Banned live Nativity goes on with mannequins

2

IL for www. theindianalawyer.com

Concord High School in northern Indiana used mannequins instead of student actors after a federal judge banned a live Nativity scene that has been performed for decades.

There was applause and cheering at Concord High School on Saturday when the curtain rose revealing a static Nativity scene during the show. The Freedom From Religion Foundation and the American Civil Liberties Union sued the district on behalf of a Concord High School student and his father, arguing that a Nativity scene conveyed an endorsement of religion.

U.S. District Judge Jon DeGuilio issued a preliminary injunction to stop this year’s live scene, ruling that “the living Nativity scene impermissibly conveys an endorsement of religion and thus runs afoul of the Establishment Clause.”

School officials say the injunction only applied to a live scene and that they complied with the judge’s order.

“The injunction is a preliminary ruling and applies only to this year’s Christmas Spectacular performance,” Concord Community Schools Superintendent John Trout said in a statement. “For 2015, the court ordered that the School not present a live Nativity scene. That is, live performers cannot perform the Nativity scene in this year’s Spectacular, and Concord Community Schools will comply with that order.”

The school district in Elkhart, about 15 miles east of South Bend, has about 5,300 students.

The ACLU and the foundation didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment sent Sunday morning.

This year’s show also included performances of songs like “White Christmas,” a Hanukkah song and a traditional African song for Kwanzaa.

The case is to go to court Jan. 7.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR

2 COMMENTS

  1. It’s Christmas. Why must an event with historic value and past precidence be forbidden to student participation and include non Christmas selections.

    • Because we cater to liberal nut cases out of fear of being called names? Or because we have lawyers wearing robes that have never read our Constitution but do read case law, thus never having to think for themselves?

Comments are closed.