https://www.vanderburghsheriff.com/jail-recent-booking-records.aspx
Audit Demands That Two Virtual Schools To Repay State $85 Million In Misspent State Funds
A special investigation by state auditors found that officials from two Indiana virtual charter schools misspent more than $85 million in state funding by inflating enrollment and funneling millions to a tangled web of related companies.
In what has become one of the nation’s largest virtual charter school scandals, Indiana Virtual School and Indiana Virtual Pathways Academy officials showed “substantial disregard†for following the rules and may have “focused on maximizing profits and revenues by exploiting perceived vulnerabilitiesâ€Â in local oversight and state funding processes, the report said.
The state auditors’ scathing report, released Wednesday, follows a series of Chalkbeat investigations revealing financial conflicts of interest at Indiana Virtual School and Indiana Virtual Pathways Academy and their dismally low academic results. The two virtual charter schools shut down last summer after allegations of enrollment fraud first emerged.
According to the report, the misspent funds include more than $68 million that the schools improperly collected from the state — far more than initially reported — by recording inactive students more than 14,000 times over eight years.
In some cases, those were people who merely requested information through the schools’ website or students who had moved out-of-state — and in one instance, a student who had died.
“Taxpayers are literally paying tens, if not hundreds of millions of dollars to a school for students who aren’t even there,†said Todd Ziebarth, senior vice president for state advocacy and support for the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools.
Virtual school officials have denied wrongdoing, but they have offered little explanation for the discrepancies and deflected blame. After Indiana Virtual School and Indiana Virtual Pathways Academy closed, board members said they were no longer responsible for the schools, despite these institutions owing millions to the state, being under investigation, and still needing to transfer student records.
But the Board of Accounts report outlines a ledger of who was responsible for each instance when enrollment was misreported or a check was improperly cut — and how much each misappropriation was worth.
The report places blame on virtual school administrators, including Superintendent Percy Clark and administrative director Phillip Holden, for signing off on inflated enrollment counts. It puts the responsibility on officials for writing checks to related parties or without proper invoices. Those officials include founder Thomas Stoughton and Merle Bright, who owned or was part of a dozen companies that contracted with the schools.
Bright had access to the schools’ bank accounts and could approve payments despite never holding a position at the schools that would have justified that authority, the report noted — and he signed checks for more than $6.8 million to companies he was associated with.
Chalkbeat could not reach Bright, Clark, or Stoughton for comment. An attorney for Holden declined to comment.
The problems at Indiana Virtual School prompted state lawmakers to take steps recently to cut virtual school funding and tighten regulations on how virtual schools count active students. But some worry that lawmakers didn’t go far enough to ensure that public money is being well spent on virtual schools.
For charter school supporters, virtual schools have presented a particular quandary: how to improve school quality and oversight, while also preserving what they see as a critical school option. But for charter school critics, the Indiana Virtual School scandal embodies their worst fears — that private organizations can profit off public dollars meant to educate students.
The State Board of Accounts sent its report to local and federal law enforcement agencies “due to the potential violations of federal and state law.†Federal authorities have already been investigating Indiana Virtual School and Indiana Virtual Pathways Academy. No charges have been filed.
It’s particularly difficult to verify enrollment — and continued engagement — at full-time online schools, where teachers don’t necessarily see students in their classroom every day. But since public schools in Indiana receive state money for each student they enroll, that also opens the door to potential abuse of how virtual schools report enrollment.
The investigation found the school officials “enrolled students that had not expressed any intention to enroll.†School officials were aware that many of the students on their rolls were inactive, the report said: Every two weeks, teachers received a report of “active†students in their classes, which included just a few of the students registered.
The messy accounting by Indiana Virtual School and Indiana Pathways Academy detailed in the report shows what can happen when financial conflicts of interest meet limited oversight.
Out of nearly $100 million paid to the schools’ largest vendors, almost every expense raised some type of red flag. The schools hardly ever received details about what they were paying for — sometimes shelling out money for duplicative services — and the school boards “had no meaningful oversight,†the report said.
The schools paid vendors to recruit 93 teachers and to run 765 background checks on teachers — at a time when the two schools had 54 teachers combined, the state report said. The schools spent money on consulting services for a 401(k) provider, despite not offering or contributing to a 401(k) plan. They hired a political lobbying firm, even though 501(c)(3) nonprofits are limited in their ability to lobby.
In addition to calling for reimbursement for inappropriately collected and misspent funds, the report also holds school officials and vendors responsible for another expenditure — the cost of the state’s special investigation.
Bill That Creates Indiana’s Own Voter Crosscheck System Heads To The Full House
By Lacey Watt
TheStatehouseFile.com
INDANAPOLIS—A House committee Thursday advanced legislation that would have Indiana create a voter registration crosscheck system similar to a widely discredited one in Kansas.
Senate Bill 334 would, among its many provisions, create a system administered by the Indiana Election Division to crosscheck voter registrations to be sure people aren’t registered to vote in other states.
The bill passed the House Elections and Apportionment Committee Thursday by an 6-4 vote and would also remove Indiana from the Kanas crosscheck program, which uses data to identify any duplicate registrations, and prohibit Indiana from joining any other multi-state compact.
The bill has drawn the opposition of Julia Vaughn of Common Cause Indiana and the League of Women voters who are concerned that people could be purged from voter rolls without adequate notice and in violation of a federal court order in a case that challenged the Kansas system.
“Unfortunately, SB 334 doesn’t fix anything, it just perpetuates past mistakes, and if passed, will be challenged,†Vaughn said. “The problem with Senate Bill 334 is that it allows counties to remove voters from the polls without a notice and waiting period requirements required under the National Voters Registration Act, or NVRA.â€
Vaughn said the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision in August that blocks county election officials in Indiana from purging voters through the Kansas crosscheck program. The federal NVRA requires that voters be given plenty of notice before having their registration put on hold or cancelled.
“Those safeguards are in the law for a reason and it is reassuring to know that Hoosier voters will be protected from unlawful purges in the future,†Vaughn said.
Brad King, the Republican co-director of the Indiana Election Division, said the new program proposed by SB 334, called the Indiana Data Enhancement Association or IDEA, would do nothing more than share data among states. The legislation would also prohibit any state from being charged, and would expire in 2021.
“I will certainly be the first to tell you that there were problems with the Kansas program,†King said. “We learned from Kansas experience, and as part of this bill will require only potential matches be forwarded if they meet confidence factors that are currently under Indiana law.â€
The author of SB 334, Sen. Greg Walker, R-Columbus, told the committee that Secretary of State Connie Lawson has an interest in creating a voter maintenance list crosscheck database, modeling some of the existing products and former systems.
“With enhanced security and an understanding of some of the core challenges that have been brought to prior systems, we can provide an opportunity as a state to create a comparable model that recognizes some of the concerns,†Walker said.
But in urging the committee to reject SB 334, Shelly Brown of the League Women of Voters said that voting is a fundamental right, and that the bill has the potential to disenfranchise some voters by removing them without the notification required by NVRA.
Angela Nussmeyer, the Democratic co-director of the Indiana Election Division, told the committee that she opposed the bill and said the state should instead join the Electronic Registration Information Center, also known as ERIC.
ERIC was created in the wake of problems with the Kansas system and now has 30 states as members, including surrounding states Illinois, Ohio, Michigan and Kentucky. Nussmeyer said  believes that Indiana would be better served by the nonpartisan ERIC.
But SB 334, if it becomes law, would bar the state from joining any other multi-state group like ERIC, which raised the concern of Rep. Charles Moseley, D-Portage. He noted that Lawson wants the bill but she won’t be Indiana’s secretary of state forever.
“That’s going to end,†Moseley said. “And then the next secretary of state has their hands tied from exploring and moving forward with another idea that we are not aware of today.†He voted against the bill, which advances to the full House for action.
Lacey Watt is a reporter for TheStatehouseFile.com, a news website powered by Franklin College journalism students.
MUSGRAVE AND SHOULDERS WERE GRAND MARSHALS OF MARDI GRAS PARADE ON WEST FRANKLIN STREET
WESTSIDE MARDI GRAS PARADE ON WEST FRANKLIN STREET WAS HUGE SUCCESS
WESTSIDE MARDI GRAS PARADE held last Saturday was a huge success. Not only did a large festive crowd filled the streets on the parade route but they also jammed the restaurants and bars for authentic cajun food and drink.
This was the 8th year that the Franklin Street Event Association sponsored this event. Â This year’s Grand Marshalls were County Commissioners Cheryl Musgrave and Ben Shoulders.
Past Grand Marshals for this event were; Mayor Lloyd Winnecke, Â Sheriff Dave Wedding, Â Don Mattingly, and County Commissioners Ben Shoulders & Cheryl Musgrave.
 This year’s Grand Marshalls were County Commissioners Cheryl Musgrave and Ben Shoulders.
Cybersecurity And Insulin Bills See Action In The Legislature
Cybersecurity And Insulin Bills See Action In The Legislature
Staff Report
TheStatehouseFile.com
INDIANAPOLIS—Legislation to make insulin available without a prescription and another bill to beef up election cybersecurity saw action in the Indiana General Assembly Thursday:
Senate Bill 179:Â Election cybersecurity
What it does:Â SB 179, proposed by Secretary of State Connie Lawson, provides another layer of security for county elections departments by having them use a program called FireEye.
What happened: SB 179 passed the House Elections and Apportionment Committee by an 11-0 vote. Rep. Holli Sullivan, R-Evansville, said the bill would require county election systems to piggyback on the state’s cybersecurity system, FireEye, a type of cybersecurity that will monitor the internet traffic accessing websites and databases. It complements but does not replace any existing threat protection and detection programs. Angela Nussmeyer, co-director of the Indiana Election Division, testified in support of SB 179.
What’s next: The bill now advances to the full House for action.
* * *
Senate Bill 255: Insulin drugs
What it does: SB 255 allows diabetes patients to get their insulin drugs from a pharmacy with a prescription from their physician. It repeals a provision in state law that makes it a felony to sell insulin without a prescription.
What happened: The bill easily passed the full House by an 88-0 vote. Earlier in the week, House Democrats failed in their attempt to amend the bill to cap the cost of insulin at $100 every 30 days but it was ruled as not being germane to the original bill.
What’s next: SB 255 advances to Gov. Eric Holcomb for his signature.
FOOTNOTE: Staff writer Lacey Watt contributed to this report. She is a reporter for TheStatehouseFile.com, a news website powered by Franklin College journalism students.
EPA Announces Proposed Decision to Regulate PFOA and PFOS in Drinking Water
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) took another important step in implementing the Agency’s PFAS Action Plan by proposing regulatory determinations for perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in drinking water. Today’s preliminary determinations mark a key milestone in EPA’s extensive efforts under the PFAS Action Plan to help communities address per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) nationwide.
“The U.S. leads the world in providing access to safe drinking water for its citizens, thanks in part to EPA’s implementation of the Safe Drinking Water Act,†said EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler. “Under President Trump’s leadership, EPA is following through on its commitment in the Action Plan to evaluate PFOA and PFOS under this Act.â€
Aggressively addressing Per and Polyfluoroalkyl (PFAS) is an ongoing and high priority effort for EPA. EPA’s PFAS Action Plan commits the agency to take important steps that will enhance how the agency researches, monitors, detects and addresses PFAS. Over the past year, EPA has made significant progress under the Action Plan to help states and local communities address PFAS.
Through today’s action, EPA is seeking public comment on its proposed regulatory determinations for eight contaminants listed on the fourth Contaminant Candidate List. The Agency is proposing to regulate two contaminants, PFOS and PFOA. EPA is also asking for information and data on other PFAS substances, as well as seeking comment on potential monitoring requirements and regulatory approaches EPA is considering for PFAS chemicals. The Agency is proposing to not regulate six contaminants: 1,1-dichloroethane, acetochlor, methyl bromide, metolachlor, nitrobenzene, and RDX.
EPA will seek comment on these preliminary determinations for 60 days after the notice is published in the Federal Register. For additional information on EPA’s efforts to address PFAS, visit https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/aggressively-addressing-pfas-epa. For additional information on this action, visit www.epa.gov/safewater.
Monmouth Defeats UE On Sunday Finale
Monmouth Defeats UEÂ
 In Sunday’s finale of the Eagle Round Robin, the University of Evansville softball team dropped a 7-1 contest to Monmouth at Eagle Field.
The Hawks opened the game with three runs in the first before plating two more in the top half of the third. Evansville scored its first run in the bottom of the third.
Mea Adams reached on a bunt single and Kat Mueller followed with a single to third. Next up was Jessica Fehr, who reached on a fielder’s choice with Adams getting thrown out at home. The Purple Aces pulled off a successful double steal with Fehr swiping second before advancing to third on an error while Mueller stole home.
UE was unable to push any more runs home as the Hawks took the 7-1 win. The Aces mustered up four hits on the day with Monmouth finishing with six. Halie Fain, Lindsay Renneisen, Adams and Mueller had the hits for Evansville.
Up next for UE is the Blues City Classic in Memphis, Tenn. The Aces face North Alabama, Northern Illinois, Northwestern State and host institution – Memphis.