|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HOT JOBS
USI Basketball Single-Game Tickets on Sale
EVANSVILLE, Ind. – University of Southern Indiana Men’s and Women’s Basketball single-game tickets are on sale now for the 2024-25 season.
Tickets can be purchased online at University Tickets. Non-conference individual tickets are $10 for adults and $5 for non-USI students (ages 3-17), while USI Basketball doubleheaders are $15 for adults, $10 for seniors (65 & older), and $5 for non-USI students (ages 3-17).
Both squads are soaring into the third year of Division I basketball with USI Women’s Basketball coming off Ohio Valley Conference regular season and tournament championships. The 2024-25 seasons will feature competitive home matchups at Screaming Eagles Arena.
There will be 30 combined home games between the USI Men’s and Women’s Basketball teams. USI Women’s Basketball tips off its home schedule on Monday, November 4 at 6 p.m. against Brescia University (Ky.). The USI Men’s team will make their home debut Thursday, November 7 at 7 p.m. against Bucknell University.
The Screaming Eagles’ Ohio Valley Conference home slate includes 10 game dates that begin earlier this season on December 19 when USI hosts Tennessee State University.
For more information on USI Men’s and Women’s Basketball tickets, contact the USI Ticket Office at 812-465-1189.
Johnson’s brace powers Aces women’s soccer to tie at Valparaiso
USI earns first road win and three OVC points at Morehead
MOREHEAD, Ky. – University of Southern Indiana Women’s Soccer claimed its first road win of the season Sunday afternoon when the Screaming Eagles used a late second-half goal toward a 1-0 victory at Morehead State University.
Southern Indiana (3-8-4, 2-2-2 OVC) was looking to get back on track Sunday following a two-game skid in Ohio Valley Conference play. The match started with offensive opportunities coming at a premium. Junior midfielder Emerson Grafton had both of Southern Indiana’s first-half shots on goal within five minutes before the 20-minute mark.
Morehead State (6-6-3, 3-3-0 OVC) generated more shots down the stretch of the first half, but USI’s defensive unit was solid, holding Morehead State to only one shot on goal out of six attempts in the opening 45 minutes. The defensive battle led to a 0-0 score at halftime.
After halftime, Grafton took two more shots on goal as USI threatened to score early in the second half. However, defense continued to be the theme of the match, as neither side recorded a shot for 20 minutes in the middle of the second half.
In the 77th minute, USI won possession on a 50-50 ball out of the air. Going into the box, redshirt freshman forward Eva Boer turned and played a square ball to the middle where sophomore midfielder Pilar Torres found space and buried a shot into the low corner of the goal to give USI a 1-0 lead at the 76:23 mark.
Southern Indiana recorded four more shots in the final 13 minutes while the Screaming Eagles’ defense stayed strong. Morehead State took a last-second shot at the goal, but USI redshirt sophomore goalkeeper Anna Markland snagged the save to close out the win.
USI put six of eight shot attempts on goal Sunday. Grafton placed all four of her shots on target, marking the first time a Screaming Eagles put at least four shots on goal since August 2022 when Jill DiTusa put four shots on frame against Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Meanwhile, Southern Indiana’s defense held Morehead State, one of the top shooting teams in the OVC going into Sunday, to only nine shots and two shots on goal.
Through Sunday’s early slate of matches in the OVC, Southern Indiana remained tied for fifth in the conference standings with eight points but closed the gap on Morehead State in fourth place.
The Screaming Eagles return home to Strassweg Field Thursday at 7 p.m. against the University of Arkansas at Little Rock. Thursday is USI Women’s Soccer’s annual pink game to help raise cancer awareness. Match coverage links can be found at usiscreamingeagles.com.
USI earns a draw on Senior Day
EVANSVILLE, Ind. – University of Southern Indiana Men’s Soccer snapped a three-match losing streak with a 0-0 draw with the University of the Incarnate Word Sunday morning on Senior Day at Strassweg Field. The Screaming Eagles fall to 2-10-1 overall and 1-3-1 in the OVC, while the Cardinals go to 4-5-1, 2-2-1 OVC.
The USI-UIW tie with the first draw to be recorded in men’s soccer conference play this fall.
The opening 45 minutes was a battle of the goalkeepers as USI and UIW combined for 10 shots on goal. USI sophomore goalkeeper Andrew Klott was spectacular in the first half with five saves as he faced seven Cardinal shots.
The Eagles had the overall lead in the first half in shots, 8-7, with five on-goal and the advantage in corner kicks, 4-3.
The defensive battle continued throughout the second 45 finals as the match raced to a 0-0 draw. Klott duplicated his first half efforts with five more saves, ending two short of tying a career best (12 vs. Southern Illinois University Edwardsville).
UIW had the lead in chances in the second half, 9-7, in shots, while it was even in corner kicks, 3-3.
Overall for the match, UIW had a one-shot lead, 16-15, with USI leading in corners, 7-6. USI freshman forward David Davilla had a match-best five shots, two on-goal.
NEXT UP FOR USI:
The Eagles hit the road for two OVC matches next week, beginning with Western Illinois University Wednesday at 3:30 p.m. in Macomb, Illinois. The road trip concludes October 20 when USI visits Liberty University for a Lynchburg, Virginia.
WIU entered its match today at Lindenwood University with a 6-6-1 overall record, 1-3-0 in the OVC. The Leathernecks lead the all-time series with the Eagles, 3-2-1, since 1980.
The last meeting between USI and WIU was in 2022 when they battled to a 1-1 draw at Strassweg Field in Summit League play.
Liberty entered Sunday’s action at SIUE with a 5-4-1 overall mark, 3-1-0 in the OVC, a game behind the Cougars in the standings. USI and Liberty battled to a 1-1 draw at USI last season in the first-ever meeting between the two programs.
USI’s final home match of the season is October 31 when it hosts SIUE at 6 p.m.
IS IT TRUE October 14,2024
We hope today’s “IS IT TRUE” will provoke honest and open dialogue concerning issues that this community’s responsible citizens need to address rationally and responsibly.
City-County Observer Comment Policy: Be kind to people. No personal attacks or harassment will be tolerated and will be removed from our site.
We understand that sometimes people don’t always agree and discussions may become a little heated. Using offensive language and insults against commenters will not be tolerated and will be removed from our site.
IS IT TRUE that some people took to social media to make allegations of improprieties in association with the West Side Nut Club’s $2 million half-pot? …that we find such accusations to be without merit? …that Indiana law allows the winners to remain anonymous? …that the West Side Nut Club has utilized proceeds from the Fall Festival to support schools and non-profit organizations for 103 years? …that we are grateful for the service and hard work of Nut Club members? …that we support the integrity of those who run the Fall Festival?
IS IT TRUE that Evansville gained a new millionaire thanks to the Fall Festival half pot? …that the millionaire designation was only valid for a fleeting moment because taxes will take a healthy bite out of the winnings? …that the government wants their share of every dollar that changes hands? …that the true winners of the half-pot are the charities that will receive a portion of the $1 million dollars that the Nut Club made from the half-pot?
IS IT TRUE that the Westside Nut Club has once again put on a first-class festival on West Franklin Street? …that a few short hours after the food booths sold their last pronto pup, the street was cleaned and returned to normal? …that good weather and moderate temperatures allowed the participating charities to raise record amounts of money?
IS IT TRUE that the proposed $24 million Parks bond could impact taxes in the county while assuring that the city tax rate will remain constant? …that without the bond there could be a reduction in tax rates? …that Evansville will pay millions of dollars on the first year of the bond? …that the Board of Park Commissioners will hear public comment on the parks bond at their meeting this Wednesday at noon?
IS IT TRUE that the Evansville-Vanderburgh Library Board was approved last year for a series of bonds that total $29 million?
IS IT TRUE that Evansville-Vanderburgh School Corporation quietly passed a bond to fund capitol projects like the work being done at 421 Chestnut Street (the former Deaconess Clinic)? …that the word bond really means that we are borrowing money in a long-term loan?
IS IT TRUE that Mayor Stephanie Terry spent part of her weekend hanging out with her friends from high school at the Bosse Class of ’94 Reunion?
IS IT TRUE that the current population of the City of Evansville is down to 114,651 from 117,373 in the 2020 Census? …that Evansville’s population peaked in 1960 at 141,500 and has declined ever since? …the current projection for 2028 is decrease to a population of 111,300? …that a comprehensive analysis is needed to determine what has happened over the last 64 years to drive away nearly 20% of the population? …that root causes for the decrease could be a declining base of jobs that pay a living wage, a rise in violent crime and leaders absorbed with trivial pursuits? …that at one point in our history, the city of Evansville was bigger than Nashville, Tennessee?
IS IT TRUE that E-REP announced the addition of six new members to their board of directors? …that Lloyd Winnecke’s former deputy mayor, Steve Schafer is among the new additions? …that other new board members include two representatives of CenterPoint Energy, and representatives from USI, Toyota, and the Indiana Port Authority? …that many members of E-REP (formerly know as the Chamber of Commerce) are commenting about the lack of diversity on the board? …that of the 48 board members, none represent retail or food service businesses? …that small businesses comprise the lions share of E-REP membership but are woefully under represented on the board?
IS IT TRUE that representatives from E-REP have been asked to attend the County Commission meeting this Tuesday? …that at the August 13 commission meeting commissioner Cheryl Musgrave asked pointed financial questions that E-REP was unprepared to answer and a promise was made to provide answers at the next commission meeting? …that E-REP imitated the old country music star George “No-Show” Jones? …that we suspect that we could see a repeat performance and the commissioners get stood up again this week?
IS IT TRUE that the City-County Observer is experiencing tremendous growth? …that we are looking for a part time sales person and a part time sports writer? …that you can inquire by sending an email to Johnny Kincaid, Director of Operations and Marketing: johnny@city-countyobserver.com
Mayor Reacts to Letter About Conditions at Animal Control
Last Friday, the City-County Observer published a letter from Mark Albini addressed to the Evansville City Council to draw attention to conditions at the Evansville Animal Control Center. Albini pointed out ongoing maintenance issues such as peeling paint, clogged drains, and safety and health issues.
For Albini, the final straw was the death of a dog that he adopted just in time to save it from being euthanized. Less than five days after the one-year-old dog went home with Albini, she died from parvo.
Albini’s letter also shared his disappointment in the response from the mayor’s office. “I have received a very dismissive email stating that the mayor’s office doesn’t oversee Animal Control,” Albini said, “and that it is solely under the Department of Transportation and Services, specifically Todd Robertson.”
When asked about the tone of the correspondence between the mayor’s office and Abini, Mayor Stephanie Terry said, “Our office prides itself on being professional in responding to inquiries.”
The email to Albini, sent by a staff member, said, “Thank you for reaching out to the Mayor’s Office with your concerns. I have shared the information with the Superintendent and Assistant Superintendent of Animal Control, as well as the Director of Transportation and Services (the city department EACC falls under). EACC does have a union maintenance team that makes these repairs, and they have been made aware. Additionally, contractors will be performing regularly scheduled painting of the kennels shortly.”
When asked if she would visit the facility, Mayor Terry said, “Yes. And members of the mayor’s office staff have visited Animal Control on multiple occasions.” The visit from the mayor took place Friday afternoon.
Animal Control falls under Transportation & Services Director Todd Robinson, and the mayor has been engaged with him and 2nd Ward City Councilperson Missy Mosby about what steps can be taken to “make a significant difference in support of the work done by Animal Control.” Ablin, Mosby, and the mayor all agree that the staff at Animal Control are not at fault. “We are fortunate to have a caring, dedicated staff at Animal Control, and we are working with them to determine what resources are needed and available to improve conditions within the facility,” Mayor Terry said.
One of the resources that is needed is funding. The mayor tells us that she increased the budget for Animal Control by $74,905 in the proposed 2025 budget. The city council will adopt that budget on October 28.
The Damaging Effects of Political Polarization in the United States: A Call for Unity
The Damaging Effects of Political Polarization in the United States: A Call for Unity
by Joe Wallace
In recent years, the United States has experienced an unsettling and persistent trend of political polarization, a force that is unraveling the social and political fabric of the nation. While political differences have always existed in the U.S., the division between opposing parties has grown sharper, more antagonistic, and seemingly insurmountable. The consequences of this deepening rift are stark: critical issues remain unaddressed, public discourse has become increasingly toxic, and the ability to govern effectively has diminished. The country, once celebrated as a beacon of democracy and unity, is now in danger of succumbing to the very forces that threaten its core ideals.
For those who have traveled or spent time outside the country, it can be a breath of fresh air to step away from the relentless drumbeat of politically charged headlines and biased narratives. However, the reality that awaits upon returning is an America locked in an ideological tug-of-war, where reason and cooperation are often overshadowed by party loyalty and sensationalized rhetoric. This polarization has reached a fever pitch, stalling progress on critical national issues and fostering a climate of mistrust.
The Growing Divide
Political polarization in the U.S. is not new, but it has escalated in both intensity and visibility. The gap between Republicans and Democrats has widened, not just on policy issues but in the ways people view one another. According to the Pew Research Center, partisan antipathy has reached its highest level in decades, with a significant portion of each party viewing the other not just as political opponents but as threats to the country’s well-being. This has fostered an “us versus them” mentality, where compromise and dialogue are seen as weaknesses rather than strengths.
This divide has not only infiltrated political institutions but also personal relationships, with families, friends, and communities split along ideological lines. Social media platforms and partisan news outlets, often driven by algorithms that amplify extreme views, have exacerbated this polarization. These echo chambers create a reality where individuals are only exposed to opinions that reinforce their existing beliefs, making it easier to dismiss or demonize opposing viewpoints. The result is a society where meaningful debate has been replaced by hyper-partisan sound bites, and common ground is increasingly elusive.
The Failure to Address Critical Issues
One of the most damaging effects of political polarization is its impact on governance. In a healthy democracy, political parties serve as vehicles for debate and compromise, allowing diverse perspectives to inform public policy. However, in the current climate, partisanship often supersedes problem-solving, leading to legislative gridlock and policy paralysis.
Consider the pressing issues that the nation faces today—climate change, healthcare reform, infrastructure development, income inequality, and immigration, to name a few. These are complex, multifaceted challenges that require bipartisan cooperation and nuanced solutions. Yet, instead of addressing these problems head-on, political leaders often retreat into their partisan corners, more focused on scoring points with their base than on finding real solutions.
Take climate change as an example. While the scientific consensus is clear that urgent action is needed, partisan politics has rendered meaningful progress nearly impossible. Republicans and Democrats remain locked in an ideological battle, with one side prioritizing economic growth and deregulation, and the other emphasizing environmental protection and sustainability. Rather than working together to craft a balanced approach, each party clings to its dogma, leaving the country ill-prepared to mitigate the effects of a warming planet.
Similarly, healthcare reform has been an ongoing debate for decades, yet comprehensive reform remains out of reach. The Affordable Care Act (ACA), while a step forward, has been under constant attack from those seeking to dismantle it without offering viable alternatives. This back-and-forth between administrations has left millions of Americans in limbo, uncertain about the future of their healthcare. Instead of building on the ACA’s strengths and addressing its weaknesses through bipartisan dialogue, the issue has become a political football, tossed back and forth with little regard for the lives it affects.
The Perils of Party Loyalty
One of the root causes of this polarization is the way political parties have come to dominate not just politics, but the lives of American citizens. Party affiliation has become an identity, one that often takes precedence over national interest or even personal values. Political leaders, beholden to their party’s base and corporate donors, are reluctant to stray from the party line for fear of being labeled as traitors. This has created a toxic environment where independent thought and collaboration are discouraged, and loyalty to party ideology is paramount.
In this landscape, the concept of public service has been distorted. Politicians, rather than serving their constituents, are often more focused on securing their next election or appeasing special interest groups. The result is a government that is more responsive to party agendas than to the needs of the American people. Issues like campaign finance reform, voting rights, and gerrymandering, which could help restore some balance to the system, are routinely ignored because they threaten the status quo of entrenched political power.
The Need for a New Approach
To move forward, the U.S. must find a way to bridge this growing divide. It will require political leaders and citizens alike to recommit to the principles of democracy—compromise, dialogue, and mutual respect. While differences in opinion are inevitable, they should not be viewed as insurmountable obstacles. Instead, they should be seen as opportunities to find common ground and create policies that benefit the greater good.
Furthermore, media literacy is essential in combating the effects of biased and intentionally misleading narratives. As consumers of news, Americans must become more discerning, seeking out diverse perspectives and questioning the motivations behind the stories they are fed. Social media companies must also take responsibility for their role in fostering division and work to create platforms that encourage thoughtful dialogue rather than knee-jerk reactions.
Finally, political leaders must prioritize governance over partisanship. This will require courage—courage to defy party orthodoxy when necessary, courage to engage in difficult conversations, and courage to put the country’s long-term interests above short-term political gain.
Conclusion
The United States stands at a crossroads. The current path of polarization threatens to erode the very foundations of its democracy, making it impossible to address the pressing challenges of our time. However, there is still hope. By rejecting the divisive politics of today and embracing a spirit of unity and cooperation, the nation can once again become a place where progress is possible, and where the government serves not the interests of the few, but the needs of the many. The time to act is now—before the damage becomes irreversible.