of Southern Indiana Men’s Soccer lost to the University of Evansville, 3-1, in the Mayor’s Cup Sunday evening at Arad McCutchan Stadium. The Screaming Eagles are 0-4-0, while the Purple Aces goes to 3-0-0.
The Eagles grabbed the early 1-0 advantage at 16:25 when freshman forward David Davila (Elkhart, Indiana) recorded his first collegiate goal. Davila, who found the lower left corner, was assisted on the play by sophomore forward Jackson Mitchell (Newburgh, Indiana).
The Aces would respond with back-to-back goals at 22:45 and 32:23 to tie the match and go out in front, 2-1. Evansville, who had a 10-6 first half lead in shots, would hold the lead through the end of the first 45 minutes.
The second half was a defensive standoff until the Aces sealed the match with a goal at 82:02, for the eventual final score of 3-1. Evansville had a 10-3 lead in shots, while corner kicks chances were even, 2-2, in the final 45 minutes.
Overall, USI was outshot, 20-9, in the match, but had the advantage in corner kicks, 4-3.
NEXT UP FOR USI:
USI concludes the season-opening, five-game road swing next Sunday (September 8) when the Eagles visit Mercer University in Macon, Georgia. Match time is a special 10 a.m. (CDT) kickoff.
The Bears are 1-1-2 after a 0-0 tie at the University of North Florida this evening Jacksonville, Florida. Mercer hosts the University of Memphis Thursday before welcoming the Eagles next weekend.
USI lost the first ever meeting with Mercer last year at Strassweg Field, 1-0.
Eagles cut deficit late, fall 2-1 to Wright State
EVANSVILLE, Ind. – University of Southern Indiana Women’s Soccer cut a two-goal deficit in half late in Sunday’s match against Wright State University, but the Screaming Eagles ran out of time and fell 2-1 to the Raiders at Strassweg Field.
Southern Indiana moved to 0-4-1 on the season with Sunday’s final score while Wright State tallied its first victory of 2024 to improve to 1-3-0.
Both teams took some time to settle into the match, as neither side recorded a shot until after the 10-minute mark of the first half. Then Wright State broke through in the 19th minute to take a 1-0 advantage.
USI responded with three shot attempts over the next handful of minutes. Senior midfielder Maggie Duggan (Defiance, Missouri) had USI’s best look at goal at 23:22 with one of her team-high three shots saved.
The visiting Raiders grabbed back control of possession and scored a second time at 27:26 of the opening half to take a 2-0 lead. The 2-0 scoreline held until halftime as Southern Indiana stopped a few more attempts late in the first.
The physicality intensified in the second half. Wright State was awarded a penalty kick in the 58th minute but missed it high and wide, keeping the score 2-0.
After making substitutions to get fresh legs in the match and ramping up the urgency, Southern Indiana created several chances in the middle of the second stanza from inside the 18-yard box. A shot each from junior forward Payton Seymour (Louisville, Kentucky) and sophomore midfielder Pilar Torres (Chula Vista, California) were kept out of the goal by Wright State.
The Screaming Eagles’ high-paced efforts led to a goal at the 76:24 mark to cut into Wright State’s lead. Redshirt freshman Eva Boer (St. Charles, Illinois) received a crisp pass from Torres, spun off her defender, and struck the ball past a diving goalkeeper. The goal was Boer’s second of the season.
The one goal was all USI could muster in the late frenzy before the match reached full time.
USI redshirt sophomore goalkeeper Anna Markland (Hoover, Alabama) finished the game with four saves on 10 shots faced and six on goal by the Raiders. Southern Indiana notched eight shot attempts with three on target.
The Screaming Eagles head back on the road Thursday against Purdue University Fort Wayne. Kickoff is at 4:30 p.m. (CT) from Fort Wayne, Indiana. Coverage links of the match can be found at usiscreamingeagles.com.
Happy Labor Day
What is Labor Day?
Reasons for Labor Day
During the 19th century, many people, including children, worked seven days a week. The workday was 12 hours long. Most Americans endured these harsh, unsafe, working conditions to try and earn a living. Some worked on farms, while others worked in mines or factories. The tasks were often physically demanding, yet offered poor pay. In 1879 New York, a woman working as a dressmaker in a factory averaged between 33 and 58 cents per day.
Although only a small number of workers joined varied labor unions, the idea of organized labor was growing. Labor leaders in the late 1800s suggested a Labor Day event to show the solidarity of labor unions and support for America’s laborers.
How To Deal With Politicians Who Contradict Themselves Repeatedly
How to Deal with Politicians Who Contradict Themselves Repeatedly
JOE WALLACE
SEPTEMBER 2, 2024
Politicians often change their stance on issues, sometimes dramatically. This phenomenon can frustrate voters, disillusioned, and unsure of what to believe. The recent about-face by a prominent politician, once a vocal critic of border walls, now reportedly advocating for their construction, is just the latest example of political flip-flopping. While politicians may argue that their evolving views reflect a willingness to adapt to changing circumstances, voters are often left grappling with the question of how to trust leaders who contradict themselves repeatedly.
Here are some strategies to help navigate the complex landscape of inconsistent political behavior:
1. Understand the Context of the Flip-Flop
Not every change of opinion is driven by pure opportunism. Sometimes, new information, shifting public sentiment, or evolving circumstances can lead a politician to revise their stance. Before jumping to conclusions, examine the context. Ask yourself: Has there been a significant event that justifies the change? Is there new data or evidence that supports their revised position? While some shifts may be reasonable, others may be a transparent attempt to win favor or avoid criticism.
2. Evaluate the Consistency of Core Values
A key way to assess a politician’s reliability is to examine their core values and principles. While policy positions may change, foundational beliefs about governance, human rights, and economic strategy should remain consistent. If a politician’s decisions seem to contradict their core values repeatedly, it may be a sign that their positions are driven more by political expediency than genuine conviction.
3. Hold Politicians Accountable
Politicians work for the public, and it is crucial to hold them accountable when they appear to contradict themselves. Use social media, town hall meetings, and public forums to ask pointed questions about their changes in position. Don’t settle for vague or evasive answers—press for clear explanations. Journalists, advocacy groups, and engaged citizens play an essential role in highlighting inconsistencies and demanding accountability.
4. Examine Track Records Over Time
An isolated flip-flop might be forgivable, but a pattern of reversals should raise red flags. Look at the politician’s long-term voting record, past speeches, and policy proposals. Patterns of inconsistency suggest a lack of commitment to any specific policy direction. If a politician frequently reverses positions depending on what’s popular, it could indicate that they prioritize personal or political gain over principled leadership.
5. Consider Motivations Behind the Shift
Understanding why a politician might change their stance can provide critical insights. Are they facing pressure from donors, party leaders, or their voter base? Is the change a calculated move to appeal to a broader audience ahead of an election? Being aware of these motivations can help you discern whether the shift is driven by genuine belief or strategic calculation.
6. Demand Transparency and Clear Communication
Transparency is essential in maintaining public trust. Politicians should clearly communicate why they’ve changed their stance, what new information influenced their decision, and how the new position aligns with their overall vision. Voters should demand straightforward answers and resist accepting superficial explanations.
7. Stay Informed and Critical
One of the best defenses against political flip-flopping is to stay well-informed and critical of the information presented. Rely on diverse and reputable sources for your news, and be wary of echo chambers that only reinforce preconceived beliefs. The more informed you are, the better equipped you’ll be to spot contradictions and make educated decisions about whom to support.
Conclusion
Politicians who frequently change their positions challenge our ability to trust them as reliable leaders. By staying informed, scrutinizing their motivations, and demanding accountability, voters can better navigate the shifting political landscape. Ultimately, politicians who cannot offer clear, consistent, and value-driven explanations for their actions risk losing the public’s trust—and rightly so.
BREAKING NEWS: Teamsters Local 215 President Chuck Whobrey Announces His Retirement
BREAKING NEWS: Teamsters Local 215 President Chuck Whobrey Announces His Retirement
CCO STAFF
SEPTEMBER 2, 2024
Teamsters Local 215 President Chuck Whobrey Announces His Retirement
Teamsters Local 215 President Chuck Whobrey announced his retirement at the Union’s General Membership Meeting on Sunday.
Whobrey has worked for Local 215 for over 43 years and has been president of the local for 32 years. He is the longest-serving president in Local 215’s history.
Even though he is retiring Whobrey will negotiate the contracts the union has with the City of Evansville that expire at the end of this year.
Secretary-Treasurer Earl Brown was selected by the Local Union Executive Board to succeed Whobrey as President.
Teamsters Local 215 has over 2,800 members and is the largest labor organization in the tri-state area.
For more information call 812-424-6471 or email cwhobrey@teamster.org.
Indiana Excludes China From Public Pensions
Indiana Excludes China fFom Public Pensions by Wendy McNamara |
|||||
The Indiana Public Retirement System recently completed divesting $1.2 billion in investments from Chinese government-controlled entities. Indiana was the first state to pass legislation mandating divestment from entities controlled by the People’s Republic of China or Chinese Communist Party. The FBI has reported on the national security threat the Chinese Communist Party poses, which includes intellectual property theft, cyber espionage and coordinating with other countries to develop a global currency that would undermine the U.S. dollar. INPRS manages the pension funds for Indiana’s state employees, teachers, state law enforcement officers, public officials and others. The state manages over $45 billion in pension assets, which is invested for the exclusive benefit of its more than 500,000 members and their families. |
|||||