Polls Archive

Was the $200,000 advance to Earthcare Energy....

  • Snegal, but inappropriate and should be illegal (50%, 77 Votes)
  • Illegal and some folks should go to jail (47%, 73 Votes)
  • A fine way to conduct business (3%, 5 Votes)

Total Voters: 155

Start Date: 05/11/2012 @ 12:23 am
End Date: No Expiry

What next for the Earthcare Deal?

  • Do a post mortem vetting and find how how this travesty happened. Hold people accountable for failures. (74%, 105 Votes)
  • Rescind the loan approval so they don't come back and ask for another chance (17%, 24 Votes)
  • It is over, forget it and move on (9%, 12 Votes)

Total Voters: 141

Start Date: 05/09/2012 @ 10:03 pm
End Date: No Expiry

Will the way the Earthcare Energy deal has been handled effect your vote on consolidation?

  • No, I am against it and will not change (55%, 122 Votes)
  • Yes, the Earthcare deal has been so bad that I am now against consolidation (33%, 73 Votes)
  • No, I am for it and will not change (12%, 26 Votes)
  • Yes, Earthcare is so great the I can't wait to consolidate (0%, 1 Votes)

Total Voters: 222

Start Date: 05/08/2012 @ 9:33 am
End Date: No Expiry

Should the bond sale to fund the Earthcare Energy Loan be delayed until after the May 14th City Council Meeting?

  • Yes, of course, any prudent person can figure this out (95%, 364 Votes)
  • No, one council member made our bed now we have to sleep in it (5%, 19 Votes)

Total Voters: 383

Start Date: 05/04/2012 @ 12:27 pm
End Date: No Expiry

Should the City Council Fund the Earthcare Energy Loan or Should They Consider the Newly Available Material Information?

  • Consider the new material information before writing a check (95%, 210 Votes)
  • Fund it now like Councilman Weaver said (5%, 10 Votes)

Total Voters: 220

Start Date: 05/02/2012 @ 11:54 pm
End Date: No Expiry