This handsome devil is an old soul, in the body of a 7-month-old kitten! He walks the line between playful & snuggly, and would make a great addition to just about anyone’s home. He was originally surrendered in July with his littermate June Carter, who has since been adopted. Johnny’s adoption fee is only $40 and includes his neuter, microchip, vaccines, & more. Contact Vanderburgh Humane at (812) 426-2563 for adoption details!
Commentary: Don’t Look For A Happy Ending
Commentary: Don’t Look For A Happy Ending
By John Krull
TheStatehouseFile.comÂ
INDIANAPOLIS – Two weeks of impeachment hearings made some things clear.
The first and most important of them is that there is no good end to this.
If Republicans in the U.S. Senate defend and sustain President Donald Trump with the same fervor House Republicans have, several dangerous precedents will have been set. One of America’s two major parties will have said that compromising U.S. security in pursuit of personal political ends, bribing foreign leaders and obstructing justice just aren’t that big a deal.
The fact that the party that will be saying this historically has been the one most to fear unchecked government – and particularly executive – power just makes the irony even more painful and tragic.
But, if Donald Trump is removed from office, another dangerous precedent will have been set.
Impeachment and removal from office are supposed to be last resorts, used only in rare and exceptional circumstances.
In my lifetime, I have seen three presidents – Richard Nixon, Bill Clinton and now Trump – face impeachment threats.
Nixon, Clinton and Trump don’t rate as moral exemplars. Their relationship to telling the truth has ranged from indifferent to actively hostile. In each case, their refusal to be honest landed them in serious trouble.
But there have been other scalawags to occupy the Oval Office.
And, prior to Nixon, only one other president – Andrew Johnson – had faced impeachment in America’s then nearly 200-year history under the Constitution.
It’s hard to escape the conclusion that, once we let the impeachment threat out of the bottle, it was hard to get it back in. Threatening presidents with impeachment, once unthinkable, became the norm.
Will the same thing happen if we actually remove one from office?
I’m not optimistic.
One look at the swift degradation of procedural and institutional protections in the U.S. Senate over the past 15 years tells us that there is no beer bottle or rusty pipe either party will hesitate to grab and use in the alley fight that has become our national politics. What once was considered incomprehensible fast becomes acceptable and then the new standard for conduct.
If Donald Trump were to be removed from office, however much he may deserve it, we Americans would be naïve to think that using removal from office as a political weapon would end with this president.
And, yet, it is difficult, perhaps even impossible, for many Americans to stomach the brazenness with which this president and his enablers defy both the law and all standards of decency. The president’s absolute refusal to accept any responsibility for his actions or to the duties imposed on him by his high office puts not just members of the Republican Party but all concerned Americans in a difficult, even untenable, position.
That he does this deliberately for crass political reasons only makes the offense rankle more.
But that also should trouble thinking Republicans.
For the past two months, it has been clear to everyone but fully indoctrinated members of the Trump cult that what the president did was wrong. The central question always has been whether Trump’s offense was great enough to merit the remedy of removal from office.
The smart play for the GOP would have been to try to acknowledge the wrongdoing, skip the public hearings and confront that essential question head on.
They didn’t, and they are likely to pay for that misjudgment.
By resisting the inquiry and insisting on legalistic standards that do not apply to a political process such as impeachment, the president’s Republican defenders may have motivated his rabid base even more.
But that increased energy among the fervid has come at the cost of alienating the once reliably Republican American suburbs, which is where the great political fights in this country are likely to occur for the next several election cycles.
There are Republicans, I know, who see the danger Donald Trump presents to both their party and the nation, but they feel powerless to confront it.
That’s the problem with grabbing a tiger by the ears.
It’s impossible to hang on, but suicidal to let go.
FOOTNOTE: John Krull is director of Franklin College’s Pulliam School of Journalism and publisher of TheStatehouseFile.com, a news website powered by Franklin College journalism students.
Indiana Men’s Swimming Earns Runner-Up Finish at Tennessee Invitational
Indiana Men’s Swimming Earns Runner-Up Finish at Tennessee Invitational
 KNOXVILLE, Tenn. – The No. 4 Indiana men’s swimming team took home runner-up honors with a three-day score of 942, while the No. 16 Indiana women’s swimming team finished fourth with a team score of 656 at the Tennessee Invitational. The three-day meet at the Jones Aquatic Center concluded on Saturday evening.
For the second-straight day, both diving teams competed at the 2019 House of Champions event hosted by IUPUI in Indianapolis. The women’s team dove off the 1-meter board, while the men handled the 3-meter board. Junior Mory Gould placed fifth with a score of 362.80, while sophomore Cole VanDevender claimed sixth with a final tally of 344.70.
TEAM SCORES
Men
No. 12 Georgia – 961 points
No. 4 Indiana – 942 points
No. 8 Tennessee – 839.5 Points
No. 10 Virginia – 524.5 points
Women
No. 2 Tennessee – 1,068.5 points
No. 8 Georgia – 948.5 points
No. 4 Virginia – 778 points
No. 16 Indiana – 656 points
HOOSIER WINNERS
MEN
Bruno Blaskovic – 100 freestyle (42.44), 400 freestyle relay (2:50.11)
Brendan Burns – 200 butterfly (1:41.45), 400 freestyle relay (2:50.11)
Mikey Calvillo – 1,650 freestyle (14:46.25)
Jack Franzman – 400 freestyle relay (2:50.11)
Mohamed Samy – 200 backstroke (1:41.03), 400 freestyle relay (2:50.11)
WOMEN
None.
NOTABLES
- Freshman Cora Dupre broke the program record in the 100 freestyle with a time of 47.84. She eclipsed the previous record set by Kait Flederbach (48.54) on Feb. 22, 2014. Dupre also established the school record in the 50 free to open the Tennessee Invitational.
- Sophomore Mikey Calvillo turned in the fastest time in the country in the 1,650 freestyle with a mark of 14:46.25. He lowered the previous NCAA-best time by nearly 10 full seconds.
- Senior Mohamed Samy compiled his 14th individual event victory with an NCAA B Cut time of 1:41.03 in the 200 backstroke. His time currently ranks as the top time in the country.
- Junior Bruno Blaskovic secured his first individual event victory of the season in the 100 freestyle with an NCAA B Cut time of 42.44.
- Freshman Brendan Burns turned in an historic 200 butterfly victory. His time of 1:41.45 is the fourth-fastest time swam by a USA swimmer in the 17-18 age group ever.
NCAA CUTS
A: None.
B: Bruno Blaskovic (100 free, 42.44; 400 free relay, 2:50.11); Brendan Burns (200 fly, 1:41.45; 400 free relay, 2:50.11); Mikey Calvillo (1,650 free, 14:46.25); Alexis Doherty (400 free relay, 3:16.59); Cora Dupre (100 free, 47.97; 400 free relay, 3:16.59); Laurel Eiber (400 free relay, 3:16.59); Jack Franzman (100 free, 43.63; 400 free relay, 2:50.11); Will Gallant (1,650 free, 14:49.00); Josie Grote (200 back, 1:56.79; 1,650 free, 16:15.44); Matt Jerden (200 breast, 1:58.02); Cassy Jernberg (1,650 free, 16:14.45); Mackenzie Looze (200 fly, 1:58.28); Gary Kostbade (200 breast, 1:56.150); Ben McDade (1,650 free, 15:19.25); Noelle Peplowski (200 breast, 2:08.25); Mohamed Samy (100 free, 42.74; 200 back, 1:41.03, 400 free relay, 2:50.11); Jacob Steele (200 back, 1:41.82); Ashley Turak (400 free relay, 3:16.59); Maggie Wallace (1,650 free, 16:14.95); Emily Weiss (200 breast, 2:11.12)
NCAA Zones Qualifying Scores
3-meter: Mory Gould (362.80); Cole VanDevender (344.70)
 UP NEXT
The Hoosiers will wrap up action at the 2019 House of Champions Invitational on Nov. 24. The team will then be off for the remainder of the calendar year before jumping back into dual meet season with a clash at Michigan.
New Harmony Gallery To Hold Closing Reception For Land Report East 6
The New Harmony Gallery of Contemporary Art’s latest exhibition, Land Report East 6, will host a closing reception from 4 to 6 p.m. Saturday, November 23rd in conjunction with the Harmonist Thanksgiving Feast offered by the Indiana State Museum from 6 to 8 p.m. at Thrall’s Opera House. The closing reception is free and open to the public, but tickets are required for the feast.
The Land Report Collective features work from six artists: Leticia Bajuyo, Jason Brown, Brian Jobe, David Jones, Patrick Kikut, Shelby Shadwell. While the exhibition deals with landscape as a foundational reference point, do not expect traditional landscape paintings when you visit the gallery. This group brings together artists from across the nation to explore the concept of land art in a variety of media to create a dialogue within the gallery.
“Although each Land Report artist investigates formal and conceptual issues based in the landscape as an individual, the essence of our collective lies in the intersection between the things each of us point at – as if we were pointing to locations like road signs,†the artists say in their collective statement. “New meanings and contexts emerge when viewers see the conversations that open up between works in an exhibition that would not normally occur when pieces are exhibited in isolation. Furthermore, the development of the work for each exhibition is a result of the artists being in direct and indirect dialogue with each other, the spaces they inhabit and the people they interact with there. Through this active process, members of the collective make new work as if it were a conversation, even though each artist acts autonomously and there is no hierarchical structure imposed.â€
Bajuyo’s work is fueled by compassion and a critique of capitalism, as she explores perceptions of value in order to foster an awareness of the role of social amnesia on consumer behavior. Brown considers the politics of mountaintop removal in his construction of objects and installations while also creating playful formal assemblages. Jobe typically creates schemes for public interaction through the delineation of pathways or through site-specific focal points. Jones responds to desert environments with experimental interactions, model scale sculpture, and large-scale outdoor works. Kikut incorporates a lifelong interest in the horizon line in a series of paintings with flat Midwestern landscapes as his muse. Shadwell views the landscape from a non-traditional lens, responding to ephemeral images from highway road cameras, monumental mining operations and the optical nature of the salt flats through drawing, sculpture and video installation.
This activity made possible, in part, with support from the Indiana Arts Commission and the National Endowment for the Arts, a federal agency.
The New Harmony Gallery of Contemporary Art is an outreach partner of the University of Southern Indiana. The gallery is located at 506 Main Street in New Harmony, Indiana. Regular hours are 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. Tuesday through Saturday. For more information, call 812-682-3156 or go to usi.edu/nhgallery.
EPA Announces Availability of $4.8 Million in Funding for New Research on Managing PFAS in Agriculture
At the 2019 Annual Meeting of the New Mexico Farm & Livestock Bureau, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Regional Administrator Ken McQueen will announce the availability of $4.8 million in funding to expand research on managing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in rural America and the agricultural sector. This funding is a part of EPA’s extensive efforts to help communities address the larger issue of PFAS nationwide. In a memorandum issued in February 2019, EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler called for the agency to prioritize new federal research that will help farmers, ranchers, and rural communities by generating new scientifically-driven information on PFAS, potential PFAS impacts in agricultural settings, and actions people can take to address PFAS in their communities.
“EPA is following through on our commitment under the PFAS Action Plan and the memo to close the gaps in the science around PFAS as quickly as possible by supporting cutting-edge research that will help manage PFAS issues in agricultural and rural economies,†said EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler. “We want to make sure that decision makers at the federal, state, and local levels have the best science available to make informed decisions. These new research grants will help identify potential impacts of PFAS to farms, ranches and rural communities.â€
“While our scientific understanding of PFAS continues to develop, the people of New Mexico, especially farmers and ranchers, already know how it can affect the water resources that are so critical to the state’s environmental and economic wellbeing,†said Regional Administrator Ken McQueen. “With this funding, EPA is committing to finding solutions to the challenges PFAS presents and bringing relief to rural communities.â€
“EPA is uniquely suited to lead and promote research on this important topic and USDA applauds EPA’s focus on farmers, ranchers, and rural communities. EPA’s funding of this research complements the work USDA does supporting U.S. production agriculture and ensuring a safe food supply,†said USDA Deputy Under Secretary for Research, Education, and Economics Dr. Scott Hutchins.
“NASDA appreciates the EPA’s efforts to prioritize PFAS research that will help the agricultural community. As the primary stewards for the agricultural industries in their states, NASDA members will continue to work closely with the EPA as the agency implements its PFAS Action Plan. Together, we can ensure healthy communities and farms across America,â€Â said National Association of State Departments of Agriculture (NASDA) CEO Dr. Barbara P. Glenn.
EPA is seeking grant applications that help improve the agency’s understanding of the potential impacts of PFAS on water quality and availability in rural communities and agricultural operations across the United States. Specifically, the agency is seeking research on PFAS occurrence, fate, and transport in water sources used by rural communities and agricultural operations and new or improved PFAS treatment methods appropriate for small drinking water and wastewater systems including influents, effluents, and biosolids/residuals. Some of the questions EPA hopes to answer include:
- How do serial biosolids applications impact PFAS concentrations and accumulation over time?
- What are the impacts of factors such as soil type, crop type, and landscape traits, such as topography, that may influence PFAS concentration and accumulation?
- How do we treat and clean up PFAS from water, soil and biosolids used in agricultural settings?
EPA is accepting applications through February 11, 2020.
Screening for Lung Cancer Saves Lives
Screening for Lung Cancer Saves Lives
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death, killing more Americans than breast, prostate and colon cancer combined. Fortunately, there is a screening tool available for those at risk for lung cancer, but many people don’t take advantage of this option.
The screening, called low dose CT, helps detect lung cancer at its earliest, most treatable stages. If lung cancer has grown into a larger tumor or spread beyond the lungs, the prognosis is very poor.
Low Dose CT—What it is & how does it work?
Lung cancer screening is performed with a low-dose CT scan (commonly referred to as a “cat scanâ€) which can identify abnormalities in the lungs called nodules that could be–or could turn into—lung cancer. A low dose CT (LDCT) takes 3-D images of your lungs and can show nodules as small as a grain of rice.
The goal of any cancer screening test (for example: PAP smear, mammogram, colonoscopy) is to identify cancer in its earliest stages so that it can be treated effectively. With any cancer—especially lung cancer—the earlier it is found, the better chance there is for a cure.
Lung cancer is difficult to “cure,†except when the cancer is still very small and confined to a portion of the lung; in this case, the tumor may be surgically removed.
Who should be screened?
An annual screening for lung cancer (intended for long-term smokers) is now being recommended by major medical organizations, including the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
To be eligible for the screening, you must have the following risk factors:
- Be between the ages of 55-77*
- Have a 30 pack-year history or more**
- Be currently smoking or have smoked within the last 15 years
- No current symptoms of lung cancer (more on that below)
All criteria must be met for this testing. Because the test does involve some radiation, the risk for lung cancer must be higher than the overall lifetime radiation risk.
*If someone has a higher risk due to extensive smoking history, or a first degree relative (parent, sibling) who had lung cancer, screening may be recommended earlier.
**The “pack-year history†is determined by calculating how many packs of cigarettes per day have been smoked for what number of years. For example, if an individual started smoking at age 20, and smoked a pack a day until age 50, that would be 30 pack years. If that same person smoked 2 packs per day, 30 pack years would be reached by age 35.
As mentioned, lung cancer is the number one cancer killer in this country. And while smoking is the leading risk factor for lung cancer, people who don’t smoke also develop lung cancer. Exposures to chemicals (such as those that coal miners or veterans may have experienced), radon in the home and family history are also factors.
Does insurance cover this test?
Most insurance companies, including Medicare, currently pay for the screenings. If someone wants this test and is a good candidate, and their insurance doesn’t cover the test, we will work with patients on affordable payment options. We want this life-saving service to be available to as many people as possible.
If someone thinks they may be a good candidate for the test, getting started with the process is easy. The first step is to contact your primary care doctor to discuss your lung cancer risk. He or she will then assess if you are a good candidate for the screening, and then provide a referral.
The scan takes place at the Deaconess Midtown Hospital or at Deaconess Gateway Hospital. The testing appointment will last less than 30 minutes.
How often should someone at risk for lung cancer be screened?
It’s best to be screened once a year. Set a reminder with your primary care doctor to order the test at each annual wellness check-up.  After you have completed your first LDCT screening, Jessica Waggoner, nurse navigator, will mail a reminder letter every year.
If the scan does show an abnormality, then additional tests or more frequent screenings may be needed. Even if your scan does not show any nodules, yearly scans are suggested because lung cancer can still develop over time.
Screening Results
The results are interpreted by a board certified radiologist, and abnormal results are also presented to the Deaconess Multidisciplinary Lung Nodule Review Board, where each patient’s scan and history is individually reviewed. Results are sent to the primary care physician or physician who ordered the test.
If a patient is diagnosed with lung cancer, our Deaconess Cancer Services Nurse Navigator, Jessica Waggoner, steps in to help the patient begin the treatment process and various consultations.
Does lung cancer have symptoms?
Sadly, most lung cancers do not cause any symptoms until they have spread, which is why screening is so crucial.
Some people with early lung cancer do have symptoms. If you go to your doctor when you first notice symptoms, your cancer might be diagnosed at an earlier stage, when treatment is more likely to be effective.
According to the American Cancer Society, the most common symptoms of lung cancer are:
- A cough that does not go away or gets worse
- Coughing up blood or rust-colored sputum (spit or phlegm)
- Chest pain that is often worse with deep breathing, coughing, or laughing
- Hoarseness
- Weight loss and loss of appetite
- Shortness of breath
- Feeling tired or weak
- Infections such as bronchitis and pneumonia that don’t go away or keep coming back
- New onset of wheezing
If you are at risk for lung cancer, we encourage you to be screened. And if you know someone who should be screened, encourage them to do so.
For more information about the screening, or to schedule an appointment, call 812-450-LUNG.
HOT JOBS IN EVANSVILLE AREA
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Harrison High School Athletics to Host Soup Cook-Off
Soup season is officially here and Harrison High School’s athletic department can help everyone knock off the winter chill with some delicious, warm soups. Harrison High School’s Athletic Department is hosting its first Soup Cook-off, tomorrow, November 23, as a way to bring together families, alumni, and local businesses for a night of delicious food, fun, and fundraising.
The event, which is open to the public, will be open from 5:30 to 8:30 p.m. at Harrison High School’s gymnasium.
Numerous soups will be available to sample at the event. Judges will select a first, second and third place winner. Other activities at the event will include a silent auction, raffle and door prizes planned throughout the evening.
Proceeds raised from the event will go back to Harrison’s athletic department to support equipment costs, travel expenses, jerseys, and other apparel needs for 350 male and female athletes across 19 sports. Harrison has a long history of excellence in athletics, but program needs are always present and change on a daily basis.