Otters finish out homestand with big, fun promotions!
AG Curtis Hill joins federal authorities in national crackdown on robocalling
Represents the nation’s state AGs at Chicago press conference
Attorney General Curtis Hill today joined federal authorities at a Chicago press conference announcing a national robocalling sweep organized by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). In “Operation Call it Quits,†the FTC and its law enforcement partners announced 94 actions targeting operations around the country.
In 2018, Americans lost an estimated $10.5 billion to phone scams. That same year, Indiana residents reported losing more than $16 million to such scams. The actual amounts lost are probably much higher because many of the most vulnerable citizens — the elderly — don’t report their losses. Often, they’re embarrassed or intimidated, or they don’t even realize they’ve been scammed.
“Every year, our office gets more consumer complaints about unwanted robocalls than just about any other issue,†Attorney General Hill said. “At best, these calls represent a nuisance for families just wanting to enjoy peace and privacy without needless disturbances interrupting their routines. At worst, they represent scams that successfully steal people’s identities or hard-earned money. In Indiana, we are quite serious about stopping illegal robocalls, and our alliances with such partners as the FTC are valuable assets in this mission.â€
Attorney General Hill was the only state attorney general attending the national press conference in Chicago.
“We’re all fed up with the tens of billions of illegal robocalls we get every year,†said Andrew Smith, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. “Today’s joint effort shows that combating this scourge remains a top priority for law enforcement agencies around the nation.â€
At the press conference, Attorney General Hill also discussed his office’s recent civil complaint against a Maryland company and two individuals after receiving dozens of consumer complaints.
Anthony and Michael Valenti – doing business as American Health Services – persistently robocalled Hoosiers from Maryland-based phone numbers to pitch various insurance products. All of the calls began with prerecorded messages rather than a live speaker. Of the consumers who complained to the Office of the Attorney General, all but one had telephone numbers registered on the Indiana Do Not Call List. Further, the Valentis had no valid Indiana insurance licenses and had never registered the business with the Indiana Secretary of State.
In the complaint, the Office of the Attorney General alleges that these individuals and their company violated three Indiana statutes. As a result, they now could face up to $1.17 million in civil penalties, plus fees and costs.
“These are the kinds of actions we must continue to take against violators of laws intended to protect consumers,†Attorney General Hill said. “We will never stem the tide of illegal robocalling until we prove we have the resolve and wherewithal to make offenders pay.â€
Administrator Wheeler Discusses North American Environmental and Transboundry Water Issues with Canada, Mexico at CEC
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Andrew Wheeler wrapped up trilateral meetings with Canada and Mexico as part of the 25th Anniversary of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC) Council meetings in Mexico City. The meetings focused on resource efficiency, including working together to combat marine debris, and to encourage innovation and build partnerships to expand environmental protection and sustainable growth.
“I am pleased to work with my counterparts across North America to tackle some of our most pressing environmental issues such as water infrastructure and marine litter,†said Administrator Wheeler. “Our trilateral work on marine litter mitigation in communities along our shared border watersheds will help produce a toolkit and best practices that can be replicated in other North American communities and across the globe.â€
In a closing trilateral statement, members of the CEC reaffirmed its determination to continue the work of protecting the environment and ecosystems, as well as to encourage innovation and build partnerships in favor of sustainable growth. Additionally, the nations agreed to increase cooperation between our countries on trade and environment priorities to protect and enhance the North American environment. The full statement is available here: http://www.cec.org/news-and-outreach/press-releases/cec-council-statement-2019
This year, Mexico hosted the Regular Session, with the participation of over 200 representatives from government, Indigenous communities, civil society groups, academia, the scientific community, and the private sector.
Of note, Administrator Wheeler announced the launch of the EcoInnovation Network. This network will facilitate the creation of innovation centers in North America with a focus on cultivating North American leaders in innovation, entrepreneurship and sustainable growth.
“Through this network, innovation centers within academic institutions in Canada, Mexico and the United States will share or secure the capacities to empower youth and communities with tools and resources to innovate and succeed in enhancing environmental stewardship,†said Administrator Wheeler.
Founding institutions of this Network include: The University of Oklahoma Tom Love Innovation Hub; The University of Oklahoma Ronnie K. Irani Center for the Creation of Economic Wealth; Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec; Universite Laval, Quebec; Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC; University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario; University of Anahuac, Mexico City; Universidad Autonoma de Queretaro, Queretaro State.
Administrator Wheeler also had the opportunity to meet with the newly appointed Mexican Minister of Environment and Natural Resources, Victor Manuel Toledo. In their meeting, the two leaders discussed issues of mutual concern including the Border 2020 plan, Tijuana River wastewater and transboundry pollution. Administrator Wheeler also congratulated the Minister and the Government of Mexico for ratifying the USMCA.
Under the Border 2020 bi-national environmental program, the two countries agree to implement core programs to improve air quality, water quality, address solid waste, improve emergency preparedness and response, and enhance environmental compliance. This program encourages participation from communities and local stakeholders within 100 kilometers (62 miles) of the international border between the United States and Mexico.
Additionally, the issue of Tijuana waste water is of concern to both countries, and especially our communities along the border near Tijuana, Mexico and California. The North American Development Bank will be releasing a report in the coming days with results from a diagnostic study that will include infrastructure option on both sides of the border to reduce dry-weather transboundary flows in the Tijuana River.
Administrator Wheeler raised the issue with the Minister, with the goal of developing short and long-term options and strategies to increase capacity and/or replace aging infrastructure to minimize transboundry impacts. The EPA also continues to work closely with border stakeholders to find technical and financial solutions to clean up this wastewater.
Purchase Agreement for Potential Fourth Port Extended
INDIANAPOLIS — Governor Eric J. Holcomb announced today that the state has extended the option to decide if it will purchase land near Lawrenceburg that could be the site of the state’s fourth port.
The Ports of Indiana entered into an agreement in September 2017 to purchase up to 725 acres of land that was formerly the American Electric Power plant. That option was set to expire June 30.
The option has been extended by six months to enable the seller, Tanners Creek Development, LLC, to complete its environmental remediation plan for the site and submit it to the Indiana Department of Environmental Management. If the Ports of Indiana decides to move forward, the total cost for the land and equipment would be approximately $8 million.
Indiana has three state ports operating on the Ohio River and Lake Michigan, with locations in Jeffersonville, Mount Vernon and Burns Harbor/Portage. Over the years, the Ports of Indiana has expanded each of its ports and now operates approximately 2,800 acres along Indiana’s navigable waterways. Indiana’s ports contribute over $7.8 billion per year to the state economy and support nearly 60,000 jobs.
EVSC to Celebrate End of Summer School with Science Show
Justices uphold $1.3 million judgment for crash victim
Katie Stancombe for www.theindianalawyer.com
A divided Indiana Supreme Court has affirmed an award of $1.3 million to a woman suffering long-lasting injuries resulting from car wreck. The majority held that evidence of a medical expert witness’s professional license status and reasons for his professional discipline may be admissible to challenge his credibility.
Levetta Tunstall rear-ended Dawn Manning while Manning was waiting at a stop sign, leaving Manning with permanent and chronic pain from back and neck injuries. With little relief from her pain nearly a year after the accident, Manning was informed by medical expert Dr. Steven Paschall that she had reached maximum medical improvement. Due to her limited ability to function normally, a jury awarded Manning $1.3 million.
Tunstall’s motion to correct error was denied, and on appeal she argued that Marion Superior Court abused its discretion by refusing to admit evidence regarding Paschall’s disciplinary history with the Indiana Medical Licensing Board. Paschall was disciplined twice in 30 years, and at the time he examined Manning, Paschall was facing a disciplinary complaint that ultimately resulted in the indefinite probation of his medical license for at least one year.
But the Indiana Court of Appeals found the exclusion of that information to be harmless, and further excluded evidence of the reasons for his past professional discipline. Judge John Baker dissented in a separate opinion, believing that excluding evidence of Paschall’s professional disciplinary history was reversible error.
Chief Justice Loretta Rush, writing for the Indiana Supreme Court majority in a Wednesday opinion, affirmed the jury’s award to Manning, holding that that both types of evidence may be admissible to challenge the expert’s credibility.
“Under the facts of this case, the trial court abused its discretion when it excluded evidence that the expert — doctor’s medical license had been on probation — though the error was harmless,†Rush wrote in Levetta Tunstall v. Dawn Manning, 19S-CT-18. “And the trial court properly excluded evidence of the reasons for the doctor’s professional discipline, as that evidence was inadmissible under certain evidentiary rules.â€
Finding both parties partially correct in their arguments, the majority noted that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding Paschall’s license probation, but properly excluded evidence of the reasons for his past professional discipline. The status of his medical license, Rush wrote, was relevant to the credibility of his medical opinion and the probative value of that evidence outweighed any of Evidence Rule 403’s dangers. Any error was harmless however, the majority concluded, finding the fact that Paschall’s medical license had been on probation would have been “a small drop in the large bucket of Tunstall’s evidence attacking his credibility.â€
Additionally, it noted that Manning presented substantial and consistent testimony about how her injury had significantly and permanently impacted her life. But the majority found the trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding why Paschall was disciplined because the evidence was inadmissible under Indiana Evidence Rules 608 and 609.
Writing in a separate dissent, Justice Geoffrey Slaughter opined that though agreed that the exclusion of Paschall’s past licensure status was an abuse of discretion, the error was not harmless.
“The fact and recency of Dr. Paschall’s past professional discipline persuade me that this evidence likely would influence how a reasonable jury weighs his testimony. In my view, the exclusion of this evidence was not only erroneous but also prejudicial,†Slaughter wrote, stating he would reverse the trial court’s judgement and remand for a new damages trial.
National Pro-Life Bridges Day
On Friday, June 28, pro-life volunteers from Right to Life of Southwest Indiana will hold large banners on the Vann Avenue pedestrian bridge over the Lloyd Expressway with the message that “Abortion Takes a Human Lifeâ€. As part of the National Pro-Life Bridges Day, taking place in more than 50 cities throughout the United States, the group will hold their banners during the morning and afternoon rush hours.
“With all of the national controversy over abortion this year, we want to bring the conversation back to basicsâ€, explained Mary Ellen Van Dyke, Executive Director of Right to Life of Southwest Indiana, who is organizing the banner display in Evansville on June 28. “We keep hearing about special cases and rare circumstances, but the simple truth is that every single abortion takes a human life. We want the people of southwest Indiana to think about that.â€
This nationwide day of public outreach is being coordinated by the Chicago based Pro-Life Action League. Evansville is one of 50 locations where National Pro-Life Bridges Day is being held. Other cities include Tampa, Florida; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Atlanta, Georgia; St. Paul, Minnesota; San Antonio, Texas; Los Angeles, California and the suburbs of Chicago, Boston and Washington, DC. Organizers expect to exceed the total of one million commuters reached during the inaugural Pro-Life Bridges Day last year.
HOT JOBS IN EVANSVILLE
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Family of Indy legal startup founder sues Tesla over fatal 2016 crash
Marilyn Odendahl for www.theindianalawyer.com
Survivors of the founder of the Indianapolis-based legal startup Case Pacer, who died after a fiery 2016 crash of a Tesla Model S, have filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the electric car maker, claiming the company built and sold a vehicle it knew was defective.
Kevin McCarthy’s wife and three children filed the lawsuit June 25 in Superior Court in Alameda, California. They assert the automobile’s defects, including its “unstable and inadequately protected lithium ion batteries,†“faulty door handles,†and “uncommanded acceleration,†led to McCarthy’s death after his Tesla S wrecked on Illinois Street in downtown Indianapolis on Nov. 3, 2016.
The family is seeking general damages and special damages as well as punitive and exemplary damages against Tesla, Inc.
“Kevin was a loving husband and father, a successful businessman and a pillar in his community,†said attorney Elise Sanguinetti, founding partner of Arias Sanguinetti Wang & Torrijos LLP. “He was killed because Tesla built and sold a car it knew was defective, and those known defects led to Kevin’s horrible, avoidable death.â€
Arias Sanguinetti Wang & Torrijos LLP in California and Slavik Law Firm LLC in Colorado are representing the McCarthy family. The case is Stacey McCarthy et al. v. Tesla, Inc. and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 19C24488.
Tesla did not respond to a request for comment by IL deadline.
McCarthy had been in the process of building his company Case Pacer. After his death, the company leadership continued the business.
McCarthy was riding as a passenger in his 2015 Tesla Model S and Casey Speckman, an employee of Case Pacer, was driving. He and Speckman had been entertaining clients at the Omni Hotel in Indianapolis when they left shortly before 1 a.m. to retrieve some promotional materials they needed for the next day’s Indiana Trial Lawyers Association conference.
According to the lawsuit, Speckman lost control of the vehicle because of the uncommanded acceleration defect and, while attempting to avoid an oncoming car headed the wrong way, she drove up on the sidewalk and hit a tree. Witnesses said the car hit a wall and a fire subsequently ensured, engulfing the vehicle.
McCarthy was observed to be alive following the impact and was attempting to escape the vehicle, the lawsuit says.
However, the lawsuit says, because of the uncommanded acceleration event, the lack of effective automatic emergency braking and the ensuing crash, and the propensity of the vehicle to catch fire, as well as the defective design of the door latch system entrapping him in the vehicle, he was unable to exit the car.
As a result, according to the suit, McCarthy suffered severe thermal injuries and was exposed to toxic gases. After almost twenty minutes, the Indianapolis Fire Department extricated McCarthy and transported him to Eskenazi Hospital, where he died due to the injuries he suffered during the post-impact fire, the suit says.