EARLY VOTING CENTERS SCHEDULE

1. Hey, democrats: Say hello to all your dead relatives at the polls for me. BP

   • Need some proof there, bud. Turn off fox news and wake up.

     • It seems that BP is projecting his own behavior onto Democrats.

2. I thought I’d post this once again until one of the other news organizations picks this up and does some investigating.

   Recently I received an official copy of the “Restraining Order Petition” between At-Large City Councilman Jonathan Weaver and one of his ex-wifes thats on file at the Vanderburgh County Clerk office. I find the Court findings concerning this petition extremely interesting.

   I originally thought that I would make this public document available to the local media. However after a second thought, I decided to let our local media do the research and report the findings of the Court concerning a “Restraining Order Petition” filed against an elected public official.

   If Courier and Press, TV Channels 25, 7. 14 and 44, and the City County Observer would like to have an official copy of this “Restraining Order Petition” they could pick one up at the Vanderburgh County Clerks Office. For your information I also understand that Mr. Weaver may have two (2) such petitions on file but the Judge sealed one of them from public view.

   Finally, in my opinion the local media are duty bond to research and make this information public!

   AFTER HEARING TESTIMONY FROM BOTH SIDES THE COURT CAN MAKE THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS:

   a. The Court could rule that Petitioner has shown, by a preponderance of the evidence, that domestic or family violence, stalking, or a sex offense has occurred sufficient to justify the issuance of this Order.

   b. The Court could rule if this order does/does not protect an intimate partner or child.

   c. The Court could determine if the Respondent represents a credible threat to the safety of the Petitioner or a member of the Petitioner’s household.

   d. The Court could determine if relief is necessary to bring about a cessation of the violence or the threat of violence.

   THE COURT COULD ORDER:

   1. The Court could enjoined the “Respondent” from threatening to commit or committing acts of domestic or family violence, stalking, or a sex offense against the Petitioner and the following designated family or household members.

   2. The Court could prohibited the “Respondent” from harassing, annoying, telephoning, contacting, or directly or indirectly communicating with the “Petitioner”.

   3. The Court could remove the “Respondent” and excluded him from the Petitioner’s residence.

   4. The Court can ordered the “Respondent” to stay away from the residence, school, and/or place of employment of the Petitioner. The Court could further ordered the “Respondent” to stay away from the following place(s) that is/are frequented by the Petitioner and/or the Petitioner’s family or household members.

   Submitted to the City County Observer

   Greg LaMar-Evansville

Comments are closed.