The Impact of Increased Child Tax Credits on Children and Families

4
Part 3: Can One out of Three Be Not Bad?
August 20, 2024
BY JOE WALLACE

The Impact of Increased Child Tax Credits on Children and Families

In recent years, the United States has significantly expanded child tax credits, with the Child Tax Credit (CTC) rising to over $3,000 per child under the American Rescue Plan in 2021. This increase aims to alleviate child poverty and support low-income families by providing financial assistance directly linked to the number of children in a household. As debates continue about further increasing these credits, it’s essential to examine how this money impacts the children it is intended to benefit. Do parents utilize these funds to improve their children’s well-being, or are the resources diverted elsewhere?

How Families Spend Child Tax Credits

Research suggests that most families do spend the bulk of child tax credits on their children. The Census Bureau’s Household Pulse Survey in 2021 found that a substantial portion of recipients used the expanded Child Tax Credit for basic needs, including food, clothing, housing, and utilities. Specifically, nearly half of the respondents reported spending the credit on food, which aligns with the basic need for children’s well-being. Another significant portion of the credit went towards clothing, another critical need for children.

Moreover, studies have shown that low-income families, in particular, are more likely to allocate these funds towards essentials. The increase in available funds often allows families to meet immediate needs, such as rent or utility payments, thus preventing potential crises that could directly harm children.

Long-Term Benefits for Children

Beyond immediate consumption, child tax credits can have long-term positive effects on children’s health, education, and overall development. By reducing financial stress, parents can provide a more stable and nurturing environment. For instance, a study published by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) found that children in families receiving tax credits tend to have better educational outcomes, including higher test scores and an increased likelihood of high school graduation.

Additionally, the expanded credit has been linked to reductions in child poverty, a factor strongly correlated with better health outcomes and reduced psychological stress in children. Lower poverty rates are associated with fewer behavioral problems and improved cognitive development, which can lead to better long-term prospects.

Concerns About Misallocation of Funds

While the evidence largely supports the beneficial impact of child tax credits on children, there are concerns about potential misuse. Critics argue that some parents may not spend the additional funds directly on their children, opting instead to pay down debts or cover personal expenses unrelated to child care. However, this perspective may overlook the broader context in which these decisions are made. Paying down debt or securing housing can indirectly benefit children by providing a more stable and less stressful environment.

Moreover, the vast majority of parents report that their primary use of the child tax credit is on goods and services directly related to their children’s needs. For many families, especially those in low-income brackets, the extra money is a lifeline that helps cover essential costs that directly impact their children’s quality of life.

Policy Implications

The ongoing debate over further increasing child tax credits hinges on these observed benefits and concerns. If the goal is to support children and reduce poverty, the evidence suggests that expanding these credits can be an effective tool. Policymakers should, however, consider complementary measures, such as financial literacy programs or targeted assistance, to ensure that the funds are used most effectively.

In conclusion, the expansion of child tax credits in the U.S. has demonstrably benefited children by providing financial relief to families, reducing poverty, and improving outcomes in education and health. While there is always the potential for funds to be used in ways not directly related to child welfare, the overwhelming evidence supports the idea that these credits are a crucial investment in the future of children in low-income families. Further increases in these credits could amplify these positive effects, making them a vital component of efforts to improve the well-being of children nationwide.

The Impact of Increased Child Tax Credits on Children and Families

In recent years, the United States has significantly expanded child tax credits, with the Child Tax Credit (CTC) rising to over $3,000 per child under the American Rescue Plan in 2021. This increase aims to alleviate child poverty and support low-income families by providing financial assistance directly linked to the number of children in a household. As debates continue about further increasing these credits, it’s essential to examine how this money impacts the children it is intended to benefit. Do parents utilize these funds to improve their children’s well-being, or are the resources diverted elsewhere?

How Families Spend Child Tax Credits

Research suggests that most families do spend the bulk of child tax credits on their children. The Census Bureau’s Household Pulse Survey in 2021 found that a substantial portion of recipients used the expanded Child Tax Credit for basic needs, including food, clothing, housing, and utilities. Specifically, nearly half of the respondents reported spending the credit on food, which aligns with the basic need for children’s well-being. Another significant portion of the credit went towards clothing, another critical need for children.

Moreover, studies have shown that low-income families, in particular, are more likely to allocate these funds towards essentials. The increase in available funds often allows families to meet immediate needs, such as rent or utility payments, thus preventing potential crises that could directly harm children.

Long-Term Benefits for Children

Beyond immediate consumption, child tax credits can have long-term positive effects on children’s health, education, and overall development. By reducing financial stress, parents can provide a more stable and nurturing environment. For instance, a study published by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) found that children in families receiving tax credits tend to have better educational outcomes, including higher test scores and an increased likelihood of high school graduation.

Additionally, the expanded credit has been linked to reductions in child poverty, a factor strongly correlated with better health outcomes and reduced psychological stress in children. Lower poverty rates are associated with fewer behavioral problems and improved cognitive development, which can lead to better long-term prospects.

Cumulative Costs and Who Pays

The expansion of child tax credits, while beneficial to millions of families, comes at a significant cost. The American Rescue Plan’s enhancement of the Child Tax Credit in 2021 alone was estimated to cost about $110 billion. The total cost of child tax credits has risen sharply in recent years as more families have become eligible and the amount per child has increased.

From a broader perspective, since the introduction of the Child Tax Credit in 1997, the federal government has spent hundreds of billions of dollars on this program. The Joint Committee on Taxation estimated that the total cost of the Child Tax Credit was approximately $118 billion in 2021 alone, making it one of the most expensive tax provisions in the U.S. tax code.

The financial burden of these credits is primarily borne by U.S. taxpayers, funded through federal tax revenues. As the credits are non-refundable or refundable, depending on income levels, they reduce the federal income tax liability for millions of households. This reduction in revenue means that other areas of the federal budget must absorb the cost, potentially leading to higher deficits or cuts in other services.

Moreover, the funding for these credits has sparked political debate about the fairness and sustainability of such expenditures. Proponents argue that the credits are a necessary investment in the nation’s future, reducing poverty and improving outcomes for children. Opponents, however, caution against the rising costs and the potential burden on taxpayers, particularly if the credits are expanded further.

Concerns About Misallocation of Funds

While the evidence largely supports the beneficial impact of child tax credits on children, there are concerns about potential misuse. Critics argue that some parents may not spend the additional funds directly on their children, opting instead to pay down debts or cover personal expenses unrelated to child care. However, this perspective may overlook the broader context in which these decisions are made. Paying down debt or securing housing can indirectly benefit children by providing a more stable and less stressful environment.

Moreover, the vast majority of parents report that their primary use of the child tax credit is on goods and services directly related to their children’s needs. For many families, especially those in low-income brackets, the extra money is a lifeline that helps cover essential costs that directly impact their children’s quality of life.

Policy Implications

The ongoing debate over further increasing child tax credits hinges on these observed benefits and concerns. If the goal is to support children and reduce poverty, the evidence suggests that expanding these credits can be an effective tool. Policymakers should, however, consider complementary measures, such as financial literacy programs or targeted assistance, to ensure that the funds are used most effectively.

In conclusion, the expansion of child tax credits in the U.S. has demonstrably benefited children by providing financial relief to families, reducing poverty, and improving outcomes in education and health. While there is always the potential for funds to be used in ways not directly related to child welfare, the overwhelming evidence supports the idea that these credits are a crucial investment in the future of children in low-income families. Further increases in these credits could amplify these positive effects, making them a vital component of efforts to improve the well-being of children nationwide. However, the rising costs and who ultimately pays for these credits remain central to the discussion as policymakers balance the immediate needs of families with the long-term fiscal health of the nation.

FOOTNOTE: The City-Observer posted this article without bias

4 COMMENTS

  1. .
    You know what?

    For the last three days…….Joe Wallace and the CCO have been advocating:

    1. AGAINST lowering prices on Family’s cost to buy groceries and get medicine.
    2. AGAINST helping families buying their 1st Home, AGAINST making them Homeowners, and lowering the cost of downpayments.
    3. AGAINST helping families reduce their taxes because they are Parents and have children.

    Trump Voters?
    Joe Wallace & the CCO?

    Are you nuts?
    I have seen the people at Kid Rock concerts. These are Parents with kids who need lower prices, lower homeownership costs, and lower taxes because they have kids to feed and send to school.

    What is wrong with you?

    • It would be instructive to read the articles as comments on the policies proposed to achieve the outcomes you advocate for. The goals are worthy, but the paths have failed miserably in the past as most things Harris has supported and voted for. Wanting to make things less expensive is not the same as being able to do so without significant negative consequences.

      https://www.wsj.com/opinion/kamala-harris-said-yes-to-inflation-deciding-vote-on-programs-that-led-directly-to-it-885882b5?mod=hp_opin_pos_5#cxrecs_s

      • 1. Your comments about goals/objectives? Great.

        2. But let’s be clear…if YOU are in the ruling/financing class of American Citizens? Then what you are saying is the priorities of that class of Americans.

        3. But if you are regular, working class, raising a family class of Americans? (Who Trump says, he cares about), then YOUR TALKING POINTS DO NOT APPLY to regular Families who care about lower food and medicine cost, lower home-ownership costs, and lower taxes on families. These are TRUMP voters.

        If fact, your comments are about how we should manage the affairs “of the little people” in America.

        I am just pointing out……..that your comments, and Joe Wallace’s comments are AGAINST these efforts to help working class American families WHO DO CARE ABOUT THOSE THINGS.

        Stop the pretense. Joe’s article is an effort to protect the investor class. 100% designed to protect the interests of the investor class.

        Just being clear about that Yoda.

  2. Another great article by Joe Wallace. Very happy he is again contributing to the CCO!

Comments are closed.